Википедия: Перенаправления для обсуждения

На этой странице есть невыполненная работа , требующая внимания одного или нескольких администраторов.
Измените это примечание на {{ Нет невыполненной работы администратора }}, когда она будет очищена.

Инструкции для администратора

Перейти к содержанию · Перейти к текущим обсуждениям · Очистить эту страницу · Архивы

Ярлыки

WP: RFD
РГ: RfD

Обсуждения удаления
Удаление сегодня Восстановление Отзыв об удалении Журнал удалений Запросить копию удаленной статьи
Статьи
Cегодня все ( отсортировано ) закрытие
Шаблоны и модули
Cегодня все закрытие держа
Файлы
Cегодня все закрытие
Категории
Cегодня все закрытие быстро
Перенаправления
Cегодня все закрытие бревно
Разное
Cегодня все закрытие
Быстрое удаление
кандидаты
Предлагаемое удаление
все ( отсортировано ) книги BLPs
Политика Процесс Гид Руководство администратора
v т е

Перенаправления для обсуждения ( RfD ) - это место, где обсуждаются потенциально проблемные перенаправления . Элементы обычно остаются в списке в течение недели или около того, после чего они удаляются, сохраняются или перенаправляются.

Если вы хотите заменить незащищенный редирект статьей, указывать ее здесь не нужно. Полностью приветствуется преобразование перенаправлений в статьи. Смелее !
Если вы хотите переместить страницу, но вам мешает переадресация, не указывайте ее здесь. По не спорным случаям размещайте технический запрос ; если требуется обсуждение, начните запрошенный ход .
Если вы думаете, что перенаправление указывает на неправильную целевую статью, это хорошее место для обсуждения того, что должно быть правильной целью.
Редиректы не следует удалять только потому, что в них нет входящих ссылок. Пожалуйста, не используйте это как единственную причину для удаления перенаправления. Тем не менее, переадресовывает , что делать есть входящие ссылки иногда удаляется, так что это не является достаточным условием для хранения. (Дополнительную информацию см. В § Когда следует удалять перенаправление? ).

Пожалуйста, не меняйте цель перенаправления, пока она обсуждается. Это добавляет ненужного усложнения дискуссии как для потенциальных близких, так и для участников.

Перед включением перенаправления для обсуждения [ править ]

Помните об этих общих правилах, которые применяются здесь, как и везде:

Википедия: Перенаправление - что такое перенаправления, почему они существуют и как используются.
Википедия: Критерии быстрого удаления - какие страницы можно удалить без обсуждения; в частности разделы « Общие » и « Перенаправления ».
Википедия: Политика удаления - как мы удаляем вещи консенсусом.
Википедия: Руководство по удалению - рекомендации по формату обсуждения и сокращению.

Руководящие принципы RfD [ править ]

Ярлык

WP: RGUIDE

Цель хорошего перенаправления - исключить возможность того, что читатели будут тупо смотреть на «Результаты поиска 1–10 из 378» вместо статьи, которую они искали. Если кто-то может правдоподобно ввести имя перенаправления при поиске целевой статьи, это хорошее перенаправление.
Перенаправления дешевы . Они занимают мало места для хранения и используют очень небольшую полосу пропускания. Это не повредит вещам, если их несколько разбросаны вокруг. С другой стороны, удаление перенаправлений также обходится дешево, потому что запись удаления занимает мало места в хранилище и использует очень небольшую полосу пропускания. Нет никакого вреда в удалении проблемных редиректов.
Если добросовестная номинация RfD предлагает удалить перенаправление и не обсуждается в течение как минимум 7 дней, результатом по умолчанию является удаление .
Перенаправления, назначенные в нарушение Википедии: Перенаправление будет быстро сохранено .
RfD также может служить центральным дискуссионным форумом для обсуждения того, на какую страницу следует нацелить перенаправление. В случаях, когда перенаправление перенаправления может считаться спорным, рекомендуется оставить уведомление на странице обсуждения текущей целевой страницы перенаправления или предлагаемой целевой страницы, чтобы направить читателей к назначению перенаправления, чтобы разрешить ввод и помочь сформировать консенсус для перенаправления. цель.
Запросы на удаление переадресации с одной страницы обсуждения на другую страницу не нужно перечислять здесь. Кто угодно может удалить перенаправление, очистив страницу. G6 критерий для быстрого удаления может быть целесообразным.
В обсуждениях всегда спрашивайте себя, поможет ли переадресация читателю.

Когда следует удалять редирект? [ редактировать ]

Эта страница исключена из Википедии: причины перенаправления / удаления . ( править | история )

Ярлык

WP: RFD # ВРЕДНЫЙ

Основные причины, по которым удаление перенаправлений вредно :

редирект может содержать нетривиальную историю редактирования;
если перенаправление достаточно старое (или является результатом перемещения страницы, которая находилась там довольно долгое время), то возможно, что его удаление нарушит входящие ссылки (такие ссылки, поступающие из более старых версий страниц Википедии, из сводок редактирования , из других проектов Викимедиа или из других источников в Интернете , не отображаются в разделе «Какие ссылки здесь» ).

Поэтому рассматривайте удаление только вредоносных перенаправлений или недавних.

Причины удаления [ править ]

Ярлык

WP: RFD # УДАЛИТЬ

Вы можете удалить перенаправление, если выполняется одно или несколько из следующих условий ( но обратите внимание также на исключения, перечисленные под этим списком ):

Страница перенаправления неоправданно затрудняет пользователям поиск статей с похожими названиями через поисковую систему. Например, если пользователь выполняет поиск по запросу «Новые статьи» и перенаправляется на страницу разрешения неоднозначности для «Статей», ему потребуется гораздо больше времени, чтобы перейти к недавно добавленным статьям в Википедии.
Перенаправление может вызвать путаницу. Например, если «Адам Б. Смит» был перенаправлен на «Эндрю Б. Смит», потому что Эндрю был случайно назван Адамом в одном источнике, это могло вызвать путаницу со статьей об Адаме Смите , поэтому перенаправление следует удалить.
Переадресация является оскорбительной или оскорбительной, например, перенаправление «Блог Джо - неудачник» на «Блоги Джо» (если в статье законно не обсуждается «Блоггс Джо» на «Неудачник»). ( Могут применяться критерии быстрого удаления G10 и G3 .)
Перенаправление представляет собой саморекламу или спам. ( Может применяться критерий быстрого удаления G11 .)
Перенаправление не имеет смысла, например перенаправление «Apple» на «Orange». ( Может применяться критерий быстрого удаления G1 .)
Это перекрестное перенаправление пространства имен из пространства статьи, например перенаправление в пространство имен User или Wikipedia. Основным исключением из этого правила являются перенаправления ярлыков псевдо-пространства имен , которые технически находятся в основном пространстве статьи. Некоторые давние перенаправления между пространствами имен также сохраняются из-за их давней истории и потенциальной полезности. Например, перенаправления « MOS: » являются исключением из этого правила. (Примечание «РГ:» перенаправление в пространстве имен Википедии, WP: будучи псевдоним для Википедии: . Speedy критерий удаления R2 может также применяться , если если редирект из основных пунктов статьи пространства имен в категорию:, Шаблон: , Википедия: , Help: и Portal: Пространства имен).
Если перенаправление не работает, то есть перенаправляет на несуществующую статью, ее можно немедленно удалить в соответствии с критерием быстрого удаления G8 , хотя вы должны убедиться, что нет альтернативного места, куда оно могло бы быть соответствующим образом перенаправлено первым.
Если переадресация является новым или очень малоизвестным синонимом названия статьи, она вряд ли будет полезна. В частности, как правило, не следует создавать перенаправления на языке, отличном от английского, на страницу, тема которой не связана с этим языком (или культурой, которая говорит на этом языке). Недопустимые опечатки или неправильные названия являются кандидатами на критерий быстрого удаления R3 , если они были созданы недавно.
Если целевую статью нужно переместить в заголовок перенаправления, но перенаправление было отредактировано ранее и имеет собственную историю, тогда заголовок необходимо освободить, чтобы освободить место для перемещения. Если ход не вызывает сомнений, пометьте перенаправление для быстрого удаления G6 или, в качестве альтернативы (с suppressredirectправом пользователя; доступно для переносчиков страниц и администраторов), выполните циклическое перемещение . Если нет, отнесите статью к Запрошенным ходам .
Если редирект может быть расширен до статьи, а целевая статья практически не содержит информации по теме.

Причины не удаления [ править ]

Ярлык

WP: RFD № KEEP

Однако не удаляйте такие перенаправления, если:

У них есть потенциально полезная история страниц или история редактирования, которую следует вести в соответствии с требованиями лицензирования для слияния (см. Википедия: Слияние и удаление ). С другой стороны, если перенаправление было создано путем переименования страницы с этим именем, а в истории страниц просто упоминается переименование, и по одной из вышеуказанных причин вы хотите удалить страницу, скопируйте историю страницы на страницу обсуждения статья, на которую он перенаправляет. Акт переименования полезен для истории страниц, и тем более, если было обсуждение имени страницы.
Они могут способствовать случайному связыванию и снизить вероятность создания дублирующих статей , будь то перенаправление множественного числа в единственное число, перенаправление частых орфографических ошибок на правильное написание, перенаправление неправильного названия на правильный термин, перенаправление на синоним и т. Д. Другими словами, перенаправления без входящих ссылок не являются кандидатами на удаление по этим причинам, потому что они полезны для просматривающего пользователя. От редакторов потребуется некоторая дополнительная бдительность, чтобы свести к минимуму появление этих частых орфографических ошибок в текстах статей, потому что связанные с ними орфографические ошибки не будут отображаться как неработающие ссылки.
Они помогают поиску на определенных условиях. Например, если кто-то увидит где-то упомянутое «состояние краеугольного камня », но не знает, к чему это относится, то он или она сможет узнать об этом в статье о Пенсильвании (целевой).
Вы рискуете сломать входящие или внутренние ссылки, удалив перенаправление. Например, перенаправления, возникающие в результате перемещения страниц, обычно не следует удалять без уважительной причины. Ссылки, которые существовали в течение значительного периода времени, включая ссылки CamelCase и ссылки на старые подстраницы , следует оставить в покое на случай, если на внешних страницах есть какие-либо существующие ссылки, указывающие на них.
Кто-то считает их полезными. Подсказка: если кто-то говорит, что считает редирект полезным, вероятно, так оно и есть. Возможно, вы не сочтете это полезным - это не потому, что другой человек лжет, а потому, что вы просматриваете Википедию по-разному. Инструмент просмотра страниц также может свидетельствовать о внешней полезности.
Редирект к тесно связанной форме слова, такие как форма множественного числа к форме единственного числа .

Нейтральность переадресации [ править ]

Ярлык

WP: RNEUTRAL

Подобно тому, как заголовки статей, использующие ненейтральный язык , разрешены в некоторых случаях , такие переадресации разрешены . Поскольку переадресация менее заметна для читателей, в их именах допускается большая свобода. Таким образом, предполагаемое отсутствие нейтральности в именах переадресации не является достаточной причиной для их удаления. В большинстве случаев ненейтральные, но поддающиеся проверке перенаправления должны указывать на статьи с нейтральным заголовком, посвященные теме термина. Ненейтральные перенаправления могут быть помечены .{{R from non-neutral name}}

Ненейтральные перенаправления обычно создаются по трем причинам:

Статьи, созданные с использованием ненейтральных заголовков, обычно перемещаются в новое нейтральное заголовок, которое оставляет старое ненейтральное заголовок в качестве рабочего перенаправления (например, разногласия по электронной почте Climategate → Climatic Research Unit ).
Статьи, созданные как вилки POV, могут быть удалены и заменены перенаправлением, указывающим на статью, из которой возник вилка (например, мусульманский слух Барака Обамы → удален и теперь перенаправлен на теорию заговора религии Барака Обамы ).
Тематика статей может быть представлена некоторыми источниками за пределами Википедии в ненейтральных терминах. Таких терминов обычно избегают в заголовках статей Википедии, чтобы избежать рекомендаций и общей политики нейтральной точки зрения . Например, ненейтральное выражение « Attorneygate » используется для перенаправления на нейтрально названный спор об увольнении американских поверенных . В статье, о которой идет речь, никогда не использовалось это название, но перенаправление было создано, чтобы предоставить альтернативные средства доступа к нему, потому что этот термин используется в ряде сообщений прессы.

Исключениями из этого правила будут перенаправления, которые не являются установленными условиями и вряд ли будут полезны, и поэтому могут быть номинированы на удаление, возможно, по причине удаления № 3 . Однако, если перенаправление представляет собой установленный термин, который используется в нескольких основных надежных источниках , его следует сохранить, даже если он не является нейтральным, поскольку он облегчит поиск по таким условиям. Помните, что RfD - не то место, где разрешается большинство редакционных споров.

Заключительные примечания [ править ]

Подробности в: Инструкции для администратора RfD .

Номинации должны оставаться открытыми в соответствии с политикой примерно за неделю до их закрытия, если они не соответствуют общим критериям быстрого удаления , критериям быстрого удаления перенаправления или не являются действительными запросами на обсуждение перенаправления (например, фактически являются запросами на перемещение ).

Как выставить редирект для обсуждения [ править ]

Ярлык

WP: RFD # HOWTO

Я .

Отметьте перенаправление.

Войдите в самое начало страницы перенаправления, которую вы указываете для обсуждения, и войдите в самый конец страницы.{{subst:rfd|content=}}

Это кажется слишком сложным?
Вместо этого попробуйте этот полуавтоматический процесс:

1. Включите Twinkle на вкладке «Гаджеты» в ваших настройках.

2. Вернитесь на страницу перенаправления и выберите «XFD» в новом меню Twinkle.

3. Заполните форму и отправьте ее.

Пожалуйста, не отмечайте правку как незначительную ( m ).
Включите в сводку редактирования фразу:
Nominated for RFD: see [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]].
Сохраните страницу.
Если вы не можете редактировать страницу перенаправления из-за защиты, этот шаг можно пропустить, а после завершения шага 2 запрос на добавление шаблона RFD может быть помещен на страницу обсуждения перенаправления.
Если перенаправление, которое вы |showontransclusion=1назначаете, находится в пространстве имен шаблона, рассмотрите возможность добавления в тег RfD, чтобы люди, использующие перенаправление шаблона, знали о назначении.

II .

Перечислите запись на RfD.

Щелкните здесь, чтобы отредактировать раздел RfD для сегодняшних записей.

Введите этот текст под заголовком даты:

{{subst:Rfd2|redirect=RedirectName|target=TargetArticle|text=The action you would like to occur (deletion, re-targeting, etc.) and the rationale for that action.}}

~~~~

Для этого шаблона:
- Поместите имя перенаправления вместо RedirectName, поместите название целевой статьи вместо TargetArticleи укажите причину после text=.
- Обратите внимание, что на этом этапе «целевая статья» является текущей целью перенаправления (если у вас есть предложение по лучшей цели, включите это в текст, который вы вставляете после text=).
Пожалуйста, используйте сводку редактирования, такую как: (замените на имя назначаемого перенаправления).
Nominating [[RedirectName]]
RedirectName
Чтобы перечислить несколько связанных перенаправлений для обсуждения, используйте следующий синтаксис. Повторите строку 2 для N перенаправлений:

{{subst:Rfd2|redirect=RedirectName1|target=TargetArticle1}}

{{subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=RedirectName2|target=TargetArticle2}}

{{subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=RedirectNameN|target=TargetArticleN|text=The actions you would like to occur (deletion, re-targeting, etc.) and the rationale for those actions.}}

~~~~

Если для перенаправления были предыдущие RfD, вы можете добавить их сразу после шаблона.{{Oldrfdlist|previous RfD without brackets|result of previous RfD}}rfd2

III .

Уведомлять пользователей.

Обычно считается хорошей практикой уведомлять создателя и основных участников перенаправления о том, что вы назначаете перенаправление.

Чтобы найти основных участников, просмотрите историю страницы перенаправления. Для удобства шаблон

{{subst:Rfd notice|RedirectName}} ~~~~

могут быть размещены на странице обсуждения создателя / основных участников для уведомления об обсуждении. Пожалуйста, замените RedirectNameимя перенаправления и используйте сводку редактирования, например:
Notice of redirect discussion at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]]

Уведомления об обсуждении RFD также можно оставлять на соответствующих страницах обсуждения.

Пожалуйста, подумайте об использовании здесь ссылок What, чтобы найти другие перенаправления, которые могут быть связаны с тем, который вы назначаете. После перехода на целевую страницу перенаправления и выбора «Какие ссылки здесь» на панели инструментов в левой части экрана компьютера выберите фильтры «Скрыть включения» и «Скрыть ссылки», чтобы отобразить перенаправления на целевую страницу перенаправления.

Если эта страница была недавно изменена, она может не отражать самые последние изменения.
Пожалуйста, очистите эту страницу, чтобы увидеть самые последние изменения.

Текущий список [ править ]

16 апреля [ править ]

15 апреля [ править ]

Клаудия Пульхра (жена Гракха) [ править ]

Клаудия Пульхра (жена Гракха) → Тиберий Гракх ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Клаудия Пульхра (жена Филиппа) → Луций Марций Филипп (консул 91 г. до н.э.) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Клаудия Пульхра (жена Лукулла) → Лукулл ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Клодия Пульхра (жена Метелла) → Клодия (жена Метелла) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Клаудия Пульхра (жена Метелла) → Клодия (жена Метелла) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Клаудиа Пульхра Майор → Маркус Юний Брут ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Клаудия Пульхра Малая → Гней Помпей (сын Помпея Великого) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Клаудия Пульхра (внучатая племянница Августа) → Клаудия Пульхра ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Клаудия Пульхра (дочь Фульвии) → Клаудия (жена Октавиана) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Клодия Пульхра (жена Августа) → Клаудия (жена Октавиана) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Клаудия Пульхра (жена Августа) → Клаудия (жена Октавиана) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Сложный кладезь неверно приписанных / неправильных имен, которые с момента их первоначального появления в 2015 году (некоторые были удалены и воссозданы несколько раз после) неоднократно вводили в заблуждение как читателей, так и редакторов и приводили к нескольким непродуманным перемещениям и созданию страниц. Есть только один человек, которому присвоено имя «Клаудиа Пульхра» , но эти записи и эта крайне нерегулярная страница значений неоднозначности, содержащая их, сделали многое, чтобы запутать этот факт. Некоторые люди, представленные перенаправлениями, даже не идентичны тем, кого представляют целевые статьи, и поэтому, даже если бы какие-либо отдельные записи были правильными, они были бы почти бесполезными. Маловероятно, что кто-либо когда-либо наберет какое-либо из этих условий, не зная их заранее, и удаливвсе это избавит читателей и редакторов от заблуждений и путаницы в будущем. Авилич ( разговор ) 20:18, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Комментарий Для двух недавних предыдущих обсуждений см. Обсуждение: Клаудия Пульхра (значения) . Certes ( разговор ) 20:37, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Удалите всех этих жен, которые настолько незначительны, что вряд ли они могут стать серьезным источником путаницы, насколько я могу судить, в академической литературе есть только одна Клаудиа Пульхра . Hemiauchenia ( разговорное ) 02:05, 16 апреля 2021 (UTC)

"Ассоциация прессы Северной Каролины" [ править ]

Закрытое обсуждение , см. Полное обсуждение . Результат: быстрое удаление.

Умерший изобретатель [ править ]

Умерший изобретатель → Изобретатель (патент) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Это просто кажется мне очень маловероятным поисковым запросом. Никаких входящих ссылок, поэтому нигде не используется. Не упоминается в целевой статье, и если кто-то искал в ней, не является безопасным предположение, что им было интересно конкретно о патентном праве. Библброкс ( разговор ) 18:07, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Во всяком случае, я думаю, что Список изобретателей будет иметь больше смысла, поскольку я считаю, что более вероятно, что кто-то, использующий это в качестве поискового запроса, ищет список мертвых изобретателей, и поскольку в списке упоминаются даты рождения и смерти (если применимо), list можно было бы использовать таким образом. По крайней мере, это имеет больше смысла, чем текущая цель. - 67.70.101.238 ( разговор ) 21:54, 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Инфравидение [ править ]

Infravision → Dungeons & Dragons, геймплей ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Удалите перенаправление как бесполезное. В целевой статье раньше был раздел, описывающий инфравидение, но он был удален, поэтому перенаправление просто сбивает с толку. Также до перенаправления эта статья освещала эту тему, но поскольку в ней нет текущих ссылок, она была возвращена, когда я ее восстановил. Диего ( разговорное ) 16:52, 21 марта 2021 (UTC)

Это упоминается в ряде статей, связанных с D&D, и, вероятно, должно быть где-то освещено, но если этого не произойдет , мягкое перенаправление на wikt: Infvision было бы лучше, чем удаление. - Эврика Лотт 17:26, 21 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
Уточните цель до Dungeons _ & _ Dragons_gameplay # Extraordinary_senses, где это обсуждается - Лентичел ^{( разговор )} 01:30, 22 марта 2021 (UTC)
- Этот раздел был там, но его просто удалили - при этом, я думаю, мы можем позволить себе сказать что-то по теме на этой странице, что было бы лучшим местом для включения такой информации. 2601: 249: 8B80: 4050: B05E: 9959: 5A91: C6A0 ( обсуждение ) 12:30, 22 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris ^talk!01:53, 29 марта 2021 (UTC)

Уточните цель, как указано выше, после восстановления удаленного материала, указанного выше. BOZ ( разговор ) 03:46, 29 марта 2021 (UTC)
Я не знаком с использованием игры, но, по моему опыту, «инфравидение» чаще относится к «инфракрасному зрению» или зрению на инфракрасных длинах волн. Если существует несколько вариантов использования, тогда это должна быть страница с разрешением неоднозначности . Николь Шарп ( разговор ) 18:59, 29 марта 2021 (UTC)
- - « Инфравидение » в Викисловаре. Николь Шарп ( разговор ) 19:01, 29 марта 2021 (UTC)
- - « Инфракрасное зрение » в Википедии. Николь Шарп ( разговор ) 19:02, 29 марта 2021 (UTC)
  - Вы представляете интересный случай, хотя люди в WP: WPDAB пришли бы в ужас, увидев страницу с неоднозначностью, ссылающуюся на одну-единственную статью в Википедии. Попробую разработать страницу, соответствующую правилам WP: PRIMARYRED . Меня больше всего беспокоит не страница, которая направляет читателей к статье, где тема вообще не освещена, а страница DAB, которая кратко описывает смысл, могла бы работать. Диего ( разговорное ) 12:46, 1 апреля 2021 (UTC)
  - П.Д. Я смело превратил страницу в разрешение неоднозначности , но теперь шаблон показывает ошибку, поскольку это не перенаправление. Должен ли я уже удалить шаблон или возвращать страницу DAB, пока не будет принято решение? Диего ( разговорное ) 12:56, 1 апреля 2021 (UTC)
    @ Diego Moya : Я отремонтировал шаблон, за ним следует ваш черновик DAB. Приветствуется добавление черновика к перенаправлению во время RFD; вы просто не смогли правильно отредактировать, не беспокойтесь. Нарки Блерт ( разговор ) 08:07, 2 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Восстановить редирект на D&D. добавьте сюда перенаправления и добавьте к инфракрасному зрению. AngusW🐶🐶F ( кора • сопение ) 00:35, 31 марта 2021 (UTC)
Восстановите перенаправление на D&D (желательно на уточненную цель) и настройте на инфракрасное зрение.

«Инфравидение» имеет четыре тесно связанных значения в D&D ( ссылки не WP: RS ): врожденная способность некоторых рас, заклинание и зелье, которые дают способность как временный эффект, и несколько артефактов, которые дают способность как постоянный эффект при экипировке. ИМО, мы должны где-то рассказать об этом, но это определенно не заслуживает отдельной статьи. Заклинание широко считается самым бесполезным во всей тайной книге заклинаний, и лучшее использование предметов - их продажа. Нарки Блерт ( разговор ) 08:30, 2 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Восстановление / уточнение в качестве перенаправления нецелесообразно, поскольку целевая статья не имеет релевантного содержания. Может быть, такой контент можно (повторно) добавить, но это должно быть где-то еще - может быть, статья D&D более низкого уровня или какое-нибудь новое ночное видение в художественной литературе ? Устранение неоднозначности заманчиво, но, помимо значения D&D, есть еще одна запись - для инфракрасного зрения . Имеется ли в виду инфравидение ? Я не смог найти никаких источников во время быстрого поиска. Если не появится что-то новое, я считаю, что единственными жизнеспособными вариантами являются удаление и - предпочтительно, на мой взгляд, временное мягкое перенацеливание на Wiktionary : wikt: Infravision дает краткое определение этого термина и пока кажется наименьшим из всех зол.-Уанфала (разговорное) 15:55, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий опереносесписка:перенос списка для дальнейшего обсуждения предлагаемых альтернатив.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо,BDD(обсуждение) 16:56, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

GeorgeNotFound [ править ]

GeorgeNotFound → Dream (YouTuber) #Career ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

ДжорджНотФонуд - это не «Мечта». Это перенаправление вводит в заблуждение, так как создается впечатление, что этот человек - Мечта, хотя на самом деле это не так. ( WP: RDEL номер 10) JackFromReedsburg ( ток | вклад ) 16:44, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Нет мнения о том, следует ли сохранять перенаправление, но я бы поддержал его сохранение и перенаправление на Dream SMP, если это когда-нибудь выйдет за рамки черновика. GeorgeNotFound упоминается в статье Dream как еще один связанный с ним YouTube. Hemiauchenia ( разговор ) 17:10, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Если бы это нужно было сохранить, это могло бы пойти только на Dream SMP (если бы это была статья, а это не так). JackFromReedsburg ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 17:09, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Удалить и соль . Текущая цель практически не содержит информации об этом человеке, только мимолетное упоминание о том, что в какой-то момент они вместе снимали видео. В истории страниц было внесено огромное количество разрушительных изменений, таких как попытки превратить это в не имеющий источника BLP, и, похоже, это стало чем-то вроде магнита для носков, поэтому я думаю, что защита создания EC была бы уместна. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 16:57, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Алиби (песня Брэдли Купера) [ править ]

Закрытое обсуждение , см. Полное обсуждение . Результат: сохранился . отозван первоначальным номинатором ( закрытие без прав администратора ) Элли ( обсуждение | вклад ) 02:18, 16 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Париж Сен-Жермен (любители) [ править ]

ФК Пари Сен-Жермен (любители) → ФК Пари Сен-Жермен ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Париж Сен-Жермен Любители → Пари Сен-Жермен ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Paris Saint-Germain (любители) → Paris Saint-Germain FC ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Париж Сен-Жермен Любители → Париж Сен-Жермен ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Никакого упоминания любительской команды в мишени, удалите, если не может быть предоставлено должным образом указание или другое обоснование. _{подписали,}Rosguill ^{разговоры} 15:26, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Я сделал эти перенаправления после обсуждения здесь: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_140#Paris_Saint-Germain_C
Несколько статей ссылаются на эти перенаправления. Но , по общему признанию, лучшей идеей было бы перенаправить в Молодежную академию Пари Сен-Жермен , где в разделе «Лучшие команды» есть статья об этой любительской команде «С» . Пол Вори ( разговорное ) 15:34, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Ретаргетинг на молодежную академию Paris Saint-Germain кажется мне хорошим решением. _{подписали,}Rosguill ^{разговор} 15:39, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Примечание. Это обсуждение было включено в список удалений, связанных с футбольными ассоциациями, на сайте WikiProject Football . - BDD ( разговор ) 16:57, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Выполните перенацеливание, как было предложено. Гигантский снеговик 17:54, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Fent [ править ]

Fent → Fentanyl ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]

Хотя иногда кажется, что это жаргонный термин для обозначения фентанила, это также само по себе слово . Я не совсем уверен, что здесь более уместно: перенаправление или удаление викисловаря. _{подписали,}Rosguill ^{разговоры} 15:20, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Неоднозначность в Wiktionary ссылки, фентанил , Кэтлин Fent , Лэнс Бейкер Fent из арахисового масла Conspiracy , Fent - продукт Лаборатории преобразования энергии ---- 67.70.27.246 ( разговор ) 22:04, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

II [ править ]

II → 2 ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Термин «II» чрезвычайно широк и может относиться к множеству вещей. 54nd60x ( разговор ) 12:37, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Переместите страницу-мазок на II (значение) к основному заголовку. В цели нет реального упоминания римских цифр (они перечислены в информационном поле и в маркированном списке), а поиск в Google дает полный набор результатов. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 13:05, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Является ли 2 основной темой для «II»? Вероятно, это было для римлян, но III , IV и т. Д. Предполагают, что это не сейчас. Переместите мазок на базовое имя. Certes ( обсуждение ) 14:43, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Мультяшный загон Ханны-Барбера [ править ]

Мультяшный загон Ханны-Барбера → Ханна-Барбера ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Незаметные серии компиляций были перенаправлены в одностороннем порядке в 2005 году и больше не упоминаются в целевых. - Прачечная Пицца 03 ( d c̄ ) 04:14 , 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Глобус (Земля) [ править ]

Глобус (Земля) → Земля ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Должен ли он быть нацелен на землю или глобус ? Я думаю, что любой из них может быть разумной целью для этого. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 12:47, 7 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Удалить (ни одна цель). Это не похоже на правдоподобный поисковый запрос, отсутствие входящих ссылок в основном пространстве и просто сбивает с толку. - Билорв ( разговор ) 23:06, 11 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✗ plicit 02:26, 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Сохранять неформальное название для всего мира в географическом контексте - это правдоподобный поисковый запрос. В среднем 0,572 PVS / день - это неплохо. - Прачечная Пицца 03 ( d c̄ ) 04:21, 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Удалить . Я согласен с рассуждениями Билорва. (Что касается статистики просмотров страниц, я думаю, что недавние просмотры могут быть несколько завышены из-за того, что они перечислены в RfD. Если вы посмотрите на промежуток в несколько месяцев в 2020 году, это больше похоже на 1 просмотр страницы за 6 дней или около того. Я должен представьте, что это почти тот уровень, который может быть накоплен любым бессмысленным перенаправлением, нацеленным на популярную статью. Например, просто от людей, проверяющих перенаправления на Special: WhatLinksHere / Earth .) Колин М. ( выступление ) 15:13, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Сомнительный [ править ]

Сомнительный → Вопрос ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Сомнительно → Вопрос ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

вопрос касается вопросов как лингвистического понятия. wikt: сомнительный означает сомнительный / проблемный. Значение слова не имеет отношения к теме статьи. У него просто внешнее орфографическое сходство. Если бы мне пришлось куда-то перенаправить это, что-то вроде сомнения было бы лучшей целью, но на самом деле я думаю, что его следует просто удалить для WP: NOTDIC . Колин М ( разговор ) 00:23, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Удалить или мягко перенаправить в Викисловарь. - Paul_012 ( разговор ) 05:29, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Мягкое перенаправление на wikt, поскольку они действительно используются [1] . Шхноцолоуд ( разговор ) 10:34, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Мягкое перенаправление их на соответствующие записи в Викисловаре на Shhhnotsoloud. Они придают более прямое значение, чем текущие целевые предложения - зачем нам доставлять неудобства всем перечисленным читателям? С уважением, SONIC ⁶⁷⁸ 17:14, 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

14 апреля [ править ]

Фредерик Рене Кудерт младший [ править ]

Фредерик Рене Кудерт-младший → Фредерик Рене Кудерт-младший ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Хан Гао Цзу, → Император Хань Гаозу ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Польско-тевтонская война (1308-1309), → Тевтонский захват Данцига (Гданьск) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

WP, созданный ботом: НЕестественные ошибки. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 20:37, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Удалять все по номеру, кто будет искать с запятой в конце термина, это не стилизация? С уважением, SONIC ^678, 03:12, 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Удалите все , отметив, что существуют версии без неуместных запятых. Шхноцолоуд ( разговор ) 10:37, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
@ Shhhnotsoloud Я заметил, что бот создавал их как ASCII-варианты существующих перенаправлений с использованием специальных символов. Если вы посмотрите сводку редактирования созданных страниц, вы найдете исходные перенаправления, два из которых все еще существуют. Однако они возникли в результате перемещения страниц, поэтому их следует обсуждать отдельно (при желании вы можете их номинировать). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 12:52, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Стрекоза, [ править ]

Стрекоза, → Стрекоза ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Первоначальное содержание страницы относилось к треку из The Hunter (альбом Blondie) , но, поскольку он не кажется примечательным (я могу найти только страницы с текстами песен при быстром поиске в Интернете), я предлагаю удалить его для WP: UNNATURAL . 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 20:32, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Переместите историю страниц в Dragonfly (песня Blondie), не выходя из перенаправления, и перенацелите на The Hunter (альбом Blondie) . Я не вижу никаких указаний на то, что запятая является частью стилизованного названия песни, и нет никаких причин для иного сохранения перенаправления в этом названии, но под более конкретным названием это можно было бы сохранить как перенаправление на альбом. - Paul_012 ( разговор ) 05:24, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Kpg [ править ]

Kpg → Кампунг (деревня) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Не упоминается у цели. Может относиться к языку Капингамаранги , возможно, больше. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 20:22, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Неоднозначности есть на корейском Временном правительстве , на вымирание КПГ и границе, Капингамаранги языке ] (ISO 639: КПГ), курдский Pride Gang перечислен в Бандах в Соединенных Штатах , Киви Группа собственности (биржевые сводки: KPG), железнодорожной станции Kopargaon ( железнодорожный код: КПГ); также см. KPGS и ссылку на викисловарь для wikt: en: K-Pg - 67.70.27.246 ( обсуждение ) 00:16, 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Устраните неоднозначность . Я предоставил черновик на основе исследования IP (спасибо IP). Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 10:52, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Остров Ханна-Барбера [ править ]

Остров Ханна-Барбера → Cartoon Network Studios ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Эта страница перенаправления, похоже, предназначена для чего-то, чего даже не существует, поскольку поиск в Google просто нашел несколько фанфиков и фильм DTV Скуби-Ду! Среди прочего, вернитесь на Остров Зомби . IceWalrus236 ( обсуждение ) 18:57, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Подождите и следите за результатами Википедии: перенаправления для обсуждения / Журнал / 2021 15 апреля # Cartoon Corral Ханны-Барбера , поскольку это было упомянуто как альтернативное название в статье, перенаправленной с тех пор. - Paul_012 ( разговор ) 05:28, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Губка Боб Квадратные Штаны: Diner Dash [ править ]

Губка Боб Квадратные Штаны: Diner Dash → Diner Dash ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Удалить Не упоминается в целевой статье. США ( разговорное ) 18:21, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Слабый перенацеливание на List of SpongeBob SquarePants video games # Releases , где он упоминается. Страница могла быть перенаправлена на текущую цель еще в 2010 году, когда там упоминалась игра, но лучше направить читателей туда, где она действительно упоминается. Опять же, я не уверен на 100% в этом плане действий ... С уважением, SONIC ⁶⁷⁸ 22:00, 14 апреля 2021 года (UTC)

Закон о школьном молоке 1946 года [ править ]

Закон о школьном молоке 1946 года → Закон об образовании 1944 года # Школьное питание и молоко ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Такого закона никогда не существовало. Бесплатное школьное молоко было введено Положением о бесплатном молоке 1946 года, принятым в соответствии с разделом 49 Закона 1944 года. См. Wikipedia: Reference_desk / Humanities # Purported School Milk Act 1946 . К сожалению, ошибка Википедии была воспроизведена в другом месте. Это очевидный обман, и он был номинирован как таковой, но был отклонен. DuncanHill ( разговорное ) 17:05, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Удалить по ном. Примечание для Википедии: Список мистификаций в Википедии : Этот обман был создан 30 апреля 2008 г. и удален 14 апреля 2021 г. - Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 04:09, 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
- В статье мистификация была удалена на 25 октября 2010 года - J947 ‡ ^{сообщения ⁓ редактирует} 5:42, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
  - Неправда, что «статья-мистификация была удалена 25 октября 2010 года». Произошло то, что в этот день статья была закрыта и перенаправлена. По условиям WP: DWHOAX расследование розыгрыша розыгрыша не проводилось . Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 11:14, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
    - И материал из статьи был включен в цель редиректа. DuncanHill ( разговор ) 19:36, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Держи . Утверждается, что это обман, но есть вероятность, что «Закон о школьном молоке 1946 года» является просто неправильным толкованием «Положения о бесплатном молоке 1946 года», что не совсем необоснованно. Тот факт, что это перенаправление существует, не является утверждением о существовании закона. Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 11:14, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Комментарий Википедия не должна поощрять невежественное уравнение закона с правилами. Мы бы не назвали американский исполнительный приказ актом Конгресса, не так ли? Или сейчас приемлема вопиющая чушь? DuncanHill ( разговор ) 19:36, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Создатели аккаунта [ править ]

Создатели учетных записей → Википедия: Создатели учетных записей ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

кажется довольно бессмысленным, я не знаю об использовании нами основного пространства для проецирования перенаправления пространства TAXIDICAE💰 16:55, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Удалить по WP: XNR . Перенаправления между пространствами имен иногда допустимы, но быстрый поиск показывает, что «создатели учетных записей» используются в гораздо более широких контекстах, чем WP, так что это бесполезный XNR. _{Обсуждение} Hog Farm 17:03, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Удалить согласно Википедии: перенаправления между пространствами имен - не нужны и могут относиться к другим темам - DannyS712 ( обсуждение ) 17:06, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Удаление не должно быть необходимо в качестве XNR по какой-либо причине. - ^{Обсуждение} xaosflux 18:23, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Быстро удаляем как G5, так и R2. - Paul_012 ( разговор ) 04:32, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Поскольку он был помечен дважды, я просто хочу указать, что R2 не применяется. Но G5 определенно есть. Быстрое удаление . - J947 ‡ ^{сообщение ⁓ редактирует} 5:14, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Удалите это ненужное перенаправление между пространствами имен. Шхноцолоуд ( разговор ) 11:15, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Происхождение земноводных [ править ]

Происхождение земноводных → Labyrinthodontia # Происхождение современных амфибий ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

В то время как целевой раздел действительно обсуждает, что существует общее мнение, что земноводные произошли от целевых варминтов, не будет ли Amphibian # Evolutionary History более всеобъемлющей целью? Предлагаю ретаргетинг туда. _{Обсуждение} Hog Farm 16:35, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Бирманско-сиамская война (1824–1826 гг.) [ Править ]

Бирманско-сиамская война (1824–1826) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1824-1826) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Соответствующая запись на целевой странице отмечает, что эти даты на самом деле относятся к Первой англо-бирманской войне , и прямого бирманско-сиамского конфликта не было. Я не вижу пользы в перенаправлении этого термина ни на текущую цель, ни на статью об англо-бирманской войне, поэтому предлагаю удалить. Paul_012 ( разговор ) 14:57, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Пенитенциарная система Гонконга [ править ]

Пенитенциарная система Гонконга → Пенитенциарная система Гонконга ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Похоже, это машинный перевод ru: Пенитенциарная система Гонконга [2] . Слово «The» не обязательно должно присутствовать в названии. Кроме того, неправильное использование заглавных букв. Неверный поиск с "The". _{Обсуждение} Sun8908  13:23, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Бирманско-сиамская война (1700–01) [ править ]

Бирманско-сиамская война (1700–01) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1700-01) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1700–1701) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1700-1701) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1803–08) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1803–1808) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1803-08) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1803-1808) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1613–1614) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1613-1614) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1613–1614 гг.) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1613-14) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1614–1615 гг.) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1614-15) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1675–1676) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1675-1676) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1675–1676 гг.) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Бирманско-сиамская война (1675-76) → Бирманско-сиамские войны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Эти перенаправления представляли собой записи с красной связью в предыдущих версиях статьи о бирманско-сиамских войнах , которые были созданы как однострочные подзаголовки пользователем sockpuppeter, который с тех пор был заблокирован. Затем другие редакторы перенаправили заглушки обратно в основную статью списка, но более поздняя работа над статьей удалила упоминания о войнах, соответствующих этим датам, которые предположительно неточны. Предложите удалить эти перенаправления. - Paul_012 ( обсуждение ) 13:13, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC), обновлено 15:03, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Удалить . Если мы не можем предоставить читателям какую-либо информацию об этих поисковых запросах, вероятно, у нас не должно быть переадресации. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 20:55, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Оби-Ван Кеноби (фильм) [ править ]

Оби-Ван Кеноби (фильм) → Оби-Ван Кеноби # Предстоящие серии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Это будет сериал, а не фильм, поэтому этот редирек неправильный и ненужный, и на самом деле раздела «Предстоящие сериалы» не существует в Оби-Ван Кеноби Арамил Феракса ( разговор ) 12:15, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Удалить . Это было с тех времен, когда должен был быть фильм. Излишне говорить, что это неудачное перенаправление WP: CRYSTAL . Dominicmgm ( разговор ) 14:38, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Удалить, как указано выше, не удалось перенаправить WP: CRYSTAL , на самом деле фильма с таким именем не существует. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 15:31, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Прокомментируйте целевую статью, в которой обсуждается отмененный фильм, поэтому она кажется жизнеспособной в качестве поискового запроса - 67.70.27.246 ( обсуждение ) 00:05, 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Удалить по 86 IP. Страница CanadianOtaku Talk 01:34, 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Википедия: CR [ править ]

Википедия: CR → Википедия: Ресурсы по очистке ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Предложение перенацеливания в Википедию: запросы на закрытие , которое недавно было перенесено из Википедии : Доска объявлений для администраторов / Запросы на закрытие ( WP: ANRFC ) в Википедии: Запросы на закрытие § Запрошенный перенос 22 марта 2021 года . Несколько редакторов в запрошенном перемещении предложили узурпировать этот ярлык для доски объявлений запросов на закрытие.

Согласно данным о просмотрах страниц , на доску объявлений о закрытии запросов за последние 90 дней было получено 7 353 просмотра, тогда как ресурсы Wikipedia: Cleanup получили только 344 просмотра за тот же период. - Newslinger talk 11:58, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Я думаю , что это , вероятно , будет лучше всего неоднозначность этого, как текущая цель имеет hatnote с 4 другими страницами это может быть обоснованно , нацеленных на, и мы теперь имеем два процесса с этим аббревиатуру , которые имеют разумное требование к нему, один , потому что они» Я использую этот ярлык в течение 15 лет и получил сотни обратных ссылок, другой - потому что это широко используемая доска объявлений. Я думаю, что разумная страница для приклеивания будет включать Википедию: Ресурсы по очистке , Википедия: Запросы на закрытие , Википедия: Авторские права и Википедия: Категоризация перенаправлений , возможно, пару других, которые я пропустил. Возможно, потребуется новый ярлык для доски объявлений о запросах закрытия, например, никто еще не использует WP: CLR .86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 12:09, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Перенацеливание на Википедию: количество запросов на закрытие по номеру; ярлыки предназначены для ярлыков, а не ярлыков. Однако входящие ссылки необходимо будет исправить. - J947 ‡ ^{сообщение ⁓ редактирует} 1:47, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Я бы сильно склонился к ретаргетингу, если бы не проблема всех исторических ссылок на старый ярлык. Есть ли способ массово изменить их, чтобы они не указывали не в то место? Если так, мы должны это сделать. Я против устранения неоднозначности, которая сочетает в себе худшее из обоих: нарушает историю и не позволяет запросам WP: Closure получить удобный ярлык, который был специально перемещен в новый заголовок, чтобы он мог иметь. {{u | Sdkb }}  ^talk 22:34, 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Да, либо AutoWikiBrowser или JavaScript Wiki браузер может изменить старый WP: CR ссылки на водопроводного ссылки , которые указывают на Википедии: Cleanup ресурсы . Я могу это сделать , если есть консенсус нацелить, и любой может присоединиться. - Newslinger разговор 1:06, 16 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Ладно, в таком случае, Ретаргетинг . {{u | Sdkb }}  ^talk 01:38, 16 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Чиниот из колледжа Islamia, [ править ]

Исламский колледж chiniot, → Государственный исламский колледж, Chiniot ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Удалить. Невероятные заглавные буквы и пунктуация (конечная запятая в имени). - Fayenatic L ondon 11:36, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Удалите , как мы должны поступить со всеми пунктирными перенаправлениями. США ( разговорное ) 18:23, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Примечание: это может стать спорным для пользователя: Störm добавил статью в AFD. - Fayenatic L ondon 20:44, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Удалите это перенаправление с запятой в конце. Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 11:17, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Академический элитизм [ править ]

AcademicElitism → Башня из слоновой кости ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Академическая элитарность → Элитарность # Академическая ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Не совсем уверен, что с этим делать. Это буквально одна из старейших вещей на сайте, созданная в феврале 2001 года самим Джимбо. Похоже, раньше у этого была техническая цель, но я недостаточно хорошо разбираюсь в аспектах кодирования, чтобы знать, что это было. Проблема здесь в том, что академический элитизм сам по себе является перенаправлением к элитарности , а это означает, что если перенаправление определено как правдоподобная орфография для определенной цели, его, вероятно, следует, по крайней мере, перенаправить. Оставляем это здесь для дальнейшего обсуждения. AllegedlyHuman ( разговор ) 09:37, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Определенно не удаляйте , см. {{ R from CamelCase }}. Ретаргетинг кажется полезным. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 10:58, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Сохраните и доработайте башню из слоновой кости # Академическое использование . Я думаю, что академический элитизм должен быть перенаправлен на башню из слоновой кости # Academic, так как текущая цель, Elitism # Academic , была удалена из этой статьи в 2019 году, поскольку на нее не было ссылок . Независимо от того, какая цель выбрана, они должны быть одинаковыми. A7V2 ( разговорное ) 11:44, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Как-то синхронизируйте с академической элитностью , поскольку R из CamelCase для этого термина, а также отметьте, что R избегает двойного перенаправления. - Paul_012 ( разговор ) 13:19, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Комментарий Когда эта страница была создана, на ней изначально был текст: [3] . AllegedlyHuman ( разговор ) 21:16, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

В Academic elitism была целая статья до 2014 года, когда она была превращена в редирект из-за серьезных проблем и плохого источника Diff 86.23.109.101 ( обсуждение ) 22:26, 14 апреля 2021 года (UTC)

Комментарий . Я добавил к этой номинации академическую элитарность, потому что они явно связаны между собой. Pinging @ AllegedlyHuman : @ Павел 012 : @ 1234qwer1234qwer4 : . Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 11:24, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Перенацелите оба на Elitism , у которого есть также вход в Башню Слоновой Кости . Ни одна из целей не идеальна, но я не уверен, что Башня из слоновой кости действительно имеет дело с академической элитностью. Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 11:32, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Україна [ править ]

Україна → Украина ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]
Lu / lə ˈpœj də ˈvəlaj → Ле-Пюи-ан-Веле ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]
Fʀɑ̃swa ʀəˈne də atobriˈjɑ̃ → Франсуа-Рене де Шатобриан ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Я назначил только один вчера , но есть еще редиректы, которые нужно удалить за 1 , 2 . 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 06:49, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Топливная промышленность [ править ]

Топливная промышленность → Уголь ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Топливная промышленность → Уголь ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Эти перенаправления не кажутся синонимами их цели, на мой взгляд, топливная промышленность - это общий термин, который не относится исключительно к углю. Я не уверен, где лучше всего нацелить их, поэтому перечислил их здесь. Энергетическая промышленность - лучшая цель, которую я мог найти, но я также мог видеть аргумент в пользу превращения их в DAB или установки индекса для всех различных статей топливной / топливной промышленности ( угольная промышленность , нефтяная промышленность и т. Д.). 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 12:04, 6 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Перенацеливание на энергетику , на практике это синонимы. Предлагаемая цель также четко перечисляет основные топливные отрасли в Леде, что обеспечивает то, что дает индекс, и многое другое. - T avix⁽^{разговор}⁾ 02:07, 8 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Нанесите или перенаправьте . Уголь точно не правильный. В то время как энергетическая отрасль является улучшением, она немного шире, и электроэнергия может доминировать в качестве топлива в качестве поставщика энергии с переходом на энергоносители. Даб лучше. FemkeMilene ( разговор ) 19:58, 11 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris ^talk!06:36, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Перенацеливание на энергетику как наиболее подходящую цель. Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 11:36, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Перенацеливание на энергетику . Это единственное возможное значение, которое я могу придумать. Клейоквот ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 19:09, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

寶馬汽車[ редактировать ]

寶馬汽車→ BMW ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

РГ: РЛОТЕ . Нет конкретной связи между BMW и китайским языком 86.23.109.101 ( разговор ) 12:08, 6 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Удалить по ном. - Mx. Грейнджер ( обсуждение · вклад ) 16:15, 6 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Это довольно известная транскрипция на китайские иероглифы («драгоценный конный вагон»), и его можно перенаправить туда (он упоминается без 汽車, «автомобиль»). - Кусма ( 𐍄 · 𐌺 ) 22:07, 6 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
- «寶馬» может означать «драгоценный конь» , но это в основном используется классическими китайскими , который, согласно статье Википедии Китайского БМВ , приходит из ХИ в династии Суна ,青玉案. Я не уверен, что вы имеете в виду под «перенацеливанием туда», но «寶馬» не является буквальной транскрипцией. _{Обсуждение} Sun8908  16:10, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Сохраните или перенацелите - «нет конкретной связи между BMW и китайским языком» - забавное предложение для всех, кто жил где-то с большим количеством фуэрдай . Я склонен придерживаться текущего целевого значения согласно WP: SURPRISE , хотя я могу понять точку зрения Кузмы. Ватицидальный пророк 00:04, 7 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Родители Ритча, покупающие своим детям BMW, не являются чем-то исключительно китайским, это случается практически везде. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 00:20, 7 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Перенацеливание на BMW Brilliance , совместное предприятие BMW в Китае. - T avix⁽^{разговор}⁾ 01:57, 8 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris ^talk!06:35, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Перенацелите на BMW Brilliance per Tavix. _{Обсуждение} Sun8908  13:17, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Halo pc [ править ]

Halo pc → Halo: Combat Evolved ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Halo PC → Halo: Combat Evolved ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Halo (игра для ПК) → Halo: Combat Evolved ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Halo (компьютерная игра) → Halo: Combat Evolved ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Когда было создано это перенаправление, единственной игрой с ореолом, доступной на ПК, была борьба с эволюцией, а остальная часть серии была эксклюзивной для Xbox, но это уже не так. Halo 2 была выпущена на ПК в 2007 году, а остальная часть серии недавно была перенесена на ПК как часть Halo: The Master Chief Collection . Именно в этот момент я думаю, что основной темой этих перенаправлений, вероятно, является коллекция master Chief, основанная на поиске в Google, но это, вероятно, недавний подход, поскольку коллекция была выпущена совсем недавно. Предлагаю перенацелить их на статью о франшизе. ( Halo (франшиза) ) 86.23.109.101 ( разговор ) 12:55, 6 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Перенацеливание на Halo (франшиза) # Игровая серия . Вероятно, здесь не нужно было обсуждать, если только не было отказа от ретаргетинга. Также обратите внимание на сноску на этой странице после любых новых перенаправлений на нее. Литопсийское ( разговорное ) 14:00, 6 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Удалить все Как заявил номинатор, они теперь слишком расплывчаты, поскольку каждая игра Halo доступна для ПК. У них больше нет никакой навигационной цели, поскольку «Halo PC» теперь означает то же самое, что и «Halo». _{ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР )} 09:19, 7 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris ^talk!06:35, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Коминтерм [ править ]

Коминтерм → Коммунистический Интернационал ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Удалите как маловероятно орфографические ошибки. AllegedlyHuman ( разговор ) 01:55, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Прокомментируйте, что клавиша M находится рядом с клавишей N на англоязычной клавиатуре QWERTY , так как же это маловероятно? Цель известна как Коминтерн с N - 67.70.27.246 ( разговор ) 04:14, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Оставьте как бы опечатку "Коминтерн". Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 11:38, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

RMS Titanic [ править ]

RMS titanic → Titanic ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Ошибка заглавной буквы. RMS Titanic - это уже существующий редирект. В этом нет необходимости. Ad Orientem ( разговор ) 01:43, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Держите эту штуку, я вижу, как люди забывают использовать первую букву T с заглавной буквы, и это не является двусмысленным в отношении того, что это означает. Также кажется, что с 14 августа прошлого года наблюдается огромный всплеск просмотров страниц. С уважением, SONIC ⁶⁷⁸ 04:17, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Продолжайте , это совершенно стандартный {{ R от miscapitalisation }}, а диаграмма просмотров страниц показывает, что внешние ссылки вероятны. - J947 ‡ ^{сообщение ⁓ редактирует} 4:29, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Держи . Таких редиректов множество, поэтому нет веских причин для удаления. Dominicmgm ( разговорное ) 06:05, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Держи . Плохой стандарт {{ R от неправильной капитализации }}, и при просмотре 500-700 страниц в месяц это, похоже, неправильная капитализация, используемая многими читателями или имеющая некоторые внешние ссылки. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:58, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Генерал Луна Авеню [ править ]

Генерал Луна Авеню → Сан-Матео, Ризал ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Авеню Генерала Антонио Луна → Сан-Матео, Ризал ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Генерал Луна Авеню → Сан-Матео, Ризал ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Редирект, General Luna Avenue , со сложной историей, следует удалить. В статье нет абзаца, посвященного самому проспекту. Первоначально это была отдельная статья, которая была отмечена тегом значимости с 2009 года, затем PROD- от Doghouse09 25 августа 2020 года ( дата в соответствии с часовым поясом Филиппин ), затем де-PROD от Djsasso 28 августа 2020 года, утверждая, что это национальная дорога. Тем не менее, он не указан в филиппинской сети шоссейных дорог (возможно, это национальная дорога третичного уровня, но даже указанная там она все равно не соответствует руководящим принципам известности). Он был окончательно перенаправлен в Сан-Матео, Ризал, 31 марта 2021 года Маккапрой., ссылаясь на проблему известности. Однако, как я сказал ранее, цель кажется неуместной, и лучше удалить ее, так как нет таких статей, как « Список дорог в Ризале », « Список дорог в КАЛАБАРЗОНЕ » или каких-либо подобных статей списка, чтобы сохранить ее ( в отличие от тех, которые перенаправляют сегодня в Список дорог в Метро Манила ). JWilz12345 ( Обсуждение | Contrib's. ) 03:52, 5 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Примечание: данное обсуждение также включает в себя два других перенаправления , которые ранее перенаправлены здесь (пингуется редирект создателей за их редактирования истории, чтобы добавить уведомление о RFD на этих переадресаций вскоре после этого): ( @ HueMan1 : ) ( @ Bluemask : ) _ JWilz12345 ( Обсуждение | Contrib's. ) 03:57, 5 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

! vote : Версия статьи о группе General Luna (группа) была создана под названием Gen. Luna Avenue . Я не читал, что группа когда-либо упоминалась под таким названием «Авеню». - Bluemask ( разговор ) 02:53, 6 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Держи . Нет никаких политических причин для удаления. «Генерал Луна Авеню» упоминается в статье в 4 раз, и это название не предполагает двусмысленности. Тем не менее, круговые вики-ссылки в статье необходимо удалить. Шхнотсолоуд ( разговорное ) 19:04, 5 апреля 2021 (UTC)
- @ Shhhnotsocloud : он просто будет воссоздан и восстановит тот же контент с тегами значимости. JWilz12345 ( Обсуждение | Contrib's. ) 19:06, 5 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо,Hog Farm _Talk 01:09, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Восстановите статью и обсудите в AfD. Учитывая оспариваемые претензии в отношении известности, это требует надлежащего обсуждения, для которого RfD не является подходящим местом. - Paul_012 ( разговор ) 05:35, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Средневековый (альбом) [ править ]

Medieval (альбом) → Tierra Santa (группа) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]

Акцент над A может быть правдоподобным, а может и нет, поскольку группа испанская (и это практически единственный альбом с таким названием в Википедии, кроме того, есть Medieval (альбом) ), но нехватка места определенно делает это сомнительно так. Удалите, если кто-то не может предоставить обоснование. С уважением, SONIC ⁶⁷⁸ 01:00, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Удалить (за WP: UNNATURAL ). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 20:54, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

13 апреля [ править ]

Государственный лидер Мьянмы [ править ]

Государственный лидер Мьянмы → Председатель Совета государственного управления ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Удалить. Этот термин никогда не появлялся в каких-либо источниках AFAICT и был сфабрикован редактором, который теперь заблокирован на неопределенный срок, среди прочего, за фабрикацию контента. Так что это бесполезный поисковый запрос. И даже если бы это было так, неясно, является ли текущая цель подходящей, поскольку ее можно было бы так же легко нацелить на президента Мьянмы . - ^{Обсуждение}Tartan357, 23:30, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Википедия: Бестолковый новичок [ править ]

Википедия: Бестолковый новичок → Википедия: Служба поддержки ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Википедия: Бестолковый новичок → Википедия: Служба поддержки ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Я не вижу каких-либо вариантов использования этих перенаправлений, и, честно говоря, я думаю, что оставить кому-то сообщение со связанным «Бестолковым новичком», направляющим их в службу поддержки, было бы крайне невежливо, граничащее с личной атакой. Несмотря на то, что они существуют с 2005 года, между ними имеется около полдюжины входящих ссылок, большинство из которых из номинаций АдГ, где ссылка не имеет отношения к службе поддержки. Они в основном не используются, у одного было 20 просмотров страниц в прошлом году (хотя 17 из них по какой-то причине были в один и тот же месяц ), у другого - 8. 86.23.109.101 ( обсуждение ) 23:05, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Удалить по ном. - ^{Обсуждение}Tartan357 01:17, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Еще одна мысль, которую я только что подумал, как насчет перенацеливания на WP: Предположим, ничего не понимаете ? Это было бы гораздо более актуально для мест, где на самом деле связаны эти перенаправления. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 15:09, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Коррида (альбом Dschinghis Khan) [ править ]

Коррида (альбом Dschinghis Khan) → Dschinghis Khan ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Это было оставлено после переезда в 2008 году, чтобы изменить его название на английский. Более того, похоже, что эта группа не имеет отношения к испанскому, и в испанской Википедии также нет эквивалента. Я предлагаю удалить это для WP: RFOREIGN из-за этого. С уважением, SONIC ⁶⁷⁸ 22:47, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Удалить по ном. Grk1011 ( разговор ) 15:00, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Удалить, отметив, что Коррида (альбом Dschinghis Khan) существует. Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 11:40, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Помощь: увещевания [ править ]

Справка: Наставления → Википедия: Чайный домик # Help_on_admonitions_templates ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Предположительно это было создано как временное перенаправление согласно сводке создания, с какой целью я не знаю. В любом случае перенаправление страницы справки с термина, не используемого в Википедии, на длинный вопрос, хранящийся в архиве, в чайхане никому не нужен. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 22:25, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Во-первых, редирект нарушил архив обсуждения Чайхана . Во-вторых, как вы указываете, это было временно, и, немного подождав дальнейших комментариев, я забыл внести поправки в то, что, казалось, было заключением: амбоксы . - Джеймс Р. Хей ( разговор ) 2021-04-14 ср 21: 19: 17Z

Я исправил / изменил его в соответствии с исходом обсуждения в Чайхане. - Джеймс Р. Хей ( разговор ) 2021-04-14 Ср 21: 41: 34Z

Хорошо, это справедливо, но такой стиль окон сообщений в статьях не называется в Википедии «предостережениями», и как слово, которое означает просто «предупреждение», я бы не ожидал, что попаду в документацию этого шаблона, если бы искал справочную документацию по этому термину, я ожидаю, что в конечном итоге попаду на что-то, относящееся к шаблонам предупреждений пользователей. Если это будет сохранено, я думаю, что что-то вроде Wikipedia: Vandalism # Warnings или Wikipedia: Template index / User talk namespace было бы лучшей целью. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 22:05, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

JLin [ править ]

JLin → Джереми Лин ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Удалить или перенаправить на Jlin . Если бы это был «Дж. Линь», я полагаю, что это было бы иначе, но не совсем понятно, почему он перенаправляется сюда; Лин, похоже, не часто носит это имя, и не упоминается в самой статье. AllegedlyHuman ( разговор ) 21:58, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Комментарий это американизм, из уличной культуры. У многих других знаменитостей есть такая форма аббревиатуры, например JLo . Поскольку ббол является распространенной темой в американской уличной культуре, и в какой-то момент Джереми Лин имел большое значение в бболе, в то время его использовали. - 67.70.27.246 ( разговорное ) 03:43, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Удалить как неоднозначные и удалить соответствующие сноски у Джереми Лина и Джлина . - Предыдущий неподписанный комментарий добавлен Shhhnotsoloud ( обсуждение • вклад ) 11:43, 15 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Я еще мертв [ править ]

Я еще мертв → Список персонажей слайдеров ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Этот термин не появляется у цели, и я не могу найти содержание об этом, относящемся к « Слайдерам ». При поиске здесь открывается книга с биографией, но это маловероятный поисковый запрос. Семьдесят пять лет ( разговорное ) 21:34, 13 апреля 2021 года (UTC)

Несоответствие между книгой Джона Скалли (журналиста) и треками из " Городского ребенка, атакованного крысами" , " Блюз депортации" и " Жизнь в грязном районе" . Группа, созданная Мэри Байкер и Ноко , также упоминается в их статьях. - Прачечная Пицца 03 ( d c̄ ) 00:03, 14 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Геноцид хмонгов [ править ]

Геноцид хмонгов → Повстанческое движение в Лаосе ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

В целевой статье нет надежного источника, чтобы это событие было названо геноцидом. ( t · c ) buidhe 20:34, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Недавно была опубликована статья о Геноциде хмонгов , но, честно говоря, она выглядит как вилка POV, которую следует перенаправить обратно к основной статье о мятеже. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 10:36, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Перенацелите на геноцид хмонгов , а затем исправьте эту статью по мере необходимости. Я добавлю, что определенно кажется, что этот термин используется в некоторых надежных источниках (из быстрого поиска в Google), хотя, как правило, это такие слова, как «заявления о геноциде» и т. нейтральный редирект, согласно WP: RNEUTRAL . A7V2 ( разговорное ) 11:53, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Тантен [ править ]

Тантен → Берлингске ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Берлингске известен под прозвищем Tanten i Pilestrde , но, похоже, не так широко известен как Tanten . Тантен в переводе с датского, шведского и норвежского означает «тетя», поэтому редкие обращения, которые он получает, вряд ли будут исходить от людей, которые ищут газету. - Arms & Hearts ( обсуждение ) 19:17, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Кислый (альбом) [ править ]

Sour (альбом) → SOUR ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Не очень подходящий поисковый запрос - зачем кому-то использовать термин «альбом» с акцентом над буквой «а», если это не так, как пишется «альбом». ≫ Lil- Unique1 - { Talk } - 18:31, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Удалить Я бы согласился с Lil- Unique1 . Его следует удалить, а если нет, перенаправить на SOUR . Джек Рейнольдс ( поговорите со мной! ) ( Напишите мне !! ) 18:36, 13 апреля 2021 года (UTC)
Удалить - по обоснованию номинатора - N Ø 18:38, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Удалить Никто никогда не будет использовать это в качестве поискового запроса. Джеральдо Перес ( разговорное ) 18:46, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Удалить . Маловероятный поисковый запрос. (Примечание: бот мое изменение, где это указывает, так как я только что переместил SOUR в Sour (альбом Оливии Родриго) . - К.Фред ( выступление ) 19:02, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Держите , это перенаправление с совсем недавнего перемещения страницы, и поэтому в игру вступает K4 . Это очень неправдоподобный поисковый запрос, но он все же полезен, поскольку, вероятно, есть внешние ссылки, указывающие на это перенаправление. Мы не хотим разрывать эти ссылки, так как это часто может быть большим неудобством для тех, кто использует ссылку. По крайней мере, оставьте пока что, чтобы мы могли видеть просмотры страниц для этого перенаправления после перехода, чтобы оценить, есть ли такие входящие ссылки. - J947 ‡ ^{сообщение ⁓ редактирует} 20:48, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Комментарий : «álbum» - это написание слова «альбом» на испанском и португальском языках, так что это вполне может быть поисковый запрос, используемый читателями в испаноязычных и португалоговорящих странах ... это будет зависеть от того, сколько из них будет в ближайшее время. месяцев, как предполагает J947. Richard3120 ( разговор ) 18:34, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Удалите, отметив, что Sour (альбом) существует как перенаправление на Sour (значения) . Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 11:46, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Waˈpanka [ править ]

Waˈpanka → Roundup (история) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

По прецеденту ( 1 , 2 ) я предлагаю удалить это перенаправление из транскрипции IPA. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 17:42, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Bedwars [ править ]

Bedwars → Hypixel ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Не упоминается в целевом объекте, удалить, если не может быть предоставлено обоснование. _{подписали,}Rosguill ^{разговор} 15:59, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Удалить Я обнаружил, что Bed Wars - это командная игра на выживание в сети Hypixel. Он имеет довольно обширное освещение в Hypixel Fandom, однако я не смог найти ни одного IRS, который позволил бы добавить информацию в целевую статью. Так что пока я считаю, что его следует удалить. Меньше, если только ( разговор ) 17:12, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Удалить Помимо вышесказанного, Bedwars - это мини-игра, не уникальная даже для Hypixel. Никсинова Т С 19:59, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Индивидуальные паралимпийские спортсмены на Паралимпийских играх [ править ]

Индивидуальные спортсмены-паралимпийцы на Паралимпийских играх → Индивидуальные спортсмены-паралимпийцы на Летних Паралимпийских играх 2000 года ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Нет причин, по которым люди будут искать Игры 2000 года. На летних Паралимпийских играх 2016 года , а также в 2018 году под названием «Нейтральные паралимпийцы» присутствовали отдельные спортсмены-паралимпийцы в 1992 , 2000 г. и независимые паралимпийские спортсмены под названием «Нейтральные паралимпийские спортсмены» Джозеф 2302 ( разговор) 08:45, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Перенацеливание на независимых паралимпийцев на Паралимпийских играх, где перечислены все годы. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:49, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Перенацелите это и одно ниже на независимых паралимпийцев на Паралимпийских играх за нашего 86 друга. Эти обсуждения действительно следует объединить. С уважением, SONIC ⁶⁷⁸ 15:21, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Ретаргетинг на IP-пользователя. Меньше, если только ( разговор ) 17:14, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Keep - Спортсменов 1992 года так не называли. Из статьи « Независимые паралимпийцы на Паралимпийских играх» , только на паралимпийских играх 2000 года, где спортсмены описывались таким образом («индивидуальные» в противоположность «независимым»). A7V2 ( разговорное ) 11:59, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Индивидуальные паралимпийцы [ править ]

Индивидуальные паралимпийцы → Индивидуальные паралимпийцы на Летних Паралимпийских играх 2000 года ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Нет причин, по которым люди будут искать Игры 2000 года. На летних Паралимпийских играх 2016 года , а также в 2018 году под названием «Нейтральные паралимпийцы» присутствовали отдельные спортсмены-паралимпийцы в 1992 , 2000 г. и независимые паралимпийские спортсмены под названием «Нейтральные паралимпийские спортсмены» Джозеф 2302 ( разговор) 08:44, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Перенацеливание на независимых паралимпийцев на Паралимпийских играх, где перечислены все годы. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:50, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Ретаргетинг для каждого IP-пользователя, как указано выше. Меньше, если только ( разговор ) 17:14, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Сохраните по причинам, которые я указал выше. A7V2 ( разговор ) 12:00, 14 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Симаррон (люди) [ править ]

Cimarron (люди) → Cimarron people (Панама) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]

Это давнее перенаправление может быть ошибочно нацелено на конкретное использование: являются ли Мароны (цель Симарронов ) лучшей целью для более широкого использования? Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 11:30, 5 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Это могло произойти в любом случае. Я думаю, что все в порядке, но я вижу изменения. Я добавил упоминание о маронах к Lede в Cimarron люди (Панама) статьи, которая помогает направить кого - то , кто мог бы искали для этой статьи. Картер ( разговор ) 13:42, 5 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✗ plicit 03:50, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Агуэйбана [ править ]

Агуэйбана → Агуэйбана ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Агуэйбана II → Агуэйбана ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Агуэйбана и Агуэйбана II → Агуэйбана ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Agueimes → Agüimes ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Агуэймс, Лас-Пальмас → Агуимес ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Испанский (означает, что произносится буква u), а не немецкий умляут. Агуэро пережил RFD, поэтому я не буду перечислять его здесь. HotdogPi 00:57, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)

12 апреля [ править ]

Рождество в июне [ править ]

Рождество в июне → Smile Empty Soul ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Не упоминается в цели, не ссылается ни на какие статьи и имеет менее 10 просмотров страниц в месяц. Google предлагает песню AJR . Судя по всему, он был создан при перемещении страницы @ Jax 0677 :, но история страницы не так интересна (всего несколько ходов). Я бы сказал удалить или перенацелить на OK Orchestra . Mattx8y ( разговор ) 20:01, 12 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Ретаргетинг - Ретаргетинг на OK Orchestra . - Jax 0677 ( разговор ) 00:21, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Перенацеливание на "OK Orchestra" по номеру и Jax 0677. 053pvr ( обсуждение ) 02:12, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Перенацеливание на OK Orchestra , который также известен как AJR по 053pvr и Jax 0677. StaleGuy22 ( обсуждение ) 15:57, 13 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Voltswagen [ править ]

Voltswagen → Volkswagen № 2017 – настоящее время: В центре внимания электромобили ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Это была первоапрельская шутка Volkswagen, и она, похоже, не считается достаточной для того, чтобы упоминать ее у цели. Удалять, если только упоминание из надлежащих источников не может быть добавлено к цели или может быть предоставлено другое обоснование. _{подписали,}Rosguill ^{разговоры} 16:24, 12 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Прото гэльский [ править ]

Прото гэльский → Первобытный ирландский ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]

«Прото-гэльский» не похоже на собственное имя какого-либо языка, реконструированного или иного. Насколько я могу судить, ближайшим эквивалентом является прото-кельтский язык , который является предшественником кельтской языковой семьи, к которой принадлежит гэльский (гойдельский). Я бы предложил перенаправить туда, если не будет предоставлено обоснование. _{подписали,}Rosguill ^{разговоры} 16:16, 12 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Перенацеливание на прото-кельтский за ном. 053pvr ( обсуждение ) 02:11, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Оставить как есть . Прото-гэльский был бы предком всех гэльских языков, а не всех кельтских языков. Гэльские языки также известны как гойдельские языки , поэтому прото-гэльский эквивалентен прото-гойдельскому языку. У нас нет статьи о прото-гойдельском языке , но наиболее близким к нему является примитивный ирландский язык , старейший засвидетельствованный гойдельский язык. Таким образом, хотя прото-гойделик (реконструированный язык) не совсем идентичен примитивному ирландскому (аттестованному языку), примитивный ирландский язык действительно кажется лучшей доступной целью перенаправления. - Махагаджа · разговор 10:17, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Планетарные или гендерные символы [ править ]

♂ → Символы планет # Марс ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]

♂️ → Символы планет # Марс ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]

♀ → Символы планет # Венера ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

♀️ → Женский ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]

~~⚧️ →Гендерный символ ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]~~

~~⚧ →Гендерный символ ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]~~

☿ → Символы планет # Меркурий ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Не уверен, на что они должны быть нацелены, но это требует обсуждения. И мужской символ, и женский символ являются целевыми гендерными символами для контекста. Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 09:12, 10 марта 2021 (UTC)

Нейтрально . Обе статьи о символах планет и о гендерах имеют отношение к делу и объясняют, что означают эти символы. Glades12 ( разговорное ) 10:28, 10 марта 2021 (UTC)

* Переключитесь на статью о разрешении неоднозначности для каждого символа, указав ссылки на обе соответствующие статьи. (Я не могу не задаться вопросом, является ли это спорным вопросом. Единственный способ ввести эти символы - скопировать / вставить из внешнего документа, где обозначения, вероятно, уже объяснены). Если консенсус в пользу «сохранить», тогда в заголовке каждой планетарной статьи потребуется уведомление «перенаправляет сюда», что мне не нравится, потому что это не проблема, - Джон Мейнард Фридман ( talk ) 12:17, 10 марта 2021 г. (UTC) Поскольку этот RFD был повторно включен, я беру свой первый ответ, чтобы было понятнее, что я поддерживаю предложение 053pvr ниже. - Джон Мейнард Фридман ( разговор) 00:21, 27 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Устранение неоднозначности или перенацеливание на их записи на странице « Разные символы», которая определяет их использование, как указано выше. Они также используются в качестве алхимических символов, и я думаю, что есть аргумент, что ♀️ ассоциируется с феминистской символикой (о которой я удивлен, что не смог найти статью). 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 12:42, 10 марта 2021 (UTC)
- Я считаю, что это лучшая альтернатива моим предпочтениям. Меня беспокоит только то, что страница « Разные символы» немного пугает посетителей, незнакомых с концепцией кодовых точек , нелегко найти нужный символ и не очевидно, что на ней есть ссылки на более подробные статьи. - Джон Мейнард Фридман ( выступление ) 14:21, 10 марта 2021 г. (UTC) Поскольку этот RFD был повторно добавлен, я выделяю этот ответ, чтобы было понятнее, что я поддерживаю предложение 053pvr ниже. - Джон Мейнард Фридман ( разговор ) 00:21, 27 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  - @ John Maynard Friedman : Если бы мы перенастроили список, я бы предложил поместить шаблон {{ Anchor }} в соответствующие записи, чтобы перенаправления указывали на определенные записи таблицы. Я вижу аргумент, что пара мазков может быть лучше. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 14:31, 10 марта 2021 (UTC)
    - Или даже одну страницу-мазок для этого набора символов ( ☿ ♀ ♂): мы могли бы даже назвать это планетарными или гендерными символами . - Джон Мейнард Фридман ( выступление ) 14:50, 10 марта 2021 г. (UTC) Поскольку этот RFD был повторно добавлен, я выделяю этот ответ, чтобы было понятнее, что я поддерживаю предложение 053pvr ниже. - Джон Мейнард Фридман ( разговор ) 14:08, 29 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Комментарий. Я добавил сюда ⚧ , ⚧️ и ☿, так как они в том же духе. - MJL - Обсуждение - ^☖ 18:26, 10 марта 2021 (UTC)
На самом деле просто игнорируйте первые два. Это не помогло. - MJL - Обсуждение - ^☖ 18:33, 10 марта 2021 (UTC)

* Retarget «♂️» и «♀️» в «Гендерное символ» , как это то , что они находятся в Unicode. Остальные оставьте себе. 053pvr ( обсуждение ) 05:01, 13 марта 2021 (UTC)

- Эта идея имеет много достоинств, если судить по чему-то вроде WP: common name , учитывая, что их подавляющее современное использование - это гендерные символы. Международный астрономический союз осуждает их применение в астрономии. Только астрологи до сих пор используют их для планет. Я поддерживаю это предложение. - Джон Мейнард Фридман ( разговор ) 08:59, 14 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
Они должны быть мишенью редактор в соответствии с их юникода определение текста на WP: Emoji . Их внешний вид зависит от платформы компьютера и шрифта. Например, ♂️, т. Е. Может появляться MALE SIGNв некоторых местах, которые не имеют отношения к марсу, но всегда будут иметь постоянное текстовое определение, определяемое консорциумом . - Godsy^{( TALK}_{CONT )} 20:32, 21 марта 2021 (UTC)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо,_{подписали,} Rosguill ^{разговоры} 21:27, 26 марта 2021 (UTC)

Просто обратите внимание, что эффект ответа Godsy будет таким же, как эффект 053pvr . Они приходят к одному и тому же выводу, исходя из разных отправных точек. - Джон Мейнард Фридман ( разговор ) 14:08, 29 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Комментарий «☿» (U + 263F) - это Меркурий в соответствии с Unicode, поэтому кажется, что он указывает на правильное место, так как это символ планеты. - 67.70.27.246 ( разговорное ) 14:22, 9 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Комментарий для мужских и женских символов, что бы ни случилось, сноска должна существовать для другой темы (будь то таблица планет или таблица пола; или их соответствующие отдельные статьи) - 67.70.27.246 ( обсуждение ) 14:22, 9 апреля 2021 г. ( УНИВЕРСАЛЬНОЕ ГЛОБАЛЬНОЕ ВРЕМЯ)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий по повторному включению:я закрыл это, но вместо этого снова добавляю его после обсуждения на моей странице обсуждения.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, - T avix⁽^{обсуждение}⁾13:42, 12 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Retarget ♂️, ♀️, ♂ и ♀ к символу Пола отразить их ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЯ Unicode. Например, символ планеты # Марс говорит: «Его кодовая точка Unicode - U + 2642 ♂ МУЖСКОЙ ЗНАК (HTML ♂ · &male; )». ☿ следует сохранить, поскольку его определение Unicode - Меркурий. - T avix⁽^{разговор}⁾ 13:53, 12 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)
Комментарий Для тех, кто не видит разницы между ♂️ и ♂ (из-за личного нарушения зрения или из-за того, что они используют веб-браузер, который не делает различий), это сделано благодаря умному "волшебному" URL-адресу: сравните https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%99%82%EF%B8%8F с https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%99%82 : оба адресуют% E2% 99% 82 (U + 2642), но первый добавляет декоративные эффекты, которые не видны многим посетителям. Я не думаю, что нам нужно конкретное правило MOS, чтобы знать, что это плохая идея и, конечно, не основание для разных целей перенаправления в зависимости от внешнего вида. [Так что, если нужно сказать однозначно, я голосую за все появления U + 263F для перенаправления на Меркурий (планету) и за все появления U + 2640 и U + 2642 на символ пола.] - Джон Мейнард Фридман ( разговорное ) 16:36, 12 апреля 2021 (UTC)
- Перенацелить все на символ пола , поскольку все эти символы определены в Unicode как символы пола. 053pvr ( обсуждение ) 01:58, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)

BMZ GmbH [ править ]

BMZ GmbH → Умная батарея ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие: (@subpage) ]

Редирект от случайного производителя аккумуляторов на статью про умные аккумуляторы, где они не упоминаются в прозе статьи. Учитывая, что следующим изменением создателя перенаправления было добавление несоответствующей внешней ссылки на веб-сайт компании, похоже, что это могло быть частью небольшой спам-кампании. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:43, 26 марта 2021 (UTC)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✗ plicit 00:35, 5 апреля 2021 г. (UTC)

Удалить Согласен с номинатором, перенаправление выглядит как замаскированная реклама. Кстати, пользователь, создавший перенаправление, был заблокирован за sockpuppetry. Меньше, если только ( разговор ) 11:34, 5 апреля 2021 (UTC)
Перенацелить на Список производителей аккумуляторов для электромобилей, где была ILL, на BMZ [ de ] , но я только что изменил это на BMZ (немецкая компания) [ de ], потому что сейчас на BMZ котируются несколько компаний . Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 19:30, 5 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris ^talk!10:14, 12 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Перенацелить на: BMZ (Unternehmen). У нас нет статьи в Википедии на английском языке, в которой обсуждалась бы эта компания, и этот поисковый запрос действительно на немецком языке, поэтому перенаправление интервики было бы лучшим вариантом. 053pvr ( обсуждение ) 02:09, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)

Я категорически не согласен с этим - перенаправления на другие языковые проекты всегда удаляются с единодушной или почти единодушной поддержкой, когда они вносятся сюда, и у нас нет подходящего шаблона мягкого перенаправления, поскольку в основном пространстве должно быть 0 перенаправлений на другие языковые проекты. если вы хотите добавить ссылку на статью на немецком языке, вы должны использовать ссылку Template: Interlanguage , а не перенаправление. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 17:53, 13 апреля 2021 (UTC)

@ 053pvr : Обратите внимание, что de: BMZ (Unternehmen) - это межъязыковая ссылка в BMZ (немецкая компания) [ de ] (см. Мой комментарий выше). Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 11:58, 15 апреля 2021 (UTC)

{ꭜ, ꭝ, ꭞ, ꭟ} [ редактировать ]

ꭜ → Расширенная латиница-E ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]
ꭝ → Подстрочные и надстрочные индексы Unicode ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]
ꭞ → Расширенная латиница-E ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]
ꭟ → Подстрочные и надстрочные индексы Unicode ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure: (@subpage) ]

Should these redirects target the Unicode block or the generic article about superscripts? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

I think they should redirect to Teuthonista. That's what these characters are used for. In my mind, the fact that they're encoded in Unicode, or a specific block of Unicode, is secondary to what they're used for. For example, Ꜧ doesn't redirect to Unicode block Latin Extended-D, it redirects to Heng. It would be nice if these characters actually appeared in the Teuthonista article but I don't have the time or expertise to expand it. DRMcCreedy (talk) 16:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Teuthonista is my ideal destination but Unicode subscripts and superscripts would be my second choice. Not that I'll oppose any outcome of this discussion. DRMcCreedy (talk) 17:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

I think Latin Extended-E currently looks like the best target. My computer doesn't have a font that displays these characters, so I just see a box with e.g. "AB5F" in it. This target explains what U+AB5F is, and it seems to be the only one that does that at the moment. Sadly, it does not explain which language uses this character, which would be more encyclopedic. Assuming these symbols are only used for one purpose, I agree with DRMcCreedy that ideally, Teuthonista would be the target. But first I think it needs to list the characters and Unicode code points (and hopefully some day a picture, for those of us who don't have the right fonts) for each of the characters in this writing system so I could make sense of why I was redirected there. (We typically see that in a section titled something like "Computer encoding".) -- Beland (talk) 18:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
If these characters were put into Unicode for Teuthonista then that is where they should be directed to.Spitzak (talk) 18:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:49, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment: I am not quite a fan of targeting redirects at pages that do not mention them when mentions in other articles exist, so I would prefer a different target than the discussed Teuthonista. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Retarget to Latin Extended-E. That article is the only place where these characters are mentioned. 053pvr (talk) 02:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

शिवाजी महाराज[edit]

शिवाजी महाराज → hi:शिवाजी (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Delete, unless there is an appropriate local target for this page. Sending readers to non-English content is not helpful. Additionally, the plain {{soft redirect}} template is not used in the mainspace (along the lines of the sentiment expressed at WP:SOFTSP). See here for precedents. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 05:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Retarget back to Shivaji, which was the stable target for 7 years until last Saturday. This title translates as "Shivaji Maharaja". (That said, this is an {{R to article without mention}}, due to MOS:INDICSCRIPTS. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 05:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget per 61.239.39.90. 053pvr (talk) 02:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Nenetarun (talk) 11:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Defined Lines[edit]

Defined Lines → Blurred Lines#Parodies (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Not mentioned in the target article. Dominicmgm (talk) 03:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete not mentioned. 053pvr (talk) 02:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Less Unless (talk) 17:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Basit Saeed[edit]

Basit Saeed → List of Sialkot cricketers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Article was deleted at [4] (I closed). I fail to see how this is a logical redirect if the person is not notable. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:41, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Redirection to a list is a reasonable alternative to deletion isn't it? Given that the chap played five top-class cricket matches (see CricInfo) there's a claim that can be made about notability (if he played one Division 4 football match in the UK he'd "qualify" for an article), even if no information beyond stats can be found about him. The list didn't exist at the time the AfD was done; it does now. It's not an unreasonable redirect imo. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep This is a perfectly reasonable redirect IMO. BST is right I don't think the redirect existed at the time, and if it did so then it would have been discussed as a WP:ATD in the discussion. The majority of cricketers at AfD are resulting in redirect like this. FWIW the player also currently passes the cricket SNG (was deleted as there wasn't enough for GNG) so there is some notability there, just not enough for a full article. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:14, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete He is not mentioned in the article. 053pvr (talk) 02:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

053pvr, Have added him to the list. It's likely the list was made from Category:Sialkot cricketers and given the page was deleted before list created, is why he wasn't included. This shows he played for them though. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Tom Marlowe[edit]

Tom Marlowe → Brian Cox (physicist) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Not mentioned on target page, and I can find nothing online that links Brian Cox and Tom Marlowe - absolutely baffled why this redirect was created. Could be eligible for speedy as G1 or, given the creator's edit history, as G2. schetm (talk) 00:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguate. There are characters with the name in Good News (musical) (and a couple films based on the musical), Six Days, Seven Nights, a series of books by Chris Priestley, and a golfer who won the 1964 Pacific Northwest PGA Championship. A see also is Thomas Marlow, an English cricketer. If we include "Thomas Marlowe", there was an editor of the Daily Mail mentioned in a few articles. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:12, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Disambig per Tavix. 053pvr (talk) 02:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

April 11[edit]

Template:Taxonomy/Hildebrandtia[edit]

Template:Taxonomy/Hildebrandtia → Template:Taxonomy/Hildebrandtia (frog) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

To be deleted. Misleading, also genus of plants, see Hildebrandtia Estopedist1 (talk) 13:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment The template (with its original name) is required by pages such as Hildebrandtia ornatissima, which is now broken and showing a Lua error. Certes (talk) 13:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Revert template move and ask someone who maintains the Taxonomy templates to move this properly, I assume they must have some way of dealing with multiple genus' with the same name. Since Template:Taxonomy is called in other templates moving this has broken the infoboxes on a couple of articles, and some more updates to the Taxonomy templates will probably be needed to fix everything. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

@Certes: just add the row: | parent = Hildebrandtia (frog) --Estopedist1 (talk) 19:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Yes, that change is one part of the clean-up needed when moving a template like this. Certes (talk) 19:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete per nom. SCP-053 (talk) 02:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Mokick[edit]

Mokick → Scooter (motorcycle) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Delete completely, not redirect to a different target. German term, possibly slang, has no use or bearing in En Wiki. Created in 2011, there is no accompanying text, only redirect to title. A quick check for several random versions circa 2011/2012 returns no inclusion into the article body. Term is not part of UK culture, unlikely to be in US/Canada, IMO, unsure of Australian but would doubt it. Can't understand why this was created. FYI, a similar term is Kutte, meaning cut-off clothing, again not used and hardly known within En first speakers. Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete: Appears to refer to a specific type of light motorcycle (in de.wiki, Mokick redirects to Kleinkraftrad, which translates roughly to light motorcycle), but we have no mention of that in the target article on en.wiki. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Big (M|m)edia[edit]

Big media → Media conglomerate (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
Big Media → Concentration of media ownership (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

These redirects should target the same place. Note that both redirects have an old article in their history. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 20:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Convert Big Media to a disambig page and redirect Big media to Big Media since both target articles are a good choice. It is conventional to treat Big Oil, Big Tobacco etc as proper nouns so the capital M should be preferred User:GKFX^talk 20:16, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

I absolutely agree with you about the name, since it was parallelism with the "Big Tech" article that inspired me make the make the "Big Media" redirect. In thinking about a disambiguation page, it occurs to me that "Concentration of media ownership" and "Media conglomerate" aren't clearly distinctive topics. I made a suggestion to merge to merge the two articles at Talk:Concentration of media ownership#Merge with "Media conglomerate"?. -- RobLa (talk) 05:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Disambiguate. This could sensibly taget a number of articles, e.g. Media conglomerate, Concentration of media ownership, Mainstream media and Big Media Publishers, possibly also Mass media. I'm not seeing a primary topic as usage seems to be largely informal. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 20:19, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to "Concentration of media ownership". SCP-053 (talk) 02:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Corporate media[edit]

Corporate media → Media conglomerate (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

I think we should have another discussion about this. The first RfD closed with preference to send the recently-redirected article to AfD. The AfD closed as delete, but a few days later, the redirect was re-created. So here we are again. Last time the redirect was targeted to concentration of media ownership, this time it is targeted to media conglomerate. I think this target is better than the last one, but still not "right" IMO. My opinion is that Wikipedia should have something on the topic, whether a redirect, dab page, or stub. I might be leaning towards a dab page.

As an aside, I'm not comfortable with how this situation was procedurally handled. I think that it would have been better to at first discuss the merits of the redirect at RfD and if a consensus to delete occurred, it would be sent to AfD. That said, the old article due to its importance probably should've been discussed at AfD. I don't know really, but it seems wrong to end up back at RfD again. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 19:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

I created this redirect today. As the deleted article was apparently very old I think it is important to put something at that title, and the current target seemed to be the best of two options discussed at the AfD. A disambiguation page would also be an excellent idea. I've got no strong views on the final outcome, just that it shouldn't be left empty. User:GKFX^talk 20:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep "Corporate media" refers to media which is owned by a corporation, and "Media conglomerate seems o be the best title we've got. SCP-053 (talk) 02:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Peer-to-peer energy trading[edit]

Peer-to-peer energy trading → Net_metering#Virtual_net_metering (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Currently peer-to-peer energy trading redirects to a short section on 'Virtual Net Metering' on the 'Net Metering' page. This is justified by a reference to a 2016 conference paper, "The Potential Value of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in the Australian National Electricity Market". However, this is not consistent with the literature on peer-to-peer energy trading which has grown substantially since 2016. A better definition is that peer-to-peer energy trading is a market design architecture which enables participants to directly negotiate energy transactions with one another, for which metering is only a component (see e.g. "Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review" from Renew. Sustain. Energy Reviews doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.036). Virtual net metering is instead related to billing arrangements for off-site distributed generation which assumes there is a utility or supplier acting as an intermediary (see e.g. NREL's definition https://www.nrel.gov/state-local-tribal/basics-net-metering.html). My proposal is that instead of a redirect, a new page on 'Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading' is created, with suitable links to the net metering page where appropriate. Minister of the left (talk) 18:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep. There is nothing to stop an editor creating an article to replace the redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete That term is very obscure. Don't think anyone would search it. SCP-053 (talk) 02:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Paralvinella[edit]

Paralvinella → Alvinellidae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

One of two genera in this family, no reason to have a redirect - in fact, it's presence makes the creation of an article less likely. Animal lover 666 (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Deleteto inspire article creation. Alternatively retarget to Paralvinella sulfincola.Less Unless (talk) 11:36, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to existing species article in the genus (Paralvinella sulfincola). Definitely not delete - the aim here is to have a search target that gets the reader to a sensibly related article. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Craft City[edit]

Craft City → Bitz & Bob (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep Fictitious city, in Bitz and bob episodes. Episode setting. ACQ322Acuity (answer me) 10:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete: Not mentioned at target. Anyone who knows what Craft City is would know the programme- this isn't a TV fandom website. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete WP:FANCRUFT. SCP-053 (talk) 02:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Church-state relations[edit]

Church-state relations → Separation of church and state (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

I think this is an ambiguous redirect, and I don't think the current target is equivalent to it's name. There are a load of other articles on topics where there are relations between church and state which could also be valid targets, e.g. state religion and Religion in politics. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 17:19, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment. As creator of the redirect, I agree the target is not equivalent and happy for it to be redirected to another page like Church and State, for instance. --Caorongjin (talk) 17:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

I missed that dab page, retargeting there looks like an ideal solution. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 19:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Retarget to Church and State. (Not sure if I agree with the capitalization there, though, but that's a separate matter.) -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 22:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep. There's a hatnote at Separation of church and state—the target of Church and state—to the disambiguation page Church and State. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to "Church and State" per Caorongjin. There are many pages in that dab which this redirect could refer to. SCP-053 (talk) 02:05, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Heimin[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Joe Cell[edit]

Joe Cell → Perpetual motion (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Joe cell → Perpetual motion (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

These seem to be a non notable perpetual motion device that is not mentioned in the target article or anywhere else in the encyclopaedia. I can't tag these redirects as they were semi-protected due to the repeated recreation of spam, could someone please tag them on my behalf? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 17:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment: Tagged. Delete per nom. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete per all. SCP-053 (talk) 02:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Championnat de France de football féminin[edit]

Championnat de France de football féminin → Division 1 Féminine (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

I propose a retarget to Fédération des sociétés féminines sportives de France#Sports (or I can add an anchor to the specific paragraph on the inter-war championship on that page). As far as I can tell, Championnat de France de football féminin has only been used by the inter-war football championship, the most text of which is at the proposed location. Most of the Division 1 Féminine is the current (since 1974) competition, which doesn't seem to have used that name Joseph2302 (talk) 15:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 11:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Retarget per nom. GiantSnowman 11:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget per all. SCP-053 (talk) 02:31, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Nilpotent endomorphism[edit]

Nilpotent endomorphism → Nilpotent matrix (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Similarly to how Idempotent endomorphism redirects to the more general article Idempotent (ring theory), I suggest this be retargeted to Nilpotent. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Neutral for the two targets (not deletion though): On one hand, the nilpotent transformation in the second paragraph of Nilpotent matrix is precisely the notion of a nilpotent endomorphism (just for vector spaces) and may be more useful for someone searching specifically for nilpotent endomorphisms than the more general article (a reader of the more general article looking for nilpotent endomorphism may not realize that they need to consider a nilpotent endomorphism as an element of an endomorphism ring). On the other hand, the more general article is technically correct since a nilpotent endomorphism does not need to be on a vector space. — MarkH21^talk 17:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose if asked to take a side. The thing is the terms like "nilpotent endomorphism" mostly appear in the context of linear algebra or representation theory. Since it is synonymous with "nilpotent transformation" and that one redirects to "nilpotent matrix", this one needs to share the same target. (This is a matter of tension between common usage and math precision and the common usage should typically be weighted higher.) —- Taku (talk) 23:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete I don't think that this is actually a phrase. SCP-053 (talk) 02:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

@SCP-053: a google scholar search turns up loads of mathematical papers using this phrase, so clearly this is a real thing. We don't delete these kind of technical redirects because someone "thinks" it isn't a real phrase, we are guided by usage in reliable sources. I don't know enough about this topic to make a judgement, so I'm going to stay quiet in this discussion, but I would make the suggestion that you should really read the advice at WP:Contributing to complicated discussions. Knowing when you're out of your depth and don't know enough about a topic to make a sensible judgment is an important skill to have. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 18:21, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Business Information Systems[edit]

Business Information Systems → Management information system (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Business Information System → Management information system (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

"Business Information System" is not mentioned at the target in plural, singular, capitalised or uncapitalised forms. Is there a better target, or should these redirects be deleted as ambiguous (with, for example, YTJ (Finnish government service))? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep. It is a plausible search term for the subject of the article, so it is fine for the redirect to exist, even if it is not mentioned at the target. WP:HARMLESS. SCP-053 (talk) 02:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

SCP-053 I don't believe these are the same thing, I'm certainly not seeing them being used in an interchangeable way with a google search. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

The primary usage I seem to be getting when I search for these terms relates to the Bachelor of Business Information Systems degree, but I'm not sure that retargeting there would be appropriate. I'm leaning towards deletion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

MOS:Naming convention[edit]

MOS:Naming convention → Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

I was looking for Wikipedia:Naming conventions when I entered this; not sure the current target's topic can be called "naming conventions". 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Just to give some history: This redirect goes back a long way... there was a time back in the mid 2000s when we talked about articles having a “name”. This caused a lot of confusion because people were not sure whether we were referring to the name of the subject or the “name” of of the article (not always the same). We realized that we needed to separate these two concepts better, by shifting terminology... we decided to stop talking about an article’s NAME, and instead talk about an article’s TITLE.

So... we changed our WP:Naming conventions guideline (which mostly talked about how to “name” an article) to WP:Article titles (which was soon promoted to Policy status).

However, there were a few parts of the old WP:Naming conventions guideline that dealt with how to present the subject’s name beyond an article title, (such as whether to present nicknames in quotes or parentheses). These were primarily STYLE issues, so we hived these bits off, and created a separate MOS:Naming convention guideline to deal with these issues.

Hope this history helps clarify why the various policies and guidelines are (currently) entitled as they are, why the various redirects exist, and why they (currently) point where they do.

I spell it out not to support or object to any new proposals, but merely to inform the discussion. Blueboar (talk) 21:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

@Blueboar This makes sense to me, though I am still not sure if the target is really about "naming". I guess the hatnote which is already present at the target does help, and my search using "MOS:" instead of "WP:", which was my motivation for this nomination, was a bit unfortunate. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:10, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation, Blueboar. Since WP:Naming conventions refers to article titles, we could align this with MOS:TITLES and retarget it to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles. - Eureka Lott 14:42, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment: @EurekaLott This is the current target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Whoops, apologies for being oblivious. I guess that means I'm fine with keeping this as-is. - Eureka Lott 16:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Retarget to Wikipedia:Article titles. Probably what people are looking for when they typed this in. SCP-053 (talk) 02:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Someone seems to have pinged me here, althought I can't see their comment. SCP-053 (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Adio (company)[edit]

Adio (company) → K2 Sports#Adio (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

"Adio" is not mentioned at the target. I understand from Google that K2 once owned the brand (but doesn't now) so unless the article is going to mention that I think it's misleading to redirect to the current target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

It was merged in 2014, first to Jarden then moved to K2 Sports. It was recently made into a separate article again and removed from K2 Sports but was redirected again because of a copyright problem with the new article's content, and the section of the target page can still be restored and updated. If there is consensus that the mention there shouldn't be restored or it isn't a useful redirect, it would have to be moved somewhere out of the main namespace so there is still attribution for old revisions of the other articles. Peter James (talk) 14:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hog Farm _Talk 04:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep and add info about "Adio (company)" back into "K2 Sports" per Peter James. SCP-053 (talk) 02:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Joseph A. Manchin III**[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted

April 10[edit]

Þ̧[edit]

Þ̧ → Cedilla (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This is not one Unicode character, it uses the combining cedilla. There is no mention of it in the article ~~now and there wasn't when the redirect was created~~.[5][6] It was mentioned on the talk page (Talk:Cedilla#All these letters but no explanation was provided. It's an unlikely combination as there appears to be no language that uses both Þ and the cedilla. (It was included in a template but was removed in 2013[7].) Peter James (talk) 21:45, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

DKC TV cartoon.[edit]

DKC TV cartoon. → Donkey Kong#Donkey Kong Country (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Delete The full stop makes this a very unlikely search term UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete. This isn't Neon Genesis Evangelion. Dominicmgm (talk) 02:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete: The extraneous dot makes the redirect unlikely to be useful. DKC TV cartoon, however, would be reasonable. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 11:16, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete The period is not something someone would type looking this up. Also, if someone decides to create DKC TV cartoon the target should be Donkey Kong Country (TV series).--67.70.101.238 (talk) 02:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Technological Liberation[edit]

Technological Liberation → Technological unemployment (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

No mention of "liberation" at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:06, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete since not mentioned in the article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete; yes, "liberation" is not mentioned in the target: I wish creators of links like this would provide some justification for the link in their initial edit summary creating the link. ---Avatar317(talk) 00:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

DList of Dragon Ball Z episodes (season 9)[edit]

DList of Dragon Ball Z episodes (season 9) → Dragon Ball Z (season 9) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Delete very unlikely typo. Properly spelled List of Dragon Ball Z episodes (season 9) exists. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete looking at the history of the target page this was a typo introduced in an attempt to reverted an undiscussed page move in 2010 which was fixed about a minute later.--67.70.101.238 (talk) 02:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

DONAL HENAHAN[edit]

DONAL HENAHAN → Donal Henahan (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

DONALD THOMPSON MP → Donald Thompson (politician) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

DOKKA SEETHAMMA → Dokka Seethamma (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

DMITRENKO, Grigory → Hryhoriy Dmytrenko (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

DIVISIONAL PUBLIC SCHOOL AND INTER COLLEGE SAHIWAL PAKISTAN → Divisional Public School and College, Sahiwal (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

DIYAB, JIHAD AHMED MUJSTAFA → Jihad Ahmed Mustafa Dhiab (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Delete per WP:RCAPS UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:15, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Oppose for DONAL HENAHAN only. Donal Henahan's name is usually capitalized in print in The New York Times over his many decades as a writer; and many readers may copy paste his name into a search on wikipedia.4meter4 (talk) 20:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia's search does not require a capitalization match, and we don't have similar redirects for other Times writers (e.g. R. W. APPLE JR.), as doing so would certainly be WP:COSTLY. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
  That's an essay, and one that I don't think applies here. Maybe try applying WP:COMMON. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments aren't helpful.4meter4 (talk) 21:33, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep. I agree with 4meter4 that if a name is used in all caps, that it would be plausible to copy-paste it to Wikipedia in all caps. I think WP:RCAPS actually supports this interpretation, namely When there is a connection between the subject and an alternative capitalization, it is usually kept. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Except that even if the all caps is copy-pasted, we no longer need a redirect in order for the searchbox to function. Try it! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  - The search function isn't the only way of finding a redirect – many people use the URL bar to search (which is case-sensitive) for one. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Edens Zero[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: move has been reversed

Wikipedia:UC[edit]

Wikipedia:UC → Wikipedia:WikiProject University of California (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

It should be made a disambiguation, seeing that there are three other pages (Wikipedia:Changing username, Wikipedia:User contributions, and Wikipedia:User categories) that also fits the acronym. DePlume (talk) 06:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC) - edited on 18:00, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep, longstanding redirect, hatnotes are sufficient. —Kusma (𐍄·𐌺) 14:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- I am not debating the worthiness of keeping the redirect. I am debating its target. DePlume (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NotReallySoroka (talk • contribs)
  - Yes, I understand that. My thinking is that the shortcut does send people who know what it has been used for in the last 14 years to the right place. People who don't know and think it means "changing username" or "user categories" need an extra click to get to the place they want. If we change to a disambiguation page, nobody gets where they want to go directly (everyone has to do the extra click). Kind of defeats the purpose of a shortcut. —Kusma (𐍄·𐌺) 18:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguate per nom -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 09:02, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Not many uses, and some are intended to link to Wikipedia:User categories. WP:WPUC is unused and could redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject University of California. Peter James (talk) 17:28, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Great minds think alike, NotReallySoroka (talk) 03:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Taper ratio[edit]

Taper ratio → Chord (aeronautics) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

The quantity is mentioned only in passing in the target, and is also mentioned in a totally different context in Space elevator. The original article was an unsourced, 2-sentence stub that fails WP:DICDEF and lacked context. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Refine the target to Chord (aeronautics)#Tapered wing and put a section hatnote there to Space elevator#Cable materials. I did first spend a happy few minutes determining that Space elevator isn't an April Fool's joke. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (talk • work) 05:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Anthony Opoka[edit]

Anthony Opoka → Michael Patrick Mulroy (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Created by blocked UPE sockpuppet to promote Mulroy. This is the name of a person that has a passing mention in the target article, but does not seem to grant a redirect. MarioGom (talk) 13:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Nasibi[edit]

Nasibi → Shia–Sunni relations (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This term does not appear anywhere in the article, much less with a reliable source, so there is no context to its relationship to Shias and Sunnis. ... discospinster _talk 16:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

This was an article until it was redirected last year as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasibi. - Eureka Lott 16:52, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Gents (Swedish band)[edit]

Gents (Swedish band) → Pebbles, Volume 28 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
The Gents (Swedish band) → Pebbles, Volume 28 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

The redirect target, a compilation album that one of this band's songs appears on, has now itself been redirected as non-notable. The band is not mentioned anywhere else on Wikipedia as far as I can tell, so these redirects should be deleted. Lennart97 (talk) 00:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

April 9[edit]

Vietnam flashback[edit]

Vietnam flashback → Vietnam War (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

An editor changed it from Post-traumatic stress disorder to the current redirect but I feel it should target the former instead seeing as it's a nickname for PTSD. Instead of potentially starting an edit war I'm gonna leave it to be discussed. Dominicmgm (talk) 20:01, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Return to original target. PTSD is much more relevant that the history of the war.--Grahame (talk) 08:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Rosen Trap[edit]

Rosen Trap → Swindle (chess) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Not mentioned in target. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Changed redirect to List of chess traps. Sun Creator^(talk) 21:04, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Incorrect redirect, as the Rosen Trap is a swindle, not a trap. I'll revert to the original redirect. Maxipups Mamsipupsovich (talk) 21:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Abdulla2021/sandbox[edit]

Talk:Abdulla2021/sandbox → Draft:Sudan Bookshop (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Was mistakenly moved here and then moved to the draft namespace. FF-11 (talk) 18:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Allentown, Pennsylva.[edit]

Allentown, Pennsylva. → Allentown, Pennsylvania (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Nothing links here and Pennsylva. is not a standard abbreviation for Pennsylvania. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 17:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep The U.S. HUD uses "Pennsylva" as an abbreviation for Pennsylvania here, as "Allentown, Pennsylva" https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/SPM/documents/CC_PA-100119.docx "Allentown PENNSYLVA 18102" WhisperToMe (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep per above. If the government uses it, it's good for us. Dominicmgm (talk) 12:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep - government-used abbreviation, making this reasonable. Hog Farm _Talk 04:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
~~Delete~~ - It's not a government-used abbreviation, the full text is Pennsylvania. It's just that the Nia goes onto the next line. Here is a screenshot to substantiate my point: snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 20:16, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Stricken duplicate !vote – your nomination counts as a !vote. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

UNC-R[edit]

UNC-R → North Carolina State University (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

The abbreviation "UNC-R" has never been a correct name for NC State, and the usage of "UNC-R" is mostly a derogatory reference from rival schools who would already know how to find the article on Wikipedia under the correct name. I even checked the creator's user page, it indicates that he went to UNC-CH, which is usually the source of unwarranted references to "UNC-R". 2600:1700:FDF1:1FC0:D83F:388:E5D5:D1A5 (talk) 17:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment the article states this was founded as the University of North Carolina facility in Raleigh as North Carolina College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, so it would seem to be a viable search term. I don't see where the letters UNC-R become derogatory, as it seems to state what it was when it was founded. I don't seem any expletives in those letters, unless there is an expanded acronym that elides the swear words. You could tag it as a {{R from incorrect term}} -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 00:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Met Him Last Night (Demi Lovato song)[edit]

Met Him Last Night (Demi Lovato song) → Dancing with the Devil... the Art of Starting Over (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

An article already exists for Met Him Last Night, and this redirect points to the album that it's on, instead of pointing to its own article. Even if it pointed to its own article, I would say it's unnecessary. I'd like to delete it to prevent further confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dylx (talk • contribs) 14:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete both "Met Him Last Night (song)" and "Met Him Last Night (Demi Lovato song)" both are redirected to Dancing with the Devil... the Art of Starting Over and were created by unregistered accounts/unverified editors when the original target Met Him Last Night was redirected before the topic became notable. Both redirects are unrequired. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 16:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep and redirect it to Met Him Last Night. This redirect is valid and harmless, and a plausible search term. I want to note that there were similar RFDs at this discussion and this discussion. All responses to both of these were "keep". CountyCountry (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to Met Him Last Night per CountyCountry. That's what people are looking for when they search this term. Why have it redirect to the album if there's already an article on the song? Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 22:55, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget per CountyCountry. Vaticidalprophet 11:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete. To keep deliberately created name space redirects would be totally against the principals of Wikipedia:Article titles. Either the article is at the correct place or it is not, if redirects are necessary then Article titles needs to be re-written. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'm confused – are you saying that redirects wouldn't exist if article titles are right? Because that's a very odd interpretation. Should United States of America be deleted, or what? — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  No, J947, I am saying the title, Met Him Last Night, is sufficient. When typing the title out in the search engine, does anyone continue until they find (song) or even (Demi Lovato song)? Or is the actual title of the song sufficient? Nobody will see these redirects. If you are arguing that the title itself is not sufficient, then you need to review Article Naming, which confirms that the actual title is sufficient unless disambiguation is necessary. Both redirects, before even being listed here are tagged as 'unnecessary disambiguation' and those wishing to keep them are saying we need unnecessary disambiguation. That doesn't make sense.--Richhoncho (talk) 22:46, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  Many people ignore search suggestions and keep typing, and the search engine is definitely not the only case of a redirect's usage. This redirect may not be needed, but it sure is helpful. How exactly would deleting this redirect benefit the encyclopedia? — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 23:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  Define helpful? J947. --Richhoncho (talk) 13:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
  Richhoncho, it is helpful to people searching in both the URL bar and the search bar, and as Tavix says it is helpful for linking. How is deleting the redirect helpful? — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 23:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
  Firstly in your last but one post you said that searchers will keep searching until they have completed their search term, so the extra parenthesis words are a disadvantage to them, and you still have failed to explain the helpfulness in any way that is meaningful to me. secondly, the argument that unnecessary disambiguations help because... 'it works well in songs,' but I can't think of another WP situation where that might be the case, which makes it music exceptionalism, and thirdly, it is not helpful for linking, instead of one change necessary, we now need 3. This is why deletion of unnecessary disambiguation is not disadvantageous to anybody save those that think their particular favorite artist is bigger than everybody else's. Finally, we are talking about redirects. In the future nobody will need or see them. They will become electronic clutter. --Richhoncho (talk) 23:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
  Sorry, but I'm not understanding your arguments very well here and I don't think you're understanding mine. Firstly, the readers often keep searching until they complete the search that they want to search for. They don't keep going as long as there's an option in the search bar left – why would they do that? What's music exceptionalism? It is helpful for linking as Tavix explained. Simply stating it is not helpful for linking does not invalidate that. Why would three changes be required by keeping this redirect? And why would this be searched up by those that think their particular favorite artist is bigger than everybody else's? I'd like to reiterate that it is helpful to readers who search this term up, as you don't seem to acknowledge that. It's a perfectly plausible search term because so many article titles are titled in this manner.
  Now Richhoncho, after reading my comment, answer this: How exactly would deleting this redirect benefit the encyclopedia? — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 02:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to Met Him Last Night as an {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. These redirects are useful when an unambiguous link is desired that we know will not need to be updated if another song by the name becomes notable. Redirects are not articles, so the article title policy is irrelevant. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to Met Him Last Night per above. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 23:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Enola(Waterworld)[edit]

Enola(Waterworld) → Waterworld#Cast (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Malformed redirect with lack of space. Dominicmgm (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete per nom. I recently created the correctly formatted Enola (Waterworld) that redirects to this one's target. Also, during the malformed one's time as an article about the character, it was never moved to the correct counterpart. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 19:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

London Buses route 659[edit]

London Buses route 659 → List of bus routes in London#600–699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Non-existent London Bus route which has never ever existed before. Could be potentially speedy deleted but I'm taking it to RfD. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

London Buses route 691[edit]

London Buses route 691 → List of bus routes in London#600–699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Non-existent London Bus route from a quick search on the TfL website at [8]. May have existed in the past but currently doesn't exist. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

According to the creation edit summary this was a school bus route, and is supposed to be targeting List of London school bus routes, which was deleted in 2009 following this AfD nomination. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

London Buses route N13[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Withdrawn

London Buses route 611[edit]

London Buses route 611 → List of bus routes in London (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Makes no sense to have a redirect called "London Buses route 611" when the 611 bus isn't a London Bus at all. A more sensible redirect would be something like Uno Buses Route 611 redirected to List_of_bus_routes_in_London#Non-TfL_bus_routes_in_Greater_London. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Note - From my analysis of Non-TfL bus routes, the 611 and the 614 below are the only bus route redirects which aren't TfL bus routes. There are no others. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:50, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep and refine to the "Non-TfL bus routes in Greater London" section. Plausible search term, and there is a bus route numbered 611 in the list. The vast majority of searcher's aren't going to know or care who the operator is, or that it isn't technically a London Buses route, they'll just be looking for information on bus route 611 that operates in London, and having one route that doesn't follow the standard naming pattern for the hundreds of other routes in the list is likely to be more confusing than helpful. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
No because the other Non-TfL bus routes do not have redirects and it's implausible because London Buses do not operate the 611 bus. There is no London Buses route 420, London Buses route 515 or the other non-TfL bus routes in the list. Also, it's a rarely used search term. Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep and refine per the ip above. That WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESN'TEXIST (but should) is irrelevant. Redirects exist to help people find the content they are looking for, regardless of whether they know all the details about it before they've read the content. There is a route 611 that runs in London and so this is a perfectly logical search term. Thryduulf (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
@Thryduulf: I am still not convinced to why it's okay to have a redirect starting with "London Buses" for a bus route that isn't operated by London Buses. This redirect and the other one below both aren't rarely used. Secondly, if I put all the points that I made aside, a quick look on the Uno bus tracker website shows that the 611 bus service is non-existent. There is a 614 bus but there's not 611 bus. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:03, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
I used the Uno bus tracker website which is here. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
The 611 only runs during the day Monday to Friday during University term times[9] so, it's not surprising that they aren't featured on the bus tracker on a Saturday evening during the Easter holiday. As for the London Buses prefix, it's acceptable because it's plausible that someone looking for a bus route in London will look for a page starting "London Buses route" whether that service is operated by London Buses or not. See Category:Redirects from incorrect names for thousands of other examples of redirects that are not correct being used to guide people to the content they are looking for. Just because a redirect is lightly used does not mean it's harmful, and we do not delete redirects unless they are. Thryduulf (talk) 22:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
@Thryduulf: Actually, no. The 610, 612 and 614 bus routes are not in service today but are still featured on the Uno bus tracker website saying when they will next be in service. This is not the case with the 611 bus; it's literally non-existent. If the 611 bus existed, it would show on the bus tracker website saying when the next 611 bus service will run on which day. Also, if you think it's so useful, why can't it be moved to something like London Buses route 611 (Non-TfL)? Right now, it's so misleading because it looks like it is going to a 611 bus route operated by TfL which doesn't exist. How about support the alternative proposal of moving it? Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
London Buses route 611 (Non-TfL) would not be a plausible search term so I oppose that suggestion. The whole point is that we do not require people to know the operator before they look it up. Redirects do not have to be correct, they simply need to be plausible search terms. If they are incorrect then the target should correct any misunderstands, misrememberings, etc. and this one does. Thryduulf (talk) 11:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
@Thryduulf: Why would it not be plausible? It's a Non-TfL bus route and it would come up if someone typed up "London Buses route 611" in the search bar, it would come up. If not deletion, at least moving it to a more correct name would make sense. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
The internal search engine is only one of many different ways people use to find Wikipedia content and one of only a minority where search suggestions are available. There is only one route 611 so disambiguation is not needed, but even if it was needed then the undisambiguated title would always either redirect to the primary topic or disambiguate between them meaning that even if moved (and see WP:MOVEREDIRECT for why it's generally better not to do that) a redirect at this title would still be needed. Thryduulf (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

London Buses route 614[edit]

London Buses route 614 → Uno (bus company) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Implausible redirect because the 614 bus isn't a London Bus route, it's a Hertfordshire bus route. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Retarget to List of bus routes in London#Non-TfL bus routes in Greater London. Much of this route is in London so this is (as explained in the nominations above) a very plausible search term, we don't require readers to know everything about what they are looking up in an encyclopaedia before they have looked it up. The list article is more helpful as a target though as it details the specific route with a link to the operator (the current target) for those that are looking for that. Thryduulf (talk) 18:41, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Com.com[edit]

Com.com → CNET (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

As of 2021 http://com.com does no longer redirect to CNET but is instead parked. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:19, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep. The URL is mentioned at the target article, and as far as I can tell, that's the only place it's mentioned. There are a bunch of articles with faulty references like nytimes.com.com, so I might have overlooked something. - Eureka Lott 15:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:04, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Chees[edit]

Chees → Cheese (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Recognising that April Fools is now over and that this is a proper RfD, this redirect should be deleted. It's tagged as a misspelling but it could refer to cheese, chess, cheers, etc. An alternative could be to retarget to Cheez but I prefer deletion. Anarchyte (talk • work) 05:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

There's also the Chees (disambiguation) redirect, that might be worth bundling here. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Redirect to Chee; the surname can have a plural, not sure if the others can, but any other significant uses can be mentioned there. Peter James (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:04, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Redirect to Chee, for the same reason as Peter James. Kokopelli7309 (talk) 23:19, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. None of the entries at Chee naturally take a plural. As a typo, too ambiguous to be useful. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment both the given name and the surname nautrally take plural forms. Like "keeping up with the Joneses" uses the plural form for "Jones", a surname. "there are 3 Toms in class" takes the plural for "Tom", a given name. Thus the given name and surname "Chee" can use "Chees" as plural. -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 08:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  Yes, but Chee just has links for Chee (surname) or Chee (given name), rather than a list of names that could be plural. I guess searchers could be seeking a list of people with the name, which would be plural because there are multiple such people with articles. In such a case it seems like a pretty week search term if that's what was really being sought, which seems unlikely, and will bring the searcher to a dab page where none of the entries can be plural and they still have to choose given name or surname. So search results seem better here to me, given the potential that it could just be a typo as discussed above. There seems to be no consistent way to handle plurals of names. For example Nicks targets Nix (surname) rather than Nick or Nick (disambiguation) (though there is a hatnote). Joneses targets The Joneses and not Jones or any of its entries. (These could probably benefit from RfDs too, as I'm not sure their current targets are best.) Mdewman6 (talk) 01:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete or disambiguate unorthodoxly as ambiguous. The vast majority of readers finding this redirect will not be looking for Chee and as such, a retarget there would be suboptimal in my opinion. Cheese and chess are likely what most readers are looking for. J947^{'s public account} 23:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

DSV limiting Factor[edit]

DSV limiting Factor → DSV Limiting Factor (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Nothing links to this redirect. The redirect is improperly capitalized (it's a ship's name). Renamed to [DSV Limiting Factor], seeking to delete this redirect. sbb (talk) 18:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete. @Sbb: redirects generally aren't moved (WP:MOVEREDIRECT) but never mind. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete as housekeeping per nominators rationale. Less Unless (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep, miscapitalisations are perfectly plausible search terms. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 04:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep as a miscapitalization and as record of a page move. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Does the Flower Bloom?[edit]

Does the Flower Bloom? → Does the Flower Blossom? (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This is my first time nominating a redirect for discussion, so I apologize in advance if I'm doing something wrong. I was wondering if this redirect is valid? "Does the Flower Bloom?" is a fan-translated title for the series that seemed to have appeared when the live-action film was released despite "Does the Flower Blossom?" being used as a title since 2015. lullabying (talk) 06:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep: If it's a translation in use amongst fans, it's reasonable to expect people will look for or recognize the title. Vaticidalprophet 11:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Muscle fiber[edit]

Muscle fiber → Skeletal muscle#Muscle fibers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
Muscle fibers → Skeletal muscle#Muscle fibers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
Muscle fibers, fast-twitch → Myocyte#Fiber types (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
Muscle fibre → Myocyte (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
Muscle fibres → Skeletal muscle (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Target had been Myocyte for six years, recently changed w/o discussion. MB 18:28, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Weak keep In my medically uninformed assessment, the new target does appear to be more appropriate than the old one. MB, is there any specific issue that you have with the new target other than a procedural concern? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Rosguill, No, just a long standing redirect changed without discussion or much reason ("better target"). I am similarly uninformed and after looking at both articles wasn't sure and was trying to get a more expert opinion. Aren't muscle fibers found in all types of muscle, not just skeletal muscle? If so, why is the target an article on skeletal muscle rather than Myocyte which seems to be more broad. MB 20:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Given that the long-standing redirect was the product of a bot-correction of a double redirect, I wouldn't implicitly put much faith in the old redirect target, even if it has been around for 5 years. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:33, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Involved relist to add related redirects
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

I've added some related redirects that MB found, but am still not sure what the best solution here is (other than that most of thse should probably point at th same place). Simply pointing to Muscle may be appropriate. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep as redirects for Myocyte. We had this discussion before "muscle fiber" /" muscle fibre" is a synonym of "muscle cell", which is the definition of myocyte. The redirection to Skeletal muscle leaves out the fact that muscle fibres/fibers occur in cardiac tissue as well as in skeletal muscle. It is also a vertebrate centric change. There are invertebrate animals (without skeletons) that have muscle fibers, but they do not have skeletons and therefore have no skeletal muscle. The undiscussed change to the redirect is unwarranted. Also, it is not clear what the previous "keep" vote is for. None of these redirects are up for deletion are they? The term "muscle fiber" / "muscle fibre" is extremely common in the literature, so deletion or the redirects would not make sense. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep as is - muscle cell still redirects to myocyte ; the redirects were made in accordance with the MeSH entry which distinguishes between myocyte and muscle fiber still referring to myocyte for cardiac muscle cell.[10] Do invertebrates have muscle cells or muscle fibers? As far as I can see a muscle fiber only refers to a skeletal muscle cell. Otherwise this could be mentioned in Other animals.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:39, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Muscle tissue consists of elongated cells also called as muscle fibers - taken from muscle tissue page.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Also image used in infobox on skeletal muscle page uses diagram from Seer cancer training clearly showing use of muscle fiber describing it as a single cell and multi-nuclear.[11] --Iztwoz (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

@Iztwoz: The the MeSH entry is specifically about human medicine. It does not cover non-human biology. Muscle fibers are found in nearly all animals (except sponges). Using the the MeSH entry over other viewpoints violates WP:NPOV.
But even in humans, muscle cell/fibers occur in both skeletal and cardiac muscle. See pp.276-284 in Marieb & Hoehn, Human Anatomy & Physiology, 8th edition, which is a standard textbook in universities. I quote from page 276: "First, skeletal and smooth muscle cells ... are called muscle fibers." So fibres are synonymous with "cell" in muscle tissue, and are not restricted in use of the term to skeletal muscle.
It is easy to find evidence of the term used for invertebrates, for example in this paper on the hydrodynamics of jellyfish swimming: [12] "Swimming via jet propulsion involves contraction of circular muscle fibers "Swimming via jet propulsion involves contraction of circular muscle fibers..." Or also this article [13] on contractile strength of muscle fibres in giant clams. In this article muscle fibre is even a keyword for the article. --EncycloPetey (talk) 22:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Multiplikator[edit]

Multiplikator → Multiplication (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
Multiplikand → Multiplication (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

These were mass-created by a script, and might fall afoul of WP:RFOREIGN, since multiplication doesn't have a special connection to German. Delete them unless a justification can be provided. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 00:00, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete per nom, no connection to the language. The editor who made this made about 500 of these redirects with a bot, which I've slowly been sorting through. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 08:40, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. D.Lazard (talk) 09:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Implausible in this context. Less Unless (talk) 21:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment "Multiplikator" can be taken as a {{R from typo}} for multiplicator and retargeted to Schur multiplier where "multiplicator" leads to. "Multiplikand" can be taken as a {{R from typo}} for multiplicand, and is thus correctly targeted -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 08:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Lexi Rabe[edit]

Lexi Rabe → Silk Road (2021 film) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

The target article has little to do with the subject of 'Lexi Rabe', other than her being a cast member. It does not contain any info about her, and is confusing for someone who searches for the subject. The redirect should therefore be deleted.IronManCap (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

April 8[edit]

Caroline Henry[edit]

Caroline Henry → Carol Henry (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Delete as misleading. Unlikely that any English first speaker would confuse the two variants. Page stats show that the few views that have occurred are consistent with Caroline Henry (wife of Conservative MP Darren Henry) being announced as a candidate for Police and Crime Commissioner. I checked per BEFORE when updating the PCC article. For me, there's nothing more frustrating that arriving at an inappropriate link. Old RfD = delete on 11 August 2018 refers to a non-notable Caroline Henry [journalist), can't understand why this was created 16 February 2019?

Rocknrollmancer (talk) 00:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep. Name redirects are common — Jonathan may redirect to Jon, William may redirect to Will, Katherine may redirect to Kate, Charles may redirect to Charlie, Robert may redirect to Rob, etc. "Carol Henry" is contained entirely within "Caroline Henry", thus it may be of help to some users searching for similar names. On the other hand, no one would benefit if "Caroline Henry" were to become a redlink. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nominator. No such person is listed on the disambiguation page, and we regularly delete "name variant + surname" redirects where there is no evidence that any person in Wikipedia actually uses the variant name: see e.g. RfDs for Samantha Leach, Billy Bentinck, or this whole bunch. Meanwhile, per WP:R#D10, a redlink is a valuable signal to readers & editors alike that we lack an article about the potentially-notable Police and Crime Commissioner Candidate. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 05:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment I didn't think to check until reading the argument above, but Carolina Henry was likewise created 2 minutes afterwards. FYI only.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 12:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Coalición Cívica[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy retarget.

Incompetent valves[edit]

Incompetent valves → Heart valve (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Incompetent valve → Heart valve (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ] added by 61.239.39.90 (talk) 13:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Valvular incompetence → Valvular heart disease (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ] added by 61.239.39.90 (talk) 13:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

I don't believe that this specific term is mentioned at the target. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 08:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Keep. Incompetent valves, and Incompetent valve, is used to refer to heart valves, and as far as I can see nothing else, although I agree a mention would be useful. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment venous valves can be incompetent [14]; chronic venous insufficiency briefly mentions valvular incompetence too. Out of my depth in this subject area, so I'm not sure what's the best solution here - a mention at Regurgitation (circulation)? 61.239.39.90 (talk) 13:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow for a full 7 days' consideration for the redirects added since the discussion was first opened.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Put to the sword[edit]

Put to the sword → No quarter (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This could also refer to Capital punishment. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 07:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Soft Redirect to it's wiktionary entry? I couldn't find any articles discussing this phrase. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- See Google book search "put to the sword" "no quarter" to see that the two terms are very closely related. One is the action of killing when no quarter has given. Quite a few of these books refer to the end of Cromwell's siege of Drogheda and "put to the sword" is used idiomatically as Cromwell in his report uses the term "knocked on the head" for the way they tended to kill priests and others. -- PBS (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Actually checking the report Cromwell uses both the sword and head descriptions: "were ordered by me to put them all to the Sword; and indeed being in the heat of action, I forbade them to spare any that were in Arms in the Town" and "I believe all their Fryers were knockt on the head promiscuously". The phrases sword quarter also often used in conjunction about the Siege of the Alamo eg The Edinburgh Review - Volumes 73-74 - Page 265 1841; and in popular culture for exam in Ballad of the Alamo 1:51–2:00 "Santa Anna ... roared./"I will show them no quarter, everyone will be put to the sword." (I use the song, not as a reliable source about the Alamo, but to show that these terms are not obscure academic ones but are also used together in popular culture and therefore widely understood). -- PBS (talk) 13:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
  - I'm aware of the connection between the two terms, but "Put to the sword" is also used extensively as an idiom in contexts unrelated to military events, a football themed example from the telegraph - "Scotland put to the sword by Belgium". While the usage in that context is related to No Quarter in the sense that it's referring to showing no mercy it isn't 100% equivalent to the military usage. I think a soft redirect to the wiktionary entry which defines three usages of the phrase in conjunction with either a hatnote or see also section to related concepts would be more helpful to searchers, especially since the phrase isn't mentioned in the current target. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 19:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
    - @86.23.109.101 ] That is true for the term "no quater" as well eg BBC report "Michael Johnson (left) and David Nielsen show no quarter". If we were to do as you suggest then there are lots of terms that are used as idioms that would have to have their articles scrapped and be replaced with link to Wiktionary. The primary meaning of the term is "no quater" and the average reader is more than capable of understanding the difference between the true meaning a sporting idiom eg "it was murder out there" does not mean that the opposing teams were literally murdering each other. -- PBS (talk) 07:34, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
As far as I know (PBS) "put to the sword" is not a phrase that means capital punishment; User:Mr. Guye do you have any examples? As to redirecting it to Wiktionary why when the term no quarter is covered by laws of war "it is especially forbidden ... to declare that no quarter will be given" and as the OED defines it that is precisely what the term put to the sword means (meaning 3 in the OED) -- which is not to execute but to use in the military to slaughter with the sword:
- 3. [Sword]
  - a. transferred. The use of the sword in warfare, massacre, etc.; hence, slaughter; warfare; military force or power; also, the military profession or class, the army.
  - b. to put (†do) to the sword, to kill or slaughter with the sword.
I suggest that if anything is to be done to this redirect it is done by bringing reliable sources to the discussion. So far neither User:Mr. Guye or 86.23.109.101 have presented any evidence as to why this redirect is not correct. -- PBS (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Googling and discovering that sometimes "put to the sword" and "no quarter" were used near each other can indicate that the author thought they were different things (else why be redundant?), and "no quarter" doesn't necessarily involve swords or even involve killing -- my reliable source is a dictionary. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 20:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Histoire[edit]

Histoire → History (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

~~Delete~~. While "histoire" is French for "history" the primary meaning given by Wiktionary is "story" (cf WP:RFOREIGN). The incoming article-space links expect an article about a TV channel, the project-space links expect a journal (possibly [15]). Additionally I'm undecided whether it would be a plausible search term for L'Histoire (a magazine), although I would oppose redirecting it there as it is neither a journal nor a TV channel - it would definitely merit a disambiguation see also and maybe a hatnote though. Thryduulf (talk) 02:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

I've actually just found that we do have an article about the TV channel, at Histoire TV, which notes that the channels name was just "Histoire" from 1997-2019, this should be probably be retargeted there instead of being deleted (I found it on page 3 of search results). I can't find that we have an article on the journal, but as we do have articles about many other journals with this word in their title I'm not certain of that. If we do, I'm unsure whether disambiguation should be primary or by hatnote? Thryduulf (talk) 02:59, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguate per Thryduulf's findings. Add one of those in title or look from searches, add See also to History. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:51, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Editors appear to be split between retargeting and disambiguating.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguate between the two uses found here, and a wiktionary link; add a see also for Historia (TV channel), the French language TV channel in Canada, and History (disambiguation) -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 20:41, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Dominican passport[edit]

Dominican passport → Dominica passport (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Ambiguous redirect. "Dominican" can mean either the Commonwealth of Dominica or the Dominican Republic. Additionally, there are many more people from the Dominican Republic than the State of Dominica. Persons from the Dominican Republic are called Dominicans as well, with the pronunciation different from that of people from the State of Dominica. This redirect has been maintained for 11 years, when the page was moved to prevent ambiguity with the Dominican Republic. Eyesnore 14:53, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguate with Dominican Republic passport and Dominica passport -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 20:42, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguate per Ip user. Less Unless (talk) 21:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

P-I[edit]

P-I → PI (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This previously pointed to Seattle Post-Intelligencer, but was retargeted today by 67.70.27.246 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). It's always hard to search for terms that differ only in punctuation from a better-known term (in this case PI or P.I.), so I can't say for certain that "P-I" refers to the Post-Intelligencer the significant majority of the time, but there's nothing else at the DAB page where you'd expect to find a hyphen in the abbreviation. The only other entry with a hyphen in it is Provider-independent address space, but I don't think "P-I" is frequently used to refer to those. Special:PrefixIndex/P-I yields seven other results, all redirects, only one of which seems potentially shortenable to "P-I", namely P-I dyad; however, its target page, interval cycle, shows that "P/I dyad" is the preferred nomenclature. On this basis, I propose restoring the Post-Intelligencer as target. -- Tamzin (they/she) | o toki tawa mi. 13:36, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Commnet "P-I" is one of the attributive forms for abbreviations PI or P.I.; so can be used with several of the topics listed at the disambiguation page. It's also an unusual alternate form of "P.I." abbreviations that I've encountered some times in the past. If it is restored to Post-Intelligencer, then a hatnote should be added leading back to the disambiguation page -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 20:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Astrophysicien[edit]

Astrophysicien → Astrophysics (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

TWP:RLOTE, no connection between astrophysics and French. This is also a semi-incorrect translation, in that it means the career of being an Astrophysicist, rather than the area of study. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete: Don't need random foreign language redirects, especially if they're grammatically incorrect Joseph2302 (talk) 07:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Strahlung[edit]

Strahlung → Radiation (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

WP:RLOTE, no specific connection between radiation and the German language. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment. There's at least one case where the German word is used in English - Bremsstrahlung. Narky Blert (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete: Don't need random foreign language redirects, doesn't seems to be an appropriate target for it on en.wiki. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Acustica[edit]

Acustica → Acoustics (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

WP:RLOTE. Acoustics is a general concept with no specific affinity to the Italian language. We do have a dab page at Acústica, this could be retargeted there as an {{R to diacritic}}? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Retarget ~~to Acoustica as a {{R from typo}}~~ -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 20:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Retarget to Acústica per Tamzin; fair enough, I missed that one. -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 08:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to Acústica. To me, as long as there's only one {{R to diacritic}} candidate, that should take priority over any {{R from typo}}, as users generally expect diacritic-free titles to redirect to their diacritic forms. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 04:21, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

London Buses route W10[edit]

London Buses route W10 → List of bus routes in London#Wxx (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Non-existent bus route. The W10 bus route has been replaced by the 456 bus route last month. I have created a redirect for the 456 bus route at London Buses route 456. The W10 bus route redirect is no longer required as it's now a non-existent bus route, Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete. Per nom. Non existent former route. Ajf773 (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep, now redirects to a more relevant section. Lilporchy (talk) 06:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
@Lilporchy: I agree that it redirects to a more relevant section but I am disappointed with the addition of the former routes section in the List of bus routes in London article; former bus routes in London isn't a notable topic just like former bus routes in any other major city wouldn't be notable. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:51, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Notability guidelines do not apply to content within articles, and articles can cover aspects of a subject that would not be notable alone, see WP:NNC. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
You need proper sourcing to have such lists. Point me to a source which has a list of former London bus routes? There isn't so the table of former London bus routes has to go to the bin. Don't point me to Wikipedia policy; I'm aware of Wikipedia policy. Actually point me to proper sourcing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep. Suitability as a redirect is not temporary. If it was a plausible search term as an active bus route, it's a plausible search term as a former bus route. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 19:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep: Plausible search term, adequately explained in the article. Don't know what people's obsession is with removing redirects to former London bus routes.... They're still just as plausible search terms even if defunct. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Physiker[edit]

Physiker → Physicist (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Physicien → Physicist (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

WP:RLOTE. No specific connection between the career of being a physicist and the French/German languages. Mass created by a script. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Retarget "physicien" to Physician as a {{R from typo}} -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 20:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete #1, retarget #2, per 67.70. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 04:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Pragmatismo[edit]

Pragmatismo → Pragmatism (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

WP:RLOTE. No connection between pragmatism and the italian language. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Russian Automobile Federation[edit]

Russian Automobile Federation → List of FIA member organisations (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Nominating for deletion. The target provides no information on the subject. Literally nothing apart from confirmation that this is the official name and that it exists. This redirect therefore serves no purpose other than to remove red links. Given there is a draft, WP:RfD#D10 also applies.
SSSB (talk) 07:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete per nom. No information whatsoever in the article about the Russian Automobile Federation other than perhaps what can be gleamed from the name anyway. Definitely better off as a redlink. A7V2 (talk) 12:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
~~Weak~~ keep given the nomination premise is false. Redirecting to List of FIA member organisations doesn't give the reader a fount of knowledge, but it does show that the RAF is an FIA member responsible for sport and mobility. While that isn't a great deal, it certainly isn't Literally nothing apart from confirmation that this is the official name and that it exists and it is more informative than a red link. While WP:RfD#D10 could certainly apply here, the draft does not currently meet the WP:GNG threshold and isn't going to anytime soon. Simply that a draft exists is a pretty weak reason to delete a redirect if you ignore the quality of the draft.
5225C (talk • contributions) 13:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete It just wasn't necessary to create a redirect to avoid a redlink. That could have been simply done by implementing a piped link to the section in the article that mentions this subject. However since the text is a really self-explanatory and the subject does not appear to have the notability to warrant a standalone article, a link was really necessary at all.Tvx1 22:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Weak keep. As Nikita Mazepin competes in Formula One under an "RAF" flag given the WADA ban on the Russian flag, readers would wonder what the Russian Automobile Federation is. Reminder of WP:OTHERSTUFF - just because many other automobile federations don't have redirects doesn't mean this one should go. The redirect is here out of a need to remove an outstanding red link that has 32 mainspace links to it. Spa-Franks (talk) 12:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

@Spa-Franks: To remove red-links is not a valid reason to keep a redirect. Redlinks are desirable in cases where an article could plausibly be created as it makes it clear that no such article exists. Hence reason to delete a redirect number 10. A7V2 (talk) 22:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

No, but RAF is a viable search term, and addressing potential search terms is one potential role of a redirect. As I noted above (and Joseph2302 has mentioned below), the RAF draft is not showing promising signs so while RfD#D10 is applicable to the letter, it isn't useful in practice (WP:NOTBURO).
5225C (talk • contributions) 07:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

I wasn't responding to the claim it is or isn't a viable search term, Spa-Franks says "The redirect is here out of a need to remove an outstanding red link" which is a bad reason to keep or create a redirect. In any case, of course someone could search for "Russian Automobile Federation", but I do not feel they are well served by being taken to a list with no real details about the organisation (including a circular link, too). To me the quality of the draft is not relevant to the spirit of reason to delete number 10. There is "virtually no information" about the RAF in this article, so why should we redirect to it? Perhaps a better option if you feel that these organisations will never satisfy notability requirements would be to include short blurbs about the non-notable organisations on the list article? A7V2 (talk) 00:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep: It serves purpose so people know what RAF means. Normally, I would suggest delete to encourage article creation, but there's no evidence the RAF passes WP:GNG- there's a draft article, but it's nowhere near showing non-inherited notability of this organisation. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment as people are bringing up that WP:RfD#D10 doesn't apply because it is a redirect, I wanted to clarify that I had not looked at the draft, or checked whether it would pass WP:GNG when I mentioned it in my rational.
SSSB (talk) 09:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Glizzy[edit]

Glizzy → Shy Glizzy (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Redirect to hot dog. Glizzy is a regional dialectical synonym of hot dog, and people searching for it would not be expecting the rapper. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 18:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

it’s not currently mentioned at all at the proposed target so is there any evidence that people typing Glizzy would be more likely looking up hot dogs?--67.70.101.238 (talk) 19:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

I also noticed that at one point Glizzy was a dab page where it was also said to be a term for a Glock and that article doesn’t mention the term either. Basically, we need more evidence.--67.70.101.238 (talk) 19:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

The answer to that is simply. Yes. The terms are related and it's slang that originates in the Washington DC and Maryland area. A simple search brings up multiple references to the term on articles, and even youtube videos from area residents. Interestingly enough, it the term is also referenced on the Wiktionary glizzy as a hot dog reference, as well as a reference to the rapper, AND the gun. The term may in fact originate from said rapper or involve him in some way. 216.9.28.77 (talk) 16:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

This is clearly on odd situation, in that we have three different meanings, but only one of them is actually mentioned in an article. Redirecting it to an article that does not use the term is not a good solution. Perhaps using WP:HATNOTEs on the article on the person is the correct answer? Something like maybe? Beeblebrox (talk) 22:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

The hatnote solution might look a little messy. Why not restore the DAB? BlackholeWA (talk) 14:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Please don't use a hatnote to direct a reader to an article where the term isn't mentioned. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

We do that all the time with informal nicknames like this. It's certainly preferable to a redirect that does the same. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:27, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Retarget to Hot wiener. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Why? I don't see the connection with Rhode Island at all. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep and hatnote to wikt:glizzy. As a slang term it has multiple meanings, so we should not retarget it to just one of those meanings; nor is it suitable for a disambiguation page, since none of glock, hot dog, nor penis meet WP:DABMENTION. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 05:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Anatov[edit]

Anatov → Antonov (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
Anotov → Antonov (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This seems like a bit of a stretch of a misspelling, in addition to Anatov being a surname in its own right (although seemingly not the surname of anyone with a full article on Wikipedia). Delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:14, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Keep Anotov, but Delete Anatov - When I was in my teens (several decades ago), I actually pronounced it "Anotov", so it's not totally implausible. (I have a slight issue where I occasionally mix up letter order, or drop leters, in reading, writing or speech, and often tpying.) "Anatov" is less likely to be confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BilCat (talk • contribs) 19:00, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment "Anatov" was used to mean "Antonov" in an article on Wikipedia, before I corrected it just now [16]. So it certainly could be a typo for Antonov. I have no opinion on deletion otherwise -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 21:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Muscle fiber[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 9#Muscle fiber

IT'SUGAR[edit]

IT'SUGAR → Maria Sharapova#Sugarpova (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

It'Sugar → Maria Sharapova#Sugarpova (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

I think this redirect should be deleted, as it's worse than having nothing. I can see an argument if Sharapova created the company, or something--but this just sends readers to the page of someone who partnered with the company, and is utterly unrelated to the company in a larger context such as the link from from (American Dream Meadowlands) 98.243.132.66 (talk) 05:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

I've added an alternate capitalisation redirect to this nomination, since they should end up at the same place. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
I feel that my input may be useful since I created this redirect. Maybe that is a rather weird article to redirect to... but where else would it go? I think it's notable enough to have some mention in Wikipedia, but I am unsure if it's notable enough to warrant its own article. If there are any actual policies that would support deleting or keeping, or if someone believes it should be its own article, please @ me so I can leave a better judgment/opinion on this. So far, this whole discussion (my input included) is all opinion, and opinion should not determine what is removed from Wikipedia. –Aaronw1109 (talk) (contribs) 01:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

@Aaronw1109: The relevant guidance for when a redirect should be deleted is WP:RDELETE, in this case the relevant part is reason 10. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 08:45, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

@86.23.109.101: Hmmm... you've convinced me. I support a delete for both redirects. I won't do an author deletion nomination, however, as I would like to leave time for others in the community to add their thoughts. –Aaronw1109 (talk) (contribs) 18:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Cockmonger[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

April 7[edit]

Eductor-jet pump[edit]

Eductor-jet pump → Injector (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Eductors → Injector (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Eductor → Eduction (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

It seems that these three (Eductor-jet pump, Eductors, Edutor) should probably go to the same place, but I don't know which place that is. I stumbled upon this situation while cleaning up Eduction. Note, too, that I redirected Educt to Eduction, in case anyone has other opinions about that one. Cnilep (talk) 06:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No clear solution has been proposed yet
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment from proposer: Since no one has expressed an idea yet, let me ask this. Are there any objections to (re)targeting both 'Eductor' and 'Eductors' to the disambiguation 'Eduction', and leaving 'Eductor-jet pump' as the status quo (pointing to 'Injector')? Better suggestions are, of course, welcome. Cnilep (talk) 23:38, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Fragilité[edit]

Fragilité → Brittleness (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

The current target of this redirect is inappropriate per WP:FORRED as there is no connection between the concept of brittleness and the French language. We do however have an article on a ballet with the same name Fragilité (ballet). I think this redirect should either be retargeted to point at the ballet, or maybe it should be deleted and the article moved to the non-disambiguated name? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete per nom, then move the ballet to the base title since it will be unambiguous. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
I'd prefer if this was discussed at RM, but a WP:ROUNDROBIN swap between this redirect and Fragilité (ballet) looks to be the way to go. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 18:35, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Both Fragilité (ballet) and Fragilité should be kept; although agree that a discussion as to whether the ballet doesn't need the disambiguator could be had (in which case the disambiguated form should still be kept as a redirect itself). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:41, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:51, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguate between the ballet, a wiktionary link, "Fragilité" (Op.51 No.1) listed at List of compositions by Alexander Scriabin, "Fragiliteé" (1965 short) by Nadine Trintignant, "Fragilités" (2008 exhibition) by Lili Dujourie, "Fragilités" (2002 exhibition) by Luc Delahaye; and a see also to Fragility (disambiguation) -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 21:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

SiO2 Group[edit]

SiO2 Group → Quartz (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

I think this would probably be better as a redirect to Silicon dioxide, but I'm struggling to find many sources using this name, so I'm listing it here for discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete. I believe this redirect is referring to SiO2 as part of the mineral crystal structure, as in a silicate mineral, but only the quartz family (see Silicate_mineral#Tectosilicates) of minerals has the SiO2 stoichiometry. I would say retarget to that section, but if Quartz group or Quartz family aren't even redirects, I'm hesitant to pin this redirect on that. None of the other mineral-forming oxides have analogous redirects, so I think deletion here to avoid confusion might be best. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
I created this redirect 15 years ago, and I was notified that it was brought here. I have no strong opinion, and I am unsure of why I created this redirect, which might be related to why it ended up here. I think that the term refers to quartz, tridymite, opal and other such minerals that have a SiO2 composition, but that form different structures, as already surmised above. I think that Mdewman6, and others are better informed to make a decision on this. If similar things do not have articles of their own, and there is no benefit to an article, then I would lean towards delete. However, perhaps a dictionary definition should be created and then moved to Wiktionary. If that is done, then perhaps "Quartz group" and "Quartz family" should be redirected to the same definition. However, if group or family is a more common term than SiO2 group, then I think that it should get the name and then the others should redirect to it, with the other terms given as alternative names in the Wiktionary entry. After writing the preceding, I found that quartz group and family seem to refer to quartz gemstones rather than what was previously discussed. -- Kjkolb (talk) 09:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no clear consensus between deletion and retargeting
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:51, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment: There hasn't been any further discussion, but "group" could refer to the crystallographic space group (see list of space groups) for the various polymorphs of SiO2, listed at Silicon_dioxide#Crystalline_forms. If there is a desire to keep this redirect, targeting that section would seem best, though I still think deletion is probably better given the ambiguity of the term as discussed above. Furthermore, of course SiO2 already redirects to silicon dioxide, so this redirect would have limited utility, and is probably unhelpful if targeted to the lead of silicon dioxide rather than a specific section. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Soroka[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Kinnies[edit]

Kinnies → Otherkin (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Not mentioned at the target. An internet search suggests that this term is primarily used to denote affinity for fictional characters in fandom communities. Delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete, it's probably a nickname, but not a notable one if sources don't mention it.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 19:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep, see this revision for source Yitz (talk) 23:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hog Farm _Talk 17:50, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep. "Kinnie" is a nickname for members of the otherkin community. BlackholeWA (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment @Yitzilitt: would you mind restoring the reference and a mention of kinnie? -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 21:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment I'm not sure what the proper protocol is for removing the deletion discussion link. Yitz (talk) 21:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

72.187.142.113 (talk · contribs) claimed it was misinforpation, but you supplied a reference, so the term "kinnie" could be supported without the other commentary, as a term used for self-ID. The practise of "kinning" though doesn't seem to be specific to "otherkin", as other topics can use the same term to mean similar things (treating others (non-relatives) as kin). So I'd suggest just adding that "kinnie" with the ref. That would solve this RFD problem. Though "Kinnies" is also the plural of "Kinnie", an alternate form of "Kenny", so perhaps pointing it to the disambiguation page would solve that issue Kinnie (disambiguation) -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 13:53, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Postmodern conservatism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Râbnița,[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: soft delete

Main shock[edit]

Main shock → Earth#Earthquake clusters (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This is some kind of terminology related to earthquakes, which isn't mentioned in the earth article, and the section it's supposed to be tatgeting doesn't exist. mainshock targets foreshock, should this be retargeted to match or is there a better target? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment: Thanks for finding this, looking to fix it, and notifying me of the discussion. It looks like I changed this in 2018 so that it pointed to the same target as mainshock and I agree that that should still be the case. Regrettably, I seem to have used the wrong target at that time; I believe it was intended to be targeting Earthquake#Earthquake clusters. If there is no article specifically about mainshocks, that still seems like a reasonable target. Foreshock is also reasonable, but by that logic, I would think that aftershock would also be viable, so I prefer the general approach if no better targets are identified. —Ost (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Globe (Earth)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 15#Globe (Earth)

Conspirationism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Rocketbook[edit]

Rocketbook → Rocket eBook (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Rocketbook is also a brand of reusable notebooks – probably not notable enough for its own article, but this redirect is still incorrect. Kokopelli7309 (talk) 23:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Keep The fact that something else somewhere exists with the same name is not relevant, the dab is useful and has existed since 2007. We don't delete redirects on the premise that it may some day be notable, or never notable. It is perfectly reasonable that a reader would type in Rocketbook and expect to see Rocket eBook. VAXIDICAE💉 15:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete. This is actively misleading. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:35, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete I also think it's misleading. If there's no article about the reusable notebooks, why should we direct people who might have looked for them to an article about the early e-book that is not even produced now? Less Unless (talk) 11:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep If there's one use that is notable and another that isn't, it can be a redirect to the notable use. Peter James (talk) 16:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep or Disambiguate: There may be an opportunity for someone to create articles on reusable notebooks, Rocketbook (company), or Rocketbook (notebook), but as they currently do not exist, the current target is reasonable; sources on Rocket eBook demonstrate that it is associated with the term Rocketbook. However, it may be worth disambiguating, with a ~~{{redirect}}~~ hatnote or transforming into a dab page (if neither is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC). If linked, I suggest mentioning Rocketbook at Société Bic#Products and targeting that section, as the reusable notebook company Rocketbook appears to have been an acquisition ([17]). I believe the parent company to be a better target than either of the only current mentions, which are at Shark Tank (season 8) and perhaps Steve Emerson (visual effects artist)—if the Rocketbook, LLC mentioned on the back of the "Rocketbook Presents" DVDs ([18]) is that same as the notebook company. —Ost (talk) 22:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

ㅿ[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Philosophy, theology, and fundamental theory of canon law[edit]

Philosophy, theology, and fundamental theory of canon law → Philosophy, theology, and fundamental theory of Catholic canon law (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Name too broad which links to an article explaining Roman Catholic philosophy, theology, and fundamental theory of Roman Catholic canon law, not to a page where the philosophy, theology, and fundamental theory of all canon laws are discussed (i.e. in Eastern Orthodoxy, Anglicanism, the Early Church, etc.). There is no page which cover the subject this redirect is designating. Also, this redirect is unused in the main space. Therefore, I think this redirect should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 19:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment: This is an R from move of an article which stood at this title for almost five years until two months ago. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:31, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment perhaps retarget to a more generic article like Canon law? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep {{R from move}}, deletion will break links from outside Wikipedia for too little gain. Disambiguate once other articles that this title could refer to actually exist. —Kusma (𐍄·𐌺) 12:16, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Weak retarget to canon law. Current target is too narrow, and deletion isn't viable, given the high likelihood of external linking. There's no real good place to point this, but we need to keep this around somewhere. Hog Farm _Talk 13:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Cannibalistic tree[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

The Home of Football Stadium[edit]

The Home of Football Stadium → Dronfield#Sport and leisure (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Should this go to Dronfield (the geographic location) or Sheffield F.C., whose ground it is? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Retarget to Sheffield F.C.: there's more info about the stadium at the club article Joseph2302 (talk) 12:41, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment The Official Website seems to be talking about a stadium yet to be built on land called "The Transport Ground" which is currently a sports and athletic club. This news article seems to be describing as not yet even having planning permission approved. They are currently describing the Coach & Horses Pub stadium under the Home of Football Stadium moniker (which is why it is diverted to Dronfield). However I am not sure why this actually even exists as a redirect. It seems unlikely anyone will actually search for "The home of football stadium" just to find Sheffield FC, and appears to be little more than an extension of this discussion and a means of wedging the stadium onto the DAB page in the first place. Koncorde (talk) 01:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Strong Redirect to Sheffield F.C.: It makes no sense to redirect to Dronfield#Sport and leisure as the proposed stadium is going to be in Sheffield, if it is ever built. See the link to the club's website above. If the new stadium is ever notable the it might be considered for an article. As of April 2021 the Home of Football Stadium does not exist.

2A00:23C6:3B82:8500:D55C:7D87:84DF:489D (talk) 13:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Tetartagonist[edit]

Tetartagonist → Protagonist (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Absolutely no mention in the target article. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:19, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete As the person who changed it to a redirect noted, it isn't even a word. Even if someone wanted to denote the fourth most significant character in a story, as the original article stated, "tetart" isn't the prefix for it. It could have been deleted speedily as a hoax or a word coined by the contributor. Probability that somebody would search for that term × probability that somebody looking for it would spell it like that = virtually 0, and then the target article doesn't mention it anyway. Largoplazo (talk) 02:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- I try really hard not to write without checking my facts but I failed this time. "Tetarto-" is indeed the prefix for "fourth" that corresponds to "proto-" and "deutero-". Still, while I see some uses of it, essentially on fan sites and fan wikis where people are ranking characters in what, by the time we get to number 4, I suspect is their personal ordering. In any event, it isn't encyclopedic for purposes of determining whether it should have its own article (it's like having an article on Sixth associate producer), and the target article doesn't mention it so the redirect isn't helpful. So, still, delete. Largoplazo (talk) 10:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete Should have been speedied per A11, or failing that WP:PROD. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment: notwithstanding its incorrect nature, this term isn't made up by the creator and as far as I can tell is the most used term for the fourth most significant character in a story. The redirect has received ample pageviews, most likely indicating that the term is searched up frequently. It's definitely a plausible search term, but I can't find a good target for this redirect. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 05:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- So it looks like it is correct after all as the Greek ordinal prefix for 4. There's still some confusion; these aren't the tri-, tetra-, penta-, hexa-, hepta- cardinal Greek prefixes but rather the ordinal trit-, tetart-, pempt-, hect-, hebdom- prefixes. The correct terms for further -agonist s are pemptagonist, hectagonist, hebdomtagonist, ogdootagonist, etc. (or at least, I hope that they are). I doubt that it can be done, but add a mention to the tetartagonist if some sort of reliable source supports it. If no mention is there, I'm tempted to keep the redirect anyway as it directs readers to article content about the three major -agonist s. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 20:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep. Even if the term has no notability and little use outside of fan fiction, it seems that people are likely to look it up, and having it redirect to "protagonist" seems useful, since it'll take readers to the best article to explain what it means (it wouldn't hurt to mention the term there; it already mentions "deuteragonists" and "tritagonists"). I looked to see if there were "pentagonists", "hexagonists", "heptagonists", "octagonists", "nonagonists", or "decagonists", but a cursory glance at Google results suggests that these are mostly theoretical, and not actually used in this sense (although people have assumed them as social media handles), and people seem to confuse Greek and Latin prefixes, resulting in macaronic, but little-used terms like "quintagonist", "sextagonist", and "septagonist" ("tetragonist" doesn't immediately produce results, probably due to our redirects mirroring; the others would be the same in both Latin and Greek). Which is not to say that they shouldn't redirect to "protagonist"—they seem harmless and potentially useful. Maybe they could be footnoted there. P Aculeius (talk) 13:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

The word has been in use for 40+ years. [19]. Maybe retarget / slight merge to tritagonist is the best place for this information? If all we have is dicdef, transwiki'ing and soft redirecting to Wiktionary also seems better than straight deletion. —Kusma (𐍄·𐌺) 14:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Liaqat Ali (cricketer, born 1987)[edit]

Liaqat Ali (cricketer, born 1987) → List of Federally Administered Tribal Areas cricketers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Player has played for 2 different cricketing sides. per WP:XY the current redirect could confuse readers as they may be looking for information on him playing for Abbottabad Falcons. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Keep. I honestly don't understand the nominator's rationale: Player has played for 2 different cricketing sides, which seems to be irrelevant. This redirect was created as a result of this AfD, and is meant to aid readers who might search for this player, regardless of what cricket team he is currently on. Seems like a perfectly plausible search term in my book. Pinging Premeditated Chaos, who created this redirect for further input. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Meh. I created the redirect since it seemed to be a plausible search term, but I don't care to learn enough about cricket to care either way. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep That's not what WP:XY is about (also the information could be added to the list). If redirects such as this were deleted, would there be a hatnote for a third cricketer with the same name but who only played for one side but not this one? Peter James (talk) 16:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

South Scandinavian languages[edit]

South Scandinavian languages → Danish dialects (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Not mentioned at article. It is possible that at some point various dialects of Danish have been considered full-fledged languages (such debates are common, including among other Germanic languages), but there's nothing in the article about that, much less saying this was the term employed. I thought at first that this was probably a legitimate linguistics term being used too narrowly and that it should be its own article and include Danish and various now-extinct ancient and medieval southerly languages of the Scandinavian group. However, a search at Google Scholar produces zero hits for this term at all [20]. So I'm thinking it's probably an outright deletion candidate. I spot-checked for similar titles and didn't find any as actual pages ("Southern Scandinavian languages", "South Scandinavian language", "South Scandinavian", etc.). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 16:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Keep and mention the term somewhere in the article. The term "South Scandinavian" is used in Glottolog[21]. The source given for this grouping is: Oscar Bandle (1973). Die Gliederung des Nordgermanischen. (Beiträge zur nordischen Philologie, 47.) Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn. I don't have access to that book, so I can not verify if "South Scandinavian" (or rather its German equivalent Südskandinavisch) is acutally mentioned there. Glottolog is notorious for terminological ideosycrasies, so someone needs to check it. Otherwise, I couldn't find the term in any source in Englisch. Südskandinavisch fares minimally better on Google Scholar: a handful of the 34 hits indeed refers to a linguistic subgroup. A Danish source however has been easy to find[22], although here, the context is mutual intellegibility, not genealogical subgrouping. –Austronesier (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment: Danish language shows the family tree as North Germanic > South Scandinavian > Danish, which makes a redirect to Danish dialects a little odd or out of order. No actual mention of the term outside of the infobox. Unless something is added to one of the articles (and the redirect pointed appropriately), I'd be in favor of delete. Carter (talk) 18:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

That, and the existence of Südskandinavisch in one source doesn't give us license to freely translate this to "South Scandinavian", nor equate this with a singular use of this term at the Glottolog list, and equate all that in turn with the Danish language. That's a big pile of WP:OR. The Danish sourced linked to, with sydskandinavisk appears to agree with our chart in the infobox, and suggests this is either a grouping once larger than Danish, or is a proto form that later became Danish, and either way it is not what the article Danish is about. So, this should be a redlink, either because it's a legit subject for an article, or it's an uncommon idea without enough real-world traction to merit an article. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment The reason I made the RD to 'Danish dialects' was that "South Scandinavian" refers to the group that Danish belongs to, and that group is mostly covered at 'Danish dialects'. This is because the South Scandinavian languages are mostly spoken in Denmark and are therefore generally considered to be Danish dialects. If we'd treated e.g. Jutlandic as a separate language and excluded it from the Danish dialects article, the confusion wouldn't arise. There are other Danish rd's that are messed up. It might be worthwhile creating a 'S. Scandinavian' stub with component languages Danish, East Danish and Jutlandic, if that wouldn't be a content fork with 'Danish dialects'. Or perhaps move 'Danish dialects' to 'S. Scandinavian' and add Scanian? — kwami (talk) 03:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Some cleanup like that might result in a viable article, but we need to avoid confusing 1) a language group (even a small one) with 2) dialects within a language; these are essentially opposite topics, with standardized Danish in the middle of them. To the extent sources may conflict on how they want to define these things, we have to document that conflict (within WP:DUE) not silently pick a side in it. When it come to specific classification of something like Jutlandish, go with the predominant view in contemporary linguistics sources (i.e., if it's mostly treated as dialect of Danish, then focus on that, and only mention briefly that it is sometimes classified as a seprate South[ern] Scandinavian language. If it's mostly classified as the latter, then make that the main story, and only briefly touch on it sometimes being classified as a dialect of Danish. In short, treat this the way we treat all other intergrading continua that run from language group down to dialect. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 00:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Keep / Comment. I really don't see the need for a potential split with a tiny stub article - I think that would just be a fork of the same topic, per kwami's comments above. It doesn't appear to be a super-notable alternate term per nominator so I'm not sure the term deserves to be mentioned in the article, but even if this is Glottolog's weirdness, the standard for a redirect is very light - one source using the terminology may well qualify it as a valid redirect. SnowFire (talk) 04:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:56, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Wet tar[edit]

Wet tar → Asphalt concrete (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Would these be better targeting Asphalt or Tar? although this is used as a road sign after Asphalt concrete has been laid it's referring to the asphalt component of the mix. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Keep. I think it's fine as it is: the article has sufficient explanation. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete. I may be underestimating its value as a term someone would search for (it seems to be more in use in Australia than other places), but I don't see any links actually using this phrase. If it's kept, it should stay pointing to asphalt concrete or maybe redirect to sealcoat. Looking at how it's used, it seems to be more about sealcoats, chipseals, and/or tackcoats than about asphalt concrete, but pointing to just asphalt would be going too far back up the production chain and tar is the wrong product. Carter (talk) 07:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

KO temporary[edit]

KO temporary → Kemetic Orthodoxy (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Unused redirect that was used only in 2008 for a mainspace draft. Ibadibam (talk) 20:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Keep in some form for attribution reasons. See this. Compare to this. Deletion without trace is out of the question. I've thought over the keep in some form bit and decided that keeping the redirect in its current form is not harmful, but if people decide that it is, then another option is to move the redirect without leaving a redirect to User:J947/KO attribution and leave a note on Talk:Kemetic Orthodoxy. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 01:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kemetic orthodoxy already exists, but has no meaningful history. The nominated page could be moved there. - Eureka Lott 19:29, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Moving without redirect to Talk:Kemetic Orthodoxy/KO temporary is the best solution in my mind. After moving, replace the page with {{attribution history}}. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Move to a talk page archive, something like Talk:Kemetic Orthodoxy/KO temporary. needs to be kept for attribution reasons as it includes the revision history for large parts of the article, but I agree that it doesn't make sense as a mainspace redirect. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Or move it to Draft:Kemetic Orthodoxy, either would work well in my opinion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Move without redirect to Kemetic Orthodox religion so the edit history is housed somewhere useful instead of dumped or hidden away somewhere obscure. This term in used synonymically multiple times in the article and I noticed there is not yet a redirect in place. I'm not a fan of keeping as-is, mainspace is out of scope for temporary workpages. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is support to move this redirect, but the target is not yet clear.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:11, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Move per Tavix to a usable location "Kemetic Orthodox religion" -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 21:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Move per Tavis to Kemetic Orthodox religion. Needs to stick around for attribution purposes, and probably best to keep this in the least obscure location. Hog Farm _Talk 16:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

April 6[edit]

Leo John (Schindler's List)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

User:Aseleste/Category holder[edit]

User:Aseleste/Category holder → User:Aseleste (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This little-used redirect page clutters up a huge number of categories. My first choice would be deletion, second choice would be to turn it into a standard redirect with no cats, third choice would be to add leading colons to the cats. (Example: [[:Category::Wikipedians who should probably stop screwing around with categories, lest they draw unwanted attention from the Categories Police]] ). Guy Macon (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Why did User:Aseleste/Category holder end up with "#invoke:RfD" instead of linking to this discussion? Is there a way to fix this? --Guy Macon (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Normally that means you've exceeded some limit in the template parser, or the LUA module has produced an error. Rather than expanding the template it just produces a wikilink to the template or LUA module. I assume it has something to do with NAMESPACE and ROOTPAGENAME magic words on the page, I don't know if the RfD LUA module has error handling to deal with being passed those magic words. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
  - Fixed. It has nothing to do with magic words, the problem was instead that the page had too much wikitext to process. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:03, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy keep, as I can't see any evidence that the nominator contacted this active and productive user before nominating their page for deletion. Aside from that, the deletion nomination doesn't make any sense - All of the categories are Wikipedia user categories, and how is the presence of a user page "cluttering" categories that are intended to hold user pages? If a user wants to put their user categories on a separate page, there is nothing wrong with that. No valid reason for deletion, and serious incivility against another editor. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 20:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

So you see no problem with a redirect that is in all of the following categories, and which makes all of the following categories larger?

Vein attack[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Brilliant brown[edit]

Brilliant brown → Orange (colour) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

I cannot find any connection between "Brilliant brown" and orange, all the search results I get are related to the colour brown, unsurprisingly. Is this some kind of colour nomenclature that I'm just not familiar with? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

See ISCC–NBS_system#Color_categories. JsfasdF252 (talk) 17:02, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

That article says that brilliant isn't a valid modifier for brown in the ISCC–NBS_system and that brilliant brown doesn't exist as a colour? I'm still not seeing how you get from there to orange, but that may just be my attempts at searching, everything is drowned out by make-up results. Even if it is correct I'm not seeing that searching for a non-existent classification is a plausible way of looking for for orange, I think most readers would expect to end up at brown. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 17:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete Improbable redirect. I get the idea (brown objects reflect orange light dimly and this is understood by our eyes to be brown), but it's not something that is needed as a redirect. User:GKFX^talk 11:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to ISCC–NBS system#Color categories, where this specific color (i.e. the lack of its existence) is actually mentioned. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Centre vendéen de recherches historiques[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Talk:Grifo (disambiguation)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Halo pc[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 14#Halo pc

Halo game[edit]

Halo game → Halo: Combat Evolved (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Halo video game → Halo: Combat Evolved (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Halo (game) → Halo: Combat Evolved (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Halo (video game) → Halo: Combat Evolved (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

These are ambiguous in my opinion, and do not exclusively refer to Halo: Combat Evolved. Back in 2005/2006 when these redirects were made there were only 2 games in the series, but I think there are now 16 video games in the halo franchise, plus some spin off board games and the like. A google search for these terms turns up a complete mix of results covering every game in the series, so I'm not convinced by the argument in the previous RfD that combat evolved is the primary topic of these phrases. I propose retargeting all of these to the article on the franchise (Halo (franchise)). 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Retarget to Halo (franchise)#Game series. Probably didn't need to be discussed here unless there was pushback on the retargetting. Also take a look at the hatnote on that page following any new redirects to it. Lithopsian (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

I listed them here because these redirects are ancient and some have been at their current target for over a decade, two of these have already been discussed at RFD and I shouldn't be unilaterally overriding the previous consensus and there have been numerous attempts to retarget them in the page history, so clearly there's been some disagreement over where they should target. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Keep Halo (video game) Delete the rest The last one is pointing to the right place IMO. The others are unnecessary permutations of the disambiguation, and the search function can handle it fine. (Typing "Halo video game" into search immediately brings up the franchise)._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

In the last month these got 57, 12, 11 and 85 page views, so these are plausible search terms and shouldn't be deleted in my opinion. I'm not seeing any evidence that the last one is pointing to the right place, anywhere I search (e.g google) turns up a complete mix of results covering all kinds of games from the franchise. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

All right, I'll also vote to retarget Halo game to Halo (franchise) due to its ambiguity, as well as the fact that it clearly gets some use as a search term. I still submit that Halo video game and Halo (game) should be deleted due to their comparatively low views._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

寶馬汽車[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 14#寶馬汽車

Fuel industry[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 14#Fuel industry

Twin Drive[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

60i[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Sandra Lindsay[edit]

Sandra Lindsay → Gary M. Heidnik (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Sandra Lindsay was a murder victim and is mentioned at the target article. However, a Search for other uses of "Sandra Lindsay" shows 9 articles that mention the term, many about different people, but none of whom is worthy of an article. In this case, therefore, the redirect obstructs a more productive Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Sandra Lindsay was the first person to be vaccinated for Covid in the US. She's so unknown that she was part of the televised inauguration of Biden as an announcer. I don't say she should have her own article, but she should be a redirect as well. In the case of two redirects, then the disambiguation page is the best solution. --Deansfa (talk) 14:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguate per Deansfa -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 21:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Template:Taxonomy/"Labyrinthodontia"[edit]

Template:Taxonomy/"Labyrinthodontia" → Template:Taxonomy/Labyrinthodontia (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

accidental creation. Apostrophs are invalid. Just clutters enwiki database Estopedist1 (talk) 07:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment Quotation marks indicate an uncertain genus. This particular template is unused and may qualify for Unnecessary taxonomy templates, but others with quotes are being used correctly. For example, Template:Taxonomy/"Hylarana", as used in "Hylarana" attigua, has a subtly but deliberately different meaning from Template:Taxonomy/Hylarana, as used in Hylarana taipehensis, which a taxonomist could explain better than I can. Certes (talk) 11:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment by creator: I have no opinion on whether to keep it or not, but I can assure you that it was transcluded somewhere when I created it. Someone would have to dig deep to figure out where, but that may indicate future usefulness. I have no objection to deletion of an unused template redirect. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:54, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete because this redirect is unused, but noting that other titles with quotation marks play a useful and necessary role in the taxobox system. Certes (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Melania (gastropods)[edit]

Melania (gastropods) → Siccia (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Siccia is not a gastropod. And disambiguator qualifier "(gastropods)" is invalid. See User:Estopedist1/Taxons and disambiguation Estopedist1 (talk) 12:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete per nom. The target is a genus of moths, not gastropods. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Actually Retarget to Thiara which is a genus of gastropods with this name as a synonym. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:24, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete / speedy CSD 3 now I've created singular Melania (gastropods)) or Retarget (already done fixing my typo) to Thiara - same as the redirect this redirect replaces Melania Lamarck. This should be obvious to anyone who has seen the original two redirects that this (and the other one Melania (moths) now Melania (moth)) replaced. As the nom of this does know those two redirects intimately having only just nommed them WP:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_March_23#Melania_Lamarck WP:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_March_23#Melania_Wallengren, this nom of User:Estopedist1 beggars belief why it isn't obviously the intended target. Widefox; talk 17:25, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Widefox: Sorry but I found that comment difficult to follow. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:53, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Ultraconservatism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Tiger Asia Management[edit]

Tiger Asia Management → Archegos Capital Management (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

I don't understand why this redirect was created. The only link between Tiger Asia Management and Archegos Capital Management is that an employee of the former created the latter. These are clearly separate entities. JBchrch (talk) 21:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete - As stated above, these are different firms. I agree. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep Tiger Asia Management needs it’s own wikipage. --Devokewater 10:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep. According to this source cited in the article, Archegos came from Tiger Asia: "In 2013, Hwang converted the firm [Tiger Asia] into a family office – Archegos Capital Management". The "History" section should be clarified, but the redirect seems appropriate. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 09:09, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

April 5[edit]

Lolotte[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

2017–18 Coupe de France Preliminary Round, Centre-Val de Loire[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted. (non-admin closure) Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Family Guy (season seven)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Next Untied Kingdom general election[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Speedy Delete

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Combichrist - Heat EP: All Pain Is Beat[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Douglas Robinson (athlete)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Cake tin[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

ヒノマルクラゲ[edit]

ヒノマルクラゲ → Rhodaliidae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

ボウズニラ → Rhizophysidae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

嚢泳 → Cystonectae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

胞泳 → Physonectae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

鐘泳 → Calycophorae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

To be deleted. Seems to be obvious foreign language clutter in enwiki: Estopedist1 (talk) 12:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

@Estopedist1: I've fixed this malformed nomination and tagged the redirects for you. Could you please read the instructions on how to do bundled nominations properly at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#How to list a redirect or discussion? When you nominate more than one redirect in a discussion they all need to be tagged and put in an RfD2 template, you can't just stick them in a bullet point list at the end of the nomination. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:06, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

@Estopedist1: how do these differ from any of the other redirects in Category:Redirects from non-English-language terms ( 943 )? Why are these particular ones singled out? --awkwafaba (📥) 02:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

@Awkwafaba: these are categorized into content categories, in this case into: Category:Siphonophorae; hence - obvious clutter. In addition, probably most of these foreign language redirects (ie Category:Redirects from non-English-language terms) should be deleted in future to keep enwiki database clean--Estopedist1 (talk) 05:50, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

@Estopedist1: sounds like you really want to take the above pages out of Category:Siphonophorae and a CfD on Category:Redirects from non-English-language terms. --awkwafaba (📥) 03:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Portable farm[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Volkswagen Volkswagen e-up![edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: soft delete

Wave and tidal power[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Modern Painter[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Cimarron (people)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 13#Cimarron (people)

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (organizations)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

13256278887989457651018865901401704640[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

General Luna Avenue[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 14#General Luna Avenue

Random sample[edit]

Random sample → Sampling (statistics) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Random samples → simple random sample (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Random sampling → simple random sample (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

I think these two redirects should probably point to the same target, since one is just the plural of the other, but I'm unsure which target is better. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Set indexify with Simple random sample, Systematic random sample, Stratified random sample, Cluster random sample, and probably others. As a quicker solution, could instead target both to Sample (statistics) (yes, apparently that is a separate article from Sampling (statistics)), but I don't think that article really articulates the differences and searchers probably are seeking something more specific anyway. Unfortunately the relevant articles do not follow a consistent title format, with some including "sample" and others including "sampling" but that's an issue for requested moves. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment I added Random sampling that should be treated similarly to the others. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:57, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Re/target all to Sampling (statistics) which is a generic article with several sections relating to different possibilities. A separate SIA is not required: in fact a third article to Sample (statistics) and Sampling (statistics) might just make the confusion worse. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Agree Re/target all to Sampling (statistics), which is the article that covers the concepts well. Newystats (talk) 10:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Was about to close this as a retarget, but then I noticed that two different targets are being discussed here: Sample (statistics) and Sampling (statistics). Which one is more appropriate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:00, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Dark Lakitu[edit]

Dark Lakitu → Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This is a non-notable enemy who isn't mentioned at the target article. It was mentioned at Lakitu until July 2007, but hasn't been mentioned since that time, so I'm not sure about retargeting that redirect there. I'm leaning towards deletion unless a mention can be added somewhere. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 05:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete the fact that no one has no has brought up Dark Lakitu not being in the main Lakitu article for over a decade strongly indicates that no one is looking this up. The current target doesn’t work either since it’s a minor enemy not mentioned.--67.70.100.30 (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Weak retarget to Lakitu, where searchers will find some information related to the generic enemy. I wouldn't oppose outright deletion though. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

I don’t think a retarget is necessary here. Taking a look at the Lakitu article this minor variant that only appeared in a bonus area in Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door (not mentioned there) hasn’t been mentioned in the article for years strongly indicating that problem aren’t searching for it.--67.70.101.238 (talk) 02:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Rawk Hawk[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

BMZ GmbH[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 12#BMZ GmbH

Elastomeri[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Histereza[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

April 4[edit]

Basit Saeed[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 12#Basit Saeed

Paralvinella[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 11#Paralvinella

Maud Mortimer[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Retargeted (speedily) to the correct page of "Maud de Braose, Baroness Mortimer".

Docker[edit]

Docker → Stevedore (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This redirect is the subject of a "move request" at Talk:Docker_(software)#Requested_move_4_April_2021 which proposes to move the software to the base title currently occupied by this redirect. I'm not quite sure what should have been done, but following the spirit, at least, of Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_multiple_page_moves, this needs to be brought to the attention of people interested in the redirect. PamD 09:59, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Move Docker (disambiguation) to Docker as the software is primary by usage and the occupation by long-term significance so disambiguation is the best compromise. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Move Docker (disambiguation) to Docker per User:Crouch, Swale, and per the fair number of other meanings for "Docker". BD2412 T 18:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Move Docker (disambiguation) to Docker per Crouch, Swale above. No primary topic for the name. Paintspot Infez (talk) 20:39, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Also, pinging participants of the previous discussion, who might want to weigh in here. @Thjarkur, In ictu oculi, Djm-leighpark, PamD, Zxcvbnm, HumanBodyPiloter5, 86.23.109.101, and 162.208.168.92:. Paintspot Infez (talk) 20:47, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Paintspot Infez, the previous move clearly isn't going to happen so closing it early was a good idea but having no primary topic (similar to Dockers) makes sense. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:52, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Need to also ping @PowerPCG5: who started the whole palaver. PamD 21:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Move the dab page to this title per above. This is an ambiguous term with lots of potential meanings and I can't see any one of them being an unambiguous primary target. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 21:18, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep current target The only other clear potential primary topic is the software, which is obviously based in name on the dockworker. I don't see what's wrong with the current arrangement. Per WP:NWFCTM, the software is not at the same level of primariness outside of a limited demographic of IT workers._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:37, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Well being in England I hadn't heard of the software (or for that matter Dockers (brand)) but I think the best compromise is no primary topic for either singular or plural. Crouch, Swale (talk) 06:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep. Moving the disambiguation page to the base name is really a matter for a separate WP:RM, and I don't see any reason to alter the status quo. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
–Move Docker (disambiguation) to Docker per above. No clear primary target. MB 00:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Note to closer, if there is consensus to move the DAB then the page currently at {{no redirect|Docker]] should probably be moved to something like Docker (occupation) since it was formerly a separate article. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep the current arrangement. A dock worker is the primary meaning, and that page (via its redirect to Stevedore) already has a prominent link to Docker (software) and Docker (disambiguation), so it already works for everyone, I would have thought. Second choice would be to move Docker (disambiguation) to Docker. I very much oppose the software being the primary target, because that is not the primary meaning of what a "Docker" is, per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Adpete (talk) 23:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep. The software (which I certainly don't accept is "primary by usage" in any way) is nowhere near as significant as the common name of the occupation in the United Kingdom, which for hundreds of years was the most significant maritime power in the world. A term mostly only known to IT professionals vs a common term known by millions of people around the world. Very clear primary redirect. I would see anything else as very clear Americanocentrism (as in, we don't call them dockers, so obviously the term must be an obscure one!) and geekcentrism (as in, everyone knows about software and it's much more important than anything else!). -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Not just the UK: the "dock worker" usage is also the primary usage in Australia (e.g. Federated Ship Painters and Dockers Union, Fremantle Dockers football team, Painters and Dockers band) and I suspect other English-speaking countries with a heavy UK influence. Adpete (talk) 00:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Even despite having come to this RfD by looking for the software article, I'd agree that there's nothing resembling hard evidence of a primary topic here. The dab should be the root page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 18:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Mushtaq Ahmed (cricketer, born 1997)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: soft delete

April 3[edit]

MOS:Naming convention[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 11#MOS:Naming convention

Matt Gaetz child sex scandal[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete per discussions at AN and elsewhere

Long Bar[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Francis Henry Fee[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Focative case[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Adio (company)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 11#Adio (company)

'Aladdin (musical)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Julian of Rome[edit]

Julian of Rome → Julian (emperor) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Julian the Blessed → Julian (emperor) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Julian the Philosopher → Julian (emperor) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

~~Julian the Hellene → Julian (emperor) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]~~ (withdrawn)

Julianus Imperator → Julian (emperor) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Julian the Great → Julian (emperor) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

None of these epithets sound legit. A search for "Julian the Philosopher" on Gscholar returns a few results, but (as someone pointed out in the talk page awhile ago) in some of these the phrase seems to simply denote his philosophical activity – thus, a regular qualifier like any other, rather than a proper epithet. "Julian of Rome" sounds like the name of a priest or monk. A search for the more famous "Julian the Apostate" returns infinitely more results than any of these. Avilich (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete Julian of Rome, Julian the Blessed, Julian the Great and Julianus Imperator; Keep Julian the Hellene (maybe) and Julian the Philosopher (certainly). I was perplexed by several references I found to a "Julian of Rome", but it appears to be an error for Pope Julius I. Srnec (talk) 03:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep "Julian the Hellene", no opinion on the others.★Trekker (talk) 13:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment: to the extent that any of these are likely search terms, they should be kept, even if other phrases are much more common. They should only be deleted if it is highly improbable that anyone would search under them—e.g. if they were the invention of a single person with an agenda to puff up Julian's reputation, and not adopted by any serious academics. "Julian the Blessed" strikes me as that sort of attempt to "counteract" the common title of "Julian the Apostate", which, while admittedly negative, is among the most common names for the subject, past and present, scholarly and otherwise, and, IMO, has lost most of its pejorative force (apart from the most fanatical of religious figures, who rails against apostasy these days?). So really Julian doesn't need a fan club to escape his "bad reputation amongst Christians"—most Christians don't really care that Julian, like all of the emperors before AD 337, was a pagan. Of course, if it's actually used in scholarly literature to refer to Julian, and not merely mentioned in passing, then even "Julian the Blessed" would be an appropriate redirect, but only if it's actually in general (not necessarily common, but not limited to a single source of dubious authority, and a handful of citations to it) use. I doubt that "Julianus Imperator" is a useful redirect, since it's just "Julian Emperor" translated into Latin, and this is English Wikipedia. It would be a reasonable redirect for Vicipaedia, or other Wikis that use Latin orthography for Romans, but we never use forms like this to refer to Julian in English—apart from, perhaps, the title of some chapter in a biography, or the caption of an illustration—but in those cases I still don't think anyone would search under the term. As Srnec suggests, "Julian of Rome" seems fatally vague, and might be better as a redirect for the pope. P Aculeius (talk) 13:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:11, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

As the nom I still believe "Julian the Philosopher" is very flimsy and questionable. As is already clarified in Julian's talk page (December 2012), the epithet is quite rare and, when it does appear, it likely denotes Julian as a philosopher (a mundane reference to this occupation) rather than a something he was actually known as. If it ever becomes a common term it could be recreated, but currently it does not seem to be so, either in reliable sources or common usage. Avilich (talk) 20:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Automagic[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

April 1[edit]

Lakalatwe[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

DSV limiting Factor[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 9#DSV limiting Factor

Android S[edit]

Android S → Android 12 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Not mentioned at the target or Android version history, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment. Please read a message I wrote at the bottom of Talk:Android 10. Georgia guy (talk) 16:18, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not quite sure what you're asking for there, you want those pages creation protected so that the operating system articles can be moves there? If there's a redirect in the way of a page move list it at WP:RM and the redirect will just be WP:G6 speedy deleted to make room for the page move, or if it has significant history a page mover can do a WP:Round robin page swap. There's no need to block protection of those articles. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 19:15, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  - I'm asking for those pages to be protected so that no one can move (for example) Android 10 to Android Queen Cake. Georgia guy (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
This seems to be related to Google's developer previews for the operating system. If you look at the android developer blog here you can see that to get code to compile for android 12 you have to tell the compiler to compile for operating system version "Android-S" 86.23.109.101 (talk) 19:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep. Android version history makes it clear that most versions were codenamed alphabetically with a dessert (eg: Nougat is 7, Oreo is 8, Pie is 9). By the time they got to the letter Q for Android 10, they dropped the dessert name and codenamed it with just the letter. Following that forward, Android 11 is Android R and then 12 is S. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

University of Florida Bandshell[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Geared motor[edit]

Geared motor → gear (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This doesn't seem like a particularly good target to me, if I were to search for this I'd expect to end up somewhere related to motors. There's a load of mentions of geared motors in various articles, but I wasn't able to find a good target for this. There is some spam in the page history, but it would be G11'd if restored. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 20:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguate since there are a variety of things this could refer to, such as hydraulic motor#gear motor, drum motor, jacking gear, traction motor, stepper motor, electric motor, AC motor, Shaded-pole synchronous motor, and others. Alternatively, this could be retargeted to Motor (disambiguation) and a section of types of motors (all articles with "xxxxx motor" title format) could be added. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete as vague. This simply means "a motor with gears", which is way too broad to narrow down outside of a potential list of motors. Motor is the best target since it's the subject, but search results would be even better since gears do not make much of an appearance at the motor article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

I would be okay with deletion, leaving open the future possibility of someone developing a list article, set index page, or disambiguating. I agree the term is vague (as noted above). Mdewman6 (talk) 01:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Template:Taxonomy/Chaenostoma[edit]

Template:Taxonomy/Chaenostoma → Template:Taxonomy/Chaenostoma (plant) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

misleading because Chaenostoma is DAB Estopedist1 (talk) 09:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment Template is still used under its old name in Chaenostoma cordatum. Certes (talk) 22:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Chaenostoma cordatum is now fixed, and the redirect appears to be unused. Perhaps I should have done that myself, but it seems better to integrate such edits into the move process. Certes (talk) 10:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

List of megalodon sightings[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Super Mario Story[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

South: Ante Bellum[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Template:Taxonomy/Eremonotus[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Template:Taxonomy/Cremersia[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Template:Taxonomy/Bellardia[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Andersonia (Rubiaceae genus)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

April Fools' Nominations[edit]

April Fools isn't here yet, or has passed! Please do not start pranking until April 1st (UTC time). If it is April 1st (UTC), then please purge the page and this notice will disappear and you can enjoy April 1st. Please do not remove this notice, even on April Fools.
April Fools 2021 has ended. See you in 2022!

This section contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Baka Mitai[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

FBI[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: April Fools

Lazy people[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: April Fools

Deletion discussion redirects[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete almost all

Chees[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: April Fools

Monstercat Silk[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: April Fools

Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantisiliogogogoch[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: April Fools

Jimbo Whales[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: April Fools

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.</noinclude>

March 31[edit]

Aggregate concrete[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

1234567890[edit]

1234567890 → Unix time#Notable events in Unix time (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

While this is described at the target, I'm pretty sure thet Arabic numerals is the primary topic. A hatnote might be added there, but I don't think it's necessary. This redirect gets well over a hundred monthly pageviews and might be confusing for many people. Note that 0123456789 also redirects to the proposed target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Retarget to Pandigital number, where this redirect is mentioned. "123456789" also redirects to "Pandigital number". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seventyfiveyears (talk • contribs) 00:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Retarget somewhere. The current target is clearly not the primary topic. I'm not quite convinced Pandigital number is either. Meanwhile, 0-9 and 0–9 redirect to Numeral system. All of these should be unified somehow. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to Arabic numerals as the primary topic with second preference to Numeral system. I don't think Pandigital number is the primary topic. 123456789 should go to the same target as well. A7V2 (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While there is already consensus for retargeting, there is still some slight disagreement with regards to the primary topic.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Retarget to pandigital number, the correct place if we talk about this as a number, instead of as a string of symbols, and clean up the hatnotes there. —Kusma (t·c) 09:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to Numeral system. Paul 012 brings up some points that I mostly agree with. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 12:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguate There doesn't appear to be a clear primary topic to me, and there are three valid targets suggested above. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to Arabic numerals. I think someone searching this is intending to type out the set of Arabic numerals (either out of boredom or curiosity) instead of meaning this to be the number 1,234,567,890. Of course, where ever this ends up, please add or clean-up the hatnotes to the other valid targets. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to Arabic numerals, in line with 0123456789, and point 123456789 there as well. It's a better target than Numeral system, which is much more broad. I mostly agree with Tavix, but really, it's hard to do more than guess what readers likely mean. Pandigital number is too specific to strike me as the primary topic. — The Earwig (talk) 08:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Depending on which retarget option is the most popular, we could end up with 0123456789, 123456789, and 1234567890 going to 2-3 different targets. There seems to be a consensus against deletion and for retargeting, but we can do with more opinions on where to take the redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 09:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguate per 86 above. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I've reverted an earlier close. Because of the variety of opinions and the relevance for other redirects, this discussion could do with more input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Uanfala (talk) 23:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Retarget to Arabic numerals. I think this because it points out the Arabic numerals and 0123456789 goes there as well. It is also a more specific one than Numeral system.Keresluna (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguate per 86 IP and Mdewman6, where the three valid targets can be added as to avoid any sort of confusion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to Arabic numerals. Numeral system seems too broad, and Pandigital number seems like an unlikely intended target. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Roman equivalent[edit]

Roman equivalent → Interpretatio graeca (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

I understand how the redirect text arises in this context, but "Roman equivalent" is far too generic a concept to redirect this way. A reader might want to find the "Roman equivalent" of ancient weights and measures, of later Italian or Byzantine institutions, or of any number of other things. The target article has several better redirects for those trying to find it without using the specific page title, and the redirect is too generic to point to any specific thing, so it should be deleted 50.248.234.77 (talk) 14:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

If it could be applied to several concepts—the titles of which may not be altogether intuitive—perhaps it would make sense to list them on a disambiguation page under this title. Otherwise, perhaps choose the most likely target (the mythological use seems slightly more probable than weights and measures, IMO), and place a hatnote there for other uses. P Aculeius (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguate There are many things which could be referred to as "Roman equivalent", such as Roman numeral equivalents of Arabic numbers. 053pvr (talk) 05:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguate There are Roman equivalents of many, many modern things. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguate or just delete. The current targeting is clearly not optimal. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete unless someone has a concrete proposal of what should be disambiguated a this title. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep. From my search, mythology is the primary usage of the term. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:53, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Cylindricity[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Cockmonger[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8#Cockmonger

Glizzy[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8#Glizzy

A (internet meme)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Current Fractions[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Arnold Hall (Hartwick College)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Fine Arts Theatre[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Paolino Recreation Center[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

OpenStore[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Kinnies[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 7#Kinnies

Free Willie (Due South)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Fee willy[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Bum bum be-dum[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Stephen French (troll)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

(East Lancs) British Citybus[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Geodreieck[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Incompetent valves[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8#Incompetent valves

Put to the sword[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8#Put to the sword

Podarke (polychaete)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Sub Zero (roller coaster)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete.

Eductor-jet pump[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 7#Eductor-jet pump

March 30[edit]

White(people)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Heavy (magazine)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

3.1415926535897932384626433832795[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy keep

Political opening[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Muscle fiber[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8#Muscle fiber

Wikipedia:Rahat Ali Warsi[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Anatov[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8#Anatov

Abrogationism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Correctionism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Imprecationism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Conceptionism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Transfigurationism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Draft:Let Me Reintroduce Myself (EP)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted under G5

Conspirationism[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 7#Conspirationism

Kohlenstoff[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Occupationism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Disputationism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Coagulationism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Objectionism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Collectionism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Concentrationism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Lucciano Pizzichini[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Get Out of My Head[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Central Temple[edit]

Central Temple → Iglesia ni Cristo#Central office (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Should this really redirect here? This is not the primary topic especially temples as a whole, this redirect is too ambiguous in my opinion and should either be retargeted or disambiguated (preferred). PyroFloe (talk) 02:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator is suggesting to disambiguate or to retarget, but a potential new target has not been proposed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment if disambiguated there should be a see also link to Middle Temple. Thryduulf (talk) 12:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to INC Central Temple, which seems to be the primary topic for this term. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to INC Central Temple as the primary topic. I disagree that Middle Temple is relevant. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete to reveal the search results. Central temple may refer to the main temple of a city or a monastic complex – quite a few instances of that in various archaeological sites are revealed by the search results, including cases where Central Temple is the proper name (e.g. in Shenhe District). – Uanfala (talk) 00:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:CONTEXTUALISATION[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Husman[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Histoire[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8#Histoire

ThreeLawsOfAlGore[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Userfy

March 27[edit]

Non-notable Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door enemies[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Category:Religious Rituals[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Template:Cw[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Boggly Woods[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Sadako Came to the Arcade[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Punderton[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Australasian relations[edit]

Australasian relations → Australia–New Zealand relations (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Australasia includes Papua New Guinea and several other states in Melanasia, as well as Australia and New Zealand. Delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete – yes, the target is too narrow. —Granger (talk · contribs) 18:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep; most if not all of the time the term refers to Aus–NZ relations. However, I might have a biased viewpoint due to being from NZ where Australasia exclusively means Australia and New Zealand – I didn't know that it generally encompasses Melanesia as well. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 20:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete There currently exists no page which fits the definition of "Australasian relations" which refers to foreign relations of countries in Australasia. (no page covers foreign relations of all countries in Australasia) 053pvr (talk) 04:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- I doubt that foreign relations of countries in Australasia is the primary meaning of this term. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 00:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
It could be that my view on this redirect is completely biased by my background, but I think that this redirect is correct. I'd like another pair of eyes on this discussion. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Second relist as requested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 17:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Weak keep. I′m fine with using the narrow definition given we don't have a good target that I can find for the broader definition. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Weak keep per Tavix. Sometimes there's a tension between "this could theoretically refer to several things" and "in practice, it only refers to one". Cross-Strait relations could theoretically refer to relations between any two countries separated by a strait, but in practice, it doesn't. The only use of the phrase on Wikipedia now is a further reading entry at British Commonwealth Occupation Force; the meaning is somewhat ambiguous, but at least includes Japan, suggesting a meaning of British relations with Australian and Asian countries. That work dominates "australasian relations" -wikipedia in an incognito window for me, so I certainly consider deletion an option, but I am comfortable deferring to J947 and the Australian perspective. --BDD (talk) 18:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

JesseValentineMusic[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

La la la la la la[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

United States of Canada[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Template:Citazione necessaria[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

The Home of Football Stadium[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 7#The Home of Football Stadium

Sandra Lindsay[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 6#Sandra Lindsay

Cortez (Mario character)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Cortez (video game)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Jitter clicking[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Augustin Tamare[edit]

Augustin Tamare → Inspector Gadget (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Not mentioned at the target or anywhere else on Wikipedia, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Keep. Here's a source. --2600:6C5D:5B00:2B99:BD:C419:951B:A1EA (talk) 00:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep per our 2600 friend, and add a mention wherever appropriate. This is the character's "real" name in some French press material. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 16:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that translations of characters names, even when verifiably official, are DUE for inclusion at the target. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:09, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete per nom. I don't see anything about translated names in the article, or similar redirects. Inspector Gadget (1983 TV series) does give French names, but only Inspecteur Gadget for the titular character. The name isn't used in any of the French Wikipedia articles either. This would amount to an easter egg at best, confusing or misleading at worst. --BDD (talk) 14:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete. Inspector Gadget was produced by a French company so a French translation would make sense, but it does seem that the French translation is Inspecteur Gadget. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete per Tavix. If a reliably sourced mention of the name is appropriately added to the target article that would be fine, but I'm not seeing meaningful use of that name online, in either English or French – there are mentions on wikis and blogs that Augistine Tamare has been revealed to be the character's real name, but this doesn't appear to have been used in any of the works in the franchise. – Uanfala (talk) 14:59, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Capital equipment[edit]

Capital equipment → machine (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This is apparently a term that means "Any equipment used to manufacture goods", which isn't mentioned in the current target article. An IP left a comment on the redirect in 2009 saying it wasn't correct, and searching online it seems that a few definitions of the term include assets like buildings, not just necessarily machinery. I couldn't find an appropriate target for this but someone here might find something, or the term has a definition on Wiktionary that might be suitable? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment: This topic is mentioned, barely, in both Capital (economics) and Factors of production. I don't have a preference to retarget to either article, because in fact this concept isn't well covered in either place. That is kind of surprising given that Wikipedia has plenty of articles on types of production equipment. Manufacturing isn't a good target because the coverage of economics in that article is similarly inadequate. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 14:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to "Capital (economics)". 053pvr (talk) 05:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Retarget to Capital expenditure which better explains that capital equipment is equipment whose cost must be capitalized (amortized or depreciated over the life of the asset). MB 01:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment No. 1 This RfD needs more participants. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment No. 2 If we retarget, where do we retarget? 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to Fixed capital and tag with {{R from related term}} and {{R with possibilities}}. No obviously best target that clearly defines the term specifically, but at least capital equipment is a type or category of fixed capital. Another possibility is physical capital; I don't really understand the difference between the terms, and the two articles do not adequately link to each other or relate to each other (as is unfortunately too common on WP). Mdewman6 (talk) 19:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguate - I'm an accounting student, and would add Fixed asset as something else could be referring to. Since this doesn't have a single good target, and is a known term, maybe disambiguation between at least Fixed asset, Fixed capital, and Physical capital? Hog Farm _Talk 20:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
You know the subject better than I do, then, but is "capital equipment" a synonym, or even a close synonym, for any of those terms? It sounds like it's a type of those things. I think we could probably have an article specifically about capital equipment. --BDD (talk) 14:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to Fixed asset. "Capital equipment" simply means equipment that is capitalized, so it would fall under the PP&E definition of a fixed asset. Fixed assets are long-term (as opposed to current assets) so they must be capitalized. I don't think this would be something to disambiguate; the other options suggested are a bit broader than Fixed asset, so they aren't quite as good of fits. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment I would agree with retargeting to Fixed asset except... that article is kind of a mess. I landed there today when I noticed that the Nasdaq stock exchange article overstated assets by a factor of 100 (trillions), and wanted to check definitions. The fixed asset article had some non-encyclopedic language and too-few sources tags (scary refs, look like regex). I tried to fix it, but it might be even worse now. Concerns were already identified on the talk page. I concur with Capital equipment redirect/retarget IF AND ONLY IF someone who is proficient with accounting nuances of non-current assets, capitalized assets, capital equipment etc. looks over the fixed assets article too.--FeralOink (talk) 03:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

2021 NWSL Expansion Draft[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Corporate media[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Procedural close

Tetartagonist[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 7#Tetartagonist

March 24[edit]

Elmlea / Artificial cream[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarge to separate targets

Tire tool[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

ANBC[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 2#ANBC

Wikipedia:Delist[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Super mutant[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Liaqat Ali (cricketer, born 1987)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 7#Liaqat Ali (cricketer, born 1987)

Test Wikipedia[edit]

Test Wikipedia → Wikimedia Foundation#Software projects and other backstage projects (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 April 27#Test Wikipedia resulted in a retarget; however, the topic is not mentioned at the target anymore nor anywhere else in mainspace. Since there is also no standalone page about this in other namespaces, I suggest deletion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Change to disambiguation page that gives the reader a one-line description of and links to [ https://test.wikipedia.org/ ], [ https://test2.wikipedia.org/ ], [ ~~https://test.wikimedia.org/~~ https://test.wikidata.org/ ], and any other test Wikipedias that might be created in the future. I use those pages on occasion when investigating various bugs that might have been fixed in the development versions (free clue: you can usually do your tests in the sandbox and see them in preview, then back out without saving). --Guy Macon (talk) 11:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Can I suggest adding the Wikimedia Incubator to that list, since it's used to test new projects and languages, and a "see also" link to the sandbox, which is used for testing things on site? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  - That seems reasonable. Certainly some people use Incubator for tests. It is at [ https://incubator.wikimedia.org/ ] --Guy Macon (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Guy Macon: https://test.wikimedia.org/ does not exist. There are https://test.wikidata.org/ and https://test-commons.wikimedia.org/ though, but they would never be called "Test Wikipedia" and as such do not fit the proposed disambiguation page. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  - Thanks for catching the error, That will teach me to cut and paste rather than typing from memory... I don't see a problem with including a Wikidata or a Commons.wikimedia in the disambig page. Just preface them with "related pages". --Guy Macon (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambig per the above, and include a link to the sandbox where people looking to test how Wikipedia editing works can experiment. Thryduulf (talk) 15:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Adding a link to the sandbox is a brilliant idea. I guess that's why they pay you the big bucks. :) --Guy Macon (talk) 02:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguate per above and also link to the sandbox per above. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete I'm really not crazy about the idea of a mainspace disambiguation page consisting of only external links, and there's no question it would be noncompliant with MOS:DAB (especially MOS:DABEXT). This gets many fewer views than I would've expected, and if I understand correctly, none of the sites suggested (besides the sandbox) are suitable for testing by general users. If there's really a use for this for developers, we could at least use the project namespace. --BDD (talk) 13:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete per BDD, I am similarly uncomfortable with a mainspace disambiguation page quite that non-standard, and I'm really not convinced it would help. ~ mazca ^talk 21:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete per BDD. With "Test Wikipedia" used nowhere in mainspace, such a disambiguation page would also fail WP:DABMENTION. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguate. There's nothing wrong with the resultant dab page – the entries proposed above are not external links, but links to sister projects, and these are routinely integrated into our navigational framework (for example, they get displayed in the search results, we often create soft redirects to Wiktionary or elsewhere, we accept interlanguage links in dab entries, etc.). The only real question, in my opinion, is whether the dab page should remain in mainspace or be moved to WP:Test Wikipedia. – Uanfala (talk) 16:19, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

The Art of Stealth[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Erwin Müller (Saarland)[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Palestinian separatism[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Meteorology/Books[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Draft:2019[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

White horse flag[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Long Time[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Podarke (polychaete)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 31#Podarke (polychaete)

Titanic steel[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Cityfight[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Disambiguate Cityfight and retarget the rest there

Untitled sixth Ariana Grande studio album[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Potassium arsenate[edit]

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: procedural close

vteWikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General communitytopics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics Milestones The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R Creation Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjectsand collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Version 1.0 Editorial Team Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administratorsand noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content disputeresolution	Editor assistance Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboardsand assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education New pages patrol General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletiondiscussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Books Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and votings	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Voting is not evil Milestones
Directories and indexesand summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wikis Wiki markup
Media Category Templates

Википедия: Перенаправления для обсуждения

Перед включением перенаправления для обсуждения [ править ]

Руководящие принципы RfD [ править ]

Когда следует удалять редирект? [ редактировать ]

Причины удаления [ править ]

Причины не удаления [ править ]

Нейтральность переадресации [ править ]

Заключительные примечания [ править ]

Как выставить редирект для обсуждения [ править ]

Текущий список [ править ]

16 апреля [ править ]

15 апреля [ править ]

Клаудия Пульхра (жена Гракха) [ править ]

"Ассоциация прессы Северной Каролины" [ править ]

Умерший изобретатель [ править ]

Инфравидение [ править ]

GeorgeNotFound [ править ]

Алиби (песня Брэдли Купера) [ править ]

Париж Сен-Жермен (любители) [ править ]

Fent [ править ]

II [ править ]

Мультяшный загон Ханны-Барбера [ править ]

Глобус (Земля) [ править ]

Сомнительный [ править ]

14 апреля [ править ]

Фредерик Рене Кудерт младший [ править ]

Стрекоза, [ править ]

Kpg [ править ]

Остров Ханна-Барбера [ править ]

Губка Боб Квадратные Штаны: Diner Dash [ править ]

Закон о школьном молоке 1946 года [ править ]

Создатели аккаунта [ править ]

Происхождение земноводных [ править ]

Бирманско-сиамская война (1824–1826 гг.) [ Править ]

Пенитенциарная система Гонконга [ править ]

Бирманско-сиамская война (1700–01) [ править ]

Оби-Ван Кеноби (фильм) [ править ]

Википедия: CR [ править ]

Чиниот из колледжа Islamia, [ править ]

Академический элитизм [ править ]

Україна [ править ]

Топливная промышленность [ править ]

寶馬 汽車[ редактировать ]

Halo pc [ править ]

Коминтерм [ править ]

RMS Titanic [ править ]

Генерал Луна Авеню [ править ]

Средневековый (альбом) [ править ]

13 апреля [ править ]

Государственный лидер Мьянмы [ править ]

Википедия: Бестолковый новичок [ править ]

Коррида (альбом Dschinghis Khan) [ править ]

Помощь: увещевания [ править ]

JLin [ править ]

Я еще мертв [ править ]

Геноцид хмонгов [ править ]

Тантен [ править ]

Кислый (альбом) [ править ]

Waˈpanka [ править ]

Bedwars [ править ]

Индивидуальные паралимпийские спортсмены на Паралимпийских играх [ править ]

Индивидуальные паралимпийцы [ править ]

Симаррон (люди) [ править ]

Агуэйбана [ править ]

12 апреля [ править ]

Рождество в июне [ править ]

Voltswagen [ править ]

Прото гэльский [ править ]

Планетарные или гендерные символы [ править ]

BMZ GmbH [ править ]

{ꭜ, ꭝ, ꭞ, ꭟ} [ редактировать ]

शिवाजी महाराज[edit]

Defined Lines[edit]

Basit Saeed[edit]

Tom Marlowe[edit]

April 11[edit]

Template:Taxonomy/Hildebrandtia[edit]

Mokick[edit]

Big (M|m)edia[edit]

Corporate media[edit]

寶馬汽車[ редактировать ]