We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
To my knowledge and according to my research, no physical remains have ever been found inside the great pyramid. I would strongly suggest that the claim that the Great Pyramid of Giza is a Tomb constructed for Khufu be reduced to a [theory] and that the whole notion that the pyramid is a Tomb be reduced to a theory, even if that theory has tremendous support by academia. The Nazi's had tremendous support too, but something isn't true just because it has support. Carbon dating is unreliable because [it only dates organic matter]. The fatal flaw with that is that it only tells us the last time organic matter was in the vicinity. If in ten thousand years a civilization found our organic matter inside the Colosseum, would that mean our current civilization erected it? No. If we scribbled on the Colosseum that "Jesus was here in 2021"would that make it true? No.