With the recent DMCA takedown notices being handed down to a large amount of both small and large, popular streamers in the past few weeks on the platform, should the controversy surrounding this issue be further mentioned in the "Criticisms and Controversies" section of this article? MyJunoBaldwin (talk) 18:14, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:SUSTAINED, PogChamp is largely only notable because it was deleted from Twitch. It can easily be discussed in a section of the main article and doesn't require a full article to explain. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Nah, no need. PogChamp and Twitch should remain separate articles. Outrunno (talk) 14:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
24toonenata (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC) i don't see how a single emote is important or relevant enough to add to this page
Keep: Article is huge, well-sourced and notable, think we should be rid of this discussion now. EthanRossie2000 06:56, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Do you think there's enough articles on Wikipedia for a suitable navbox of Twitch? I think it's doable, although I have a gut feeling there might not be enough articles about Twitch itself to warrant a navbox. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 03:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)