Wikipedia talk:WikiProject COVID-19


Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

NOTE: The following is a list of material maintained on grounds that it represents current consensus for the articles under the scope of this project. In accordance with Wikipedia:General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019, ("prohibitions on the addition or removal of certain content except when consensus for the edit exists") changes of the material listed below in this article must be discussed first, and repeated offenses against established consensus may result in administrative action. It is recommended to link to this list in your edit summary when reverting, as [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject COVID-19#Current consensus]], item [n]. To ensure you are viewing the current list, you may wish to purge this page.

There's an ongoing RfC at Talk:Richard D. Gill#Rfc - Kate Shemirani radio show appearance of relevance to this project. Structuralists (talk) 21:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I know this has been asked several times in previous discussions. Many of the COVID stat templates haven't been updated for more than two years. Many are sitting around not being used. The same arguments can be said for the templates linked in the main COVID navbox in which many of the templates that are used in a way through navbox transclusions haven't been updated for significant periods and could be subject to similar Tfd rationale.

Is there any objection to having at first the unused templates being taken to Tfd? I would like there to be project-wide consensus before taking on this task myself and with members of this project. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hoi, At this time there is only one scientific paper with the "main subject" long covid. Given the denial of the subject and the consequences.. It is a great idea to consider Wikidata as a source. Here is the [Scholia https://scholia.toolforge.org/topic/Q100732653] for the subject. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 11:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]