The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Just because an artwork no longer is (part) of a permanent installment doesn't mean it's not an existing artwork when the installment closes. You have memories about the work by art subjects; you have all the documentation (etc). You don't do that for a sculpture or painting post-exhibition so why do it with installations or site-specific art. Site-specific art specifically often comes with a component that is permanent (existing in the gallery space (non-site)). Same goes for vandalism on an existing artwork - the original artwork is just replaced with a new one (building upon the original work/merges the original work with the new modification).
Why is it that for example a comedy work (sketch) is supposedly absolute even after its television screening but not a (site-specific) work of art (after its showing)? 31.208.212.102 (talk) 21:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)