What the? Minerals? Yes there is, under any realistic interpretation of "conclusive". That sentence has been around for almost two years [1]. Well, no longer. dbenbenn | talk 04:23, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I cut the following text from this article, as it is seemingly unrelated to the ontological concept of being:
If that use of "Being" is important, perhaps it belongs in the Supreme Being article or in the Eckhart Tolle article or, if The Power of Now is an important enough book, in an article about that book. The Rod 05:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Continuing to make this article more about a single topic (ontological being), I cut the following content from the article, as it seems unrelated to the ontological concept of being:
If the existentialist aspect of the film is important enough, perhaps it belongs in Existentialism or perhaps the film merits its own article. The Rod 05:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
I need the qualities or characteristics that differentiate a being from a not-being -Daëmon 02:13, 30 May 2006 (UTC)