There is a request, submitted by Omniscientmoose42 (talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.
Casliber, would you have time to work on this FA; it has issues. I haven't gone in depth beyond the lead, but if the number of problems in the lead are indicative of what we might find in the rest of the article, its FA status needs review. These are samples only from the lead.
It is not a long article; I am hoping you will find time to comb through it to identify and correct anything else. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:18, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Is anyone planning to address each of the concerns I raised below, three weeks ago? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 08:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Saving August 18, 2022 pre-cleanup version. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:14, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Additionally, the lead is overcited, which does not aid the reader, does not conform with guidelines, and (as indicated elsewhere) has only been done to facilitate a different, off-Wiki project. (While it is understandable that translators may find their task easier if citations glob up the lead, someone who isn't familiar with the entire topic, the body of the article, and the relevant MEDRS-compliant sources probably has no business translating articles to begin with.) Globbing up the lead with unnecessary citations should not be done in an FA, which must comply with policy and guideline.