Архивы |
---|
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 |
Sockorama
Да, я это видел. Я сейчас изучаю это, включая проверку носков. Bearcat ( разговор ) 01:41, 14 мая 2016 (UTC)
- Википедия: Исследования Sockpuppet / BeaverTails18 , если вы хотите добавить комментарий или что-нибудь еще. Bearcat ( разговор ) 02:01, 14 мая 2016 (UTC)
Предупреждение - удаление содержимого
Пожалуйста, прекратите разрушительное редактирование . Если вы продолжите очищать или удалять части содержимого страницы, шаблонов или других материалов из Википедии, как вы это делали в Islamic Relief , вам может быть заблокировано редактирование . Спасибо ..-- Бали Макмур ( разговор ) 21:35, 15 мая 2016 (UTC)
- Как человек, который только что заглянул на эту страницу обсуждения и был немного удивлен, увидев вышеупомянутое утверждение, нетрудно понять, что обвинение AusLondonder в разрушительном редактировании - ерунда. - Super Nintendo Chalmers ( разговор ) 22:25, 15 мая 2016 г. (UTC)
- @ Super Nintendo Chalmers : В самом деле, этот редактор, кажется, имеет некоторые записи о плохом поведении. Они критиковали редактирование, использовали вводящие в заблуждение сводки редактирования, удаляли исходный контент и неоднократно не следили за WP: NPOV . В этом шаблоне (от редактора со 108 правками) я удалил категорию "террористов" из статьи о британской исламской благотворительной организации. AusLondonder ( разговор ) 22:37, 15 мая 2016 (UTC)
- В любом случае, как вы видели, я решил перенести категорию на CFD из-за большого потенциала неправильного использования AusLondonder ( разговор ) 22:40, 15 мая 2016 г. (UTC)
- @ Super Nintendo Chalmers : В самом деле, этот редактор, кажется, имеет некоторые записи о плохом поведении. Они критиковали редактирование, использовали вводящие в заблуждение сводки редактирования, удаляли исходный контент и неоднократно не следили за WP: NPOV . В этом шаблоне (от редактора со 108 правками) я удалил категорию "террористов" из статьи о британской исламской благотворительной организации. AusLondonder ( разговор ) 22:37, 15 мая 2016 (UTC)
Уведомление о ссылке на устранение неоднозначности за 16 мая
Привет. Спасибо за ваши недавние правки. Википедия ценит вашу помощь. Однако мы заметили, что когда вы редактировали Леони Купер , вы добавили ссылку, указывающую на страницу значений « Социалистическое общество» . Такие ссылки почти всегда являются непреднамеренными, поскольку страница значений неоднозначности - это просто список заголовков статей типа «Вы имели в виду ...». Прочтите FAQ • Присоединяйтесь к нам на DPL WikiProject .
Это сообщение можно удалить. Кроме того, чтобы перестать получать эти сообщения, следуйте этим инструкциям по отказу от рассылки . Спасибо, бот DPL ( разговор ) 09:51, 16 мая 2016 (UTC)
Корбин рис
Замечу, что вы сами не голосовали на конкурсе красоты Корбина, если бы вы собирались голосовать ... забавно, что я уверен, что сам Корбин не возражал бы, какая это была фотография :) - BOD - 22:25, 22 мая 2016 (UTC)
- @ Бодни : Я уверен, что он был бы в ужасе от самой концепции, если честно! Я думаю, что нынешняя картинка, конечно, не самая лучшая. Но я не совсем уверен, какая картина является лучшей заменой. Я, наверное, приму решение в ближайшие пару дней :) AusLondonder ( разговор ) 04:17, 23 мая 2016 (UTC)
Порты Непала?
Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с моими комментариями к вашему предложению по Категория: Порты Непала Hugo999 ( обсуждение ) 23:27, 29 мая 2016 г. (UTC)
- @ Hugo999 : Спасибо, что указали на это, я ответил на CFDS. AusLondonder ( разговор ) 01:14, 30 мая 2016 (UTC)
Вики любит гордость 2016
Как участник ЛГБТ-исследований WikiProject , вы приглашены принять участие в третьей ежегодной кампании Wiki Loves Pride , которая продлится в июне. Цель кампании - создавать и улучшать контент, связанный с культурой и историей ЛГБТ . Как ты можешь помочь?
- Создать или улучшить LGBT связанных страниц Википедии и продемонстрировать результаты своей работы здесь
- Документируйте местную культуру и историю ЛГБТ, фотографируя прайды и загружая свои изображения на Wikimedia Commons.
- Внесите свой вклад в рабочую группу, связанную с ЛГБТ, в другом проекте Викимедиа ( Викиданные , Wikimedia Commons , Wikivoyage и т . Д.)
Ищете темы? Страница " Задачи" , которую вы можете обновить, предлагает несколько идей и желаемых статей.
Эта кампания проводится при поддержке группы пользователей Викимедиа ЛГБТ + , официально признанного филиала Фонда Викимедиа . Миссия группы - разрабатывать ЛГБТ-контент во всех проектах Викимедиа на всех языках. Посетите страницу партнера в Meta-Wiki для получения дополнительной информации или подпишитесь на Wikimedia LGBT + на Facebook . Помните, что Wiki Loves Pride - это создание и улучшение контента, связанного с ЛГБТ, в проектах Викимедиа, и контент должен иметь нейтральную точку зрения . Вовсе не нужно определить , как ЛГБТ или любого другого пола или сексуального меньшинства , чтобы принять участие. Эта кампания направлена на добавление точной, надежной информации в Википедию, простой и понятной, и мы приветствуем всех! Если у вас есть какие-либо вопросы, оставьте сообщение на странице обсуждения кампании .
Спасибо и удачного редактирования! --- Другой верующий ( Обсуждение ) 19:46, 30 мая 2016 (UTC)
Уведомление о ссылке на устранение неоднозначности за 1 июня
Привет. Спасибо за ваши недавние правки. Википедия ценит вашу помощь. Однако мы заметили, что когда вы редактировали Николаоса Николопулоса , вы добавляли ссылку, указывающую на страницу значений Achaia . Такие ссылки почти всегда являются непреднамеренными, поскольку страница значений неоднозначности - это просто список заголовков статей типа «Вы имели в виду ...». Прочтите FAQ • Присоединяйтесь к нам на DPL WikiProject .
Это сообщение можно удалить. Кроме того, чтобы перестать получать эти сообщения, следуйте этим инструкциям по отказу от рассылки . Спасибо, DPL-бот ( разговор ) 13:33, 1 июня 2016 (UTC)
Опрос исполнительного директора Фонда Викимедиа, 2016 г.
Попечительский совет Фонда Викимедиа назначил комитет, который возглавит поиск следующего исполнительного директора фонда. Одна из наших первых задач - написать описание должности исполнительного директора, и мы просим мнение сообщества Викимедиа. Уделите несколько минут и заполните этот опрос, чтобы помочь нам лучше понять ожидания сообщества и персонала в отношении исполнительного директора Фонда Викимедиа.
- Опрос (проводится Qualtrics)
Спасибо, Исполнительный директор Фонда Викимедиа Руководящий комитет по поиску через доставку сообщений MediaWiki ( доклад ) 21:48, 1 июня 2016 г. (UTC)
Уведомление о ссылке на устранение неоднозначности за 8 июня
Привет. Спасибо за ваши недавние правки. Википедия ценит вашу помощь. Однако мы заметили, что когда вы редактировали London Legacy Development Corporation , вы добавляли ссылку, указывающую на страницу значений John Biggs . Такие ссылки почти всегда являются непреднамеренными, поскольку страница значений неоднозначности - это просто список заголовков статей типа «Вы имели в виду ...». Прочтите FAQ • Присоединяйтесь к нам на DPL WikiProject .
Это сообщение можно удалить. Кроме того, чтобы перестать получать эти сообщения, следуйте этим инструкциям по отказу от рассылки . Спасибо, DPL-бот ( разговор ) 09:04, 8 июня 2016 (UTC)
Черновик: Убийство Джо Кокса
Hey :)
I'd just like to point out a few things regarding the draft you just created:
- Under British English (which should apply given it's a British event), an assassination has to have a political motive. Since a motive is not yet known, this cannot be an assassination. (I note that you have since renamed the article from me starting to write this, but the infobox still says asssassination).
- It's not a murder until it's proven as such in a court of law - there's some discussion on Talk:Jo Cox about this. In the UK, Sub Judice applies now since an arrest has been made, which has potential implications for those reporting on the event in the UK, which we both are.
- You've named the alleged perpetrator of an unproven crime - I'd like to point you int the direction of WP:BLPCRIME
I'm not disagreeing with splitting it into a new article, just please be careful with this!
[stwalkerster|talk] 03:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Выдвижение убийства Джо Кокса для исключения
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Jo Cox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Jo Cox until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 06:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Где?
Where is this other nomination? Surely it would be at the current AfD's page title? StillWaitingForConnection (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- It is referenced on the talkpage. It was however at the earlier title of the page. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Jo Cox AusLondonder ( talk) 18:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Хорошо
You and AGF don't get along very well, I think. "Pointy, sly and contentious"? Drmies (talk) 11:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Drmies: you and BRD don't get on very well. AusLondonder ( talk) 12:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Depends. A revert whose edit summary contains only insults, that's not likely to make anyone discuss anything. BRD is an essay, as you know; AGF is a fundamental principle in this joint. Drmies ( talk) 20:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- You waited until less eyes were on the article to remove a massive section which you know had community support. You arbitrarily chose some nations as "involved" - not French neighbours such as the Netherlands or the United Kingdom. You left the United States in unsurprisingly. The revert summary was describing your behaviour not you as a person or you as an editor. I have disputed your arbitrary and pointy removal now should be the time to discuss. AusLondonder ( talk) 01:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Depends. A revert whose edit summary contains only insults, that's not likely to make anyone discuss anything. BRD is an essay, as you know; AGF is a fundamental principle in this joint. Drmies ( talk) 20:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Флаги по случаю смерти Джо Кокса
Please see this discussion Mlpearc (open channel) 15:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Mlpearc:
Why bother starting a discussion if midway through with no consensus for your position, you show huge disrespect for your fellow editors by making the disputed change with a totally misunderstood rationale?AusLondonder ( talk) 04:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)- Please check the times. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:28, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Mlpearc: Apologies, although I think the status quo should have remained before starting the discussion per WP:BRD AusLondonder ( talk) 04:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Please check the times. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:28, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Уведомление о ссылке на устранение неоднозначности за 11 июля
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Same-sex marriage in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Есть АдГ по теме, связанной с вами
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hallel Yaffa Ariel--Bolter21 (talk to me) 18:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
AFD
Little late in writing this but wanted to say that I hope there aren't any hard feelings about Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reactions_to_the_2016_Orlando_nightclub_shooting. Hope you know that it has nothing to do with animus toward the LGBTQ community or anything. I just feel that many of the news-related articles are TOOSOON but it's becoming clear I'm in the minority with that opinion (e.g., Talk:2016_shooting_of_Baton_Rouge_police_officers#Way_too_soon). I'm recalibrating my perceptions of the community norm based on the feedback in the AFD.
TL;DR - sorry if I put you through any undue stress, especially related to such a traumatic event to folks in the LGBTQ community. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- @EvergreenFir: Thanks for that! Really cool of you, I appreciate it. I had taken a little break from the project for a couple of weeks which I think we all need sometimes! No hard feelings at all :) AusLondonder ( talk) 22:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Glad to hear and thank you. Hope your wikibreak went well! Glad to have you back! EvergreenFir(talk) 02:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Уведомление о ссылке на устранение неоднозначности за 1 сентября
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electoral division of Blain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry Mills (politician). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Категория: Клайв Палмер номинирован на обсуждение
Category:Clive Palmer, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 01:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Места с большинством участников
Hey, just explaining my undoing your change to Division of Bass - it's actually only had sixteen different members (equal with Bendigo, Denison and Swan), but Warwick Smith was the member twice. :) Frickeg (talk) 08:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Frickeg: No worries thanks for fixing it up :) AusLondonder ( talk) 19:50, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Приглашение на азиатский 10,000 Challenge
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Выборы ArbCom 2016 : Открыто голосование!
Hello, AusLondonder. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) |
Переименовать " Юридическую историю каннабиса в Канаде" в " Каннабис в Канаде" ?
Your comments solicited here: Talk:Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_Canada#Rename_Cannabis_in_Canada_or_create_new_article.3F. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 08:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Выдвижение на всеобщих выборах Соединенного Королевства 2015 г. (Лондон) для исключения
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Kingdom general election, 2015 (London) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Kingdom general election, 2015 (London) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheMagikCow (talk) 17:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Брет Чиафало
Couldn't you just put in a regular deletion request? MB298 (talk) 06:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi MB298 I am willing to do that if you take exception. Just remove the tag if you disagree. AusLondonder ( talk) 06:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done. MB298 ( talk) 06:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Декларация авокадо
Another user already declined your PROD, so now you have to take it to AfD if you think it should be deleted. Me-123567-Me (talk) 01:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- BTW I invite you to join a new Wikiproject over at WP:Greens. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 01:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
My apologies, it was a speedy tag. But if a speedy was declined, it is likely a PROD will be too. I suggest not wasting your time and going right to AfD if you feel strongly about it. Me-123567-Me (talk) 01:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
AfD - Зелень лаванды
Номинация " Лавандовая зелень" на исключение
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lavender Greens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lavender Greens until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Несколько примеров
Of recurring events in location establishment categories
- New York City Marathon in 1970 establishments in New York
- Grand National in 1839 establishments in the United Kingdom
- Reading Amateur Regatta in 1842 establishments in England
- Mar del Plata chess tournament in 1928 establishments in Argentina
- Scripps National Spelling Bee in 1925 establishments in the United States
And thousands more. You want to change what articles such as these are categorized, I suggest WP:RFC or the talk page for WP:Categorization....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting it should be categorised as an "establishment in Rhode Island" even though it could be held in any state in future years? AusLondonder ( talk) 17:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yes because that is where it started. Events as well as companies can move, but all started somewhere. There are cases where they move and even come back to its roots before ending. For instance, Western Open, a 1899 establishment and 2006 disestablishment in Illinois. In between the event was played in 15 other United States. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting it should be categorised as an "establishment in Rhode Island" even though it could be held in any state in future years? AusLondonder ( talk) 17:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Способы улучшить старшую школу Лавендер Хилл
Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. AusLondonder, thanks for creating Lavender Hill High School!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. If you could add references to [WP:V
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
TonyBallioni (talk) 16:14, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Предлагаемое исключение средней школы Лавендер-Хилл
The article Lavender Hill High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable school without any sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 16:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Назначение средней школы Лавендер Хилл для исключения
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lavender Hill High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lavender Hill High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TM 16:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
УЛЫБКА!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
CSD - мексиканские радиоканалы
I wasn't aware of that particular CSD criterion. I want to populate those Mexico regional radio station stub cats but am not familiar with stub sorting and would need to create 32 templates and edit more than 1,200 articles. Would it be possible for you to help me with that? Raymie (t • c) 08:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- As soon as you add a single article to the CSD criteria no longer applies. I would probably be able to help if you let me know what needs to be done. I'm not an expert in stub sorting either though :) AusLondonder ( talk) 09:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Недавнее изменение Стива Кристиана
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Steve Christian, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dan Koehl (talk) 07:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Март 2017 г.
Hello, I'm Me-123567-Me. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Green Party Archives that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't remove the comment, but it's still not nice. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 17:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Персональная атака
"A bit of a patronizing arse" may be relatively mild compared to some other things I heard recently, but it is still a personal attack. Kindly refrain. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 03:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Приглашение к комментарию
As someone who deals with current event articles, I am soliciting comments from you on my first attempt at a Wikipedia essay: WP:DJTG/WP:HOLDYOURHORSES. I've started a section on the talk page of the essay for comments (or you can just edit the article). Having worked on current event articles and terrorism lists, I thought this essay might be useful when addressing editors who add content prematurely (e.g., labeling an even as Islamist terrorism before RS proclaim it to be so). If you have the time and energy, feel free to comment or edit on it. Cheers! EvergreenFir (talk) 04:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Пометка для быстрого удаления
Thanks for reminding that a copy of the same tag need to be posted at the talk page of the page creator. I have been placing tags on the page alone so far. Bilingual2000 (talk) 06:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Bilingual2000: No problem thanks for your friendly response :) AusLondonder ( talk) 07:00, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Уведомление о ссылке на устранение неоднозначности за 30 марта
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kroonstad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pick'n'Pay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Может быть, запоздалое первоапрельское?
So... Wtmitchell blocks AusLondoner for twelve hours with the rationale to stop series of edits flouting WP:ENGVAR... Fifteen hours after their last edit?! Presumably the edits of concern are those most recent, labelled "per WP:TIES"- but none of those, that I can see, have been reverted, which begs the question as to how disruptive they were. In any case; where's the discussion, the escalated series of warnings, even? — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 09:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Wtmitchell Is this a joke? What on earth is this about? You haven't even notified me of the block let alone discussed the issue with me?!? AusLondonder ( talk) 11:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Just checked Wtmitchell has not even reverted a single of my edits? Wtf? AusLondonder ( talk) 11:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- No complaint about my conduct, no discussion raised that I'm aware of on any forum, no block template, no notification of the right of appeal? I'm seriously wondering whether Wtmitchell's account has been compromised. AusLondonder ( talk) 11:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Just checked Wtmitchell has not even reverted a single of my edits? Wtf? AusLondonder ( talk) 11:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Wtmitchell Is this a joke? What on earth is this about? You haven't even notified me of the block let alone discussed the issue with me?!? AusLondonder ( talk) 11:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
AusLondonder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Accept reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
- I was just coming to the same conclusion as BrownHairedGirl. Bizarre block, good unblock. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- BrownHairedGirl Thanks a lot for that. Definitely was weird seeing this today. AusLondonder (talk) 12:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- You're welcome, @AusLondonder. I'm just sorry you had to go through this, and that I didn't spot it sooner. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- (ec)Thanks, Boing. I am going to raise this at ANI, where I hope that Wtmitchell will be able to give a good explanation of what happened here. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: Perhaps ask him at his talk page first? There might be a good response that would avoid the need for ANI. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry -- too late, Boing. I had posted at ANI before seeing your comment.
In any case, I think that something as bizarre as this deserves a more public discussion, particularly given the possibility of account compromise (as speculated above by AusLondonder).
Hopefully Wtmitchell will have a good response which keep the ANI thread short. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)- Yep, fair enough. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry -- too late, Boing. I had posted at ANI before seeing your comment.
- @BrownHairedGirl: Perhaps ask him at his talk page first? There might be a good response that would avoid the need for ANI. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- BrownHairedGirl Thanks a lot for that. Definitely was weird seeing this today. AusLondonder (talk) 12:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- (ec) +1 to my colleagues above. —DoRD (talk) 12:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Belated apology
I want to acknowledge my judgemental error here and to apologize for the block which I precipitously and improperly placed following on that judgemental error. This is discussed in some detail at WP:ANI#Wtmitchell's block of AusLondonder, and I don't want to rehash that discussion here. I do want to to apologize here, though, both for my bad judgement in this instance and for the block which I improperly placed as a result of that bad judgement. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Wtmitchell Thank you for your apology. It is most appreciated. AusLondonder ( talk) 17:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Обсуждение ANI, касающееся вас
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wtmitchell's block of AusLondonder. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:04, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Can anyone help me write the article with finished contracts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NIS Construction (talk • contribs) 16:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Котенок для тебя!
Is it possible to help me write an article on the corporation. I am the marketer and I have never written an article on wikipedia.
NIS Construction (talk) 16:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Неправильное руководство в сводке правок?
Hi AusLondonder
I was just checking your contribs from yesterday[1] to see if I could find any trace of what might have prompted the block.
No sign of that, which makes the block look even more bizarre, but I did spot one small unimportant thing. Several of your edits which rightly corrected the spelling of International Labour Organization used an edit summary which included a link to WP:BRINT, which is a redirect to WP:Redirect#Bypass_redirects_in_navigational_templates. That clearly isn't what you meant, so I presume it was just a mistaken recollection of another shortcut.
Obviously, that small glitch in no way justifies any reproach, let alone an out-of-the-blue block ... but I just thought I'd point it out for future reference, in case someone gets antsy about it.
Hope this helps! If not, pls ignore.
Best wishes, --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi BrownHairedGirl. Thanks for that and for your help the past few days. It has been most appreciated. Sorry for my delay in replying I've been super-busy off-wiki. You're right I wasn't using the most correct shortcut. I was meaning the part just below where WP:BRINT appears which says "Spelling errors and other mistakes should be corrected. Don't link to a misspelled redirect". When correcting spelling in similar circumstances in future do you have any advice on what I should say in the edit summary?
- Thanks again for your help :) AusLondonder ( talk) 15:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Edit the guideline and stick a specific anchor in it? Andy Dingley ( talk) 15:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- @ Andy Dingley: I don't think any guideline needed to be cited. It was just a matter of fixing the spelling of a proper name. -- BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 15:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- (ec)Hi AusLondonder
- I was glad to be able to help. I saw your username pop up somewhere else, but with a strikeout line through it (I have a CSS setting which does that to blocked usernames), and went to investigate ... and just thought I'd not like that to be me!
- I dunno if you have seen my reply to Wtmitchell's response at ANI: WP:ANI#Response_by_Wtmitchell. What I suggested there (in point #1) was that since you were correcting the spelling of a proper name, a better edit summary might have been as something like "correct spelling of proper name International Labour Organization".
- But I'm sure there are other ways of doing it. Just check shortcuts afore using them! (I know, we all screw up on that one sometimes, and it's no biggie, unless you encounter an admin on a hair-trigger over a flakey internet connection).
- Best wishes, -- BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 15:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thankfully we have some competent admins around here! I thought what could I possibly have done to irritate this guy! I've seen your reply it certainly put in words exactly what I was thinking. Thanks for the tip about the edit summary it seems like a good idea to avoid any potential confusion. Who would have thought the spelling of the International Labour Organization would be cause for such excitement! AusLondonder ( talk) 16:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Glad that helped. And the ANI thread has been closed without any further action, which I think is a good outcome. Wtmitchell has (belatedly) apologised to you, and can be in no doubt that they screwed up badly and had better not screw up like that again. Hope you feel reassured that it hasn't left any stain on your record. -- BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 16:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- I'm glad it is now all resolved. Hopefully they won't repeat their mistake in future. I want to thank you again for your assistance and wisdom through all of this. AusLondonder ( talk) 17:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Glad that helped. And the ANI thread has been closed without any further action, which I think is a good outcome. Wtmitchell has (belatedly) apologised to you, and can be in no doubt that they screwed up badly and had better not screw up like that again. Hope you feel reassured that it hasn't left any stain on your record. -- BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 16:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thankfully we have some competent admins around here! I thought what could I possibly have done to irritate this guy! I've seen your reply it certainly put in words exactly what I was thinking. Thanks for the tip about the edit summary it seems like a good idea to avoid any potential confusion. Who would have thought the spelling of the International Labour Organization would be cause for such excitement! AusLondonder ( talk) 16:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Edit the guideline and stick a specific anchor in it? Andy Dingley ( talk) 15:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Предлагаемое исключение из Энрикя Герреро Сала
The article Enrique Guerrero Salom has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 20:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- FixedAusLondonder ( talk) 20:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Приглашение на обсуждение
Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs (talk) 10:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Отвечать
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Атака в Стокгольме, 2017 г.
In a recent edit to the page 2017 Stockholm attack, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
I think you made a big mistake on this. The article is written in British English. So the people have to use the British words. Look at the discussion page.--Rævhuld (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Rævhuld I have replied at the talkpage. Your edits violate MOS:RETAIN and MOS:TIES. The first substantial versions of the page use truck not lorry. AusLondonder ( talk) 19:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Ульрике Родуст
Title doesn't match text Jutta Steinruck vs. Ulrike Rodust, --Mandavi (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Mandavi that was a mistake from copying a template, I have now fixed it. AusLondonder ( talk) 18:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Апрель 2017 г.
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Aniar, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. also disruptive editing on Locks Brasserie and The Greenhouse (restaurant) plus POV-pushing. The Banner talk 22:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- This guideline is a part of the English Wikipedia's Manual of Style. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page. What part of treated with common sense do you not understand? The Banner talk 22:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- The Banner Please advise what "occasional exception" applies here. Don't bother with the crap about what you learnt at school again because that has no bearing on WP:TIES. Please try and stop POV-pushing for once. AusLondonder ( talk) 22:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, you indeed do not understand treated with common sense. Clear, thank you. The Banner talk 23:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Seriously? You're pushing British English onto an article, where you can't even give the title of that article without using Gaelic or at least some level of Irish English? As the local dialect would advise, catch yerself on. Andy Dingley ( talk) 23:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, you indeed do not understand treated with common sense. Clear, thank you. The Banner talk 23:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- The Banner Please advise what "occasional exception" applies here. Don't bother with the crap about what you learnt at school again because that has no bearing on WP:TIES. Please try and stop POV-pushing for once. AusLondonder ( talk) 22:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Возврат
Please stop reverting, as per the discussion on the 420 project I'm restoring them all, Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 01:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Нация аз-зебабистов из Уга
I declined G4 on this based on a review of the deleted version, I feel that the sourcing provided appears substantially different. This is of course without prejudice to other deletion mechanisms, such as AfD. Note that I had previously been asked about this earlier in the day, see my talk page. Best regards, --joe deckertalk 05:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Вы когда-нибудь слышали о том, чтобы не использовать шаблон для постоянных клиентов?
If you haven't it's at Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. There was no disruptive editing on my part. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Walter Görlitz Yes, I have. Which is why rather than placing a template warning I wrote you a personalised note regarding your disruptive editing. AusLondonder ( talk) 06:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- I stand corrected. I am a member of the project where that template was placed and there's no consensus of the English language project to promote your project's cause so yeah, I have the right to remove it. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- You have no such right. Please take a look at WP:TPO which states " The basic rule....is that you should not edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission". AusLondonder ( talk) 06:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- I stand corrected. I am a member of the project where that template was placed and there's no consensus of the English language project to promote your project's cause so yeah, I have the right to remove it. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Предлагаемое исключение из Abby Томлинсон
The article Abby Tomlinson has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inops (talk) 22:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Трамп
Just FYI, another editor (not me) removed the word "false". I put it back in per longstanding consensus, but then it occurred to me that it's not proper to revert merely because of no consensus. So it's best if someone else (like you) puts that word back, given that I think it's overkill. Anyway, you wrote "???" in your edit summary, so I came here to explain. Cheers. Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Anythingyouwant: Ah ok no worries. AusLondonder ( talk) 12:26, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Просто для гордости
I hand typed WCPW Pro Wrestling World Cup 2017 out. I understand and begrudgingly agree with it's deletion, but I did not copy and paste anything minus the bracket templates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiitit (talk • contribs) 00:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Hiitit: Hello there. I'm sorry your article got deleted, even if it was something I supported. From experience I know it can be seriously disheartening and irritating, especially when you put in work on it. I did self-revert the speedy template because I realised that wasn't appropriate in the circumstances. AusLondonder ( talk) 12:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Атака в Стокгольме, 2017 г. (2)
Hello. I have removed the dog again since there was NO consensus for adding it in the discussions on the talk page. The only one who wanted to add it was you, while multiple editors opposed it. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 09:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Thomas.W: False. Feel free to re-read Talk:2017 Stockholm attack/Archive 1#Pet dog and then get back to me. AusLondonder ( talk) 09:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with AusLondonder, as I already stated in the archived thread. (Why is the archiving so quick?) But adding the dog to the infobox, or adding the dog's name (for god's sake) is just grotesque. Bishonen | talk 10:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC).
- I have of course read the discussion in the archive, a discussion I took part in, and see no consensus for adding it (people who say they won't oppose it count as neutral in my book, and when looking at the rest I find more who oppose it than who support it...). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 10:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Well when you mis-count consensus in a way that suits yourself it is no surprise you produce a result that suits yourself. AusLondonder ( talk) 10:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- RfC started about whether the dog should be mentioned among casualties/fatalities or not, since the outcome of the previous discussion obviously is "open to interpretations". - Tom | Thomas.W talk 10:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Скорейшее исключение выдвижения на дополнительных выборах в Сринагар (округ Лок Сабха), 2017 г.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Srinagar (Lok Sabha constituency) by-election, 2017, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
- It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Srinagar bypoll election protests 2017. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Srinagar bypoll election protests 2017, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Киев vs Киев
If you feel strongly about the matter, then take it to the Talk:Kiev/naming page, because that's where it's going to be decided -- not at the "Kyi, Shchek and Khoryv" article. AnonMoos (talk) 07:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- AnonMoos ( talk ·contribs) I'm fully aware of that. The consensus is that we use Kiev not Kyiv, which is what I have done at Kyi, Shchek and Khoryv. AusLondonder ( talk) 08:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- I was very sure that I had already eliminated all "Kyiv" spellings in previous edits to the article (see summaries of past edits), so I guess I got confused, sorry... AnonMoos ( talk) 21:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- @AnonMoos: No worries :) AusLondonder ( talk) 09:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- I was very sure that I had already eliminated all "Kyiv" spellings in previous edits to the article (see summaries of past edits), so I guess I got confused, sorry... AnonMoos ( talk) 21:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Dear AusLondonder, The name Kiev is incorrect. The correct name is Kyiv, Kiev - is a Russian version of Kyiv, and it already has been proved as incorrect. For the more details, please, check the link with grammar background on this issue by Radio Svoboda: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk8SiM75_eE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annapetrenko (talk • contribs) 20:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Взрыв на манчестерской арене в 2017 году
You re-added 2017 Manchester Arena bombing to Template:Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present) and you added the template to the article without edit summaries. The attack has not been determined to be Islamic terrorism in any reliable sources that I'm aware of. Please join the talk page discussion to justify adding this template. Thank you.- MrX 11:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Категория
Can you please remove it? Your rationale is obsolete.Zigzig20s (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Вики любит гордость 2017
You are invited to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects throughout the month of June as part of the fourth annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign. Feel free to add new and expanded content on the project's Results page. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Выдвижение Аарона Бастани на исключение
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Bastani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Bastani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Отклонено от быстрого удаления: Категория: История округа Кливленд, штат Арканзас
Hello AusLondonder. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:History of Cleveland County, Arkansas, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The category is not empty at this point. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Отклонено от быстрого удаления: Категория: История округа Тишинго, штат Миссисипи
Hello AusLondonder. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:History of Tishomingo County, Mississippi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The category is not empty at this point. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Мы в Твиттере!
WikiLGBT is on Twitter! | |
---|---|
|
Re: июнь 2017 г.
"Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grenfell Tower fire, you may be blocked from editing. AusLondonder (talk) 03:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)"
What does this mean; I am not being "disruptive." Was this message intended for someone else? Am I supposed to register before I edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:7FC0:7B:410:4122:4335:F6DD (talk) 03:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Признание ITN за пожар в башне Гренфелл
On 14 June 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Grenfell Tower fire, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Mjroots (talk) 12:57, 15 June 2017 (UTC) |
Пересмотреть
I think you/we meant B in Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_June_16#Organisations_based_in_Bolivia. Oculi (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Нападение на парк Финсбери
There's a claim that you may have supported this because you believed that ten people were killed. Can you confirm or deny that? Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Выдвижение Аарона Бастани на исключение
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Bastani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Bastani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Вопрос...
Did you try to comply with WP:BEFORE, prior to nominating the article on Anne Marie Waters for deletion?
Your nomination said she was merely a failed candidate. Yet, when I google searched her I found half a dozen topics where coverage of her was not about her "failed candidacy". Geo Swan (talk) 18:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy делеция выдвижение Аарона Bastani
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Aaron Bastani, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Light2021 (talk) 20:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Редакция Ли Рианнон
Your recent edit to the page Lee Rhiannon doesn't make it clear that the issue was more than just education funding. Would you mind if I made an edit to that effect. Gumsaint (talk) 03:58, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Категории для быстрого удаления
Agree with deletion of categories "195 by country" and "196 by country" but not categories "195 by continent" and "196 by continent" Hugo999 (talk) 23:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
УЛЫБКА!! 9 июля 2017 г.
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Использовать британский английский шаблон
Here you removed {{Use British English}} from Angers. While WP:TIES talks about which dialect should be used for new articles, my understanding of {{Use British English}}, based on its documentation, is that it's descriptive, not prescriptive. The article happens to be currently written in British English, and WP prefers that subsequent edits maintain consistency unless there is good reason to convert to another dialect (in this case, there isn't). The purpose of the template is to guide subsequent authors, and, at least in theory, the ENGVAR tool; this is an independent concept from WP:TIES. Did I miss something? David Brooks (talk) 02:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- The Angers article currently uses a combination of American and British spelling, though. For example it uses "center" and -ize spelling. AusLondonder ( talk) 09:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- True. Thanks for pointing it out. David Brooks ( talk) 11:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Джейми Уэйлетт
Hi Aus. You recently added a cat to Jamie Waylett: Prisoners and detainees of England and Wales. I've no idea what he's up to, but I assume he's out and about now. Unless that cat is slightly misnamed, it doesn't apply to him. Could you remove it? Cheers, Bromley86 (talk) 10:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Способы улучшить Pholisa Makeleni
Hi, I'm Boleyn. AusLondonder, thanks for creating Pholisa Makeleni!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing more references and as a stub.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 13:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Убийство Джо Кокса
Please take this to the talk page, I've opened a discussion there. This is Paul (talk) 16:40, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Привет! Есть запрос DR / N, который может вас заинтересовать.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia: Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding whether the murder of Jo Cox can be classed as a terrorist incident. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Murder of Jo Cox".The discussion is about the topic Murder of Jo Cox. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --This is Paul (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Страница, которую вы открыли (Noenieput), была рассмотрена!
Thanks for creating Noenieput, AusLondonder!
Wikipedia editor Anoptimistix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello thanks for contibutions, this article about village passes WP:V, as South African police's website confirms it, however other contents like towns location and province could not be verified as the source does not provides information about them. If you add more source than feel free to remove the {{refimprove}} tag. Once again thanks for your contributions
To reply, leave a comment on Anoptimistix's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Anoptimistix (talk) 12:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Страница, которую вы открыли (Фрэнсис Заммит Димех), была рассмотрена!
Thanks for creating Francis Zammit Dimech, AusLondonder!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Since there's a picture on Commons (not a great one to be fair) I've added it. A bot had added foreign-language links so I purged the page to activate them. Hope that's all OK.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Blythwood (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Я номинировал вас на право автоматического патрулирования
I have nominated you for Autopatrolled rights at WP:PERM/A, an administrator have asked you whether you commit to fill bare URLs which are cited as reference. Well I think you should say yes as filling bareurls is very easy, all you have to do is go at https://tools.wmflabs.org/refill/ and enter page name, this will automatically fillup bare URL's Anoptimistix (talk) 00:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Anoptimistix Thanks for the nomination! I agreed to not use bare URLs in future. Thanks again! AusLondonder ( talk) 10:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
It was my pleasure nominating a great content creator like you. Anoptimistix (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Автоматическое патрулирование предоставлено
Hi AusLondonder, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 19:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Участие Великобритании в европейском XFEL
You made this edit to the European X-ray free-electron laser article and reverted a change to the map, but the source already cited does not appear to back up the way the article now reads. I had raised this on the article's talk page a few days ago. Would you be able to weigh in over there please? Beorhtwulf (talk) 20:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Ваш черновик статьи, Draft: Rivals of the Ripper
Hello, AusLondonder. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rivals of the Ripper".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 11:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Приглашение присоединиться к Women in Red
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.11% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 10:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Переместить обзор
An editor has asked for a Move review of Grand Duchy of Kraków. Because you participated in the requested move, you might want to participate in the move review. Academicoffee71 (talk) 05:04, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Обсуждение в Википедии: Articles_for_deletion / Killing_of_Patrick_Harman
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Killing_of_Patrick_Harman. Zazpot (talk) 07:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Барнстар для вас!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For finding the edits by that vandal who boasted on Reddit. Slashme (talk) 19:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC) |
- Thanks, Slashme. I was rather pleased to find those edits and hopefully wipe the smug smirk of the vandal's face! AusLondonder ( talk) 07:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Обсуждение: Петриковский район
I tried to ping you, but sometimes pings do not work. Could you please have a look at what I wrote there? There is no hurry. Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Обсуждение на Talk: Turkey # RfC - ведущий
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Turkey#RfC--lead. Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 11:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Ноябрьские editathons от Women in Red: Присоединяйтесь к нам!
Welcome to Women in Red's November 2017 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Удаление "За Британию" Править
Hello AusLondoner, Can you supply your reason for your complete removal of my recent edit? --ThorpeCloud (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- @ThorpeCloud: Certainly - I reverted your edit because it was far too lengthy and WP:UNDUE for an article of that size. It also gave too much weight to the opinion of Waters and was not reliably sourced to an independent, reliable, secondary source as required. AusLondonder ( talk) 05:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Реакции на ...
I recommend you or someone else start a discussion on "Reactions to..." question. I think the threshold is rather obvious: simple and almost unanimous condemnation, condolences, or whatever the trend may be needs to be met with deletion, a selective merge, or at least a completely different outlook on how these pages are written. Without an actual plan in place, I have little choice but to keep nominating these articles for deletion, and thus far participants have agreed with my rationale. Thanks for bringing that category to my attention; articles like this are simply ridiculous and fall under what Wikipedia is not.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Отмена изменений Октябрь 2017 г.
AusLondonder I watch with surprise how someone would just wake up to revert an edit that was fully sourced with 8 valids references, claiming the edit was not sourced and duly promotional. You just have to mention each sentence that was not backed up with a valid source and was promotional. KingMak1 (talk) 07:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Предупреждение и вопрос
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.BTW did you edit under any other account before?--Shrike (talk) 19:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- I am fully aware of the discretionary sanctions, thank you. I don't appreciate your loaded question. AusLondonder ( talk) 07:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- I followed User:Shrike here, and am struck by the question. AusLononder and I met, I think, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Paros (Greece) rape, a sort of baptism-by-fire for me, back when I was still a fairly new and utterly naive editor using a lot of pretty stupid arguments at AfD and making a lot of rookie mistakes. He knew all the right things to say and turned the big guns on me - a memorable encounter. Looking back in the light of Shrike's very pointed question, I am struck by the fact that AusLondonder, who had purportedly only been editing a few months at that point, already knew all the rules, the lingo, and the way to intimidate a newbie. @Shrike:, you do understand that there is little point to this unless you have some idea under what name AusLondonder previously edited. He might merely be a very quick learner. Nevertheless, AusLondonder, I think you should be able to give Shrike a straight answer to the question: Did you edit under any other account before?E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- I really have no obligation to even engage with this ridiculous fishing expedition. Your disingenuous misrepresentation of the discuss on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Paros (Greece) rape is really outrageous and truly typical for you. You seem to have a real problem with the truth, E.M.Gregory. You suggest that you were a "newbie" at the AfD discussion but you had been editing for more than six months longer than me. You say I "knew all the right things to say and turned the big guns on me" but my argument was just WP:NOTNEWS and failure of WP:GNG but I lost the AfD and you won! I've gone back and completely read the AfD and I have no fucking idea what you are talking about. If I said all the right things and you made "rookie errors" why did only one editor agree with me? I'm guessing this is part of your tried and tested tactic of flinging enough mud and hoping some will stick. But it is not going to work with me, buddy. So, E.M.Gregory. How come you had so much experience and learnt so fast after you joined? What was your previous account? AusLondonder ( talk) 03:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Энн Мари Уотерс
Hi.
I am concerned that conservatives like AMW are being misrepresented by Wikipedia. I wonder if you can tell me why you think my edit is not impartial, given I have quoted AMW, ratger than someone else writing about her. If someone came to get an opinion of your political views, would you rather they asked you directly, or asked say me, who knows very little about you? This is what the Wikipedia entry for AMW is like. Lazy, heavily left leaning, and making no attempt whatsoever to hear what the real person has to say
Whether you know it or not, you have the power to censor the truth. You can claim that edits such as mine are being inaccurate or biased, but before you do, why not actually read what Ms. Waters has to say for herself? Go to Breitbart.com and read her articles. Listen to the Delingpole podcast interview with her. And then come back and tell me, with a straight face, that the Wikipedia entry isn't the most awful leftist propaganda.
Left or right, you have to acknowledge truth of an individual comes from their mouth, and no other.
Please also look up conservative, far right, democrat and British culture and values, to familiarise yourself with the claims
Andrew Ahg196 (talk) 08:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments Ahg196. Wikipedia works on reliable sources. Per WP:WPNOTRS we also work mainly on the basis of secondary, and not primary, sources. Per WP:ABOUTSELF "Self-published and questionable sources" may be used in some contexts, but not if it is unduly self-serving or makes an exceptional claim. If Anne Marie Waters claims in an article she authored about herself that she is not an "anti-Islam activist" that seems to me both unduly self-serving and an exceptional claim, not supported by both her history of political activity and by reliable sources. Breitbart is not regarded as a reliable source at all. I cannot see how you would believe her article is "leftist propaganda", perhaps your own bias is showing? AusLondonder ( talk) 17:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
AusLondoner - you seem to make a habit of altering items that don't fit your personal political views ? Not very helpful.
I stand by every single word I typed about Lady Nugee (AKA 'Emily Thornberry'). Please put them back and don't remove valid additions by British-born observers of the hypocritical side of British politics. Accurate123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Accurate123 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Вторичные источники?
May I ask your credentials to edit a political piece on a British politician. Are you Austrian as your handle suggests? If so, may I ask what qualifies you to edit entries on Wikipedia on the British and their politics.
Secondary sources? This is truly a nonsense if ever I heard it. A politician is in the business of politics. They make their living from it. They have nothing to hide, what they are is their product. If you would rather hear the views of a right wing politician from secondary sources (which happens to be heavily left biased) you get all sorts of opinions which do not represent the person. What is the reasoning for prioritising secondary sources? Can you explain?
Andrew
Ahg196 (talk) 19:05, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Ahg196: I am sorry you think our policies on sources are "nonsense". Unfortunately your personal opinion on sourcing requirements doesn't really matter. The reason you think everybody and everything is "left biased" is because you have your own (evidently very strong) political biases. Finally, Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia and not a Brexit fansite and I am certain I am an awful lot more qualified as an editor than yourself. AusLondonder ( talk) 02:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
I know my personal opinion doesn't matter, but I will still express my opinion that your system is a nonsense. If you have a section titled political views, surely taking the person's actual statements about what they believe is more valid than a third party's opinion on their beliefs? If it doesn't, then BLP's should be ignored on Wikipedia as being pure propaganda.
I have not mentioned my views on the EU referendum, and for you to bring them up is concerning. Would it change your mind if I had voted remain? I am not interested in rubbishing anyone, I just feel they deserve a fair hearing. As a publication which prides itself in impartiality, Wikipedia and this editors like you who decide what goes and what doesn't, must at least hear out what people have to say.
Since my complaint, I found this article which explains a lot. I expect you'll tell me it's not a credible source - probably because it criticises Wikipedia.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/102601/how-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1-david-swindle
- FrontPage Magazine doesn't seem like a reliable source. It is effectively a blog published by two political activists. I'm surprised you think having neutral, non-promotional biographies of notable people is "a nonsense". This isn't a left/right issue, by the way. Our sourcing policies apply project-wide. What specifically do you think should be added to Waters' bio? AusLondonder ( talk) 10:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Носки Tobias
Since you seem to patrol the moves pages, if you come across more Tobias socks please mark for attention at the SPI or do let me know. Named socks can be reported directly at meta for global locking (he's globally banned). His disruption extends to Commons, Wikidata, de etc. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 14:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- @SpacemanSpiff: No worries, will do. AusLondonder ( talk) 14:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
WiR: лучшие моменты декабря
Welcome to Women in Red's December 2017 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 11:09, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Конкурс "Женщины в красном мире"
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Просмотрите статью о маоизме?
Hi! Long story short, I have a student that has created the Maoist Theory of National Struggle article. His first drafts of this were a little too much in the WP:ESSAY territory and had some other issues that you can read about here, if you like. (It's basically the history of the editing of the page and is more related to image issues at first.)
I saw that you edited the article on Maoism recently and your edit suggested that you're familiar with the topic area. I'm not really familiar with Maoism enough to know if this is something that would warrant its own article or not. The article seems to look good, but I do really want to have input from someone more familiar with Maoism. I'd be incredibly grateful if you could look it over! Another reason that I wanted to reach out to you is that I seem to remember that you're not a staunch deletionist. I don't want student work to be kept if it doesn't benefit Wikipedia, but I also don't really want an automatic knee jerk reaction, if that makes sense. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Сообщение избирателю на выборах ArbCom 2017
Hello, AusLondonder. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
Обсуждение удаления об убийстве Джени Перрин
Hello, AusLondonder,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Murder of Janie Perrin should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Janie Perrin .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Onel5969 TT me 22:18, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Новогоднее решение: Пишите больше статей для «Женщин в красном»!
Welcome to Women in Red's January 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Февраль 2018 на выставке Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons. New: | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Месяц женской истории 2018 в Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Еще одна Daily Mail RfC
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail#Request for comment: Other criticisms section. Your input would be most helpful. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Категория: Депутаты Европарламента от Социал-демократической партии (Великобритания) выдвинуты на обсуждение
Category:Social Democratic Party (UK) MEPs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 10:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Апрель 2018 в Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's April 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
Май 2018 в Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons. 60px
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Заявка на получение стипендии Викимании для ЮАР и САДК
The South African Wikimedia chapter is awarding a limited number of full and partial scholarships to attend Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town to SADC and South African based Wikimedians. The due date for applications is 30 May. You can get more information by clicking here. Don't waste time APPLY NOW! (Google docs form provided by WMZA) 20:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Номинация на быстрое исключение категории: Оборонные агентства Европейского Союза
A tag has been placed on Category:Defence agencies of the European Union requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT go beyond 16:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Осиротевшее платное изображение Файл: Betsie Verwoerd kleur.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Betsie Verwoerd kleur.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Википедия Семинар по наращиванию потенциала
Wikimedia South Africa will be hosting Asaf Bartov from the Wikimedia Foundation for 5 days where he will be conducting a series of Capacity Building Workshops in Johannesburg and Cape Town. The workshops are aimed at addressing challenges faced by African Wikimedians and share tools that will enable them to better increase African content. In Johannesburg the workshops will take place on 25 - 26 May 2018 at the Goethe Institut, and in Cape Town Asaf will be meeting Wikimedians on 29 May 2018. Come and join us either in Johannesburg or Cape Town, we can pay for your travel to attend in either of these cities. You can click here to see more information or you can contact [email protected]. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC), delivered on behalf of Bobbyshabangu
Женщины в красном июне Editathons
Welcome to Women in Red's June 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Выдвижение на выборах в Европейский парламент 2019 г. (Соединенное Королевство) для исключения
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Parliament election, 2019 (United Kingdom) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Parliament election, 2019 (United Kingdom) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Vintage Feminist (talk) 16:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Заявка на участие в Руководящем комитете WikiIndaba открыта
The due date for applying to be part of the WikiIndaba steering committee (WISCom) is this Friday the 22nd. Apply now and be part of the African Wikimedia Movement. (Message from Bobbyshabangu 10:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC))
Июль 2018 в Women in Red
Hello again from Women in Red!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Джон Иадарола
Per the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Iadarola (2nd nomination) as Iadarola's career has grown, I have added additional sources covering his primary hosting of "True North" and "The Damage Report" series with additional non TYT sources. This is in addition to his daily hosting duties on the TYT main show. I have reactivated the article to mainspace. Trackinfo (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Август 2018 в Women in Red
An exciting new month for Women in Red!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Уведомление о ссылке на устранение неоднозначности за 18 августа
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Elkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Совет Среднего Побережья
Your recent edit to Mid-Coast Council is missing the reference "PMHC". You might like to fix that. Regards. --AussieLegend (✉) 18:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Сентябрь 2018 в Women in Red
September is an exciting new month for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Категория: Женщины-критики феминизма номинированы на обсуждение
Category:Female critics of feminism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 20:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Уведомление о ссылке на устранение неоднозначности за 27 августа
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angus Taylor (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Sydney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
AfroCine: Присоединяйтесь к нам на Месяцы африканского кино в октябре!
Greetings! You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre. This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here. Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event! If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC) |
Что касается написания моей первой статьи в Википедии
How I write a good article on Wikipedia. Especially how to add references. Suppose I have read around 7-8 articles on any topic and then I wrote this in my own word. Then in that case if I add only 1-2 in-text citation and all references or I need to follow something different strategy. Please guide I am eagerly waiting to write first article which would be accepted in my first attempt. PRABHAKAR.S (talk) 05:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @PRABHAKAR.S:, thanks for the question. Wikipedia:Your first article is a good first point of reference for advice on how to write a first article. You can also submit your article for review at Wikipedia:Articles for creation, to help ensure it is not subject to deletion. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. AusLondonder ( talk) 05:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Я получил глобальный рейтинг городов от global city
The Global Power City Index from Tokyo from 2017 has London 1st. I have not been following Brexit negotiations closely and don't know how much decline of London a year of that has caused, maybe it's more than I'd guess? All I know is Theresa said negotiations stalled and if a breakthrough doesn't happen in some months it'll be a very disruptive hard Brexit. I'm not suggesting any city or pair of cities is as far ahead of the next one as Victorian London or New York of c.1953, that'll probably never happen again. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 15:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Sagittarian Milky Way: Thanks for your reply and clarification. The Global Power City Index seems to me a rather subjective and biased index. Indeed as I understood it we were discussing power and importance of respective cities not things like their environment or accessibility nor their attractiveness to artists or managers. According to that index, neither Moscow nor Beijing even feature in the top ten global cities, which seems inexplicable. However, I appreciate you do have a basis for what you wrote and I'm happy to clarify I certainly intended no hard feelings towards you. AusLondonder ( talk) 09:10, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Good catch, I didn't notice the weird methodology. At any rate the GaWC_study ranking next one down puts New York and London in the top tier but hasn't published since 2016(?), presumably Brexit would decrease London's degree of integration with the world economy that this ranking is most concerned about. Also the study is British. Sagittarian Milky Way ( talk) 20:52, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Октябрь 2018 в Women in Red
Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Добро пожаловать в Месяцы африканского кино!
Greetings! The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already. On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
|
Будьте готовы к ноябрю с Women in Red!
Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
О вокзале Киев-Пассажирский
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Kyiv-Pasazhyrskyi railway station a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). This message was left at 01:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- @TheDragonFire300: The page history doesn't seem to support this allegation of out-of-process moving. AusLondonder ( talk) 10:32, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, not for you. Don't ask about this warning; it may have resulted from the G6'ing of the article. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. ( Contact me | Contributions). This message was left at 11:28, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Уведомление о ссылке на устранение неоднозначности за 29 октября
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Penrith, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penrith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Глава государства Австралии снова
Howdy. An Rfc at Monarchy of Australia has opened, concerning the topic head of state. GoodDay (talk) 20:29, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Сообщение избирателю на выборах ArbCom 2018
Hello, AusLondonder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
Сообщение избирателю на выборах ArbCom 2018
Hello, AusLondonder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
Декабрь 2018 в Women in Red
The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Предлагаемое исключение из города: Лондон и глобальной державы финансов
The article The City: London and the Global Power of Finance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:40, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Январь 2019 в Women in Red
January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108
January events: |
Февраль 2019 в Women in Red
February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111
February events:
|
Категория: Партии, которые выступали за разрешение на выход во время референдума Великобритании о членстве в Европейском союзе, 2016 г. были номинированы на обсуждение
Category:Parties that campaigned for leave during the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Март 2019 в Women in Red
March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113
Please join us for these virtual events: | ||
|
Апрель 2019 в Women in Red
April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Выдвижение пожара на складе West Footscray в 2018 году на уничтожение
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 West Footscray warehouse fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 West Footscray warehouse fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stephen 02:37, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Желаю вам присоединиться к editathons этого месяца от WiR!
May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Июньские события с WIR
June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Июльские события от Women in Red!
July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Категория: Активисты солидарности Венесуэлы выдвинуты на обсуждение
Category:Venezuela solidarity activists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.
- Another editor started the CFD, but I thought you should be notified of the discussion. Anomalous+0 ( talk) 20:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
ВикиПроект Социализм
Hello! I've noticed you have the WikiProject Socialism userbox in your user page, but you didn't sign up in the project. You can do so in the WikiProject Socialism page, clicking the Join WikiProject button. If you have any doubt, feel free to ask it in the WikiProject talk page. Best, --MarioGom (talk) 11:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Август 2019 в Women in Red
August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Сентябрь 2019 в Women in Red
September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Октябрьские события от "Женщины в красном"
October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
AfroCine: присоединяйтесь к месяцам африканского кино в октябре!
Greetings! After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000. The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section. On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:
|
Ноябрь 2019 в Women in Red
November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Сообщение избирателю на выборах ArbCom 2019
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Декабрьские события с WIR
December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Номинация на быстрое исключение из категории: 2017 заведения на Кипре
A tag has been placed on Category:2017 establishments in Cyprus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Выдвижение убийства Маргарет Галл для исключения
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Margaret Gall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Margaret Gall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AussieLegend (✉) 15:07, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Январь 2020 в Women in Red
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
Февраль с женщинами в красном
February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Апрель 2020 в Women in Red
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Май 2020 в Women in Red
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Июнь 2020 в Women in Red
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169 Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Июль 2020 в Women in Red
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Август 2020 в Women in Red
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Сентябрьские женщины в красных эдитонах
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Октябрьские editathons от Women in Red
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Присоединяйтесь к глобальному конкурсу «Месяцы африканского кино»!
Greetings! The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
|
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Ноябрьские редакции от Women in Red
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Конкурс «Месяцы африканского кино» продолжается в ноябре!
Greetings, Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far. It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so. Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!! Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC) |
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Сообщение избирателя ArbCom 2020 Elections
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Декабрь с женщинами в красном
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Предлагаемое исключение из Национального центра перспективных исследований
The article National Centre for Advanced Studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable program
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Apologies for the template. Bearian (talk) 21:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Новый год с женщинами в красном!
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Февраль 2021 в Women in Red
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter |
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Март 2021 в Women in Red
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter |
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Апрельские editathons от Women in Red
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Рабочие дни группы пользователей Queering Wikipedia 2021 : 14–16 мая
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.
We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.
More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:36, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Май 2021 в Women in Red
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter |
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging