Из Википедии, бесплатной энциклопедии
Перейти к навигации Перейти к поиску

Инструкции администратора

Перенаправления для обсуждения ( RfD ) - это место, где обсуждаются потенциально проблемные перенаправления . Элементы обычно остаются в списке в течение недели или около того, после чего они удаляются, сохраняются или перенаправляются.

  • Если вы хотите заменить незащищенный редирект статьей, указывать ее здесь не нужно. Полностью приветствуется преобразование перенаправлений в статьи. Смелее !
  • Если вы хотите переместить страницу, но вам мешает переадресация, не указывайте ее здесь. По не спорным случаям размещайте технический запрос ; если требуется обсуждение, начните запрошенный ход .
  • Если вы думаете, что перенаправление указывает на неправильную целевую статью, это хорошее место для обсуждения того, что должно быть правильной целью.
  • Редиректы не следует удалять только потому, что в них нет входящих ссылок. Пожалуйста, не используйте это как единственную причину для удаления перенаправления. Тем не менее, переадресовывает , что делать есть входящие ссылки иногда удаляется, так что это не является достаточным условием для хранения. (Дополнительную информацию см. В § Когда следует удалять перенаправление? ).

Пожалуйста, не меняйте цель перенаправления, пока она обсуждается. Это добавляет ненужного усложнения обсуждению как для близких, так и для участников.

Перед включением перенаправления для обсуждения [ править ]

Помните об этих общих правилах, которые применяются здесь, как и везде:

  • Википедия: Перенаправление  - что такое перенаправления, почему они существуют и как используются.
  • Википедия: Критерии быстрого удаления  - какие страницы можно удалить без обсуждения; в частности разделы « Общие » и « Перенаправления ».
  • Википедия: Политика удаления  - как мы удаляем вещи консенсусом.
  • Википедия: Руководство по удалению  - рекомендации по формату обсуждения и сокращению.

Руководящие принципы RfD [ править ]

Ярлык
  • WP: RGUIDE
  • Цель хорошего перенаправления - исключить возможность того, что читатели обнаружат, что тупо смотрят на «Результаты поиска 1–10 из 378» вместо статьи, которую они искали. Если кто-то может правдоподобно ввести имя перенаправления при поиске целевой статьи, это хорошее перенаправление.
  • Перенаправления дешевы . Они занимают мало места для хранения и используют очень небольшую полосу пропускания. Это не повредит вещам, если их несколько разбросаны вокруг. С другой стороны, удаление перенаправлений также обходится дешево, потому что запись удаления занимает мало места в хранилище и использует очень небольшую полосу пропускания. Нет никакого вреда в удалении проблемных редиректов.
  • Если добросовестная номинация RfD предлагает удалить перенаправление и не обсуждается в течение как минимум 7 дней, результатом по умолчанию является удаление .
  • Перенаправления, назначенные в нарушение Википедии: Перенаправление будет быстро сохранено .
  • RfD также может служить центральным дискуссионным форумом для обсуждения того, на какую страницу следует нацелить перенаправление. В случаях, когда перенаправление перенаправления может считаться спорным, рекомендуется оставить уведомление на странице обсуждения текущей целевой страницы перенаправления или предлагаемой целевой страницы, чтобы направить читателей к назначению перенаправления, чтобы разрешить ввод и помочь сформировать консенсус для перенаправления. цель.
  • Запросы на удаление редиректов с одной страницы обсуждения на другую не нужно перечислять здесь. Кто угодно может удалить перенаправление, очистив страницу. G6 критерий для быстрого удаления может быть целесообразным.
  • В обсуждениях всегда спрашивайте себя, будет ли переадресация полезной для читателя.

Когда нужно удалять редирект? [ править ]


Ярлык
  • WP: RFD # ВРЕДНЫЙ

Основные причины, по которым удаление перенаправлений вредно :

  • редирект может содержать нетривиальную историю редактирования;
  • если перенаправление достаточно старое (или является результатом перемещения страницы, которая находилась там довольно долгое время), то возможно, что его удаление нарушит входящие ссылки (такие ссылки, поступающие из более старых версий страниц Википедии, из сводок редактирования , из других проектов Викимедиа или из других источников в Интернете , не отображаются в разделе «Какие ссылки здесь» ).

Поэтому рассматривайте удаление только вредоносных перенаправлений или недавних.

Причины удаления [ править ]

Ярлык
  • WP: RFD # УДАЛИТЬ

Вы можете удалить перенаправление, если выполняется одно или несколько из следующих условий ( но обратите внимание также на исключения, перечисленные под этим списком ):

  1. Страница перенаправления неоправданно затрудняет пользователям поиск статей с похожими названиями через поисковую систему. Например, если пользователь выполняет поиск по запросу «Новые статьи» и перенаправляется на страницу разрешения неоднозначности для «Статей», ему потребуется гораздо больше времени, чтобы перейти к недавно добавленным статьям в Википедии.
  2. Перенаправление может вызвать путаницу. Например, если «Адам Б. Смит» был перенаправлен на «Эндрю Б. Смит», потому что Эндрю был случайно назван Адамом в одном источнике, это могло вызвать путаницу со статьей об Адаме Смите , поэтому перенаправление следует удалить.
  3. Переадресация является оскорбительной или оскорбительной, например, перенаправление «Блог Джо - неудачник» на «Блоги Джо» (если в статье законно не обсуждается «Блоггс Джо» на «Неудачник»). ( Могут применяться критерии быстрого удаления G10 и G3 .)
  4. Перенаправление представляет собой саморекламу или спам. ( Может применяться критерий быстрого удаления G11 .)
  5. Перенаправление не имеет смысла, например перенаправление «Apple» на «Orange». ( Может применяться критерий быстрого удаления G1 .)
  6. Это перекрестное перенаправление пространства имен из пространства статьи, например перенаправление в пространство имен User или Wikipedia. Основным исключением из этого правила являются перенаправления ярлыков псевдо-пространства имен , которые технически находятся в основном пространстве статьи. Некоторые давние перенаправления между пространствами имен также сохраняются из-за их давней истории и потенциальной полезности. Например, перенаправления « MOS: » являются исключением из этого правила. (Примечание «РГ:» перенаправление в пространстве имен Википедии, WP: будучи псевдоним для Википедии: . Speedy критерий удаления R2 может также применяться , если если редирект из основных пунктов статьи пространства имен в категорию:, Шаблон: , Википедия: , Help: и Portal: Пространства имен).
  7. Если перенаправление не работает, то есть перенаправляет на несуществующую статью, ее можно немедленно удалить в соответствии с критерием быстрого удаления G8 , хотя вы должны убедиться, что нет альтернативного места, куда оно могло бы быть соответствующим образом перенаправлено первым.
  8. Если переадресация является новым или очень малоизвестным синонимом названия статьи, она вряд ли будет полезна. В частности, как правило, не следует создавать перенаправления на языке, отличном от английского, на страницу, тема которой не связана с этим языком (или культурой, которая говорит на этом языке). Недопустимые опечатки или неправильные названия являются кандидатами на критерий быстрого удаления R3 , если они были созданы недавно.
  9. Если целевую статью нужно переместить в заголовок перенаправления, но перенаправление было отредактировано ранее и имеет собственную историю, тогда заголовок необходимо освободить, чтобы освободить место для перемещения. Если ход не вызывает сомнений, пометьте перенаправление для быстрого удаления G6 или, альтернативно (с suppressredirectправом пользователя; доступно для перемещателей страниц и администраторов), выполните циклическое перемещение . Если нет, отнесите статью к Запрошенным ходам .
  10. Если редирект может быть расширен до статьи, а целевая статья практически не содержит информации по теме.

Причины не удаления [ править ]

Ярлык
  • WP: RFD № KEEP

Однако не удаляйте такие перенаправления, если:

  1. У них есть потенциально полезная история страниц или история редактирования, которую следует вести в соответствии с требованиями лицензирования для слияния (см. Википедия: Слияние и удаление ). С другой стороны, если перенаправление было создано путем переименования страницы с этим именем, а в истории страниц просто упоминается переименование, и по одной из вышеуказанных причин вы хотите удалить страницу, скопируйте историю страницы на страницу обсуждения статья, на которую он перенаправляет. Акт переименования полезен для истории страниц, и тем более, если было обсуждение имени страницы.
  2. Они могут способствовать случайному связыванию и снизить вероятность создания дублирующих статей , будь то перенаправление множественного числа в единственное число, перенаправление частых орфографических ошибок на правильное написание, перенаправление неправильного названия на правильный термин, перенаправление на синоним и т. Д. Другими словами, перенаправления без входящих ссылок не являются кандидатами на удаление по этим причинам, потому что они полезны для просматривающего пользователя. От редакторов потребуется некоторая дополнительная бдительность, чтобы свести к минимуму появление этих частых орфографических ошибок в текстах статей, потому что связанные с ними орфографические ошибки не будут отображаться как неработающие ссылки.
  3. Они помогают поиску на определенных условиях. Например, если кто-то увидит где-то упомянутое « государство краеугольного камня », но не знает, к чему это относится, то он или она сможет узнать об этом в статье о Пенсильвании (целевой).
  4. Вы рискуете сломать входящие или внутренние ссылки, удалив перенаправление. Например, перенаправления, возникающие в результате перемещения страниц, обычно не следует удалять без уважительной причины. Ссылки, которые существовали в течение значительного периода времени, включая ссылки CamelCase и ссылки на старые подстраницы , следует оставить в покое на случай, если на внешних страницах есть какие-либо существующие ссылки, указывающие на них.
  5. Кто-то считает их полезными. Подсказка: если кто-то говорит, что считает редирект полезным, вероятно, так оно и есть. Возможно, вы не сочтете это полезным - это не потому, что другой человек лжет, а потому, что вы просматриваете Википедию по-разному. Инструмент просмотра страниц также может свидетельствовать о внешней полезности.
  6. Редирект к тесно связанной форме слова, такие как форма множественного числа к форме единственного числа .

Нейтральность переадресации [ править ]

Ярлык
  • WP: RNEUTRAL

Подобно тому, как заголовки статей, использующие ненейтральный язык , разрешены в некоторых случаях , такие переадресации разрешены . Поскольку переадресация менее заметна для читателей, в их именах допускается большая свобода. Таким образом, предполагаемое отсутствие нейтральности в именах переадресации не является достаточной причиной для их удаления. В большинстве случаев ненейтральные, но поддающиеся проверке перенаправления должны указывать на статьи с нейтральным заголовком, посвященные теме термина. Ненейтральные перенаправления могут быть помечены .{{R from non-neutral name}}

Ненейтральные перенаправления обычно создаются по трем причинам:

  1. Статьи, созданные с использованием ненейтральных заголовков, обычно перемещаются в новое нейтральное заголовок, которое оставляет старое ненейтральное заголовок в качестве рабочего перенаправления (например, разногласия по электронной почте Climategate → Climatic Research Unit ).
  2. Статьи, созданные как вилки POV, могут быть удалены и заменены перенаправлением, указывающим на статью, из которой возник вилка (например, мусульманский слух Барака Обамы → удален и теперь перенаправлен на теорию заговора религии Барака Обамы ).
  3. Тематика статей может быть представлена ​​некоторыми источниками за пределами Википедии в ненейтральных терминах. Таких терминов обычно избегают в заголовках статей Википедии, чтобы избежать рекомендаций и общей политики нейтральной точки зрения . Например, ненейтральное выражение « Attorneygate » используется для перенаправления на нейтрально названный спор об увольнении американских поверенных . В статье, о которой идет речь, никогда не использовалось это название, но перенаправление было создано, чтобы предоставить альтернативные средства доступа к нему, потому что этот термин используется в ряде сообщений прессы.

Исключениями из этого правила будут перенаправления, которые не являются установленными условиями и вряд ли будут полезны, и поэтому могут быть назначены для удаления, возможно, по причине удаления № 3 . Однако, если перенаправление представляет собой установленный термин, который используется в нескольких основных надежных источниках , его следует сохранить, даже если он не является нейтральным, поскольку он облегчит поиск на таких условиях. Имейте в виду, что RfD - не то место, где разрешается большинство редакционных споров.

Заключительные примечания [ править ]

Подробности в: Инструкции для администратора RfD .

Номинации должны оставаться открытыми в соответствии с политикой примерно за неделю до их закрытия, если они не соответствуют общим критериям быстрого удаления , критериям быстрого удаления перенаправления или не являются действительными запросами на обсуждение перенаправления (например, фактически являются запросами на перемещение ).

Как выставить редирект для обсуждения [ править ]

Ярлык
  • WP: RFD # HOWTO
  • Пожалуйста, подумайте об использовании здесь ссылок What, чтобы найти другие перенаправления, которые могут быть связаны с тем, который вы назначаете. После перехода на целевую страницу перенаправления и выбора «Какие ссылки здесь» на панели инструментов в левой части экрана компьютера выберите фильтры «Скрыть включения» и «Скрыть ссылки», чтобы отобразить перенаправления на целевую страницу перенаправления.

Текущий список [ править ]

17 марта [ править ]

Послеродовой аборт [ править ]

  • Послеродовой аборт → Неонатицид ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Насколько мне известно, этот термин не часто используется для обозначения неонатицида. ★ Trekker ( разговор ) 20:50, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Послеродовой аборт [ править ]

  • Послеродовой аборт → Детоубийство # Действующий закон ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • Аборт после рождения → Детоубийство # Действующий закон ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Аборты после родов → Детоубийство # Действующий закон ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • После аборта → Детоубийство # Действующий закон ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            

Насколько мне известно, этот термин не так широко используется для обозначения детского цида. ★ Trekker ( разговор ) 20:49, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Комментарий Стоит ли объединять в эту номинацию « Аборт после рождения» , « Аборт после рождения» и « После родов », поскольку они очень похожи и нацелены на одну и ту же статью? 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 21:16, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)
    • Да. Все эти термины тоже кажутся очень вымышленными, я сомневаюсь, что кто-то когда-либо использовал их всерьез. ★ Trekker ( разговор ) 22:16, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)
      • Я добавлю их в эту номинацию 86.23.109.101 ( обсуждение ) 22:18, 17 марта 2021 года (UTC)

Анг Галинг Пиной [ править ]

  • Анг Галинг Пиной → Лакас – CMD ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Анг Галинг Пиной (AGP) - политическая партия, которая участвовала в выборах по партийным спискам на Филиппинах. Довольно злонамеренно предполагать, что он связан с Lakas-CMD. AGP даже не обсуждается в статье Lakas-CMD. Утка Говард ( разговор ) 19:19, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

DiskOSB [ править ]

  • DiskOSB → DOSBox ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • DOperatingSB → DOSBox ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • DOSystemB → DOSBox ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Неподходящее имя для DOSBox. Dominicmgm ( разговор ) 18:32, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Комментарий Эти буквы обозначают «Диск», «Операционная» или «Система», поэтому я не считаю это неправдоподобным. Если я собираюсь проголосовать за сохранение или удаление, ответ займет некоторое время. Ocelot Creeper ( ta lk ) 19:02, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Университет Австралии [ править ]

  • Университет Австралии → Австралийский национальный университет ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Никогда не слышал, что АНУ называют «Австралийским университетом». Люди могут искать статью Список университетов в Австралии вместо ANU. Мэтью хк ( разговорное ) 17:50, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Перенацеливание на список университетов Австралии по номеру. В нем будет больше университетов на случай, если люди будут искать другой. Ocelot Creeper ( ta lk ) 19:11, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Koopa Bros. [ править ]

  • Koopa Bros. → Paper Mario # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • Koopa Bros → Paper Mario # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]        

Несколько непонятный и расплывчатый термин. В Paper Mario есть набор Koopa Bros., но есть еще и Koopalings . Я считаю, что его, вероятно, следует удалить, поскольку у него нет очевидной цели. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 16:23, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

  • Удалите общее имя персонажа, упомянутое только мимоходом в Paper Mario (видеоигра) . - Прачечная Пицца 03 ( d c̄ ) 16:54, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Комментарий Все эти цели и цели назначения одинаковы. Пожалуйста, объедините их в одно обсуждение. Ocelot Creeper ( ta lk ) 18:07, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
    • Лучше обсудить это отдельно в небольших группах, связанных с каждым персонажем. Если вы объедините их в одну мега-номинацию, все, что нужно, - это найти пару редиректов, которые можно перенаправить или устранить неоднозначность, и это очень быстро превратится в крушение поезда . 86.23.109.101 ( обсуждение ) 18:10, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)
      • Возможно, тогда было бы лучше сделать 5-6 связок по 3-5, поскольку это забивает RfD менее чем в 15 различных номинациях, при этом каждая связка должна быть достаточно ограничена, чтобы предотвратить крушение поезда. Ocelot Creeper ( ta lk ) 19:09, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Клевар [ править ]

  • Клевар → Paper Mario # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Fancruft; не упоминается ни на целевой странице, ни на странице первой игры Paper Mario. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 16:21, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

  • Удалить Ни одного упоминания в энциклопедии. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 18:43, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Muskular [ править ]

  • Muskular → Paper Mario # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Fancruft; не упоминается ни на целевой странице, ни на странице первой игры Paper Mario. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 16:21, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Misstar [ править ]

  • Misstar → Paper Mario # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Fancruft; не упоминается ни на целевой странице, ни на странице первой игры Paper Mario. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 16:19, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Колорадо (Бумажный Марио) [ править ]

  • Колорадо (Paper Mario) → Paper Mario # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Fancruft; не упоминается ни на целевой странице, ни на странице первой игры Paper Mario. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 16:14, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Кальмар (Звездный Дух) [ править ]

  • Кальмар (Star Spirit) → Paper Mario # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • Мамар (Звездный Дух) → Бумажный Марио # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]        

Fancruft; не упоминается ни на целевой странице, ни на странице первой игры Paper Mario. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 16:13, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Eldstar [ править ]

  • Eldstar → Paper Mario # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Fancruft; не упоминается ни на целевой странице, ни на странице первой игры Paper Mario. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 16:12, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Баззар [ править ]

  • Buzzar → Paper Mario # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Fancruft; не упоминается ни на целевой странице, ни на странице первой игры Paper Mario. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 16:10, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

История Супер Марио [ править ]

  • История Super Mario → Paper Mario (видеоигра) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Слишком расплывчатое название; непонятно что это значит. Super Paper Mario по-японски называется просто «Super Paper Mario». ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 16:08, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Мерлон (Бумажный Марио) [ править ]

  • Мерлон (Paper Mario) → Paper Mario (видеоигра) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • Мерлон (персонаж Марио) → Paper Mario (видеоигра) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]        
  • Мерлон (персонаж Nintendo) → Paper Mario # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]        

Не упоминается в целевой статье, вымышленный персонаж. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 16:06, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Super Mario RPG 2 [ править ]

  • Super Mario RPG 2 → Paper Mario (видеоигра) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • Super mario rpg 2 → Paper Mario (видеоигра) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]        

Это не похоже на настоящее «рабочее название» игры, а исходная статья была тарабарщиной. Ненужное перенаправление WP: SURPRISE . ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 16:02, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

  • Перенацелите на Super Mario RPG # Legacy , что объясняет связь между этим названием, ролевой игрой Super Mario и бумажным Марио. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 18:46, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Гумбария [ править ]

  • Goombaria → Paper Mario # История и персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • Gommbaria → Paper Mario # Персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]        

Кажется, что это не так, поскольку персонаж не появляется на странице игры Paper Mario (хотя Goombario действительно есть). ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 15:59, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

  • Удалить . Ни одного упоминания в энциклопедии. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 18:47, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Суши (персонаж видеоигры) [ править ]

  • Суши (персонаж видеоигры) → Paper Mario # История и персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Излишне устраненный перенаправление с нетипичным устранением неоднозначности, когда Суши уже перенаправляет на рассматриваемую статью. Маловероятно, что люди будут использовать его для поиска. Хотя в нем говорится, что это перенаправление с историей, история небольшая. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 15:54, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

  • Перенацелите на Paper Mario (видеоигра) # История и персонажи, чтобы сопоставить Суши как "R от ненужного неоднозначности". «(персонаж видеоигры)» является стандартным средством устранения неоднозначности, используемым для статей о персонажах видеоигр, и текущая цель является правильной и недвусмысленной. 86.23.109.101 ( разговор ) 18:50, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Ватт (персонаж видеоигры) [ править ]

  • Ватт (персонаж видеоигры) → Paper Mario # История и персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Нетрадиционные средства устранения неоднозначности делают маловероятным, что люди будут использовать это перенаправление для поиска, когда существует Watt (Paper Mario) . Он утверждает, что это перенаправление с историей, но история крайне незначительна. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 15:52, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Поклонись Бу [ править ]

  • Bow the Boo → Paper Mario # История и персонажи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure:  (@subpage)  ]             

Персонажа обычно называют «Леди Лук» или просто «Лук». «Bow the Boo» - нетрадиционный способ наименования персонажа, который, скорее всего, не будет использоваться людьми для поиска. ZXCVBNM ( РАЗГОВОР ) 15:48, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

GA Thrones [ править ]

  • GA Thrones → Игра престолов ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Если я что-то не упускаю, это совершенно неправдоподобная опечатка - отсутствует половина слова «game», как и «of», и по какой-то причине то, что осталось от первого слова, написано заглавными буквами. Это было создано заблокированным кукловодом из носков, который сосредоточился на эпизодах игр престолов и хорошем процессе статьи, так что это могло быть задумано как «Престолы хороших статей», что также совершенно неправдоподобно в качестве поискового запроса. Во всем Интернете я нашел только одно использование этой опечатки в блоге, и в нем не используются странные заглавные буквы. 86.23.109.101 ( обсуждение ) 14:14, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Пытка кампании Роберта Кьягуланьи [ править ]

  • Пытка кампании Роберта Кьягуланьи → Роберт Кьягуланьи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Это был CSDed A10 по этому титулу. Затем он был перемещен к Роберту Кьягуланьи, что является правдоподобным перенаправлением на Bobi Wine . Однако след кампании «Пытки роберта кьягулани» (который остался от первоначального создания) не является правдоподобным перенаправлением и должен быть удален. Eostrix  ( hoot hoot🦉 ) 11:44, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Все азиаты выглядят одинаково [ править ]

  • Все азиаты выглядят одинаково → Эффект кросс-гонки ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

С момента создания 6 февраля 2017 года перенаправление набрало в общей сложности 95 просмотров по сравнению с 464606 для цели. Это неправдоподобный поисковый запрос, потому что он сформулирован как предложение. Само предложение не упоминается в мишени. - Прачечная Пицца 03 ( d c̄ ) 11:43, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

  • Комментарий Я бы не назвал 95 просмотров страниц за месяц чуть более чем неправдоподобными, это кажется довольно хорошо используемым. Также бессмысленно сравнивать просмотры страниц с целевой статьей, если бы мы оценивали перенаправления с этой логикой, у нас не было бы перенаправлений на популярные страницы, а было бы их множество на редко просматриваемые страницы. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:48, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)
    • В заявлении nom есть опечатка - оно было сделано в 2017 году, а не в 2021 году. Это означает, что он получил что, 25 просмотров страниц в год. это кажется намного более неправдоподобным.
      • Фиксированный. - Прачечная Пицца 03 ( d c̄ ) 12:04, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Компромисс [ править ]

  • Компромисс → Компромисс ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Компромисс → Компромисс ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Компромис → Компромисс ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

РГ: РЛОТЕ . Нет родства между португальским / немецким / польским языком и концепцией компромисса. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:24, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Auktion [ править ]

  • Auktion → Двойной аукцион ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

РГ: РЛОТЕ . Никакой связи между аукционами и немецким языком. Я почти уверен, что это тоже указывает не на то место и должно быть нацелено на общий товар на аукционе . Единственная ссылка на место для входящей статьи, по-видимому, предназначена для целевой группы. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:18, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Navigare [ править ]

  • Navigare → Навигация ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

РГ: РЛОТЕ . Ничего французского в навигации. Все четыре входящих ссылки на этот редирект попадают в неправильное место, две должны указывать на бренд спортивной одежды, две - на велосипедную команду. Масса создана по сценарию. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:12, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Комментарий Также есть Navigare necesse est, который перенаправляет на латинскую фразу. Страница значений - это возможность. Ocelot Creeper ( ta lk ) 17:34, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Космология [ править ]

  • Kosmologie → Физическая космология ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Космология → Физическая космология ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

РГ: РЛОТЕ . Ничего особенно французского / немецкого в космологии. Я на 99% уверен, что они тоже указывают не на то место и должны быть нацелены на общую статью по космологии . Масса создается пользователем с помощью неавторизованного бота / скрипта для выполнения десятков редиректов в минуту. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:01, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Удалить по ном. - Прачечная Пицца 03 ( d c̄ ) 16:55, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

4000-7000 Å [ править ]

  • 4000-7000 Å → Light ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Длина волны видимого света в ангстремах не кажется мне правдоподобным способом поиска статьи о свете и кажется довольно неоднозначной. Почти все результаты, которые я получаю при поиске этой фразы, относятся к спектрам излучения различных молекул, а не к статьям о самом свете. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 10:46, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Возможности трудоустройства для стажеров и кооперативов [ править ]

  • Пути трудоустройства для стажеров и кооперативов → IBM ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Довольно общая фраза, которая не кажется особенно сильно связанной с IBM и не упоминается в целевой статье. Хотя IBM действительно запускает программу под названием «IBM EPIC», которая использует это имя, похоже, что мы нигде не располагаем какой-либо информацией о ней. Статья в истории страниц была объединена с основной статьей IBM после номинации AFD, но за последние 15 лет была отредактирована. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 10:21, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Ганду Эрчел [ править ]

  • Ганду Эрчел → Ханде Эрчел ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Ханда Арчал → Ханде Эрчел ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Оба перенаправления, вероятно, необходимо удалить, поскольку они были созданы теперь заблокированным пользователем Hassanjunoir999 в результате серии бессмысленных перемещений страниц, большинство из которых теперь были отменены администраторами. Среди других примеров - Керем Бюрсин и Керем Дустбин , Бюшра Девели - Бушра Дьявол , Ханде Эрчел - Мадарчод Эрчел и Джай Хинд - Гей Хинд (в настоящее время номинированы на исключение). Keivan.f Talk 01:20, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Исключить : по номинальному обоснованию. Близко к G5. - 2pou ( разговорное ) 01:38, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Speedy G3 как перенаправляет оставшиеся после перемещения страницы вандализмы. Я только что пометил еще одно из их перенаправлений ( Гей Хинд ) для удаления. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 01:40, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Быстрое удаление согласно 86.23.109.101 . Ocelot Creeper ( ta lk ) 17:29, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

16 марта [ править ]

Будущие второстепенные актеры озвучивания GPX Cyber ​​Formula [ править ]

  • Таку Такемура → Future GPX Cyber ​​Formula # Others ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • Такемура Таку → Future GPX Cyber ​​Formula # Others ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • Шинья Мацуда → Future GPX Cyber ​​Formula # Others ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure:  (@subpage)  ]             

Еще из WP: Список неработающих перенаправлений . Актеры озвучивания, которые больше не упоминаются в цели. Вычлененный список удалил их пять лет назад . Предлагаю удаление.
Перенацеливание Такемуры, похоже, сталкивается с проблемами WP: X или Y при поиске .
Мацуда появляется только на страницах имен Шинья и Мацуда . - 2pou ( разговор ) 18:46, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Fuckyerbrainsout [ править ]

  • Fuckyerbrainsout → What the Fuck ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Target - это альбом, который теперь является перенаправлением на дискографию исполнителя. Эта песня там не упоминается, поэтому перенаправление больше не служит цели. Lennart97 ( разговор ) 18:40, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

20015 Чемпионат NCAA Division I среди мужчин по плаванию и прыжкам в воду [ править ]

  • 20015 Чемпионат NCAA I дивизиона среди мужчин по плаванию и прыжкам в воду → Чемпионат NCAA I дивизиона 2015 среди мужчин по плаванию и прыжкам в воду ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Неверное перенаправление, поскольку добавление еще одного «0» не делает его правдоподобным или полезным. Я уже создал редирект для « 20015 », в котором нацелился на « Список малых планет: 20001–21000 # 015 ». У этой страницы переадресации было менее 1000 просмотров страниц , в то время как у целевой страницы было более 4000 просмотров страниц . Я предлагаю как можно скорее удалить это перенаправление как {{ Db-error }}, если не будет предоставлено обоснование. Семьдесят пять лет ( разговорное ) 18:22, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Если вы предлагаете быстро удалить перенаправление, то почему вы назначаете перенаправление на RfD? -  J947 ‡ сообщение ⁓ редактирует 20:18, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Архитектура танца [ править ]

  • Архитектура танца → New York City Ballet # Архитектура танца ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Предлагаю удаление. Найдено в WP: Список неработающих редиректов . Не упоминается в цели. Когда он был там ( до удаления ), это был пустой раздел. - 2pou ( разговорное ) 17:53, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Lost My Gun [ править ]

  • Lost My Gun → Gears of War ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Это похоже на розыгрыш или шутку 2007 года, имеющую мало отношения к статье, на которую он нацелен. Страница в истории статьи представляет собой подделанную версию страницы Gears of War, где все упоминания «Gears of War» заменены на «Lost My Gun», включая ссылку. 14 лет спустя я не могу найти ни одного источника, связывающего это имя с gears of war, поэтому, если это был мем эпохи 2007 года, он, кажется, совершенно не примечателен. Результаты Google в основном относятся к людям, которые спрашивают совета после потери оружия. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 17:46, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Быстрое удаление по G3 . - Прачечная Пицца 03 ( d c̄ ) 21:23, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Тимканпи [ править ]

  • Timcanpi → Silver ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Очевидно, это название японской компании по производству серебряных аксессуаров, которая не упоминается в основной статье о серебре. У них есть имя в Списке персонажей D.Gray-man, поскольку они, по-видимому, вдохновили имя одного из персонажей из этой франшизы, но я не думаю, что это подходящая цель, и они нигде больше не упоминаются. В истории страниц есть статья с двумя предложениями без исходных текстов, но ее можно будет быстро удалить, если она будет восстановлена. Результаты Google для меня почти полностью состоят из онлайн-словарей, которые взяли определение этого слова из этого перенаправления и теперь думают, что оно означает серебро. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 14:37, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Удалить по ном. Должен был быть A7 вместо перенаправления. - Прачечная Пицца 03 ( d c̄ ) 21:30, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

1.000 ... 1 [ править ]

  • 1.000 ... 1 → 0.999 ... ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Доказательство того, что 1, за которой следует бесконечное количество десятичных нулей с любым произвольным числом на конце = 1, не упоминается в целевой статье. Хотя это обе идентичности, включающие десятичные представления 1, я не думаю, что читателям полезно отправлять их в статью, где это число не упоминается. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 13:52, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Попытка американского самоубийства 2020 г. [ править ]

  • Попытка государственного переворота в США в 2020 году → Президентские выборы в США в 2020 году ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Попытка переворота в США в 2020 году → Президентские выборы в США в 2020 году # Попытки отложить или опровергнуть результаты выборов ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Думаю, это было бы лучше в качестве перенаправления на статью о попытках отмены выборов в США, чем на статью о выборах в целом. ( Попытки отменить президентские выборы в США 2020 года , возможно, раздел о том, следует ли называть их переворотом). Перечислить его здесь, потому что это спорная тема, и я не думаю, что мне стоит перенацелить их как IP. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 13:02, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Комментарий - FWIW - как OA перенаправления « Попытка самоворота Америки в 2020 году » - никаких проблем с тем, что « WP: CONSENSUS » наконец-то решено - надеюсь, это каким-то образом поможет - iac - Оставайтесь в безопасности и здоровье !! - Дрбогдан ( разговор ) 13:30, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Перенацелите оба на попытки отменить президентские выборы в США 2020 года . Хотя конкретный термин «самовольный переворот» больше используется и описывается во время штурма Капитолия США в 2021 году , учитывая префиксы 2020 года для них, я думаю, что более широкая статья - лучшая цель. Я не думаю, что таргетинг на раздел является лучшим, поскольку переворот упоминается в лиде, и поисковики могут не интересоваться конкретно аспектом переворота. Mdewman6 ( разговорное ) 21:40, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Я согласен с тем, что попытки отменить президентские выборы в США 2020 года (а не какой-либо конкретный их раздел) были бы лучшим местом для этих перенаправлений читателей. Так что перенацелите оба на Mdewman6. Спасибо IP за открытие этого обсуждения. 28 байтов ( разговор ) 03:26, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Шаблон: R человеку [ править ]

  • Шаблон: R к человеку → Шаблон: R от человека ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Это перенаправление неверно. Не всякая переадресация на человека также идет на человека. Я просто хотел пометить Институт стандартов образования этим шаблоном, но с его текущей целью он не подходил для перенаправления. Либо удалите (и изучите ~ 20 включений в каждом конкретном случае), либо создайте как новый rcat. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 12:59, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Удалить : почти все шаблоны перенаправления - это «R от ...», а не «R к ...», поэтому в списке возможных шаблонов это не требуется. Это, конечно, не то же самое, что {{ R от человека }}, которое используется для таких вещей, как Автор-> Книга. Pam D 00:20, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Сохраните и, возможно, найдите лучшую цель, такую ​​как {{ R to list entry }} (?). На самом деле существует довольно много шаблонов «от R к», поэтому утверждение, что «почти все» являются «R от» шаблонов rcat, кажется недостаточным основанием для удаления. Я оставил его ждать, чтобы увидеть, увеличится ли его потенциальное использование, поэтому мы должны определить, оправдывает ли его нынешнее использование его преобразование в шаблон rcat. 20 или около того включений? возможно, еще нет, но у нас нет хрустального шара, поэтому мы можем просто оставить его в покое на некоторое время. PI Ellsworth   ed.  туда  20:48, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Шаблон: Infobox Academic [ править ]

  • Шаблон: Infobox Academic → Шаблон: Infobox ученый ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Шаблон: Infobox Академические приводит к Шаблон: Infobox ученый , а не для шаблона: Infobox академической , но , кажется, используется на нескольких страницах (см https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Infobox_Academic ) , включая, например, Джилл Лепор, где историк показан с «Научной карьерой». Требуется распутывание. Пэм Д 11:24, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

  • Перенацелить на шаблон: Infobox Academic как буква «R с альтернативными заглавными буквами». На мой взгляд, в основном все текущие включения будут лучше работать с общим академическим информационным ящиком. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:29, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)
@ 86.23.109.101 : Это нарушит существующие способы использования? Пэм Д 14:02, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
Из 10 текущих включений 5 будут работать нормально, потому что они используют только базовые поля ввода, которые существуют в обоих информационных блоках. Остальным 5 потребовалось бы либо заменить их на Template: Infobox ученый, либо заменить имена полей на их академические эквиваленты Template: Infobox , в зависимости от того, классифицируются ли они как ученые или академики. Так как их всего 5 штук, работы не должно быть слишком много. Даже если вы оставите их в покое, они не будут «ломать» информационные окна, они должны быть закодированы так, чтобы игнорировать входные параметры, которые они не распознают, и просто создавать частичное информационное окно. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 14:14, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Ретаргетинг по ном. Я вручную обновил небольшое количество статей, которые были затронуты, так что никакого воздействия нет. МБ 14:56, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
@ МБ : Молодец, спасибо. Джилл Лепор выглядит лучше. Пэм Д 21:20, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

AB 2 [ править ]

  • AB 2 → Alberta Highway 2 ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

В статье или в Списке провинциальных автомагистралей Альберты нет ничего, что указывало бы на то, что эта автомагистраль известна как «AB 2», а AB 2 двусмысленно с Aichi AB-2 . Моя смена цели вернулись на @ NASCARfan0548 : . Шхнотсолоуд ( разговор ) 19:53, 25 февраля 2021 (UTC)

Держи . Почтовый индекс штата / провинции с номером является стандартным практически повсюду в США и Канаде. Aichi AB-2 имеет дефис. HotdogPi 20:07, 25 февраля 2021 (UTC)
  • Держите , согласно HotdogPi. NASCARfan0548  ↗ 20:14, 25 февраля 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Устраните неоднозначность . Кажется, есть ряд вещей, называемых AB2 или их вариаций, пока у нас есть шоссе и Aichi AB-2 , и, кроме того, есть предлагаемый вариант Bernard AB 1, который не был построен, классификация Curtiss Model F , класс линейных усилителей , математическая категория, упомянутая в категории AB5 , устаревший почтовый индекс Великобритании ( область почтового индекса AB ) и, возможно, многое другое. множество потенциальных целей. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 20:26, 25 февраля 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambig в АВ2 и reidrect это там, покрытие AB 2 , АВ2 и АВ2 и АВ2 , как все они весьма неоднозначны друг с другом. В дополнение к тому, что упоминается выше в анонсе , существует некая классификация по множественным звездным системам (см. HD 193322 , Бета Козерога и другие), звание в Королевском флоте ( Моряк (ранг) # Соединенное Королевство ) и кое-что, связанное с наименование клинописных знаков. Тридуульф ( разговор ) 00:24, 26 февраля 2021 (UTC)
Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо,подписали, Rosguill разговор 1:45, 5 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep Это английская Википедия. Здесь основная тема Alberta Hwy 2. 🐔  Chicdat   Bawk мне! 12:54, 8 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Я не согласен, я не думаю, что это имеет какое-либо отношение к тому, что это «английская Википедия», и все, что связано с тем, где находятся читатели. Для американцев / канадцев может случиться так, что «AB2» однозначно относится к «шоссе 2 Альберты», но как читатель из Великобритании я не ожидал, что попаду туда, для меня основной темой, вероятно, будет почтовый индекс Великобритании. Это имя не упоминается в целевой статье, и даже поиск в Google по запросу AB 2 alberta или AB2 alberta дает полный беспорядок результатов, охватывающих все, от страховых форм до бейсбольных команд и шоссе. Для этих коротких комбинаций букв и цифр очевидным решением является устранение неоднозначности нескольких допустимых целей. 86.23.109.101 ( разговор ) 13:20,
Я согласен с анонсом. Я тоже из Великобритании, и для меня AB2 гораздо больше связан с Абердином, чем с Альбертой. Для человека, знакомого с клинописью, очень вероятно, что это будут знаки, о которых он думает, как и для того, кто занимается классификацией звезд. Когда я поискал AB 2 в Google, мои результаты на первых двух страницах были: «Простая зимняя стерня» (классификация пахотных земель), никель-алюминиевая бронза (6 совпадений), AB2 Bio, швейцарская фармацевтическая компания (3 поиска). , почтовый индекс (2 обращения), Angry Birds2 (4 хита), усилитель (как-то связанный с нанотехнологиями, я думаю), антитело, тикер акций банка и много алгебры. Если добавить к поисковому запросу Альберту, то первое появление шоссе - это последняя запись на первой странице результатов - нет никаких доказательств, что это основная тема. Тридуульф ( разговор ) 23:28, 8 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Неоднозначность , я согласен с доказательствами , представленными 86.23.109.101 и Thryduulf , что Alberta шоссе 2 не является основной темой. Adumbrativus ( разговор ) 03:57, 14 марта 2021 (UTC)
Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо,ДерикК.09:29, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Разъясняйте, что в этом обсуждении явно не является основной темой. Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 10:44, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

1234567890 [ править ]

  • 1234567890 → Unix time # Известные события во время Unix ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure:  (@subpage)  ]             

Хотя это описано в целевой странице, я почти уверен, что арабские цифры являются основной темой. Там можно было бы добавить сноску, но я не думаю, что это необходимо. Этот редирект позволяет получать более сотни просмотров страниц в месяц и может сбить с толку многих людей. Обратите внимание, что 0123456789 также перенаправляет на предложенную цель. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 23:00, 24 февраля 2021 г. (UTC)

  • Retarget к числу Pandigital , где упоминается это редирект. « 123456789 » также перенаправляет на «Панцифровый номер». - Предшествующий неподписанный комментарий, добавленный Seventyfiveyears ( обсуждение • вклад ) 00:51, 25 февраля 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Перенацелить куда-нибудь. Текущая цель явно не является основной темой. Я не совсем уверен, что номер Pandigital тоже. Между тем, 0–9 и 0–9 перенаправляют в систему счисления . Все это нужно как-то объединить. - Paul_012 ( разговор ) 13:17, 25 февраля 2021 (UTC)
  • Перенацеливание на арабские цифры в качестве основной темы со вторым предпочтением системе счисления . Я не думаю, что Pandigital число является основной темой. 123456789 также должен перейти к той же цели. A7V2 ( разговорное ) 08:03, 26 февраля 2021 (UTC)
Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий по повторному включению:несмотря на то, что уже существует консенсус поповодуретаргетинга, все еще есть некоторые небольшие разногласия в отношении основной темы.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 06:06, 4 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Перенацелите на панцифровое число , правильное место, если мы говорим об этом как о числе, а не как о строке символов, и очистите там шляпные сноски. - Кусма ( t · c ) 09:25, 4 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Перенацеливание на числовую систему . Пол 012 поднимает некоторые моменты, с которыми я в основном согласен. 🐔  Chicdat   Bawk мне! 12:28, 4 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Устранение неоднозначности. Мне кажется, нет четкой основной темы, и есть три допустимые цели, предложенные выше. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 12:42, 4 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Перенацеливание на арабские цифры . Я думаю, что кто-то, ищущий это, намеревается ввести набор арабских цифр (либо от скуки, либо из любопытства) вместо того, чтобы иметь в виду число 1 234 567 890. Конечно, где бы это ни закончилось, пожалуйста, добавьте или очистите шляпные сноски для других допустимых целей. - T avix ( разговор ) 18:50, 13 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Перенацеливание на арабские цифры в соответствии с 0123456789 , а также на точку 123456789 . Это лучшая цель, чем числовая система , которая гораздо шире. Я в основном согласен с Тавиксом, но на самом деле трудно сделать больше, чем предположить, что, вероятно, имеют в виду читатели. Панцифровое число слишком специфично, чтобы показаться мне главной темой. -  The  Earwig  ( разговор ) 08:54, 14 марта 2021 (UTC)
Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий по повторному включению: взависимости от того, какой вариант ретаргетинга является наиболее популярным, мы можем получить0123456789,123456789и1234567890,идущие на 2-3 разных цели. Похоже, существует консенсус против удаления и ретаргетинга, но мы можем высказать больше мнений о том, где использовать перенаправление.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо,ДерикК.09:28, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Устраните неоднозначность согласно 86 выше. Mdewman6 ( разговорное ) 22:11, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Категория: Тамильские певцы [ править ]

  • Категория: Тамильские певцы → Категория: Тамильские народные певцы ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Недопустимая опечатка, бесполезна в качестве мягкого перенаправления, нет значимой истории страниц. MClay1 ( разговор ) 09:06, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Перенаправления на удаление категорий следует использовать с осторожностью, и это бесполезно. Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 22:49, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

ISO 3166-1 N3 Многоразовые региональные пользовательские шаблоны [ править ]

  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 004 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Афганистане ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 008 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Албании ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 010 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Антарктиде ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 012 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Алжире ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 016 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Американском Самоа ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 020 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Андорре ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 024 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Анголе ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 028 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Антигуа и Барбуде ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 031 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Азербайджане ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 032 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Аргентине ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 036 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Австралии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 040 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Австрии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 044 → Шаблон: Пользователь на Багамах ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 048 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Бахрейне ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 050 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Бангладеш ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 051 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Армении ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 052 → Шаблон: Пользователь на Барбадосе ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 056 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Бельгии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 060 → Шаблон: Пользователь на Бермудских островах ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 064 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Бутане ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 068 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Боливии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 070 → Шаблон: Пользователь из Боснии и Герцеговины ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 072 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Ботсване ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 076 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Бразилии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 084 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Белизе ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 096 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Брунее ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь из 100 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Болгарии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 108 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Бурунди ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 112 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Беларуси ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 120 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Камеруне ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 124 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Канаде ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 132 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Кабо-Верде ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 140 → Шаблон: Пользователь из Центральноафриканской Республики ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 152 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Чили ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 156 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Китае ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 162 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Острове Рождества ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь на 166 → Шаблон: Пользователь на Кокосовых (Килинг) островах ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 170 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Колумбии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 178 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Республике Конго ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 180 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Демократической Республике Конго ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 184 → Шаблон: Пользователь с Островов Кука ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 188 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Коста-Рике ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 191 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Хорватии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 192 → Шаблон: Пользователь на Кубе ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 196 → Шаблон: Пользователь на Кипре ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 203 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Чехии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 204 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Бенине ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 208 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Дании ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 212 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Доминике ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 214 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Доминиканской Республике ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 218 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Эквадоре ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 226 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Экваториальной Гвинее ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 231 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Эфиопии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 232 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Эритрее ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 233 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Эстонии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 234 → Шаблон: Пользователь на Фарерских островах ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 238 → Шаблон: Пользователь с Фолклендских островов ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 242 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Фиджи ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 246 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Финляндии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 248 → Шаблон: Пользователь на Аландских островах ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 250 → Шаблон: Пользователь во Франции ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 254 → Шаблон: Пользователь во Французской Гвиане ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 262 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Джибути ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 266 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Габоне ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 268 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Грузии (страна) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 270 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гамбии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 276 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Германии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 288 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гане ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 292 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гибралтаре ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 300 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Греции ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 304 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гренландии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 308 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гренаде ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 312 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гваделупе ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 316 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гуаме ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 320 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гватемале ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 324 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гвинее ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 328 → Шаблон: Пользователь из Гайаны ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 332 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гаити ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 340 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гондурасе ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 344 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гонконге ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 384 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Кот-д'Ивуаре ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 531 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Кюрасао ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 533 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Арубе ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 581 → Шаблон: Пользователь в США ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 583 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Федеративных Штатах Микронезии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 624 → Шаблон: Пользователь из Гвинеи-Бисау ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 652 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Сен-Бартелеми ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 660 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Ангилье ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 724 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Испании ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 732 → Шаблон: Пользователь из Западной Сахары ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 756 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Швейцарии ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 784 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Объединенных Арабских Эмиратах ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 818 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Египте ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 826 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Соединенном Королевстве ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 831 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Гернси ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 840 → Шаблон: Пользователь в США ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Шаблон: Пользователь в 854 → Шаблон: Пользователь в Буркина-Фасо ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Все это бесполезно. Хотя Категория: ISO 3166-1 A2 Многоразовые региональные пользовательские шаблоны и Категория: ISO 3166-1 A3 Многоразовые региональные пользовательские шаблоны являются потенциальными кодами сокращений, которые люди могут использовать для стран, это не та система, которую люди собираются использовать для добавления своих ящиков пользователей. . Таким образом, эти перенаправления бесполезны и загромождают пространство шаблонов. Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 06:09, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Сохранить : эти перенаправления сохраняются, поэтому пользователи могут использовать коды стран ISO 3166-1 N3 для вызова региональных пользовательских шаблонов Категория: Многофункциональное использование . Ваш вклад в выступление  Buaidh  05:57, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
@ Buaidh : да, но насколько я могу судить, этого никто не делает (я не проверял все перенаправления, но все те, которые я проверял, не использовались). Как это полезно иметь при себе? Я этого не вижу. Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 07:30, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)
Удалить: почти все перенаправления не используются за пределами этой страницы, и даже шаблон «Пользователь в 840» имеет только 4 использования за пределами этой страницы. (Пользователи AFAIK из США составляют, по крайней мере, множество всех английских редакторов Википедии, если не большинство, поэтому, если пользователь в шаблоне 840 имеет только 4 использования, тогда пользователь в шаблонах не стоит держать в целом IMHO.) Jackattack1597 ( разговор ) 17:36, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)
В отличие от этих нелепых споров об их полезности, эти перенаправления не ложатся бременем на Википедию. Если эти перенаправления устранены, документацию по этой функции необходимо будет изменить, чтобы отразить потерю этой функции. Ваш вклад в выступление  Buaidh  21:44, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Meh, по умолчанию Weak Keep . На мой взгляд, они не являются особенно правдоподобным способом поиска этих пользовательских шаблонов, и я лично не стал бы их делать, но теперь они существуют, они безвредны, относительно недвусмысленны, правильно классифицированы, и я не вижу никакой ценности в удаление. Они существуют с 2015 года, поэтому некоторые из них могли быть внесены в исторические версии страниц. Поскольку пространство шаблонов не доступно пользователю, я думаю, что мы можем быть более снисходительными к перенаправлениям, поскольку читатели не столкнутся с ними случайно. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 00:03, 18 марта 2021 (UTC)

Левая крачка [ править ]

  • Left Tern → Blue Sky Studios # Художественные фильмы ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Предполагалось, что этот фильм находится в разработке в течение многих лет, и теперь, когда Карниолус удалил его в феврале 2015 года, нигде не упоминается в Википедии, потому что «[об этом] официально не объявляли, [и] единственными источниками [были] LinkedIn и резюме. " Я не уверен, стоит ли это по-прежнему хранить, поэтому я склоняюсь к удалению этого, если кто-то не сможет найти хорошую цель, хотя в противном случае я открыт, чтобы меня поколебали. С уважением, SONIC 678 05:27, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Удалить . Нигде не упоминается. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:31, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Шаблон: сенаторы США от штата Мэн [ править ]

  • Шаблон: Сенаторы США от штата Мэн → Шаблон: Сенаторы США от штата Мэн ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Маловероятная ошибка капитализации (версий для других государств не существует); неиспользованный. Elli ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 05:17, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Держи . Безобидное альтернативное использование заглавных букв, однозначно относящееся к текущему шаблону. Шаблон находился под этим названием более десяти лет, прежде чем был перемещен ~ 18 месяцев назад, поэтому этот шаблон будет часто использоваться в старых версиях страниц. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 16:48, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Держать за 86 ...; К4 применяется. -  J947 ‡ сообщение ⁓ редактирует 20:21, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Соблюдайте IP-адрес 86 и J947, я вижу, как люди забывают использовать заглавные буквы M. Это перенаправление здесь ничего не вредит. С уважением, SONIC 678 00:51, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Шаблон: Wp [ править ]

  • Шаблон: Wp → Шаблон: приветственный файл cookie ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Неиспользуемый, несвязанный ярлык шаблона; больше не имеет смысла, поскольку {{ Welcome-personal }} был объединен с {{ Welcome cookie }}. Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 05:10, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Комментарий Поскольку этот шаблон предназначен только для подстановки, при этом отключается связь с ним, на самом деле ничего не говорится о том, сколько людей его используют. 1 просмотр страницы за последний год означает, что это бесполезно. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:22, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)
    • Да, но обычно заменяемые шаблоны и ярлыки, которые фактически используются, где-то связаны , поэтому люди находят шаблон. Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 23:17, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Шаблон: WP-Todo [ править ]

  • Шаблон: WP-Todo → Шаблон: Сделать ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Неиспользуемый ненужный ярлык шаблона - нигде нет ссылок и длиннее, чем набирать {{ To do }}. Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 05:08, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Удалить . Ах да, это древнее, заменено в следующем году. Как создатель, рад просто удалить его. -  SJ  + 00:17, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Шаблон: W cl mu hist [ править ]

  • Шаблон: W cl mu hist → Шаблон: История западной художественной музыки ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Неиспользованный плохой ярлык - требуется больше времени, чтобы подумать о том, как его написать и что это значит, чем просто связать {{ Историю западной художественной музыки }}. Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 05:02, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Удалить . Невероятный ярлык. Я думаю, что это должна быть «история западной классической музыки», но это не сразу очевидно, и если вы натолкнетесь на это в викикоде, вам придется подумать, чтобы выяснить, что это за шаблон. получил 2 просмотра страниц за полтора года, и в нем нет включений, поэтому, похоже, не нашел никакого применения. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 16:45, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • ' Удалить по номеру и выше; какая чепуха. Немного смешно ... Aza24 ( разговор ) 21:42, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Шаблон: W c [ править ]

  • Шаблон: W c → Шаблон: приветственный файл cookie ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Ярлык шаблона с необычным названием, потенциально неоднозначный с {{ wc }}, который нацелен где-то еще; нигде не связан, так что маловероятно, что он используется (да, это только подстановка, но если бы он был использован, он, вероятно, отобразился бы в списке ярлыков или где-то еще). Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 05:00, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Шаблон: WPGEORGIA (COUNTRY) [ править ]

  • Шаблон: WPGEORGIA (СТРАНА) → Шаблон: WikiProject Georgia (страна) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Неиспользованный, бесполезный ярлык шаблона (это значение режет мне глаза и вряд ли кто-то наберет его, чтобы сохранить несколько символов). Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 04:58, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Шаблон: WPESCHATOLOGY [ править ]

  • Шаблон: WPESCHATOLOGY → Шаблон: Христианская эсхатология ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Перенаправление неиспользуемого шаблона заглавными буквами; также префикс «WP» не имеет смысла, поскольку он не нацелен на Википроект. Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 04:57, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

На рассмотрении [ править ]

  • В обзоре → Обзор (альбом Mikuni Shimokawa) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Целью, которая теперь является перенаправлением на дискографию исполнителя, является альбом под названием «Review», а не « In Review». Я думаю, что «на рассмотрении» может относиться ко многим вещам, поэтому лучше всего удалить перенаправление. Lennart97 ( разговор ) 10:02, 8 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Очень слабый ретаргетинг либо на Review, либо на Review (значения) , который, я думаю, охватывал бы большинство вещей, которые ищут поисковики. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 11:45, 8 марта 2021 (UTC)
Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 00:16, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Удалить - маловероятный поисковый запрос. Если его ищут, пользователю было бы более полезно увидеть результаты поиска. Обязательно должна быть песня или что-то с таким названием, которое однажды может использовать это имя, не беспокоясь о перенаправлении. MClay1 ( разговор ) 09:10, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Удалить . Для проверки я думаю о коллегиальной проверке , но поскольку этого перенаправления не существует, удалите форму в верхнем регистре, если не может быть идентифицирована цель, которая оправдывала бы имя собственное. В качестве альтернативы, я был бы в порядке с перенацеливанием на обзор (значения), если другие сочтут это лучшим вариантом. Mdewman6 ( разговорное ) 21:47, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Деймос (нефтяная вышка) [ править ]

  • Деймос (нефтяная вышка) → Плавучая стартовая платформа SpaceX ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Это перенаправление требует обсуждения . Не было и никогда не было «нефтяной вышки» по имени Деймос. SpaceX действительно приобрела в связи с банкротством старую буровую установку для бурения нефтяных скважин, и это морское судно находится в порту для полного переоборудования над уровнем воды. Нефтяное буровое оборудование отключается и списывается, и оно больше не может «буровая установка». SpaceX назвала корабль, ранее называвшийся Valaris 8500, в честь Деймоса . Для этой статьи есть правильно названный редирект: Deimos (стартовая платформа) . Я серьезно не уверен, является ли перенаправление Деймоса (нефтяной вышки) недействительным перенаправлением и, возможно, его следует удалить, или оно должно остаться (на какое-то время?), Даже если ни одна буровая установка не называется или никогда не называлась Деймосом., что может создать у читателя Википедии неверное представление о реальности. N2e ( разговорное ) 04:17, 8 марта 2021 (UTC)

Сюда также входит Фобос (нефтяная вышка) . Как человек, создавший эти перенаправления, я согласен с тем, что технически нефтяных вышек никогда не было, а «пусковая платформа» - гораздо лучший дескриптор. Может быть, лучше всего переместить их обоих на Фобос (бывшая нефтяная вышка) / Деймос (бывшая нефтяная вышка) или полностью удалить их. Не уверен, что было бы лучше. N828335 ( разговор ) 04:30, 8 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Держи . Эти пусковые платформы раньше были нефтяными вышками, а затем были переоборудованы, так что это кажется достаточно разумным поисковым запросом - за последний месяц он получил 17 просмотров страниц. Поиск в Google предполагает, что «Деймос (нефтяная вышка)» в основном ассоциируется с пусковой платформой SpaceX, и я не смог найти никаких других нефтяных платформ с таким названием. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 12:12, 8 марта 2021 (UTC)
Если мы просто добавим «бывший» к имени, перемещая каждое из них, это может сохранить поисковый запрос и устранить любую возможность недопонимания. N828335 ( разговорное ) 15:35, 8 марта 2021 (UTC)
Я не думаю, что квалификатор необходим, если вы введете в поисковую систему «нефтяная вышка Фобос» или «нефтяная вышка Деймос», вы получите страницы и страницы результатов о том, как SpaceX использует модифицированную нефтяную вышку под названием Фобос / Демиос запускает свои ракеты. У нас также нет статей о других нефтяных вышках с такими же названиями, с которыми это могло бы быть двусмысленным. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 15:45, 8 марта 2021 (UTC)
Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 00:14, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Элекса [ править ]

  • Elexa → Trojan (бренд) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Похоже, что это продукт, нигде не упомянутый на enwiki, единственное использование здесь - различные фамилии и имена, в основном вскользь упоминания, распространенные во многих статьях. Обсуждение Hog Farm 03:57, 8 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

  • перенацелить на Ондрея Элекса как R из фамилии - Lenticel ( обсуждение ) 06:09, 11 марта 2021 (UTC)
Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 00:13, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Нацелить на Чечевички. - Эврика Лотт, 01:06, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Удалить по номеру: есть несколько человек, имена которых упоминаются в статьях, и их лучше всего охватить с помощью результатов поиска, которые в любом случае ставят Ондрея Элекса на первое место. - Уанфала (разговорное) 09:50, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

15 марта [ править ]

Язык программирования Python [ править ]

  • Язык программирования Python → Python (язык программирования) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • Язык программирования Java → Java (язык программирования) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Неверный поисковый запрос. - C HAMPION ( разговор ) ( вклады ) ( логи ) 23:17, 15 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

  • Удалите оба . Я вижу, откуда идут эти перенаправления, но нам не нужно, чтобы они загромождали результаты поиска. Mdewman6 ( разговорное ) 23:44, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Удалите оба этих неправдоподобных условия поиска. Сколько людей жаловались на то, что происходит, когда кто-то ищет язык программирования C? - Гай Мейкон ( разговор ) 01:11, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Удалите перенаправления "Язык программирования Python" и "Язык программирования Java", которые уже служат своей цели - Lenticel ( обсуждение ) 03:56, 17 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

JSESSIONID [ править ]

  • JSESSIONID → Session (информатика) # Токен сеанса HTTP ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • Jsessionid → Session (информатика) # Токен сеанса HTTP ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure:  (@subpage)  ]             

Идентификатор сеанса мне кажется лучшей целью. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 22:13, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Перенацеливание на Session ID , основную статью, за ном. Я не думаю, что здесь нужен RfD. -  J947 ‡ сообщение ⁓ редактирует 22:16, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Ретаргетинг и, согласно J947, никаких возражений, если Nom отзовется и сделает это СМОТРЕТЬ. - Тамзин (она / они) | о токи тава ми. 22:26, ​​15 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Варгас (эстадо) [ править ]

  • Варгас (эстадо) → Варгас (состояние) ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Редирект создан из-за неправдоподобной опечатки. Полдень Икар ( разговор ) 19:54, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Держать ; это не опечатка, и это не неправдоподобно, просто в нем есть средство устранения неоднозначности на испанском языке, что вполне разумно для испанского государства на RLOTE . -  J947 ‡ сообщение ⁓ редактирует 22:14, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Не могли бы вы объяснить, в чем ошибка? Как J947 говорит, что это, похоже, просто средство устранения неоднозначности по-испански, но, поскольку Nom является носителем испанского языка, а я не говорю на этом языке, возможно, я что-то пропустил? 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 22:19, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
    • Похоже, что носители английского языка, не являющиеся носителями английского языка, которые впервые назначают RfD, часто неверно истолковывают альтернативные формы как опечатки. Это происходит с довольно высокой частотой, что довольно странно. -  J947 ‡ сообщение ⁓ редактирует 22:31, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
      • Говоря только об общем явлении, а не об этом случае: многие другие вики строже, чем мы, в отношении иностранных альтернативных форм. Например, fr: California - это прикроватная страница, а en: Corse - это перенаправление на Корсику со штриховой пометкой. он: Вашингтон, округ Колумбия, является красной ссылкой (как и все варианты пунктуации), а en: ירושלים существует с 2009 года. И так далее. Итак, опять же, просто в общем случае для меня имеет смысл, что редактор, который привык к вики, где перенаправление на английский язык не разрешено, может предположить, что у нас есть аналогичная политика в отношении их собственного языка. - Тамзин (она / они) | о токи тава ми. 22:51, 15 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
        • Предположения, по сути, верны. Если редирект попадает под WP: RLOTE , я снимаю номинацию. - NoonIcarus ( разговор ) 10:58, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Держи . Я не понимаю, как здесь может быть какая-то орфографическая / грамматическая проблема, учитывая, что es: Vargas (estado) перенаправляет на испанский эквивалент этого названия. estado является частью официального названия, поэтому кажется разумным использовать его как неанглийское разрешение неоднозначности (в отличие, скажем, от разрешения неоднозначности чисто описательным термином, таким как футболиста ). - Тамзин (они / она) | о токи тава ми. 22:21, 15 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Сикарпур [ править ]

  • Сикарпур → Наркатиагандж ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Не упоминается в target. Онель 5969 TT мне 17:14, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Перенаправьте на страницу мазков в Шикарпуре , которая охватывает это написание. 86.23.109.101 ( обсуждение ) 17:20, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Ретаргетинг по IP выше. Мне кажется, что Шикарпур, Бихар (округ Видхан Сабха) покрывает Наркатиагандж, и это здесь связь. Лучше всего перенаправить на страницу DAB. GreaterPonce665 ( РАЗГОВОР ) 19:19, 15 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Перенацеливание на Shikarpur по IP - Lenticel ( обсуждение ) 00:55, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Генетический материал [ править ]

  • Генетический материал → ДНК ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

В 2009 году статья в этом месте была перенаправлена Джину из-за отсутствия источника. несколько дней спустя он был изменен на Genome , который оставался в силе до октября прошлого года, когда IP перенаправил его на ДНК . Текущая цель неверна, потому что генетический материал включает в себя как ДНК, так и РНК , но я не уверен, что Геном также является особенно хорошей целью. Текущие входящие ссылки, похоже, используют его для обозначения сочетания контекстов, в которых он может относиться к ДНК и РНК 86.23.109.101 ( обсуждение ) 16:30, 15 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

  • Перенацеливание на нуклеиновую кислоту, которая составляет генетический материал. Mdewman6 ( разговорное ) 23:47, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Хм, перенаправление генетического материала в Genome, который определяет тему как «геном - это весь генетический материал организма», дает уродливую округлость ... Нуклеиновая кислота как цель перенаправления, я думаю, это исправляет, хотя в этой статье немного мало угол генома / хранения информации. ДНК слишком узкая, и старая версия статьи представляла спекулятивные вещи как факт, и, к сожалению, ее пришлось стереть. Давайте перейдем к Nucleic acid, пока кто-нибудь не напишет более сбалансированную статью о генетическом материале. Нараянес ( разговорное ) 07:50, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)
Еще одна возможность, которую следует рассмотреть, - это нацеливание на Genetics # Molecular_basis_for_inheritance, где генетический материал на самом деле несколько обсуждается, но статья Genetics фактически ссылается на генетический материал и использует этот термин во всей статье, поэтому я думаю, что больше целевой {{ R от альтернативного имени }} здесь более уместно. Mdewman6 ( разговорное ) 19:02, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)
Хорошая идея, Нараянес ( обсуждение ) 20:33, 17 марта 2021 (UTC)

Больница Маскати [ править ]

  • Больница Маскати → Сурат ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Не упоминается в мишени. Упоминается в Surat Metro , но, учитывая краткость его описания, я думаю, это оправдывает удаление WP: R # DELETE # 10. подписали, Rosguill разговор 16:09, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Удалить . Во всяком случае, наличие обратной ссылки делает аргументы в пользу WP: REDLINK намного сильнее. - Тамзин (они / она) | о токи тава ми. 23:12, 15 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Теория обезьян [ править ]

  • Теория обезьян → Эволюция ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Closure:  (@subpage)  ]             

Хотя введение теории эволюции действительно вызвало некоторые разногласия относительно предположения, что люди связаны с обезьянами, я не думаю, что это правдоподобный способ поиска эволюции. На мой взгляд, люди, которые ищут это, с гораздо большей вероятностью будут искать теорему о бесконечной обезьяне или эффект сотой обезьяны . 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 15:59, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Dabify . Три умеренно правдоподобных вещи, которые кто-то мог бы искать, и ни одна из них не была явно более вероятной, чем другая (хотя я согласен, что текущая цель, вероятно, наименее вероятна из трех). - Тамзин (она / они) | о токи тава ми. 22:38, 15 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Удалить . Хотя термин неоднозначен, ни один из идентифицированных элементов на самом деле не упоминается под этим именем. Устранение неоднозначности было бы неуместным. «Теория обезьян» - это название книги Сфурти Сахаре , но ее статья не содержит какой-либо значимой информации о книге. Это ближе всего к двум ключевым словам, сшитым вместе, что означает, что разрешить появление результатов поиска было бы нашим лучшим вариантом. - Эврика Лотт, 00:59, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

SiO2 Group [ править ]

  • SiO2 Group → Quartz ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Я думаю, что это, вероятно, было бы лучше в качестве перенаправления на диоксид кремния , но я изо всех сил пытаюсь найти много источников, использующих это имя, поэтому я перечисляю его здесь для обсуждения. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 15:51, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Удалить . Я считаю, что это перенаправление относится к SiO2 как части кристаллической структуры минерала, как в силикатном минерале , но только кварцевое семейство (см. Silicate_mineral # Tectosilicates ) минералов имеет стехиометрию SiO2 . Я бы сказал, перенацеливание на этот раздел, но если группа Quartz или семейство Quartz даже не перенаправляет, я не решаюсь привязать это перенаправление к этому. Ни один из других оксидов, образующих минералы, не имеет аналогичных перенаправлений, поэтому я думаю, что удаление здесь, чтобы избежать путаницы, может быть лучшим. Mdewman6 ( разговорное ) 00:22, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Я создал этот редирект 15 лет назад и получил уведомление о том, что он был доставлен сюда. У меня нет твердого мнения, и я не уверен, почему я создал это перенаправление, что может быть связано с тем, почему оно оказалось здесь. Я думаю, что этот термин относится к кварцу, тридимиту, опалу и другим подобным минералам, которые имеют состав SiO2, но образуют разные структуры, как уже предполагалось выше. Я думаю, что Mdewman6 и другие лучше осведомлены, чтобы принять решение по этому поводу. Если у подобных вещей нет собственных статей, и статья не приносит пользы, я бы склонился к удалению. Однако, возможно, следует создать словарное определение, а затем перенести его в Викисловарь. Если это будет сделано, то, возможно, "Quartz group" и "Quartz family" должны быть перенаправлены на одно и то же определение. Тем не мение, если группа или семья является более распространенным термином, чем группа SiO2, то я думаю, что она должна получить имя, а затем другие должны перенаправить на нее, а другие термины будут указаны в качестве альтернативных имен в записи в Викисловаре. Написав предыдущее, я обнаружил, что группа и семейство кварца, похоже, относятся к кварцевым драгоценным камням, а не к тому, что обсуждалось ранее. -Кьколб ( разговорное ) 09:53, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Англоцентризм [ править ]

  • Англоцентризм → Этноцентризм ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Не включено. Хильдеок ( разговор ) 15:39, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Мягкий редирект на Wikt: Anglocentrism , который определяет термин. Он может не объяснять это подробно, но, по крайней мере, дает более прямое описание, чем предлагает текущая цель. С уважением, SONIC 678 20:25, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

Вакуумный мешок [ править ]

  • Вакуумный мешок → Композитный материал # Формование вакуумного мешка ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Вакуумная упаковка → Композитный материал # Формование вакуумных пакетов ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Вакуумный мешок → Композитный материал # Формование вакуумного мешка ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Вакуумный мешок → Композитный материал # Формование вакуумного мешка ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Контент, на который они должны были быть нацелены, недавно был выделен в отдельную статью ( Формование вакуумных пакетов ), поэтому эти перенаправления больше не указывают на нужное место. Я исправил однозначные перенаправления, но думаю, что они заслуживают дальнейшего обсуждения. На мой взгляд, большинство людей скорее будут искать вакуумную упаковку, чем вакуумное формование пакетов, если они будут искать эти термины, поэтому я предлагаю перенацелить их там. Практически все результаты поиска в Google по этим поисковым запросам относятся к различным формам вакуумных пакетов для хранения. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 14:28, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

Спасибо, что начали это обсуждение. Два перенаправления, которые я создал в вакуумных мешках и в вакуумных мешках, перенаправляют только с изделий типа парусных лодок, где эти лодки построены с использованием процессов вакуумной упаковки из стекловолокна / композитных материалов, поэтому они должны перенаправляться на формование вакуумных мешков , а не вакуумную упаковку . - Ахунт ( разговор ) 14:42, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
За четыре года существования этих двух перенаправлений было сделано всего 6 входящих ссылок, поэтому не потребуется много усилий, чтобы изменить их на конвейерные ссылки, если они будут перенаправлены. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 14:55, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
Верно, но я их уже исправил. - Ахунт ( разговор ) 15:38, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Устранение неоднозначности вакуумного мешка в мешке для пылесоса или мешке для пыли, вакуумной упаковке для вакуумных пакетов, формовании вакуумных мешков . Другой вариант - добавить пометку к упаковке и чистке. AngusW🐶🐶F ( кора • сопение ) 3:40, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

Заполнитель бетона [ править ]

  • Заполнитель → Строительный заполнитель ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Что должно быть нацелено на строительный заполнитель или бетон (возможно, раздел " Бетон # заполнители" )? Это перенаправление имеет двоякое значение: это могут быть либо заполнители, используемые при производстве бетона, либо заполнители, изготовленные из переработанного бетона. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 14:11, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

Мокрая смола [ править ]

  • Мокрая смола → Асфальтобетон ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Будет ли лучше нацеливаться на асфальт или гудрон ? хотя это используется как дорожный знак после укладки асфальтобетона, это относится к асфальтовому компоненту смеси. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 13:31, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

Православный христианин [ править ]

  • Православный христианин → Православие # Христианство ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • Православные христиане → Восточная Православная Церковь ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            
  • Православные христиане → Православные # Христиане ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]            

Православный христианин перенаправляет в Православие # христианство . Однако в большинстве случаев он используется в качестве гиперссылки на WP для обозначения членов Восточной Православной церкви . Члены как Восточной православной церкви, так и Восточной православной церкви , которые являются двумя разными церквями, называются «православными христианами». Поэтому я считаю, что " Православный христианин" должен ссылаться на страницу значений " Православный" . Что вы думаете? Veverve ( разговор ) 09:11, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Комментарий Добавлены православные христиане и православные христиане , поскольку все они непоследовательны. 61.239.39.90 ( разговорное ) 10:56, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Ретаргетинг Согласен с номинацией. Я бы также сначала подумал о Восточной православной церкви под этим термином, но страница значений неоднозначности была бы наиболее нейтральной целью. И, надеюсь, ссылки на отдельных страницах в конечном итоге будут изменены на соответствующие индивидуальные цели. Дараниос ( разговор ) 12:08, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Ретаргетинг Согласен с номинацией. На следующих страницах «Православное христианство», «Православное христианство», «Христианское православие», «Христианское православие», «Православный христианин» и «Православный христианин» должны быть ссылки на страницу значений « Православные» . Это вопрос последовательности и нейтральности. - Omnipaedista ( разговор ) 21:55, 15 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Варнава Дрожащий [ править ]

  • Варнава Дрожжевой → Магия в Гарри Поттере ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Этот парень, возможно, был известен тем, что пытался научить троллей балету, но, похоже, он не упоминается в Википедии в течение многих лет с июля 2007 года, когда его раздел был удален из Волшебного портрета (Гарри Поттер) , и чуть меньше пяти. месяцев спустя , что был перенаправлен к текущей цели. Я не уверен, нужен ли нам этот редирект здесь, удалите, если не может быть предоставлено обоснование. С уважением, SONIC 678 03:29, 7 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Удалить . У него есть имя в Хогвартсе # Комната требований , но я не считаю это подходящей целью для этого. Никакого реального освещения в энциклопедии нет. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 17:24, 7 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Сохраните и перенаправьте на Хогвартс # Комнату Требований . Здесь лечится этот второстепенный персонаж. Он кратко упоминается в нескольких вторичных источниках , поэтому он должен быть в рамках энциклопедии, хотя эта информация по большей части еще не включена в Википедию. Дараниос ( разговорное ) 11:52, 8 марта 2021 (UTC)
Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 03:55, 15 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Канадская ассоциация помощников врачей [ править ]

  • Канадская ассоциация помощников врача → Врачи в Канаде # Помощники врача ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

В настоящее время выполняется перенаправление на страницу « Врачи в Канаде» . Раздел о фельдшерах удален как совершенно не относящийся к статье. В любую другую область, куда это можно было бы перенаправить? Даже на общей странице помощника врача эта ассоциация не упоминается в разделе, посвященном Канаде. Считается, что удаление не является важной темой. Мысли? Spyder212 ( разговор ) 02:14, 7 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Слабый ретаргетинг на помощника врача # Канада , который, кажется, имеет наиболее релевантный контент, но не охватывает эту связь. У этого перенаправления есть действительно странная история страниц, я не могу понять, почему черновик, отклоненный как реклама, был перемещен в основное пространство с намерением превратить его в перенаправление. 86.23.109.101 ( разговорное ) 03:27, 7 марта 2021 (UTC)
    Привет IP, хорошее замечание. Как создатель перенаправления я не рассматривал причину отклонения черновика, но, оглядываясь назад, очевидно, что должен был и буду делать это в будущем. S0091 ( разговор ) 22:26, ​​7 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Удалить Учитывая, что Spyder212 удалил раздел «Помощник врача» из целевой статьи, содержащий некоторую информацию об ассоциации, потому что он не имел отношения к теме статьи, нет другого разумного места для перенаправления (в лучшем случае слабого) и нет ценной истории, я считаю, что это должно быть удаленным. S0091 ( разговор ) 22:26, ​​7 марта 2021 (UTC)
Переставлено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 03:55, 15 марта 2021 г. (UTC)
  • Обратите внимание, если страница не удалена : текст отклоненного черновика в значительной степени является копией двух процитированных источников, и, вероятно, его следует пересмотреть. В этот момент имеет ли смысл просто полностью удалить старую историю и оставить перенаправление в качестве первой ревизии? - Тамзин (она / они) | о токи тава ми. 11:03, 16 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

Перенаправляет в NCAA Division I [ править ]

  • 1973–74 NCAA Division I, мужской баскетбольный сезон → NCAA Division I ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • 1974–75 NCAA Division I, мужской баскетбольный сезон → NCAA Division I ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • 1975–76. Сезон мужского баскетбола I дивизиона NCAA → I дивизион NCAA ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • 1976–77 NCAA Division I, мужской баскетбольный сезон → NCAA Division I ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             
  • 1977–78 NCAA Division I, мужской баскетбольный сезон → NCAA Division I ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Удалить все ; они вводят в заблуждение и бесполезны. Они заставляют сезоны выглядеть как полностью проработанные статьи, когда вы видите их синие ссылки на {{ NCAA Division I, где можно увидеть баскетбольный сезон для мужчин }}, но в лучшем случае они оказываются перенаправлением на статью, имеющую косвенное отношение к теме. Удалите их, чтобы читатели и редакторы могли видеть, что эти страницы еще не созданы. SportsGuy789 ( обсуждение ) 03:48, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

  • Комментарий: Я взял на себя смелость пометить эти перенаправления, поскольку они не были помечены, когда были перечислены. С уважением, SONIC 678 04:26, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Комментарий. Исправлена ​​номинация, которая была нарушена. Спасибо Sonic678 за помощь с тегами! CycloneYoris говорить! 04:52, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
    • Спасибо обоим. Я не очень хорошо разбираюсь в RfD, я ценю руки помощи. SportsGuy789 ( обсуждение ) 16:01, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • Комментарий - обратите внимание, что первоначальный создатель этих перенаправлений был навсегда заблокирован для использования sockpuppetry. SportsGuy789 ( обсуждение ) 16:02, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)
  • @ SportsGuy789 : к сведению, вы можете использовать User: Anomie / linkclassifier . «Перенаправления с возможностями» не противоречат политике, но я бы предпочел слабое удаление, чтобы стимулировать создание статей. Элли ( Обсуждение | вклад ) 11:13, 16 марта 2021 (UTC)

14 марта [ править ]

Поваренная книга Википедии [ править ]

  • Википедия Поваренная книга → Поваренная книга ( обсуждение · ссылки · история · статистика ) [Закрытие:  (@subpage)  ]             

Он был удален раньше, еще в 2008 году , но на этот раз он нацелен на Cookbook, а не на Wikipedia: Cookbook . Тогда было решено , что Cookbook Викиучебников был скорее всего смысл, но было бы неприлично XNR от mainspace по ссылке непосредственно к нему. Я согласен с этой оценкой и считаю, что удаление уместно. - T avix ( разговор ) 23:23, 14 марта 2021 г. (UTC)

  • Удалить по ном. Тридуульф ( разговор ) 19:32, 15 марта 2021 (UTC)

Официальный чарт синглов [ править ]

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Wrong forum

Tennis Grand Slam event redirects[edit]

  • 1926 French Championships – Women's Doubles → 1926 French Championships (tennis)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • 1925 French Championships – Women's Doubles → 1925 French Championships (tennis)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • 1921 U.S. National Championships – Women's Doubles → 1921 U.S. National Championships (tennis)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • 1926 French Championships – Mixed Doubles → 1926 French Championships (tennis)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • 1925 French Championships – Mixed Doubles → 1925 French Championships (tennis)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • 2002 US Open – Boys' Singles → 2002 US Open (tennis)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Standard practice in the Tennis WikiProject is to not redirect missing draw articles. They mislead readers viewing event-specific navboxes (e.g. Template:French Open men's doubles drawsheets) into thinking articles exist for those years. Also, in each case the redirect is circularly linked on the target page (WP:SELFRED), which is confusing for readers. Somnifuguist (talk) 17:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Kasar[edit]

  • Kasar → Qasar  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

There's a Turkish cheese called kaşar, which is currently described in the article Kasseri (rightly or wrongly). It is difficult to find, however, as a search for kasar gets redirected to Qasar, apparently on the basis that Qasar is "also spelled Hasar or Khasar" (no mention of Kasar per se, mind). I propose to replace the redir with a dab pointing to both pages. (I initially thought of just adding hatnotes, but I don't think 'kasar' should direct to 'Qasar' in the first place.) Admittedly the redir is quite old (since 2006), but not much seems to link to it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Dabify per nom. The term is well attested as an alternative spelling for Qasar, but there are other articles with the name and I don't see a primary topic. A draft dab page is available below the redirect. – Uanfala (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Wet cement[edit]

  • Wet cement → Concrete  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Would this be better targeting Cement? Although "wet cement" is used to refer to cement derived products (Concrete, Mortar, Cement render etc) it's pretty ambiguous in that use, and search results are split between that usage, the name of a shade of grey and safety information about the highly caustic nature of wet cement. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Cement#Setting,_hardening_and_curing which I think describes wet cement's role in the curing process best to our readers --Lenticel (talk) 01:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Theira[edit]

  • Theira → Tire  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

WP:RLOTE. No specific connection between tyres and latinised greek. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. Nothing particularly Greek about tyres. Dominicmgm (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget. Of course there is nothing Greek about tires. The page was meant to direct to Tire, İzmir. Can't explain why it did not. Constantine ✍ 16:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Tire, İzmir although I suggest someone from the region find a cited mention of the rename since I can't read Turkish. List_of_renamed_cities,_towns_and_regions_in_Turkey#İzmir_Province states that this is a former name for the district. --Lenticel (talk) 01:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete I am not a native speaker of Turkish but if I understand right according to https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1290613 it means Thrace. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
    • No. It has nothing to do with Thrace nor Turkish. 'Theira' is the modern Greek name of Tire near Smyrna/Izmir. The Turkish for 'Thrace' is 'Trakya'. The link you refer to gives a paretymology of Thrace from 'Theiris' or 'Thira' from a 1798 source. I suggest rather you search for the term in Greek: Θείρα. Constantine ✍ 20:16, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
      • You obviously know more about this than I do as I cannot read Greek or Latin. I am curious - how do you know the etymology in the 2020 paper I linked to is a false etymology? Because the 2020 paper seems to be talking about an old source written in Greek whereas you have linked to a Latin book. I changed my opinion above to "delete" as it does not seem to be an English word. Chidgk1 (talk) 08:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Tire, İzmir (that's the Greek name of the place). If I'm not mistaken, the Turkish paper cited above quotes an 1880 text which posits Theira as a hypothetical intermediate step in the derivation of the name for Thrace from Theiras, the Greek name of the biblical figure of Tiras. This is obviously not a plausible etymology, but that's beside the point – we don't do redirects for words representing the stages of an etymological derivation, even when they're mentioned in the article. – Uanfala (talk) 09:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Tire tool[edit]

  • Tire tool → tire iron  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Extremely ambiguous redirect that could be referring to anything from the large balancing machines used to fit wheel weights to the small repair kits found in basically every car in existence. A google search for this term turns up a huge number of different tools, I'm not seeing that tyre iron is the main use of this name. I couldn't find a "list of automotive tools" à la List of timber framing tools, so I'm unsure where this should target. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment Tire iron has a hatnote on top to lug wrench, so those are the two most likely candidates for tire tool. Also okay with removing it altogether as I don't see widespread usage of this phrase. "tire-changing tool" would be better also there is tire changer and that could use a hatnote to tire iron / lug wrench. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Uninsured[edit]

  • Uninsured → Health insurance coverage in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This seems like the wrong place to link this redirect SecretName101 (talk) 10:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • I agree that the current target is less than ideal, it does seems bit Americentric - lots of places use insurance based healthcare. Not really sure what to do with this though, retarget to the main page on Insurance perhaps? This could be a plausible search term for people looking for all kinds of things related to insurance, the big ones that immediately spring to mind are Uninsured drivers or Health insurance. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • My thoughts exactly. SecretName101 (talk) 23:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • weak retarget to Insurance as R from antonym. It's not a perfect antonym hence a weak retarget.--Lenticel (talk) 01:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Insurance, add Uninsured "look from" at the bottom of Insurance (disambiguation). Delete is also an option, since there is no article for Unregistered and that would get to multiple options. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 03:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:KOAT[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Notability (artists)[edit]

  • Notability (artists) → Wikipedia:Notability (artists)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Redirect from article space to project space Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete bad XNR. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Weak Retarget to Notability in the English Wikipedia, which explains the concept and links to the Wikipedia policy. I don't think this is a particularly plausible search term, but I think this is a better target and will guide anyone linking the policy without the prefix to the right place. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete The concept of "Notability" does not only exist on Wikipedia. 053pvr (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete: Cross-space, and concur with 053pvr. People savvy enough to be looking for this are probably savvy enough to just use a WP: prefix. – 2pou (talk) 07:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hillary Diane Rodham Clinotn[edit]

  • Hillary Diane Rodham Clinotn → Hillary Clinton  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Unlikely misspelling (misspelling of a long, rarely-used name). Elli (talk | contribs) 05:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete as stupidly unlikely. Dicklyon (talk) 07:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. 9 Page views in the last year indicate this is not a common or plausible misspelling. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Likely implausible. 053pvr (talk) 21:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep, harmless typo redirect; no reason to delete.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 22:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

John Barros[edit]

  • John Barros → 2013 Boston mayoral election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

I'd propose deleting this redirect altogether. A 2013 AFD had it retained as a redirect to the 2013 Boston mayoral election, in which he was a candidate. He is now a candidate again in the 2021 Boston mayoral election, and it seems bizarre that this would redirect to one over the other.

Very few articles link to this, and none of them would be harmed by the elimination of that link. SecretName101 (talk) 04:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Since Barros is already a declared candidate, retarget to 2021 Boston mayoral election, and add a note in his description there that he was an unsuccessful candidate in the 2013 Boston mayoral election. BD2412 T 05:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Perennial candidates are quite an iffy issue for this reason. I'd agree with BD2412 and retarget to the recent election. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete This is a clear case of WP:XY in that this redirect could equally target both articles, so it should be deleted. 053pvr (talk) 21:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

3.1415926535897932384626433832795[edit]

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep per WP:SNOW

🔫[edit]

  • 🔫 → Emoji#Controversial emoji  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
Previous RfDs for this redirect:
  • Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 August 2 § 🔫 – No consensus
  • 🍆 → Emoji#Controversial emoji  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • 🍑 → Emoji#Controversial emoji  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

On Wikipedia, emoji are supposed to redirect to their intended meaning. 053pvr (talk) 03:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep. These emoji have multiple meanings, and they redirect where the multiple meanings are discussed. -- Tavix (talk) 03:47, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • If you type in one of these emoji into the search bar, you would not want to be redirected to a page about a controversy involving the emoji, you would want to go to the actual meaning of that emoji. 053pvr (talk) 03:50, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
      • The problem with that is the eggplant emoji, for example, is rarely used to mean eggplant. In deference to the meaning most likely meant, redirecting to the place that explains the various meanings is a much better solution. -- Tavix (talk) 03:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
      • What is the "actual" meaning of these emojis? The one that they were intended to have or the one people actually use them for? Both would be valid targets. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 04:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep These emojis are ambiguous due to the controversies surrounding them, so redirecting to a page explaining the controversy seems like the best option. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 04:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Say what? – I had no idea that we had emoji as article titles – or that emojis where in Unicode for that matter. I guess I just don't fit in the modern age. Dicklyon (talk) 07:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep. I hardly see anyone using the eggplant and peach emojis for anything other than the penis and buttocks respectively. And the water pistol emoji was quite infamous in the gun control debates of the 2010s. Dominicmgm (talk) 09:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Steam oven[edit]

  • Steam oven → Oven  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

I suggest deleting this redirect since the only page using it is the Oven page, which is also the target. It is a loop. Very confusing. Ohnoplease (talk) 03:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Speedy Keep If someone searches "Steam oven" in the search box, they will be taken straight to "Oven", which is probably what they are looking for. This redirect is not a circular redirect, because "Oven" does not redirect back to "Steam oven". The issue is the link on "Oven" which can be removed with a single edit. 053pvr (talk) 03:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • I've removed the link on oven page. Ohnoplease (talk) 03:47, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Procedural close There is no issue with this redirect itself. 053pvr (talk) 03:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment: if the concept of a steam oven is interesting enough to support its own article and can be reliably sourced, write one. BD2412 T 05:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • I think we need a Steam oven article, given that my wife is about to drop a lot of money on one for our new kitchen. Dicklyon (talk) 07:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Not really sure about this one. While it does make sense for this to target Oven as a variant of that appliance there isn't really any content about steam ovens in the target. Steaming might also be suitable target, and I can see the WP:Redlink argument. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:29, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:STEPHENKING[edit]

  • Wikipedia:STEPHENKING → Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Stephen King  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

There is no reason why an MfD from a decade ago would need a recently-created shortcut. -- Tavix (talk) 02:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. Concur fully with nom. Would not help readers looking for a Stephen King wikiproject. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 04:38, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep in lieu of a better target. The redirect in my opinion would help those looking for a Stephen King WikiProject. The MfD clearly informs that there is no longer any Stephen King WikiProject, which is obviously of great help to those looking for a Stephen King WikiProject.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 05:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • @J947: If we wanted to keep this to help people searching for a Wikiproject would this not be better targeting a related existent/active wikiproject? Something like WikiProject Books, WikiProject Literature, or the writers and authors section of WikiProject Biography all seem like they would be much more useful targets than an MFD discussion from a decade ago. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
      • Keeping this target would illustrate to people who search this up that there is no longer a Steven King WikiProject. The other targets that you mention wouldn't do that.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 20:08, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete as silly and malformed. If, as J947 suggests, there's a use in having a redirect to an MfD discussion, it shouldn't be this ALLCAPS monstrosity, should it? Dicklyon (talk) 07:06, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • It's in the format of a standard shortcut to a WikiProject.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 08:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete for all reasons noted above. We don't want to suggest that we have a project page, of any kind, about Stephen King when we don't. The fact that it's formatted as a Wikiproject shortcut makes the argument for deletion much stronger. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 20:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
    • We don't want to suggest that we have a project page, of any kind, about Stephen King when we don't: I'm not sure how this does suggest we have one? (I doubt that people are completely fooled by the mere existence of a redirect.) In fact, it indicates that we used to have a project page based on Stephen King but now we don't – which is what we want to inform those looking for some sort of project page about Stephen King.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 22:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Eric Herschmann[edit]

  • Eric Herschmann → Executive Office appointments by Donald Trump  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Deletion. Target page does not mention Herschmann, nor could I find a point in the page history where it did. I think that falls under rationale #10 on the criteria page. Enyavar (talk) 01:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to First impeachment trial of Donald Trump, which does mention Herschmann. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to First impeachment trial of Donald Trump#Trump counsel and congressional defense team, this is the name of a lawyer who represented trump during his impeachment trial. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 02:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget per Special:Contributions/86.23.109.101. 053pvr (talk) 02:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete as Herschmann is mentioned in two articles, both of which are easily accessible from the search page. In situations like this there should be a special dab-mention page to guide readers to content IMO, but currently that doesn't exist.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 05:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Perhaps the possibility of an article (coverage) is on here?  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 05:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • I think that of the two impeachment trials this could target the first is the primary topic here. In the first impeachment trial he was an active member of Trump's defence team and actively represented him, for the second impeachment trial he released a statement saying he wasn't interested in representing trump. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:47, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • I really have no idea how you guys in en-WP are linking a person to only their topmost public appearance instead of either not linking them blue at all ("not notable") or giving them their own short article ("notable"). Herschmann was still prominent in Trump's team up to 2021, e.g. in here, so he is not a mere extra in the 1st impeachment. --Enyavar (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Jane Raskin[edit]

  • Jane Raskin → Executive Office appointments by Donald Trump  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Deletion. Target page does not mention Raskin, ever since her appointment got deleted in this edit. Article currently says there has not been an official "Legal Advisor to the President" after 2017. --Enyavar (talk) 01:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to First impeachment trial of Donald Trump, which does mention Raskin. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to First impeachment trial of Donald Trump#Trump counsel and congressional defense team, this is the name of a lawyer who represented trump during his impeachment trial. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 02:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget per Special:Contributions/86.23.109.101. 053pvr (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • I really have no idea how you guys in en-WP are linking a person to only their topmost public appearance instead of either not linking them blue at all ("not notable") or giving them their own short article ("notable"). Raskin was already defending Trump during Mueller's Russia probe, so she is not a mere extra in the 1st impeachment. --Enyavar (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Heinrich Hitler[edit]

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

March 13[edit]

Latomus[edit]

  • Latomus → Jacobus Latomus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Latomus was a disambiguation page with only one valid entry and was therefore redirected to that one entry Jacobus Latomus. Unfortunately, Jacobus is not the meaning that most mentions of "Latomus" in Enwiki refer to. There are over 200 mentions, many of which are citations that refer to the journal, about which we do not have an article. I suggest that we delete because although there are many pages of Search results, a Search is better than the current target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Why not create a stub for La Revue Latomus? And for good measure for Bernhard Latomus, who was the other entry on the old dab page? I don't think any actual case for deletion has been made here. Counting mentions: is that really a good enough reason for bringing up a page here? I mean, having the page made into a genuine disambiguation page would actually be constructive. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Redabify. I'm in favour of deleting otherwise viable redirects from surnames if the search results will be relevant. But they aren't here – almost everything is mentions of the journal within citations, which form part of article text that arguably shouldn't be displayed in searches at all. Given that Latomus is the surname of several apparently equally prominent Renaissance scholars, who lived in the same broad region and worked in related fields, it's likely that readers may be looking for any one of them when searching for the name. It's best, therefore, to present them with a disambiguation page, even if all the other entries will at present only link to the corresponding articles on the French and German Wikipedias. I've drafted one below the redirect. – Uanfala (talk) 17:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep. Unless or until any of the other articles get created, the current target is the only valid one on English Wikipedia, and this will continue to be a useful {{R from surname}}. -- Tavix (talk) 18:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep for now, per Tavix. This can become a disambiguation page when relevant articles are created on the English Wikipedia. - Eureka Lott 04:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Kris Kringle Was a Car Theif[edit]

  • Kris Kringle Was a Car Theif → Wesley Willis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not mentioned in the target article, also "thief" is misspelled. Dominicmgm (talk) 18:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete taking a closer look it appears to be a song from an album by Willis that doesn’t have an article.--67.70.100.30 (talk) 19:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable song. 053pvr (talk) 01:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Melissa Cross[edit]

  • Melissa Cross → Screaming (music)#Health concerns  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Was mentioned at the target, but I removed it as undue, referenced solely to a primary source. Delete unless a case for her inclusion at the target can be made. signed, Rosguill talk 18:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget - Retarget to Zen of Screaming or another suitable target (i.e. List_of_vocal_coaches#C). --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to "Zen of Screaming" per User:Jax 0677. 053pvr (talk) 01:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Kamelopedia[edit]

  • Kamelopedia → Uncyclopedia#Kamelopedia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not mentioned at target, though explained at German Wikipedia#Parodies and forks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to German Wikipedia#Parodies and forks. Does this really need to be brought up at RfD? What's wrong with just retargeting it yourself? Note that an hour and a bit after the nomination an unsourced mention of this was added to the current target.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 00:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Psyklopedin[edit]

  • Psyklopedin → Uncyclopedia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

No mention at target nor anywhere else on-wiki. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)KeepIs mentioned at target page; at the bottom where it says names of encyclopedia in different languages. Jackattack1597 (talk) 18:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

.hack character classes[edit]

  • .hack character classes → .hack#Setting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Nominating this as a follow up to this discussion which was closed earlier today. There is no coverage of character classes from the .hack video games in any of the articles on the .hack franchise as far as I can tell. There was a rather WP:FANCRUFTY article in the page history, which I think was merged to this article on characters from the series (difficult to tell where it ended up, all the .hack articles seem to have been restructured at the same time), but all the content on character classes seems to have been edited out in the following 12 years, leaving this without a good target. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to "List of .hack characters". That is the location of the info about .hack characters. 053pvr (talk) 01:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • The "List of .hack characters" article contains information about notable characters from the franchise, not the various character classes that players could choose in the video games. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 01:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Hidden Heroes[edit]

  • Hidden Heroes → Meta Runner#Season 2 (2020)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Current target is a webseries begun in 2019. The Redirect's authors justification is "Hidden Heroes is a fictional video game that appears in the second season of Meta Runner, in which Tari plays it when she makes her TASCorp debut." However, all links to the Hidden Heroes page refer to the Korean film from 2004. Respectfully recommend Delete. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 04:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete to encourage article creation - eventually should be a dabpage. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:FANCRUFT. 053pvr (talk) 01:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Horton Hears a Who!(soundtrack)[edit]

  • Horton Hears a Who!(soundtrack) → Horton Hears a Who! (film)#Soundtrack  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Back in 2008, this was moved to the correctly formatted Horton Hears a Who! (soundtrack), and doesn't seem to be getting very many pageviews now compared to that one and its target, perhaps at least partially because of the lack of a space between the name and disambiguator. Delete this unless a justification can be provided. Regards, SONIC678 01:34, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete not a useful typo. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:UNNATURAL; moved a day after creation. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:PARENDAB. 053pvr (talk) 01:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Greatest Team of the Greatest Club[edit]

  • Greatest Team of the Greatest Club → Port Adelaide Football Club  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Delete - completely implausible for a typo, not to mention unbiased in favour of the club. Empoleonmaster23 (talk) 12:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete way too ambiguous to target this specific club. While the club did make a list if their greatest players this idea is not unique to this club and a huge number of sports teams have made similar lists. A google search has basically every result relate to a different team. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Refine to Port Adelaide Football Club#Greatest Team if that section gets referenced. It's an ambiguous term, but in the context of Wikipedia the term isn't ambiguous. I'm wary refining the redirect to an unreferenced section per WP:V and as readers would likely be looking for further information through references, so in that scenario probably restore article and send to AfD this revision (there's some news coverage of the topic). At any stretch, don't delete as it isn't in RfD's remit to remove article content from public view.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 22:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Refine and Rename - I decided to do a bit of digging based on J947's comment about references, and have found a link between this redirect (more specifically, its edit history) and a now defunct page on Port Adelaide site listing this team. However, despite the official title being the redirect title, it would be worth renaming the redirect to Port Adelaide's Greatest Team (which is alot more common than the variant used by the redirect). I retract my earlier delete nomination, as renaming the redirect and refining to the section suggested by J947 would be ideal. Empoleonmaster23 (talk) 03:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Just create a new redirect. Renaming redirects isn't helpful.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment. There are other good reasons for redirects besides typos, and "completely implausible for a typo" doesn't apply to alternate names. All that matters is whether this is a plausible alternate name. Nyttend (talk) 12:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Restore article without prejudice to AfD per WP:BLAR, despite the edit summary of "merge and redirect" I can find no evidence that content was actually merged anywhere. Thryduulf (talk) 14:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    • @Thryduulf: It's in the section Port Adelaide Football Club#Greatest Team, the text is basically unchanged but the table has been made collapsible. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep and refine per J947. No apparent typo, and unambiguous enough—despite being nowhere near Australia, searching the term in quotes in Google exclusively returns results related to Adelaide. --BDD (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 00:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete WP:G11 Clearly promotional. 053pvr (talk) 01:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • ... did you even glance at the discussion above?  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 01:51, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • @053pvr: This is in no way promotional, G11 is not relevant here. -- Tavix (talk) 02:29, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
      • Having this redirect essentially means that Wikipedia recognises "Port Adelaide Football Club" as the "Greatest Team and the Greatest Club". We don't do that here even if this is a common name for the team. 053pvr (talk) 02:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
        • @053pvr: It is simply the name of a team, see Port Adelaide Football Club#Greatest Team. In no way does it imply that Wikipedia recognizes such (n.b. it's "Greatest Team of the Greatest Club", not "Greatest Team and the Greatest Club"). It's analogous to how 20th Century's Best Club is not promotional for Real Madrid, it's just an award they won. -- Tavix (talk) 02:47, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
          • "Port Adelaide Football Club" has not been recognised by any outside organisation as the "Greatest Team of the Greatest Club", it just decided to use this brand. Having this redir is NPOV. 053pvr (talk) 02:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
            • 053pvr, you fail to understand the scenario in which this redirect exists (and in general RfD). I want you to read the following and let it sink in.
              This redirect existing doesn't mean that we think Port Adelaide Football Club is the Greatest Team of the Greatest Club, because (a) redirects are search aids more than anything else (b) that doesn't make sense; how can Port Adelaide Football Club in a grammatical sense be the Greatest Team of the Greatest Club, and (c) this redirect doesn't even refer to the club it just refers to a team made by the club. Also NPOV only applies to encyclopedic content, and the guideline matter in the neutrality of redirects is RNEUTRAL (but that isn't relevant at all to this redirect anyhow).  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 08:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Refine to Port Adelaide Football Club#Greatest Team where this is explained. -- Tavix (talk) 02:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Refine It is explained in a section in the article, but the current redirect is too ambiguous. Jackattack1597 (talk) 18:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

March 12[edit]

Wikipedia:NO[edit]

  • Wikipedia:NO → Wikipedia:WikiProject Norway  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

I think that redirecting the term "NO" (in Wikipedia) to the WikiProject does not seem helpful. I propose retargeting to Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, which is the more plausible target, because this lists specific things that Wikipedia is not. For example, I would assume that "no battlegrounds" in Wikipedia possibly means "Wikipedia is not a battleground". Also, I have redirected "Wikipedia:No" to the proposed target. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Disambiguate. This started out as an Initialism for WP:Notability (organizations), then was retargeted to WP:WikiProject New Orleans, and is now a redirect to WP:WikiProject Norway, all of which are reasonable targets. About half the incoming links are from AFD discussions where people have got it confused with WP:NOT, and there's a load of other things this could be a reasonable shortcut to. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
    • I think that disambiguation sounds like a better choice. How about disambiguating "Wikipedia:No", and then retarget "Wikipedia:NO" to that page? Seventyfiveyears (talk) 00:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate: per IP's suggestion. There are many pages where NO could be used. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambig per above. Wikipedia:Dos and don'ts is also something someone searching for Wikipedia:No might be interested in. Thryduulf (talk) 02:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • dabify per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:DIE[edit]

  • Wikipedia:DIE → Wikipedia:No personal attacks  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This is a longstanding redirect that was retargeted to Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians a while back, before being reverted. I think the discussion is worth having. Sure, if someone says, "Die!" to you, I can see this as an avoided double redirect for Wikipedia:No personal attacks/Death threats, but that doesn't sem like a very common form of death threat. One of only two mentions of death threats on the target page links to Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm, which may be a more appropriate target. I'm not so sure about Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians—it doesn't seem like a likely search term for that. I'd like to see consensus on what to do with this, whether it's keep, delete, or retarget. --BDD (talk) 21:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete none of the past targets are really that great confusing shortcut. Possibly also disambiguate, but iffy. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. None of the proposed targets are particularly good in my opinion. I oppose retargeting to WP:Deceased Wikipedians because it seems rather disrespectful, and I think getting from "Die" to "No personal attacks" is more confusing than helpful. Despite being around since 2006 this currently has 17 incoming links, about 6 of which are resulting from this RfD discussion, so it doesn't seem to have been used in the first place. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete and maybe protect from recreation. This is an odd case, in that the normal markup, with the colon indicating the namespace, reads here like a message telling someone to die. The case for targeting to NPA is poor, because there is no need to make a redirect out of every possible personal attack. And "die" is an illogical verb tense to target to deceased Wikipedians. It ends up just being an odd and uncomfortable one-off of markup that really doesn't have any particular usefulness, no matter where it gets targeted. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Tryptofish, I don't see proof or indication that the redirect was repeatedly recreated. The redirect has been around since 2006, and it was not deleted multiple times. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 21:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
      • That's perfectly fine with me, and I don't feel strongly either way. My thinking is that we don't have experience with what happens after it is deleted, and it may be tempting to users unaware of a previous deletion discussion to (re)create it. But we could certainly cross that bridge if/when we come to it. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Locker room talk[edit]

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: soft redirect

Mohamed Kunp[edit]

  • Mohamed Kunp → Garissa University College attack  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Does not seem to be mentioned in target page. Onel5969 TT me 17:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete – All top Google hits for the name are sites that have scraped from Wikipedia. —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 19:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment I created this redirect as a typo of Mohamed Kuno, which redirects to "Garissa University College attack". 053pvr (talk) 04:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. Unless the name typo is either well used or well documented in reliable sources I would generally avoid making typo redirects from peoples names to events like terrorist attacks. There are significant WP:BLP considerations when making these types of redirects due to the possibility of collateral damage - it is possible that some unrelated person with a similar name now has internet search engines thinking they were involved in the event. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 02:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

99.999999999999999999999...[edit]

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: G7

Template:Taxonomy/Strigosella[edit]

  • Template:Taxonomy/Strigosella → Template:Taxonomy/Strigosella (animal)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

to be deleted. Misleading, see DAB page Strigosella Estopedist1 (talk) 16:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Disambiguate between Template:Taxonomy/Strigosella (animal) and Template:Taxonomy/Strigosella (plant) as a {{template disambiguation}}. -- Tavix (talk) 02:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Ad hominem[edit]

  • Wikipedia:Ad hominem → Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Arguments to the person  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Wikipedia:ADHOMINEM → Wikipedia:Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Wikipedia:ADHOM → Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Arguments to the person  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

There is a hatnote at the mainspace article Ad hominem that says '"Personal attack" redirects here. For the Wikipedia policy, see Wikipedia:No personal attacks.' In that context, the 3 nominated redirects ought to target the same page, and I think that ought to be Wikipedia:No personal attacks, although I can see why Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Arguments to the person would also be appropriate. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Redirect all to Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Ad hominems are bad everywhere, not just in deletion discussions. Ad hominems also consist of all sorts of attacks on the person making an argument, not just calling them a vandal. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget all to Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks#What_is_considered_to_be_a_personal_attack? where ad hominems in the wiki's context are discussed--Lenticel (talk) 07:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Sauerstoff[edit]

  • Sauerstoff → Oxygen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

WP:RLOTE. Oxygen has no particular affinity to the German/Luxembourgish language as far as I am aware. There's no content explaining why the German name for this element is relevant to the article, and this name isn't mentioned in the article. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Uncleftish Beholding per below discussion. This is the only known page that mentions the redirect. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 19:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Uncleftish Beholding where the terms are discussed --Lenticel (talk) 01:16, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure that it's a good idea to target this to the article on the book - this is the modern German word for oxygen, and it doesn't seem to be particularly related to that book in my opinion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:FORRED. (I think Kohlenstoff should also be nominated, BTW; it's the German word for carbon.) Double sharp (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Waterstuff[edit]

  • Waterstuff → Hydrogen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Sourstuff → Oxygen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

This is a name for Hydrogen that was created by Poul Anderson to demonstrate what element names would look like if English didn't use loanwords from other languages. In my opinion someone searching for this term is more likely to be looking for Uncleftish Beholding (the book that introduced the word), Linguistic purism in English or Poul Anderson than the article on hydrogen. I propose retargeting to Uncleftish Beholding as it's the only article I could find that mentions the word. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

I'm also nominating Sourstuff here for the same reason. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Uncleftish Beholding as the only article in which these terms are mentioned. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget both to Uncleftish Beholding which is the only target that will educate people about what these words mean. If they are interested in learning about the elements they can follow the link to the common names. Thryduulf (talk) 18:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Implausible search terms. 053pvr (talk) 04:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
    20 hits in the 3½ months of last year that they existed suggests they are not implausible. Thryduulf (talk) 13:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Uncleftish Beholding where the terms are discussed --Lenticel (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Uncleftish Beholding per nom and above. These terms are mentioned at the proposed target. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Workability[edit]

  • Workability → Concrete#Workability  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This is a generic term meaning "How easily a material can be worked", it doesn't exclusively refer to concrete. The term is also quite frequently used in woodworking to describe how difficult different species of wood are to shape, and in metalworking to describe how easy a given material can be machined or formed. I couldn't find an appropriate local target, so perhaps a soft redirect to it's Wiktionary entry would be appropriate? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:05, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment The term is also used in the context of employment schemes for disabled people. Thryduulf (talk) 13:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Wikitionary per nom. 053pvr (talk) 04:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep as {{R to section}}. This redirect has its own section of its current target. Also, add a hatnote that reads {{redirect|Workability|the Wiktionary entry for this word|[[wikt:Workability]]}}. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 03:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • @Seventyfiveyears: But why should this target this specific article? My point is that the concept of Workability is completely general and has no specific connection to concrete. There are loads of concepts in engineering where the concept of workability is relevant: Formability, Machinability, Weldability, Ductility ... just to name some of them of the top of my head. The word is also used in concepts unrelated to engineering (like carpentry and the usage mentioned by thryduulf) and the word is also a synonym for Feasibility/Practicality. We wouldn't target 1980s to Legal affairs of Donald Trump#1980s because it has a section in the article. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 04:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
      • I struck my keep vote now that I realized that "Workability" is too ambiguous. Yes, like I said, it does have its own section at the current target. However, how about disambiguating the redirect and adding {{Wiktionary|Workability}} at the top of the page. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
        • I Think disambiguation would be a sensible solution. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Titanic steel[edit]

  • Titanic steel → Steel  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

A 2006 era "R with possibilities" that doesn't seem to be mentioned in the target article - I'm unclear what this is supposed to be referring to. I found three possible targets for this: Titanic#Construction, launch and fitting-out describes the steel used in the titanic and theories related to it being brittle, while Darkhill Ironworks describes the Titanic Ironworks, named because it was involved in early experiments with titanium. Should this target one of these? Alternatively this could be refering to grades of steel containing titanium, in which case Alloy steel might be a better target?86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Secession War[edit]

  • Secession War → American Civil War  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Although this name is used to refer to the American civil war I think it's pretty ambiguous, and a google search shows it is also used to refer to the war of 1812 and numerous fictional events. I propose retargeting to the dab page at War of secession. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 09:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to dab page per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 18:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to War of secession per nom. Definitely the most appropriate target for this potentially ambiguous term. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to War of secession per nom. --Lenticel (talk) 00:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Australasian relations[edit]

  • Australasian relations → Australia–New Zealand relations  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Australasia includes Papua New Guinea and several other states in Melanasia, as well as Australia and New Zealand. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 15:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete – yes, the target is too narrow. —Granger (talk · contribs) 18:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep; most if not all of the time the term refers to Aus–NZ relations. However, I might have a biased viewpoint due to being from NZ where Australasia exclusively means Australia and New Zealand – I didn't know that it generally encompasses Melanesia as well.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 20:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete There currently exists no page which fits the definition of "Australasian relations" which refers to foreign relations of countries in Australasia. (no page covers foreign relations of all countries in Australasia) 053pvr (talk) 04:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
    • I doubt that foreign relations of countries in Australasia is the primary meaning of this term.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 00:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Super mutant[edit]

  • Super mutant → Fallout 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Super Mutant → Fallout 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Super mutants → Fallout 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

The concept of a Super Mutant is not unique to Fallout 4. Dominicmgm (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment: No opinion about this at the moment, but I'm adding Super Mutant to this discussion, for which I'm thinking similar action should be done. Regards, SONIC678 16:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment I've added the plural form of this redirect too. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 17:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Fallout (video game series) 53zodiac (talk) 19:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to "Fallout (video game series)". Super mutants are a type of enemy found in all Fallout games. 053pvr (talk) 04:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete I am unconvinced that the term is specific enough to only be used in Fallout. Unless an article is created specifically about them, it should probably be left up to the search function.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Keyway[edit]

  • Keyway → Keyhole  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

In my opinion the primary topic of keyway is Key (engineering), as the name of the slot that a key fits in. I'm listing this here because the keyhole article was at this title for ~7 years before being moved. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 09:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Disambiguate. They are both plausible targets. More people use keys in everyday life than work with rotating shafts, so I'm not sure which more readers would be trying to find. Without some more evidence of a PT, we should just make it a dab (I created one at the redirect). MB 19:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

List of massacres in the United Kingdom[edit]

  • List of massacres in the United Kingdom → List of massacres in Great Britain  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • List of massacres in Great Britain and Northern Ireland → List of massacres in Great Britain  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

The UK and Great Britain are not the same thing, but the content is organised geographically (List of massacres in Great Britain and List of massacres in Ireland) as both lists go back several hundred years before the formation of the United Kingdom. Is the current set-up where UK redirects to GB with a link in the header prose best or would a two-item disambiguation page be better? Currently my preference is weakly for the dab but I'm happy to be persuaded otherwise. I'm also nominating the GB&NI redirect for the same reason, although this has XY issues it is for obvious reasons a commonly searched grouping. Note these are the result of page moves. Thryduulf (talk) 05:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment: It seems that appear to be a WP:RM for me, so the article needs to be moved. You can nominated it to moved via RM request. 36.77.65.74 (talk) 10:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
No the articles are at the correct titles for their scope, and given the scopes the geographical split makes sense. Thryduulf (talk) 11:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep the first, delete the second (I agree WP:XY applies). I think we'd be better off reorganizing the lists by modern geography, but if that's out, this is my preferred solution. I'm American, and have heard even highly educated Americans say "Britain" or "Great Britain" when they mean the UK, so redirecting to a list that covers the majority of what the search term does seems just fine, especially with the quasi-hatnote pointing to the Ireland list. --BDD (talk) 21:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep both, as quite a few pages use them to get to one of the lists, which are correctly named, as Thryduulf says. But the first is a bit absurd, bearing in mind that for more than a hundred years the United Kingdom included the whole of Ireland and GB, and the second isn’t needed. I doubt if anyone would think to look for either. So if someone has the time to correct all those links, both are best deleted. Moonraker (talk) 22:28, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Erdviper[edit]

  • Erdviper → Micrelaps muelleri  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

German term for several species of snakes (see e.g.) that don't occur in Germany Plantdrew (talk) 04:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

  • I should say delete. As the snakes have no German (or Swiss or Austrian) habitat, I see no reason why an Erdviper would ever be called that in English. Moonraker (talk) 23:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

March 11[edit]

Bone Apple Tea[edit]

  • Bone Apple Tea → Eggcorn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Bone Apple Teeth → Eggcorn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • Bone App the Teeth → Eggcorn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Procedural listing. User:DeliciousInternetSpeeds created the redirect in December 2020 with the edit summary, "Created redirect from semi-common example of an eggcorn". User:Mrmariomaster commented at Talk:Eggcorn, "Bone Apple Tea should not be redirected here, as the faulty phrases don't have the same meaning. Instead it should be redirected to Malapropism." I will note that bone apple tea is not currently mentioned at Eggcorn. Cnilep (talk) 23:32, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Change target to malapropism - bone apple tea (bon appetit) isn't an eggcorn as Mrmariomaster pointed out. – The Grid (talk) 01:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Sorry for the late addition, but I just found that 'Bone Apple Teeth' also redirects to 'Eggcorn'. Cnilep (talk) 07:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
grrr... and also 'Bone App the Teeth' Cnilep (talk) 07:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Adding that my !vote also applies for the items added after my vote. – The Grid (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • We typically don't redirect linguistic examples to their related lexicogical articles unless there's a mention, and this one isn't included at Malapropism#Real-life examples. We could retarget them to Bon Appétit (disambiguation) as a spelling variant, but it's not mentioned there, either. I think it would be best if we retarget the first to wikt:bone apple tea and retarget the other two to that first page. - Eureka Lott 18:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Change target to malapropism. The subreddit about malapropisms is called r/BoneAppleTea, so the phrase is probably at least somewhat well known. HotdogPi 19:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Bon appétit as typo. 053pvr (talk) 04:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Rtarget per Eureka Lott (i.e. Bone Apple Tea {{wiktionary redirect}} to wikt:bone apple tea, and the other two to Bone Apple Tea until Wiktionary gets its own entries on those variants). Wiktionary actually explains this term, unlike any target in English Wikipedia. Trying to use the redirect system to hold WP:EXAMPLEFARMs of content that didn't make it into the article itself just wastes time for any reader who was looking for a definition and not just a vague implication that the term they typed in belongs to a certain class. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 23:17, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Incise[edit]

  • Incise → Cutting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Should this target the article on cutting or should it target the dab page at Incision? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Incised. It's not the greatest article, but it's probably a better target. - Eureka Lott 19:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Geared motor[edit]

  • Geared motor → gear  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This doesn't seem like a particularly good target to me, if I were to search for this I'd expect to end up somewhere related to motors. There's a load of mentions of geared motors in various articles, but I wasn't able to find a good target for this. There is some spam in the page history, but it would be G11'd if restored. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Rondelle[edit]

  • Rondelle → Washer (hardware)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

WP:FORRED. Nothing particularly French about washers 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep - harmless and possible search term. Bearian (talk) 14:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
    • (edit conflict) @Bearian: If people are searching for this they I don't think they would necessarily be looking for the French translation of washers. This word is also used in English to mean "a round object" and it's used in loads of places for that meaning, e.g. A way of cutting vegetables, a type of bead (Rondelle beads), a descriptor of circular images (e.g. Air Canada's logo is described as a "Maple leaf rondelle") and a load of other uses. There's also a band this could be ambiguous with (The Rondelles). Generally redirects in languages other than English aren't kept unless there's a specific connection between the concept and the language, per WP:FORRED, because words become ambiguous when you move between languages, and I don't think there's a specific connection between French and washers. In this case I think the search results would do a better job of helping people find what they want. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate (drafted) Clearly no good as a redirect even leaving aside the WP:FORRED issues, since this word has numerous different senses in French (see fr:Rondelle). In English there are far fewer meanings (and translations of the French meanings wouldn't belong on a dab page per MOS:DABOTHERLANG), but English Wikipedia discusses two topics actually Rondelle in English, plus The Rondelles. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 14:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Disambiguation could also be a good option. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Nut and bolt[edit]

  • Nut and bolt → Nut (hardware)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • Nut and Bolt → Nut (hardware)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

WP:XY. These could sensibly be targeting Nut (hardware) or Bolt (fastener). Perhaps a target like Bolted joint or Fastener#Threaded would be better? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Nuts and Bolts I believe that to be the best target.--70.27.244.104 (talk) 01:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
    I missed that dab page! I would support retargeting these there. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Nuts and bolts as {{R to plural}}. Thryduulf (talk) 13:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Bolt (screw)[edit]

  • Bolt (screw) → Screw  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

WP:XY. Someone coming across this redirect could be looking for Bolt (fastener) or Screw. Which one should this target or should it be deleted? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Bolt (fastener) which has a link to screw in the lead (which in turn explains the difference between bolts and screws). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Bolt (fastener) appears to be a good solution. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 19:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:NZ-Currency[edit]

  • Template:NZ-Currency → Template:Non-free currency-New Zealand  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Is this still necessary? Hasn't been at this title since 2008, and is intentionally a soft redirect so people don't use this name - which seems to have worked. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. It's currently a soft redirect so there's no point keeping this to avoid breaking old versions of pages, as they won't work anyway. Only got 5 page views in the last year, which shows this is not a common way of searching for this template. The template hasn't been at this title for 13 years at this point. Finally the name seems ambiguous to me, and I personally wouldn't expect something as generic as Template:NZ-Currency to be a copyright disclaimer template, I would expect to end up somewhere like Template:New Zealand currency and coinage. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Nenjam Marappathillai (unreleased film)[edit]

  • Nenjam Marappathillai (unreleased film) → Nenjam Marappathillai (2021 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

The film released on 5 March 2021 Kailash29792 (talk) 13:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep per WP:RFD#HARMFUL. It seems the article was at this title for almost a year and a half, so deleting the redirect may break incoming links from other websites. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
    Mx. Granger, I fixed the incoming links from the mainspace. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
    Thanks, but I'm concerned about incoming links from other websites, not internal links from within Wikipedia. This redirect still gets a significant number of pageviews every day, so readers are getting to it somehow, probably through links from other websites. —Granger (talk · contribs) 07:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep for now. Still getting 30-50 page views a day, so there's incoming traffic from somewhere. No prejudice against relisting later when traffic has died off. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep for now per above. This is still a very useful redirect at the present time. Thryduulf (talk) 13:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep per above, we don't want to inconvenience those readers.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 00:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:TempleU[edit]

  • Template:TempleU → Template:User TempleU  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Unused redirect to a userbox - could potentially also be a navigation template for subjects related to Temple University - and therefore reserved for such usage. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Tenet[edit]

  • Template:Tenet → Template:Tenet Healthcare  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Ambiguous name (multiple things with the name Tenet that a navigation template could be created for); unused. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Tennis icon(2)[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted per G7 (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 03:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Socialist Party (Ireland) Elected Representatives[edit]

  • Template:Socialist Party (Ireland) Elected Representatives → Template:Socialist Party (Ireland)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Unused from 2014 move - no longer scope of the template so potentially misleading. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Silver Republican Party (United States)/meta/color[edit]

  • Template:Silver Republican Party (United States)/meta/color → Template:Silver Republican Party/meta/color  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Unnecessary disambiguation; unused and will not be used; {{Silver Republican Party (United States)/meta/shortname}} deleted for a similar reason. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:STV programmes[edit]

  • Template:STV programmes → Category:STV Productions  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Weird XNR - no reason for people to be transcluding or linking this. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Sbd[edit]

  • Template:Sbd → Template:Date table sorting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Unused; orphaned template shortcut. {{dts}} is the same length and much more obvious in how it relates to {{Date table sorting}} (I assume this is meant to be "sort by date", but that's not immediately clear) Elli (talk | contribs) 13:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Satriani[edit]

  • Template:Satriani → Template:Joe Satriani  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

While there is only currently one person with this surname - see Satriani - this is potentially ambiguous in the future and should therefore not be used. As it is not currently used, it should be deleted. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep; every redirect is potentially ambiguous in the future. Wikipedia doesn't just stay stagnant for eternity – it maintains itself. If ever this redirect becomes ambiguous, it will be taken here and the appropriate action will be taken. This nomination serves only to be a maintenance burden as deleting this redirect is at this moment completely useless. If it isn't harmful right now, then just leave it alone.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 05:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep, there are no other templates this is ambiguous with. If that changes in the future, then we can discuss whether it is appropriate to retarget, delete, or disambiguate. -- Tavix (talk) 03:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Satch[edit]

  • Template:Satch → Template:Joe Satriani  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

No reason for template redirects from nicknames; unused and potentially confusing to editors. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Satch for editors' navigation considering the unhelpfulness of this search page. It's ambiguous with Template:Louis Armstrong. I think that such a retarget is the most helpful solution here despite being unconventional.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 05:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete as an ambiguous and unused template redirect. A WP:CNR wouldn't be a desirable outcome. - Eureka Lott 04:29, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete as ambiguous and unused, per above. I disagree with retargeting to the dab page because I think it is highly unlikely that readers are going to be searching for articles in template space, and I don't think a list of articles is of great use to editors searching for templates. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete as ambiguous. I agree with the previous IP user. Less Unless (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

First Grove[edit]

  • First Grove → San Rafael, California#Parks  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

I PRODded this years ago and it was redirected instead of deleted. But I can't find evidence that anything by this name exists in San Rafael, so I recommend deleting the redirect. —Granger (talk · contribs) 12:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep - I redirected it on case of a plausible search term. Not worth fighting over, just my two cents. Bearian (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
    Is there any evidence that anything called "First Grove" actually exists? I've never heard of anything by this name in San Rafael, and I can't find anything about it online. My guess is that the article was created as a hoax. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Rule of thirds (diving) (disambiguation)[edit]

  • Rule of thirds (diving) (disambiguation) → Rule of thirds (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Rule of thirds (diving) is an article, not a disambiguation page. The page was moved away from this title within five hours after creation. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete appears to be created in error or... something. Regardless, no longer useful. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete this doubly (but unrelatedly so) disambiguated thing. We don't need redirects like this if their targets don't serve disambiguation functions. Regards, (SONIC)(678) 00:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. If this was fixed to point at the correct target (Rule of thirds (diving)) this could be speedy deleted per WP:G14. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete I believe this was a mistake. Less Unless (talk) 16:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Junction (Dune)[edit]

  • Junction (Dune) → Chapterhouse: Dune  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Buzzell (Dune) → Chapterhouse: Dune  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

These fictional locations are not mentioned in the target and there is nothing in the article to indicate the target is the correct one. Is there a better target? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment Buzzell (Dune) should redirect to Sandworms of Dune and be unlinked in that article, and Junction (Dune) should redirect to Spacing Guild. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 22:02, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:FANCRUFT. 053pvr (talk) 04:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Your rationale for the deletion of this redirect in its entirety is a link to an essay about article content. Does it not strike you that that isn't particularly helpful?  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 01:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Freaked out[edit]

  • Freaked out → Recreational drug use  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Freaked Out → Beacon Street Girls  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Common phrase, at least in American English, that refers to a number of things beyond just this usage; seems too generic to point specifically here, and I don't think loosely-defined slang terms are good candidates for disambiguation. Hog Farm Talk 05:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Freaked Out is currently a redirect to Beacon Street Girls, as a title of a book in the series; however, it's also the title of a book in the Lizzie McGuire series, a Tom Papa comedy special, and probably other works. We can convert the proper name to a disambiguation page and retarget the nominated page there. - Eureka Lott 06:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambig at Freaked Out (which I've added to this discussion) per EurekaLott. Thryduulf (talk) 12:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Note: disambiguation page now drafted at Freaked Out. - Eureka Lott 03:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Dabify per above. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Assyrian Protestants[edit]

  • Assyrian Protestants → Assyrian  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

No content about Assyrian Protestants on the target page. People who are ethnically Assyrian and religiously Protestant may belong to a variety of Protestant churches, meaning that there is no good alternate target. (t · c) buidhe 04:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Retarget It should be redirected to section: Assyrian people#Religion, that would be the easiest solution. Sorabino (talk) 08:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Assyrian people#Religion per Sorabino, which contains directly relevant information. Thryduulf (talk) 12:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to "Assyrian people#Religion" per above. 053pvr (talk) 04:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:NELECTION[edit]

  • Wikipedia:NELECTION → User:StudiesWorld/Notability (elections)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Wikipedia:NREFERENDUM → User:StudiesWorld/Notability (elections)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

A redirect to a stale draft of a guideline, implies that there is an published guideline or policy involving elections and referendums. Could be misleading to users searching for an actual guideline (although there should be one quite frankly). JayJayWhat did I do? 04:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete to make way for an actual guideline, or at least a more agreed upon essay (I think Wikipedia:WikiProject Elections and Referendums might be interested since we do have some rough standards we use). Elli (talk | contribs) 13:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. These are potentially valuable redirects if a policy defining inclusion criteria for elections ever gains consensus, and as such these should not be pointing to an abandoned userspace essay. There's a proposed notability guideline under development at Wikipedia:Notability (politics)#Elections, if that guideline gains consensus these should be recreated to point there. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:05, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Gallery of Presidents of the United States[edit]

  • Gallery of Presidents of the United States → List of presidents of the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

At least some searchers using this term likely seek something more along the lines of the "Hall of Presidents" described somewhat at the National Portrait Gallery (United States) article (not to be confused with The Hall of Presidents at Disney World) rather than WP's virtual "gallery" of presidential portraits. Keep or retarget? Note the extensive history of this page. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment The image gallery is now on Commons at c:President of the United States. A soft redirect might work here. - Eureka Lott 06:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment The original template from the now-deleted article wound up at User:Nard the Bard/POTUSgallery, for those curious. Mackensen (talk) 11:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep. There is an image of every president in the list so people using this will find what they are looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 11:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep per Thryduulf. 053pvr (talk) 04:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep per Thryduulf. The article serves well enough as a pseudo-gallery, and there's a link to the commons category at the bottom of the article. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep per Thryduulf and IP user.Less Unless (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Presidentiad[edit]

  • Presidentiad → List of presidents of the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not sure this is the most useful target for this term coined by Walt Whitman. Only passing mention on WP occurs at List of poems by Walt Whitman. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

List of presents of the United States[edit]

  • List of presents of the United States → List of presidents of the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • List of presents of Russia → List of presidents of Russia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Unlikely typo of two missing letters; searchers may actually be seeking something regarding gifts (official gifts from state visits perhaps?). Delete to avoid confusion. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment: I also found the similar List of presents of Russia, which I'm adding here and for which I think similar action should be taken. Regards, SONIC678 03:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete as an unlikely, or at least ambiguous, search term. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:RWS[edit]

  • Template:RWS → Template:Stnlnk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Delete, as obsolete and unused. {{RWS}} started out as an independent template, but all the pages that it would have linked to were moved by the end of December 2017 and this template then became redundant. It was converted to a redirect three years ago, but all remaining uses have now been updated. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 00:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep. "Redundant" is not a reason to delete a redirect. It's harmless in its present form and deletion will break old revisions without bringing any benefit. Thryduulf (talk) 11:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
    The pages {{RWS}} redirect to no longer exist. What's the point of preserving redlinks? AlgaeGraphix (talk) 12:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
    That's not how it works. Templates in old revisions transclude the current template, which works in a sufficiently similar manner that it wont produce redlinks. Thryduulf (talk) 19:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep, seems harmless. The old RWS would send you to "{{{1}}} Railway Station" and the new Stnlnk sends you to "{{{1}}} railway station". Unless you have two pages that only differ in capitalization of "Railway Station" this seems harmless as a redirect when viewing old revisions. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:26, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Constantine[edit]

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Not a discussion for RfD

March 10[edit]

Template:Медаль Жукова[edit]

  • Template:Медаль Жукова → Template:Medal of Zhukov  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

No reason to have foreign language redirects in template-space; unused. There's a few dozen of these I'll nominate it if looks like there's consensus to delete this. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 03:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

  • This is the name of corresponding template on the Russian Wikipedia. This sort of redirects, which include for example {{Citar livro}} and {{Coloré}}, are occasionally created to assist editors when translating pages from other Wikipedias. – Uanfala (talk) 15:45, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep This is the name of the medal in it's native language, so there's enough connection between the template and the Russian language to justify a Russian language redirect, per WP:RFOREIGN, in my opinion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete not in English and highly unlikely to be used by editors and I do not think WP:RFOREIGN applies to templates 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 11:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. The only reason for foreign-language templates on the English Wikipedia is when they are basically a wrapper for the English template, taking input from foreign-named parameters and passing them to the English-named equivalents. Thryduulf (talk) 12:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per User:🌸 1.Ayana 🌸. 053pvr (talk) 05:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Weak keep per Uanfala and 86.23.109.101. I do not see the harm in maintaining the few dozen such redirects of this that exist, except maybe to stave off the notion that these are acceptable in all cases or should be created akin where possible en masse (but that is unlikely and not a reason to delete). @Thryduulf: That may not have happened in this case, but was it based on the foreign template?; at the least, Elli, I might suggest being careful and looking into the background of each redirect before you group them all together (maybe smaller groups by situation, or some may be acceptable). That aside, is it implausible that editors might search for a template under the foreign name? — Godsy (TALKCONT) 07:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
    @Godsy: is it implausible that editors might search for a template under the foreign name? yes. Especially given that any two non-English Wikipedias may use the same name for different templates the only reliable way to find out the name of the English template when you only know/remember the non-English equivalent is to look up that template on the relevant non-English Wikipedia and follow the interwiki links. This also means neither Wikipedia has to know about renames, mergers, etc of templates on other Wikipedias in order to maintain template redirects on their own wiki. Thryduulf (talk) 12:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
    @Godsy: the only redirects I would nominate are unused. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep foreign language redirects like this are useful for e.g. if someone was translating articles related to this from Russian Wikipedia. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
    How? They have to translate all the article text anyway, and the Russian template redirect working just disguises the need to translate the template call too. If it is left in the article it becomes an unnecessary barrier to non-Russian speakers while providing no benefit. If someone doesn't know the name of the template on the English Wikipedia then they can look at the interwikis from the Russian Wikipedia template or ask someone. Not so applicable to this template, but for any template that takes parameters a redirect that doesn't translate the parameter names offers no benefit over a redlink (other than being potentially harder to identify), a mix of working and non-working templates also makes the job of checking the article unnecessarily harder and any templates that happen to share their name with a different template on any other language wiki could lead to unnecessary confusion. Thryduulf (talk) 16:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Rep. of the Philippines[edit]

  • Rep. of the Philippines → Philippines  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This appears to be a pretty useless redirect. The target is the vague overview of the entire country, and this term could be used in many different instances, including several which could be official positions of the government. Onel5969 TT me 18:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Onel5969, I don't know whether you recognised this, but it can also stand for Republic of the Philippines (in which case the target is justified) as well as Representative of the Philippines. It's a question now of what it stands for in most instances.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 20:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi J947 - yes I did realize that, it was part of the point I obviously didn't make well enough, about how it could point to several different things, not just the article about the nation. Onel5969 TT me 00:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete In addition to being ambiguous, it seems a highly unlikely term for anyone to type, and if they do type something so specific they're probably looking for a more specific meaning of some kind. CMD (talk) 11:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ambiguous and likely to cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Representative of the Philippines with hatnote to Republic of the Philippines per argument of "User:J947". Putting a hatnote on "Republic of the Philippines" would be too disruptive. 053pvr (talk) 05:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Now I'm confused. Are you proposing to make an article at Representative of the Philippines? 053pvr, you can't target a redirect to a red link.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 00:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
      • *House of Representatives of the Philippines. 053pvr (talk) 01:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. "Rep. of the Philippines" almost always means "Republic of the Philippines", not "Representative of the Philippines" which is not used to refer to Members of the House of Representatives; either they're called ("Foo" being the name of the district) "Foo Congressman" or "Foo Representative" or "Party-list representative". "Representative of the Philippines" may be used for an actual representative of the Philippines in a competition on organization, but that doesn't deserve a redirect. Howard the Duck (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Yuri Jardine[edit]

  • Yuri Jardine → 4F case  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not mentioned at the target, possible BLPCRIME concerns. I think that the redirect should be deleted unless there is consensus to add a mention at the target. signed, Rosguill talk 17:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. If there's no explanation at the target, then this is a BLP issue. In particular, a web search turns up several somewhat people named "Yuri Jardine" who are not the one connected to this case, so an unexplained redirect is a BLP problem with respect to them as well. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 22:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and the ip editor. Thryduulf (talk) 12:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Implausible. 053pvr (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete - concerns of defamation. Bearian (talk) 14:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Meteorology/Books[edit]

  • Meteorology/Books → Meteorology#Further reading  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This seems to have started out as an attempt at making a subpage, years after subpages were discontinued in article space. Someone tried to G6 it shortly after creation but couldn't get the template to work, so it was redirected to the main article instead. Not a plausible way of searching for the target section in my opinion 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. This seems to have started out as an earnest attempt to make the Meteorology article's reference formatting difficult and obtuse. It does have history, but it's short enough to just be copied to the talk page. In any case, the page title is not useful to the encyclopedia. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Restore and send to AfD. This was article content that was proposed for merging but was redirected before that was actually discussed. Yes it's short, but there is no basis to delete it at RfD. Thryduulf (talk) 12:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. Whatever was attempted does not work since subpages are disabled in article space; that also makes it implausible as a search term. -- Tavix (talk) 23:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Search terms are irrelevant to article content and we don't delete articles just because they are at the wrong title, but if you prefer then it can be moved to Meteorology books when restored and discussed there. There is still no justification for RfD to delete this article content. Thryduulf (talk) 23:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
      • @Thryduulf: The list of books that was on this page seems to have been copied into the main article in this diff from 2008 to make the further reading section. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 02:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
        • Well that means we need to keep this redirect's history in some form for attribution reasons.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
          • As far as I'm aware references don't normally need attribution as they lack sufficient creative input to attract copy protection, per WP:NOATT. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep Pretty harmless and apparently needed for attribution reasons now. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 04:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Metereologia[edit]

  • Metereologia → Meteorology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • Meteorologie → Meteorology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • Meteorología → Meteorology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Inappropriate non-english redirects per WP:FORRED. Nothing particularly Spanish/French/Portuguese about the concept of Meteorology 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. Non-English redirects from a since-blocked editor. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 23:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

List of weather-related disasters[edit]

  • List of weather-related disasters → Meteorology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

The current target of this redirect is clearly inappropriate as there is no list of weather-related disasters in the article, but I found two possible targets. Natural disaster#Meteorological disasters lists various types of disasters, while List of natural disasters by death toll lists various events. Which one should this target? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to List of natural disasters by death toll, which contains weather related disasters as well as some others. The current target is not useful, and I think that readers searching for this are more likely to want a list of incidents than a list of types of disasters. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 23:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to List of disasters#Natural disasters where the reader can find lists related to specific types of weather event or the broader list of natural disasters by death toll. Neither is more likely to be useful than the other so we should not presume. Thryduulf (talk) 12:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget per "User:Thryduulf". 053pvr (talk) 05:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

MUSEA (Music School of Eastern Africa) (disambiguation)[edit]

  • MUSEA (Music School of Eastern Africa) (disambiguation) → Musea (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not only is this redirect totally implausible, consisting of an initialism disambiguated by its expanded form with an additional "(disambiguation)" appended (even though the title does not seem to be ambiguous); this is not even mentioned at the target. A mention may be added per List of university and college schools of music, but this redirect should be deleted. I also think Music School of Eastern Africa should better not be created, as the list does not provide any further information and the redlink there encourages article creation. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom - MUSEA (Music School of Eastern Africa) on its own would almost certainly be an implausible redirect, let alone the nominated one. Thryduulf (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. MUSEA (Music School of Eastern Africa) doesn't exist and therefore isn't ambiguous. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Implausible. 053pvr (talk) 05:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

(identifier) wikidata soft redirects[edit]

  • FNZA (identifier) → d:Q99484217  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • PIC (identifier) → d:Q23892012  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • WDQ (identifier) → d:Q43649390  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

The plain soft redirect template, i.e. {{soft redirect}}, is not used in the mainspace (WP:SOFTSIS). I heavily caution against retaining these soft redirects to Wikidata: and suggest deleting them along the lines of WP:NOTDIR. These seemingly do little for readers and might confuse or surprise them (the format of Wikidata may seem foreign to what they are expecting etc.). However, if these are deemed appropriate, then a new specialized soft redirect template is due to excise these occurrences of the plain soft redirect template from the mainspace ({{Wikidata redirect}} is a redirect category). I would be happy to handle that aspect if it is determined that these should be kept. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 19:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment. These have numerous incoming links due to Module:Authority control; other redirects there target appropriate mainspace articles. I can't see any suitable target article for Find New Zealand Artists. Retarget PIC to New York Public Library consistent with Photographers' Identities Catalog. Retarget WQI (Wikidata Q identifier) to Wikidata. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  • I first saw AnomieBOT III placing {{soft redirect}} on WDQ (identifier) here; I assumed it was configured properly, and propagated that change to the 2 other #Rs listed above. I have no problem replacing {{soft redirect}} with #REDIRECT [[:d:Q43649390]], as originally intended prior to AnomieBOT III.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  20:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
    • That won't actually redirect, which is why {{soft redirect}} exists in the first place. If {{soft redirect}} should not be used in some instance, feel free to replace it with the appropriate specialized template, or turn it into an appropriate stub article, or delete it. Anomie⚔ 20:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
      • @Anomie: The appropriate specialized soft redirect template does not exist at this time (i.e. there are no other soft redirects to Wikidata in the mainspace besides the ones listed here at this time), but I would be happy to create it should it be deemed that any of these should be retained as soft redirects (tried to say that in the nomination but it may not have came across clearly). — Godsy (TALKCONT) 07:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
        • Support creation of of an appropriate template.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  14:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  • The reason these 3 #Rs exist is not against WP:NOTDIR - they are but 3 exceptions to the "<ID> (identifier)" Module:Authority control #R convention, whose #Rs were created by Matthiaspaul & myself.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 
  • The general purpose of these "(identifier) redirects" instead of direct links is to reduce the clutter at "What links here" and improve reverse lookup capabilities. They are used by citation templates, authority control templates, catalog lookup link templates, infoboxes and various other templates, and they should point to the corresponding Wikipedia page explaining the identifier. They should only be used in conjunction with identifiers, not for "normal" links to the target page.
Until recently, all these redirects actually resolved to Wikipedia pages, and this should definitely remain the default in order to not undermine the idea. In rare cases, where an identifier redirect needs to be created although we don't yet have a good target page in Wikipedia, I think, we can extend the idea and let it temporarily point to the corresponding Wikidata entry, but this should remain the exception.
"WDQ (identifier)" should be changed back to point to our Wikipedia article on Wikidata.
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget These should never have been made into Wikidata interwiki links to begin with. I rectified two of them with: 1007122341 and 1007123617. I am not sure where to target FNZA (identifier) as Find New Zealand Artists [Wikidata] is a joint project of Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki and Christchurch Art Gallery. I suppose we could leave it redlinked but I have not seen redirects to a missing article much. As always, someone could stub out the article to rectify the redlink. As a final option besides a new WP:SSRT, we could delete FNZA (identifier) and do a partial revert of 1006930837 returning things to how they were before Tom.Reding pushed things in this direction. —Uzume (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
    A redirect to a redlink will be deleted under WP:CSD#G8 sooner or later, so that's not a long-term solution. Thryduulf (talk) 20:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
    I suspected that might not work. —Uzume (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget WDQ (identifier) to (the Wikipedia article on) Wikidata. Retarget PIC (identifier) to New York Public Library#Website_and_digital_holdings. Delete FNZA (identifier) because there is no article on the thing it is referring to. (I don't see what the problem with Module:Authority control linking to it despite it being red is, that is no different from any other link to a subject that doesn't have an article). These redirects linking to Wikidata is a clear perversion of Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 204#New RFC on linking to Wikidata. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
    • "clear perversion of Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 204#New RFC on linking to Wikidata"? {{Authority control}} does not reside in the body of any article, and neither should this #R.
      Also, in lieu of a Wikipedia article, Find New Zealand Artists (Q99484217) is much more informative than a red link.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  00:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete FNZA (identifier) to encourage creation of an article. Redlinks identify that an article does not exist but should, and I don't see why this one would be an exception. Of course, once Find New Zealand Artists is created, it should link there. It does appear the other two have already been resolved. -- Tavix (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment How about we get Module:Authority control to refer directly to Find New Zealand Artists? This creates the correct red links and for now we can delete FNZA (identifier). We really only use the "(identifier)" redirects to avoid Special:WhatLinksHere noise but that does not seem much applicable for a page that does not exist. Things can be updated to move back to FNZA (identifier) once Find New Zealand Artists exists. The other option would be a partial revert of 1006930837 so that the module refers to an interwiki link to Wikidata. Regardless, I do not think it is proper or even much useful to employ "(identifier)" redirects when a local article target does not exist. —Uzume (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow for further discussion of most recent comment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget WDQ (identifier) to article Wikidata. Neutral on the rest. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment. I did a bit of a search, and I honestly can't find any secondary coverage of the FNZA database (best source was a press release). I am not sure how helpful a redlink is going to be in this instance since I doubt an article is going to be made any time soon. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 18:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
    If a redlink is deemed unhelpful, Module:Authority control could easily be edited to not provide any link at all. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is cosnensus to retarget WDQ (identifier) and PIC (identifier) to the article targets identified, but further discussion about FNZA (identifier) is needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 14:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment - To clarify, I support the deletion of FNZA (identifier). If it is kept ({{soft redirect}} is not used in the mainspace), it will trigger the creation of a a new specialized soft redirect template for redirects to wikidata. I have concerns that the existence of such a template will lead to the idea that such redirects are acceptable sometimes, e.g. against certain notions. There are currently no redirects to wikidata in the mainspace; is sending readers there something the community wishes to endorse? — Godsy (TALKCONT) 17:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    @Godsy: To be honest, we might just consider having a catch-all sister project soft redirect template for {{Wikispecies redirect}} and Wikidata. We only have one Wikispecies soft redirect, and the template isn't the most popular (see also: here and here). It could say something generic and explain that the target page isn't actually an article but still may contain useful information on a sister website. Just a thought there. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 18:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    Of course, it would also have to explain that this soft redirect is only used in exceptional circumstances and per consensus. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 18:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    @MJL: I like the idea of warning text of sorts on the template that "explains that the target page is not actually an article but still may contain useful information on a sister site." However, I prefer seperate templates. It keeps the coding simple & easily editable and does not require auto-detection or an extra parameter to specify which site (easier on those applying the templates who are not familiar with it and even me because that is something I monitor and often end up fixing). — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    @Godsy: In that case, then I think we'll need a new Wikidata template. I drew something up for you to see what I propose in practice. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 19:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    @MJL: Yeah; I based the ones for wikibooks, wikispecies, and commons off the ones that existed prior to that. More than happy to sort out the specifics with you, if this redirect ends up being kept. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 19:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    @Godsy: we already have {{Wikidata redirect}} which is in the same vein as {{Wiktionary redirect}} etc (though it is currently also used on hard redirects, which I'm working on changing). The wording could realistically be changed to indicate Wikidata as the only target, but... yeah, not sure if we should do that. But there is no need for a new template here. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
    @Elli: {{Wikidata redirect}} isn't meant for this use case though. It's more of a type of WP:RCAT than a soft redirect template. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 03:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
    @MJL: it's meant for both and is named like a soft redirect template. I think the rcat and soft redirect functionality should be split, personally (you can see various discussions about this on the talk). Elli (talk | contribs) 04:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
    @Elli: I am familiar with the rcat template. I could not quite follow what you are getting at; from what I could glean, I seemingly disagree in many regards. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 15:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
    Isn't it premature to discuss how to implement a hypothetical keep closure before the discussion is closed. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
    At this length, you're making a fair point (hence, my hesitance to discuss certain matters further at this time in reply above). My intention was merely to mention that, regardless of what happens, this will not remain a plain {{soft redirect}} and the potential repercussive waves that such a new specialized template might cause. Nothing more, nothing less; certainly did not imagine it turning into this big of an exchange. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 12:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete, Probably not going to be used by anyone. 053pvr (talk) 05:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
    @053pvr: Did you read the discussion above? These redirects are used in the {{Authority control}} template and are linked to in thousands of articles - "PIC (identifier)" has over 6,000 incoming links. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 03:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Then Speedy Keep. 053pvr (talk) 03:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
      • @053pvr: Please read discussions before you comment—and then only do so if you understand the discussion enough to comprehend its nuances. It is clear you have not done so. WP:SPEEDYKEEP is not appropriate for this discussion. -- Tavix (talk) 03:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
        • Oh my god. 053pvr (talk) 03:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
          • @053pvr: Please explain. Which WP:SKCRIT has been met? -- Tavix (talk) 03:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
            • Doing anything to one on these redirects would cause too much damage. 053pvr (talk) 03:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
              • @053pvr: How would retargeting these to an appropriate local target (which is what many people in the discussion above are proposing) cause any damage, and why would a discussion with lots of input from multiple people over the last three weeks now qualify for speedy keeping? This style of redirect is used to avoid making a mess of the "What links here" section of articles, because {{Authority control}} has made hundreds of thousands of links to various identifier systems. You really need to slow down and read these discussions carefully, especially for complex cases like above. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
                • Retarget to some local target. Someone really needs to just close this as no consensus, because there will not be consensus. 053pvr (talk) 21:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget PIC (identifier) to New York Public Library#Website and digital holdings for consistency with Photographers' Identities Catalog per above.
Retarget WDQ (identifier) to Wikidata per above.
Delete FNZA (identifier), and modify the template to stop the creation of redirect links as we have no appropriate local target. Perhaps use something like {{Abbr}} to create a rollover explanation of the initialism instead? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Builder works[edit]

  • Builder works → engineering  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

I can't figure out the connection between this redirect and it's target. To me it seems that this should be targeting something like Construction, but I don't think it's a particularly plausible search term to get there either 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Weak keep or retarget to Construction. "Builder's work" or "Builders's work" is a Britishism for constructing buildings or machinery. Wikipedia doesn't actually have either of those as redirects, but it should. The nominated redirect is just a variant of those more standard search terms, so there's nothing wrong it. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 14:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    • I'm familiar with the phrase "Building works" meaning construction, but I've never come across "Builder works" before and I wouldn't associate it with engineering. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'm a native speaker of British English and I've never heard this phrase (unlike "building works"). Google results for the exact phrase are a mix of a couple of specific companies, "builder's works" and partial matches for phrases a like "a builder works on...". Thryduulf (talk) 12:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Implausible search term. 053pvr (talk) 05:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Automagic[edit]

  • Automagic → Automatic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not mentioned at target besides the sister project link to Wiktionary. Why not soft redirect there directly (wikt:automagic)? Note that automagically already is a soft redirect. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Soft redirect per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 12:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete to facilitate Search, which will find encyclopedic uses, including Thor washing machine#Automagic washer/dishwasher. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Roman equivalent[edit]

  • Roman equivalent → Interpretatio graeca  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

I understand how the redirect text arises in this context, but "Roman equivalent" is far too generic a concept to redirect this way. A reader might want to find the "Roman equivalent" of ancient weights and measures, of later Italian or Byzantine institutions, or of any number of other things. The target article has several better redirects for those trying to find it without using the specific page title, and the redirect is too generic to point to any specific thing, so it should be deleted 50.248.234.77 (talk) 14:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

If it could be applied to several concepts—the titles of which may not be altogether intuitive—perhaps it would make sense to list them on a disambiguation page under this title. Otherwise, perhaps choose the most likely target (the mythological use seems slightly more probable than weights and measures, IMO), and place a hatnote there for other uses. P Aculeius (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate There are many things which could be referred to as "Roman equivalent", such as Roman numeral equivalents of Arabic numbers. 053pvr (talk) 05:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Capital equipment[edit]

  • Capital equipment → machine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This is apparently a term that means "Any equipment used to manufacture goods", which isn't mentioned in the current target article. An IP left a comment on the redirect in 2009 saying it wasn't correct, and searching online it seems that a few definitions of the term include assets like buildings, not just necessarily machinery. I couldn't find an appropriate target for this but someone here might find something, or the term has a definition on Wiktionary that might be suitable? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment: This topic is mentioned, barely, in both Capital (economics) and Factors of production. I don't have a preference to retarget to either article, because in fact this concept isn't well covered in either place. That is kind of surprising given that Wikipedia has plenty of articles on types of production equipment. Manufacturing isn't a good target because the coverage of economics in that article is similarly inadequate. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 14:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to "Capital (economics)". 053pvr (talk) 05:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

IndustrialHydraulis[edit]

  • IndustrialHydraulis → Machine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Implausible double typo redirect, has both a spacing error and missing c from hydraulics. I just retargeted Industrial Hydraulics to Hydraulic machinery which seemed like a better target to me, but I don't think this typo redirect is worth keeping. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. This is not worth having since the correct version exists. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 14:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. Quite implausible; 76 page views in the last 6 years. I usually delete these contemporaneous with the move from the bad title, if rather implausible like this one, and since I wasn't yet an admin at the time of this move, tag for deletion. I have no memory of this ministerial move from 15 years ago, of course, but not doing so was likely just an oversight.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget. It's an {{R with old history}} at this point and pretty harmless to keep around. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 18:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    • The page history for the article is in the correctly spelled Industrial Hydraulics redirect, this one only contains a redirect. The article was at this misspelled title for 5 mins in 2006 so I don't think it's a valuable "R from move" either 86.23.109.101 (talk) 19:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Baroody (surname) (disambiguation)[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Spruce Text List[edit]

  • Spruce Text List → Apple Inc.#1997–2007: Return to profitability  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This is supposed to be targeting Spruce Technologies, as the name of a DVD subtitling technology that they released, but the article on Spruce Technology was merged into the apple aticle in 2010 following an AfD nomination. As it stands this technology isn't mentioned by name anywhere in the encyclopedia 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete Non-notable software. 053pvr (talk) 05:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft:2019[edit]

  • Draft:2019 → 2019  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This redirect page was purposely created for a test, and it is not useful anymore. There are no helpful pages that link to the redirect, which also only had nearly less than 100 pageviews since 2018. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 12:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete: Not a likely search term, and per precedent. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep, MfD often (though not in this case) redirects drafts to the mainspace article of the same name to discourage people from re-creating it. Such a deletion undermines that protocol. Also, if anything don't delete because there is a draft in the history and it isn't RfD's job to decide the merits of that draft.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 17:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep per J947· Thryduulf (talk) 12:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. There is no reason to have a draft, nor a draft redirect, for a year already passed. -- Tavix (talk) 23:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete - useless and confusing. Bearian (talk) 14:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Grafikkort[edit]

  • Grafikkort → Video card  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

WP:FORRED. Nothing Swedish about a video card. There is a Swedish language article in the page history, but it would be A2 / A10 speedy deletable if restored 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. This should have been deleted in 2008 instead of being redirected. In any case, graphics cards are indeed not especially Swedish, so this is not needed on the English Wikipedia. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 13:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. Swedish search term. Wikipedia:Redirects in languages other than English. Heymid (contribs) 15:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Évaporation[edit]

  • Évaporation → Evaporation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • Verdunstung → Evaporation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

WP:FORRED. Nothing French/German about evaporation 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. Foreign terms for a concept that has no particular affinity for any language. In addition, the creator is globally banned, though this wasn't a creation in violation of their ban. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 13:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects in languages other than English. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

ジングル (ラジオ)[edit]

  • ジングル (ラジオ) → Jingle  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

WP:FORRED. No connection between the concept of a jingle and the Japanese language. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. Foreign term for a concept that has no particular affinity for the Japanese language. In addition, the redirect creator is globally banned , though this wasn't a creation in violation of their ban. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 13:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects in languages other than English. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. 053pvr (talk) 05:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Fågelsång[edit]

  • Fågelsång → Bird vocalization  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

WP:FORRED. Nothing particularly Swedish about birdsong 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. Foreign term for a concept that has no particular affinity for any language. In addition, the redirect creator is globally banned, though this wasn't a creation in violation of their ban. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 13:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects in languages other than English. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. I concur as a Swedish speaker. Glades12 (talk) 19:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The Nest (stadium)[edit]

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Fringer[edit]

  • Fringer → Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Astaire and Rogers were never referred to as Fringer. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. This inhibits Search for other valid uses. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Planetary or gender symbols[edit]

  • → Planet symbols#Mars  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • ♂️ → Planet symbols#Mars  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • → Planet symbols#Venus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • ♀️ → Female  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • ⚧️ → Gender symbol  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • → Gender symbol  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • → Planet symbols#Mercury  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Unsure of where these should target, but this bears discussion. Male symbol and female symbol both target gender symbol, for context. Elli (talk | contribs) 09:12, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Neutral. Both the article on planet symbols and the ones about the genders are relevant and explain what these symbols mean. Glades12 (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Change to a disambiguation article for each symbol, giving pointers to both relevant articles. (I can't help wondering if this is a moot question. The only way to enter these symbols is to copy/paste from an external document, where the notation is likely explained already). If the consensus is for 'keep', then a 'redirects here' notice would be needed at the head of each of the planetary articles, which I don't like because it is such a non-problem.--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate or retarget to their entries on the Miscellaneous Symbols page which defines their usage per above. These are also used as alchemical symbols and I think there's an argument to be made that ♀️ is associated with Feminist symbology (Which I'm amazed I wasn't able to find an article on). 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    • I consider this the next best alternative to my own preference. My only concern about it is that the Miscellaneous Symbols page is a bit intimidating for visitors unfamiliar with the concept of codepoints, not easy to find the symbol you want and not obvious that it has links to more detailed articles. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
      • @John Maynard Friedman: If we were to retarget to the list I would suggest putting an {{Anchor}} template in the relevant entries so the redirects would point at the specific table entries. I can see the argument that a pair of dab pages could be better though. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:31, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
        • Or even a single dab page for this set of symbols (☿ ♀ ♂): we could even call it Planetary or gender symbols. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment. I've added , ⚧️, and ☿ here as well since it's in the same vein. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 18:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    Actually, just ignore the first two. That wasn't helpful. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 18:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget "♂️" and "♀️" to "Gender symbol" as that is what they are in Unicode. Keep the other ones. 053pvr (talk) 05:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
    • This idea has a lot of merit, per something like WP:common name, given that their overwhelming modern usage is as gender symbols. The International Astronomical Union deprecates their use in astronomy. Only astrologers still use them for planets. I support this proposal. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 08:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

March 9[edit]

Template:Self-reference[edit]

  • Template:Self-reference → Template:Self reference cleanup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This was moved in February, but I think this is quite ambiguous, as {{Self reference}} exists and is spelt very similarly. I think that is a better target because of the singular number, although I understand that the current target has been under this title since 2006. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to {{Self reference}} per nom. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 15:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Lindi Cistia Prabha[edit]

  • Lindi Cistia Prabha → Puteri Indonesia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not mentioned in target. Onel5969 TT me 18:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep, not sure if it's a recent change, but this name is currently mentioned at the target as a 2005 environment ambassador. signed, Rosguill talk 19:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears (talk) 22:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep Included in target since 2014[1] and also present at the time of nomination.[2] However, there is no requirement for XfD claims to be correct so my claim may not be correct. Thincat (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete - per WP:RfD#d10. Yes the name is definitely mentioned at the target and has been for some time, but this mention is really just a circular link without providing any real information other than when she won this competition. A7V2 (talk) 00:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:REDLINK. Most other winners have articles, and I don't see why she would be an exception. -- Tavix (talk) 23:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Last go.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete to encourage article creation if appropriate. There are other mentions of this subject other than at the current target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Water Pasteurisation Indicator[edit]

  • Water Pasteurisation Indicator → Solar Cookers International#Water Pasteurization Indicator  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Water Pasteurization Indicator → Solar Cookers International#Water Pasteurization Indicator  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • Water pasteurization indicator → Solar Cookers International#Water Pasteurization Indicator  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

No mention in target article Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment I've added the American spelling redirect to this nomination since they should end up with the same target (or deleted). 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
    • And an alternate capitalisation 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment there was formerly content about this in the target article, but it was removed by now-blocked editor Cantaloupe2 in 2013 for not having relevance [3]. Thryduulf (talk) 12:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep and merge the content formerly at Water pasteurization indicator into Solar Cookers International. --Un assiolo (talk) 10:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 00:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

In the hood[edit]

  • In the hood → Ghetto#African American ghettos  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

I think this is not very useful and should be deleted. Or at least retargeted to Hood (disambiguation). Un assiolo (talk) 19:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Redirect >>>>Neighbourhood, as this a 'hood slang. Djflem (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • The alternate capitalisation In the Hood currently targets Restless (Trae album) as the name of a song, maybe this one should point to the same place? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Redirect to the disambiguation page; while "the hood" literally means "neighbourhood" in hood slang, it most often refers to African-American ghettos, i.e. the neighbourhoods of the original users of the slang. So clarifying on "Hood (disambiguation)" that this is a term originating in AAVE which is used to mean "African-American ghetto" more specifically, or "neighbourhoods" more generally may be appropriate. --Bangalamania (talk) 22:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two different targets are being considered here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Soft redirect to wikt:hood#Etymology_3, which explains the term better than any of the suggested targets. signed, Rosguill talk 02:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Now three different targets are being discussed. Let's settle on one, people.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:09, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Soft redirect to wikt with a hatnote {{for|the song by Trae|In the Hood}}. Neighbourhood (or African-American Vernacular English) is not a good target because "hood" is not mentioned there. Disambiguation page Hood is not a good target because it does disambiguate uses of "in the hood". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Agno (Fluss)[edit]

  • Agno (Fluss) → Agno River  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

WP:RLOTE: no affinity to German. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete: I don't remember exactly why I created this redirect, probably because there were articles linking to it. It's unlikely that someone will use a German disambiguation for a river in the Philippines in English Wikipedia. Markussep Talk 07:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • delete as unlikely redirect --Lenticel (talk) 06:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects in languages other than English. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Igor Ivanov (Schauspieler)[edit]

  • Igor Ivanov (Schauspieler) → Igor Ivanov (actor)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

WP:RLOTE: no affinity to German; moved on the day of the creation. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects in languages other than English and probably created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Honk Honkler[edit]

  • Honk Honkler → Pepe the Frog#Appropriation by the alt-right  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not mentioned at target, nor anywhere else on Wikipedia. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. Go ahead, the Honkler meme isn’t even what started the appropriation. 21:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marisauna (talk • contribs)
  • Delete. Enwiki has nothing about the topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Big sad[edit]

  • Big sad → Depression_(mood)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • Big Sad → Depression_(mood)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Appears to be a meme about depression that is not mentioned in the target article (See the comments on the redirect pages). Does not appear to be a widely used name for depression, google turns up a few memes and some unrelated results 86.23.109.101 (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep as a bona fide popular slang term, certainly significant enough to be a redirect. (I hear it not infrequently in daily life.) For the standards of 'significant enough to be a redirect', it passes, even if it doesn't make Wikipedia notability. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 12:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Chooch[edit]

  • Chooch → Train  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Baby talk redirect for a term not mentioned in the target article. Google suggests this is the name of a film, a word meaning idiot and the name of an AI company. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 18:28, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Disambiguate – draft provided – note that none of the entries is Train. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    • The dab page looks good, I would also support disambiguation. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Support dab per User:Shhhnotsoloud --Lenticel (talk) 06:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Emu War/Archive 1[edit]

  • Emu War/Archive 1 → Emu War  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Pointless and confusing. Only exists to make a talk page archive go back to the article. --Cortex128 17:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. I assume this is supposed to be a talk page archive, but since it's missing the talk prefix its actually in article space. The actual archive is at Talk:Emu War/Archive 1. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete - Looks like someone found it necessary to create an article page to go along with the talk archive. However, this serves no purpose, would have no real use, and is kinda pointless since subpages have been disabled in the article namespace. Hog Farm Talk 05:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep, this is to aid people on Talk:Emu War/Archive 1 pressing the Article tab expecting to go to Emu War. It seems a niche usage, and it is, but it's happened to me and other users many times before.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 22:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep per J947, that is the reason why I created the redirect in the first place. Mattx8y (talk) 17:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per Wikipedia:Subpages#Wikipedia namespaces that do not have sub-pages, which discourages mainspace subpages. Talk archives don't need associated article pages. - Eureka Lott 04:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. If we want a link like this, I think it would have to be hardcoded into the page instead of using a redirect. It's one of those "all or nothing" things because there is no expectation of having a link like this in place for any given page. -- Tavix (talk) 18:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per Tavix. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Proof of area of a circle(a=pi*r*r)[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Compulsory public education[edit]

  • Compulsory public education → Compulsory public education in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • Compulsory Public Education → Compulsory public education in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

General topic should not redirect to an article about a U.S.-specific movement. —Granger (talk · contribs) 17:09, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Compulsory education. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
    IMO that would be misleading, because compulsory public education is not the same as compulsory education. —Granger (talk · contribs) 15:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Pete Williams (voice actor)[edit]

  • Pete Williams (voice actor) → Undergrads  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Pretty obscure voice actor redirect created by a blocked UPE. scope_creepTalk 16:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep as this appears to be reasonably unambiguous and the target contains information about a person primarily known for voice acting. Peter Williams (actor) is in Category:Canadian male voice actors, but he is not primarily known as a voice actor; that, and the Peter/Pete distinction, suggests that the current target is reasonable. feminist (talk) 13:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Géosphère[edit]

  • Géosphère → Sphere  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Innapropriate non-english redirect per WP:FORRED, nothing particularly French about the concept of a sphere. I'm fairly sure this is also pointing to the wrong place and is supposed to be targeting Geosphere. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom and WP:FORRED. Mdewman6 (talk) 07:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Pi R Cubed[edit]

  • Pi R Cubed → Cylinder  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This seems to be an incorrect formula redirect, I'm not aware of this expression having any connection to cylinders. The volume of a sphere is 4/3 Pi R Cubed, but since this is missing the 4/3 I don't think it should redirect there. The equation for the volume of a Cylinder is Pi R Squared h. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete as inaccurate. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete: per nom – 2pou (talk) 07:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Cylindricity[edit]

  • Cylindricity → Cylinder  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Cylindricity is a measure of how cylindrical an object is, but it isn't mentioned in the target article. The best target I found was Roundness (object), but it only mentions the term in the lead. There are also a load of articles on engineering tolerances that might be suitable targets, and an entry on wiktionary. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

[edit]

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Zylinder (Geometrie)[edit]

  • Zylinder (Geometrie) → Cylinder  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This is an innapropriate non-english redirect in my opinion, per WP:RFOREIGN. There's no particular connection between a cylinder and the German language 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Löschen per nom. No backlinks either. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Railway Worker's Union (Open Line) Pakistan[edit]

  • Railway Worker's Union (Open Line) Pakistan → All Pakistan Trade Union Federation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Railway Workers' Union (Pakistan) exists, and I corrected the redirect from one article that had it, to this. Shushugah (talk) 14:52, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Demon Hunters[edit]

  • Demon Hunters → World_of_Warcraft:_Legion#Demon_Hunters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This is an extremely ambiguous redirect in my opinion, and I not sure that World of Warcraft is the primary usage of this phrase. I propose retargeting this to the DAB page at Demon hunter and possibly making disambiguated redirect (like "Deamon Hunters (World of Warcraft)") to target the WoW page. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • retarget to dab per nom --Lenticel (talk) 01:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Pakistan Transport & General Workers' Federation[edit]

  • Pakistan Transport & General Workers' Federation → Pakistan Workers' Federation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Unclear what this has to do with the target page Pakistan Workers' Federation. I could not find any evidence that Pakistan Transport & General Workers' Federation ever existed. This redirect itself was the result of a prior AfD which resulted in a redirect decision. Shushugah (talk) 13:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Support -- Zarasophos (talk) 14:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

WebView[edit]

  • WebView → Microsoft Edge  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • WebView2 → Microsoft Edge  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Procedural nomination; redirect was blanked by LMB with the following reason:

WebView is NOT Microsoft Edge! Perhaps Edge is based on WebView, but it's a way more general technology than Edge.

JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 19:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

My basis for the redirect:
  • Bringing a modern WebView to your .NET WinForms and WPF Apps - Microsoft Edge Blog
  • Microsoft Edge WebView2 Control - Microsoft Edge Development | Microsoft Docs
I agree that there is not much information regarding WebView in the Microsoft Edge article (yet). Any better ideas where else to redirect instead? You may also want to start an article on WebView. Ghettoblaster (talk) 19:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment should WebView2 be bundled into this nomination? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Added WebView2 as suggested by the IP and since both were created by the same editor.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Retarget to JavaFX#WebView, where this is described. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
I guess that when there is more than one thing called WebView then we need either a separate article describing the general concept or at least a disambiguation page. Ghettoblaster (talk) 18:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget: WebView has become almost a sort of generic trademark for an OS component that allows embedding a web browser engine inside an application, especially within Android and iOS. I think that this topic in particular could work as an actual page. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I've seen Google Play provides Android System WebView runtime app, and Android Developers website have a portal for WebView API. --Great Brightstar (talk) 07:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Agathidium cheneyi[edit]

  • Agathidium cheneyi → Agathidium  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Deserves its own page, especially since no other Agathidium species redirect to the genus page.Vaporwaveboyfriend (talk) 08:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment I've fixed the template above and tagged the redirect. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 09:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Either Restore the stub article in the page history, or Delete to encourage article creation per WP:Redlink. All species are assumed inherently notable enough for a stand alone article per WP:NSPECIES so this should not be a redirect. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep. Deserving its own page is not a reason to delete a redirect. It is a valid species (as far as I know) and can have its own page. It once had its own very brief stub article, but this was merged by IceKarma (talk · contribs) into a single article covering three beetles in the genus named after politicians of the era. This was subsequently moved to the genus name and expanded. Nothing to stop anyone creating a new article about this species although I'm not a huge fan of the one-liner "... is a beetle." articles. The redirect target contains information specifically about this species, so it seems like a good target as long as there is no separate article. Lithopsian (talk) 16:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep. "Deserves its own page" and WP:REDLINK are not standalone reasons to delete a redirect. It's a redirect with possibilities which is perfectly valid. Expanding it into its own article is also valid, which anyone is free to do if there is some meaningful content to write about the species. Adumbrativus (talk) 01:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

C. States[edit]

  • C. States → United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Propose retargeting to Advanced Configuration and Power Interface#Processor states. This originally target the Confederate States of America, and was targeted here through IP vandalism and a double-redirect bot late last year. The current target is clearly innappropriate. However, I've got a good deal of familiarity with the American Civil War, and "C. States" isn't a particularly common (although not completely unknown) construction for the CSA. A WP:BEFORE suggests that the computer topic is likely the primary topic, which is also where C state points. Hog Farm Talk 06:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete No one looking for anything would type "C. States" because just typing "Conf" in the search box gives you Confederate States of America and there is no evidence that Advanced Configuration and Power Interface is known as "C." 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget per nom. A WP:BEFORE google search suggests to me that the overwhelming primary topic of this phrase relates to the processor states. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Souutsubyou[edit]

  • Souutsubyou → Bipolar disorder  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Appears to run afoul of WP:RFFL. Hog Farm Talk 06:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. Nothing particularly Japanese about bipolar disorder. Dominicmgm (talk) 07:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Rod (shaft)[edit]

  • Rod (shaft) → Cylinder  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not discussed at the target page Cylinder; also, "(shaft)" is a rather strange disambiguator. See also the RfD for Rod (geometry) (Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_March_8#Rod_(geometry)). Adumbrativus (talk) 06:09, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Squad (app)[edit]

  • Squad (app) → List of mergers and acquisitions by Twitter#Squad  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Procedural listing. Brief recap: Sandstein closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squad (app), which was then brought to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 February 27#Squad (app) (closed) by Cunard. My closure of the DRV was contested by Sandstein. Instead of having another argument over procedure, I think it would be simplest to have a fresh discussion on the merits over whether Squad (app) should remain a redirect or be deleted, now that AfD has determined that it should not have its own article. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#Reasons for not deleting (WP:RFD#KEEP) and the Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Merging subsection of Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion.

    The first item of WP:RFD#KEEP notes, "They have a potentially useful page history, or an edit history that should be kept to comply with the licensing requirements for a merge (see Wikipedia:Merge and delete)." I consider the page to have a "potentially useful page history". I merged content from Squad (app) to List of mergers and acquisitions by Twitter#Squad (app).

    Cunard (talk) 07:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep. There is relevant content about the app in the target article, so clearly this redirect is appropriate. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • I am not contesting this redirect, which appears appropriate to me. I am contesting King of Hearts's DRV closure as a result of which they restored the history of Squad (app) despite an AfD consensus to delete it. I'll be seeking review of that decision at WP:AN. Sandstein 11:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

March 8[edit]

Micro ribbon=edit[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted per G6, obviously created in error.

MEDEVAC target=[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted per G6, obviously created in error. -- Tavix (talk) 23:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:From Here to Eternityaction=edit[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted

Template:Current Montgomery County Council (Maryland)=edit[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted

Rod (geometry)[edit]

  • Rod (geometry) → Cylinder  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

The Rod (geometry) redirects to Cylinder, but the target page does never even mention the term rod, let alone describing it or even defining it. As such, the redirect is clearly misleading. Hence either the redirect should be deleted or reverted to a stub version, or the target article should be expanded to cover the redirected notion. CiaPan (talk) 20:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment There's also the Rod (shaft) redirect, should that be bundled into this nomination? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.109.101 (talk) 21:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
    • I put up Rod (shaft) for discussion following the suggestion: Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_March_9#Rod_(shaft). (I put it up separately because they weren't nominated at the same time, and also because it was easier that way with Twinkle for me. Not sure if it was more proper to have them separate or combine them here.) Adumbrativus (talk) 06:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. Rod has no real technical meaning in geometry. The old stub claimed that "In geometry, a rod is a three-dimensional, solid (filled) cylinder", but it gave no sources, and it's not a standard definition or even a noteworthy uncommon definition. If "rod" were to get a mention in Cylinder, it would at most be an informal example of familiar cylinder-like objects, like the way a tin can is used as an example there currently—but that's no reason for a "Tin can (geometry)" either. Adumbrativus (talk) 08:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Conservative logo 2006.svg[edit]

  • File:Conservative logo 2006.svg → File:Conservatives logo.svg  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Misleading; the file has been moved and updated so it currently is no longer the 2006 version of the logo. No incoming file links. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Colors[edit]

  • Colors → Color (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • Colours → Color  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

I'm pretty sure that these ought to go to the same place. Which is better? I've looked at a number of other pairs of colo(u)r page titles (multicolor, colourful, etc.), and every pair goes to the same place, except for colored and coloured, which are distinct articles covering different topics. Nyttend (talk) 18:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Support 'color', color seems the obvious redirect for all spellings. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget Colors to Color, consistent with Colours, per WP:PLURALPT: "the normal situation is that a plural redirects to its singular". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget Colours to Color (disambiguation). Despite WP:PLURALPT, it may not have a primary topic and may be better retargeted to the dab. I just worked through the incoming links to Colours. Most of them did not relate to Color, the most popular correction being Military colours. Certes (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
    • @Certes: But "colours" in the context of Military colours, standards and guidons is just a plural of "colour". Clearly linking to Color when you mean "military colour" or "military colours" is an error, but I think it's a stretch to say that there is no primary topic for "Colours". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
      • It's not a normal plural because the singular "military colo[u]r" is rare. It's more like Browns or Greens where extra meanings such as Cleveland Browns‎ and Greens (vegetable) make the plural more ambiguous than the singular. Certes (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget Colours to Color (disambiguation) per Certes. In particular, the reference to military colors/colours necessitates disambiguation for the plural forms, and I don't think targeting the singular with a hatnote is preferable, though I would be open to that. Mdewman6 (talk) 07:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget Colors to Color per Shhhnotsoloud. "Color" is the singular form and primary topic for both "Colors" and "Colours". Seventyfiveyears (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment Keeping my vote above, but another possibility to consider would be to retarget to List of colors, since many searchers may be seeking that content. Would be analogous to, for example, Presidents of the United States targeting List of presidents of the United States and not President of the United States. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Cityfight[edit]

  • Cityfight → Warhammer 40,000#Cities of Death  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • City Fight → Cityfight: Modern Combat in the Urban Environment  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • City-Fight → Cityfight: Modern Combat in the Urban Environment  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]
  • City fight → Urban warfare  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This is a bit of a mess of redirects in my opinion, with slight variations in capitalisation and punctuation sending readers to three very different articles. The warhammer 40K redirect is a partial title match for a codex (rule book) that was released as part of the Cities of Death expansion pack, the other two are self explanatory. My gut feeling with this is to retarget all of these to Cityfight: Modern Combat in the Urban Environment and hatnote to the article on Urban warfare, but I could also see the argument for disambiguation. There's also the related City fighting redirect, Which I won't nominate here to avoid a trainwreck. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

  • I concir that the redirect to WH40K is least good, support nom's proposal. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for firmer consensus on where to retarget.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Secession crisis of 1860-61[edit]

  • Secession crisis of 1860-61 → United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This does not refer to just the United States. I recommend retargeting this to American Civil War. CrazyBoy826 22:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

retargeting this to American Civil War. = good idea. Rjensen (talk) 22:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Reverted to where it redirected before being inexplicably mangled (double redirect to Confederate_States_of_America#Secession). I'm not saying that's the best fix (the previous section might be better), but it gets back to something plausible at least. Please review and see. Dicklyon (talk) 00:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Confederate_States_of_America#Secession per Dicklyon - This should have the same target as Secession crisis of 1860–61, which was always Confederate_States_of_America#Secession except briefly to United States which was quickly reverted. If there is a better target then both redirects should point to the same article. A7V2 (talk) 08:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget both to American Civil War#Secession crisis, which I think does a slightly better job of explaining this than the material at the CSA target. Hog Farm Talk 14:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We're closing in on a consensus but there's still some disagreement on which article to target to.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget both to American Civil War#Secession crisis per Hog Farm. I agree the section at the Civil War article better captures the specific topic envisaged by this redirect, as the CSA did not exist in 1860. Mdewman6 (talk) 07:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

X ratings[edit]

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Hair Fairies (people)[edit]

  • Hair Fairies (people) → Transgender  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not mentioned at target. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 02:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Probably delete as an unlikely search term with this capitalization and parenthetical, and as a questionable target. "Hair fairies" is (as mentioned in various RS) an older term for a category of gay queens, some (perhaps even many) of whom were trans women, but it is unclear that "Transgender" is unambiguously the right target for a redirect about that. "Hair fairies" are already briefly mentioned in San Francisco Pride, and if someone is feeling energetic, they could probably add a sentence to an article like LGBT history which could make a better target(?). (I found enough uses of the term to meet Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion as a dictionary entry, though; revise if needed.) -sche (talk) 06:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • If there is usage in reliable sources then I would think that it would be best to add an entry to List of LGBT slang terms and retarget this there. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
    True, that would also work. -sche (talk) 22:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete – unused, implausible, derogatory, and over-capitalized to boot. Dicklyon (talk) 00:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Per the usage in reliable sources this is neither implausible nor derogatory - it is a (now obsolete) self-description. It received almost 60 hits last year so it isn't unused and the capitalisation is trivial. Thryduulf (talk) 05:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: while the bolded !votes thus far are all for deletion, there's been some dissent in the actual discussion that justifies a relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Héctor Pineda[edit]

  • Héctor Pineda → Mauricio Pineda  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Hector Pineda → Mauricio Pineda  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

The original target was Mauricio Pineda (footballer, born 1975), whose full name is Mauricio Héctor Pineda. There is however no indication that this person is ever referred to as Héctor Pineda. There seems to be no other suitable target. Lennart97 (talk) 14:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Mauricio Pineda (footballer, born 1975). The page is short on valid sources but the top External link has him as "Héctor Mauricio Pineda". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Mauricio Pineda (footballer, born 1975) per the above. CycloneYoris talk! 00:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

You're just a sad song[edit]

  • You're just a sad song → The Black Parade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Created as a redirect to a redirect, repointed to the same target where there is no mention of sad song in any format. If it is a song, then it the capitalisation is wrong. No assistance to navigation. Richhoncho (talk) 14:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment: This is the starting line of the chorus of "Disenchanted" (see https://www.metrolyrics.com/disenchanted-lyrics-my-chemical-romance.html). What do you do when it is not the song's title but more recognised than the actual title which appears nowhere in the lyrics? Kailash29792 (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's reasonable to assume one would type the most recognisable lyric to a song where the title isn't in the lyrics. Just look at Galileo Galileo Galileo Galileo and Today I don't feel like doing anything. Dominicmgm (talk) 16:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Dominicmgm. In both the examples you have given there are substantial articles about the song. In this case there is no article for the song. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. Helpful redirect which is meant to aid readers who are searching for the song. CycloneYoris talk! 00:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

In Review[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 16#In Review

Sayuki[edit]

  • Sayuki → Fiona Graham  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Starting this RFD per a suggestion received at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Redirect#Sayuki redirect. Basically Sayuki was redirected to Fiona Graham back in 2011 as part of a page move. "Sayuki" is Graham's professional geisha name and apparently someone tried to create a separate article about Graham as "Sayuki" instead of incorporating such content into the BLP about Graham. The "Sayuki" article content was eventually merged into the Graham article and the redirect was created as part of the post merge cleanup. The problem is (in my opinion) is that "Sayuki" is a relatively common Japanese female given name and it seems a bit odd for it to automatically redirect to the BLP of a single person. In seems much better to for the newly created redirect Sayuki (geisha) to be for Graham article and for "Sayuki" to instead be converted into a dab page/article like is done for some other Japanese female given names (e.g. Mika, Mayumi (name), Akiko (given name)). I'm not too familiar with redirects and not sure if it's OK to just be bold and do this; so, I'm bringing it up for discussion here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Disambiguate / setindexify per nom. Seems like the best solution for common names. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Make a disambig page: All pages with titles containing Sayuki The redirect is actgually unused in wikipedia. Lembit Staan (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
    • There's not a lot (Legend of Sayuki, Sayuki Takagi) but fair enough. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:13, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • dabify' per above --Lenticel (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Tedious[edit]

  • Tedious → Manual labour  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

While manual labour is generally tedious, it is not the only sort of thing that is tedious. This redirect should be deleted. Soft redirect to wiktionary. signed, Rosguill talk 18:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Should it be redirected to monotonous then? I made the redirect when I couldn’t think of a good synonym for tedious. Dull? Boring? These are synonyms that would make sense to use. I will acknowledge that manual labor isn’t a very good redirect. Clamless (talk) 21:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Soft redirect to wiktionary? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 19:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Tedium is a redirect to boredom. That might work here, too. - Eureka Lott 19:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Soft redirect. This seems to meet the criteria for a soft redirect to wikt. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Soft redirect sounds like the best solution to me. signed, Rosguill talk 01:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Boredom to match Tedium and to keep redirects local when possible. -- Tavix (talk) 23:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow the Feb 24 log page to be closed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Boredom: this is a common, everyday word, so it's very unlikely that a reader may type it here looking for the dictionary definition that will tell them what it means. On the other hand, it is a perfectly plausible search term for the article about tedium and boredom. – Uanfala (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Boredom per Tavix's findings --Lenticel (talk) 02:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Boredom per Uanfala. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure that tedious (or tedium for that matter) should redirect to the article about boredom as in my mind they represent two different things – those performing a tedious task don't necessarily find it boring. I prefer to keep redirects local but I don't think that the retarget proposed is the right solution. Weak soft retarget to wikt:tedious in lieu of a better solution. If this redirect is targeted to boredom, there's a fair bit about tedium in boredom#Philosophy so that is also a possible solution.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 01:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Deimos (oil rig)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 16#Deimos (oil rig)

Elexa[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 16#Elexa

Gaarbage[edit]

  • Gaarbage → Trojan (brand)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Looks like this may be old vandalism. Can't really find any connection between the phrase "gaarbage" and this brand of condoms. Looks like deletion is the best solution. Hog Farm Talk 03:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete. Vandalism; no hits for search of exact spelling on Google. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 07:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete G3 left over redirect from some 2005 era page move vandalism. Page views are not high enough to indicate that this is a plausible misspelling of "Garbage". 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:43, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. The title speaks of itself. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • delete per above. It won't be a useful redirect to garbage. --Lenticel (talk) 03:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete This redirect is just ga[a]rbage. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to garbage as such would be harmless.  J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 01:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Zirkouh County[edit]

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Template:Zodiac sign[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Template:ß template[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Template:¬[edit]

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Gilthui[edit]

  • Gilthui → Middle-earth#Geography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Two issues here: First, there appears to be no content on enwiki about this obscure subject. Second, the correct spelling would be Glithui, which was deleted back in January 2020. Hog Farm Talk 00:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete: The Glithui was a tributary of the River Teiglin in Beleriand. I think the deletion was correct, so this one should also be deleted. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

March 7[edit]

1993 Kids' Choice Awards[edit]

  • 1993 Kids' Choice Awards → Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Honestly interested to see what others believe about this:

A KCA ceremony was not held in this specific year. For years people had thought there was, but in more recent years there has been plenty of research done, finding out it did not happen. In fact, I have the full '92 and '94 shows in my possession, the intros of each have the announcer say they are the sixth and seventh annual respectively (as can be seen on their articles).

Looking back at a previous version of the article, plenty of the information is actually for the 1992 ceremony, including:

  • The date of November 14, 1993 - 1992 ceremony was actually on November 14, 1992 - the promo sourced in that old version of the article is actually for 1992
  • Hosts Brian Austin Green, Holly Robinson, and Tori Spelling actually hosted the 1992 show
  • The celebrity sliming at the bottom of the article is actually for 1992
  • The 2005 KCA press site itself is actually incorrect- most (if not, all) the times the year 1993 is mentioned is actually the 1994 show

After it was figured out that a ceremony didn't occur that year, it was simply redirected to Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards. However, I'd actually think the redirect should be deleted altogether (and possibly protected from being recreated), as now it makes no sense to even have a redirect for a non-existent ceremony. Magitroopa (talk) 23:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Actually it sounds like we should have some encyclopaedic content about this - even if it's just a sourced sentence saying that there wasn't one. "For years people had thought there was [a ceremony in 1993]" means that this is a very plausible search term, as does it being part of a predictable series, so deletion is definitely the wrong thing here. Thryduulf (talk) 03:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 23:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Ngamba-namae[edit]

  • Ngamba-namae → List of cryptids  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Enwiki does not seem to have any content about this WP:FRINGE subject. Hog Farm Talk 23:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Beninese[edit]

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Falangist[edit]

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

The Something (2017 film)[edit]

  • The Something (2017 film) → List of Universal Pictures films (2020–2029)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

There is no film named "The Something", and this redirect is not mentioned at the current target. We don't have the page "The Something (film)", so this is the only mention of "The Something (film)" in the English Wikipedia. This redirect had less than 100 pageviews for the last 365 days. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 19:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. IMDB has a stub on it ([4]), but it appears no such film was ever made nor is there any indication that it will be made. This redirect was a "too soon" creation. Adumbrativus (talk) 04:06, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Test Wikipedia[edit]

  • Test Wikipedia → Wikimedia Foundation#Software projects and other backstage projects  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 April 27#Test Wikipedia resulted in a retarget; however, the topic is not mentioned at the target anymore nor anywhere else in mainspace. Since there is also no standalone page about this in other namespaces, I suggest deletion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Change to disambiguation page that gives the reader a one-line description of and links to [ https://test.wikipedia.org/ ], [ https://test2.wikipedia.org/ ], [ https://test.wikimedia.org/ https://test.wikidata.org/ ], and any other test Wikipedias that might be created in the future. I use those pages on occasion when investigating various bugs that might have been fixed in the development versions (free clue: you can usually do your tests in the sandbox and see them in preview, then back out without saving). --Guy Macon (talk) 11:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
    • Can I suggest adding the Wikimedia Incubator to that list, since it's used to test new projects and languages, and a "see also" link to the sandbox, which is used for testing things on site? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
      • That seems reasonable. Certainly some people use Incubator for tests. It is at [ https://incubator.wikimedia.org/ ] --Guy Macon (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
    • @Guy Macon: https://test.wikimedia.org/ does not exist. There are https://test.wikidata.org/ and https://test-commons.wikimedia.org/ though, but they would never be called "Test Wikipedia" and as such do not fit the proposed disambiguation page. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
      • Thanks for catching the error, That will teach me to cut and paste rather than typing from memory... I don't see a problem with including a Wikidata or a Commons.wikimedia in the disambig page. Just preface them with "related pages". --Guy Macon (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambig per the above, and include a link to the sandbox where people looking to test how Wikipedia editing works can experiment. Thryduulf (talk) 15:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
    • Adding a link to the sandbox is a brilliant idea. I guess that's why they pay you the big bucks.   :)   --Guy Macon (talk) 02:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 19:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate per above and also link to the sandbox per above. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Miſsiſsippi[edit]

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Bilat[edit]

  • Bilat → Bilateralism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Seems as likely to be a given name as a an abbreviation of Bilateralism. Deleting to allow for search results seems like the best option at this time. signed, Rosguill talk 18:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete, a search for this would show bilateralism on the autocomplete.-- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Hi Eraserhead1. Many users don't use the Wikipedia search function directly and I'm not sure why we would want to presume that they do. For example, I often directly search Wikipedia from my browser's URL search bar where there is no autocomplete. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate. See draft disambiguation page below the redirect. - Eureka Lott 23:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Rosguill. As we note on Wiktionary, "bilat" is an abbreviation for a bilateral meeting. Wikipedia somewhat strangely has very little mention of bilateral meetings, so the redirect to bilateralism was a compromise of sorts. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Support Dabify per Eureka Lott--Lenticel (talk) 03:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Gatling laser[edit]

  • Gatling laser → Fallout 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Super sledge → Fallout 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

  • delete Super sledge It seems that aside from Fallout, there are several companies using this term. No mention seems to be notable. Also delete Gatling laser on the same reason. This weapon is found in different video games as a futuristic version of the Gatling gun and not necessarily unique to Fallout. --Lenticel (talk) 03:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Westminster, London[edit]

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Crazy (The Adicts song)[edit]

  • Crazy (The Adicts song) → Smart Alex  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Redirect target is the album the song is on, but the album article is now itself a redirect to the artist's article (The Adicts) where this song isn't mentioned, so I suggest deleting the redirect. Lennart97 (talk) 14:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete. If there is no explanation or reason for the redirect, then there is no reason to keep the redirect. It does not assist navigation, but throws up confusion. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft:The Bowling-Alley Cat[edit]

  • Draft:The Bowling-Alley Cat → Tom and Jerry filmography#1940–1958: Hanna-Barbera/MGM Cartoons  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

This was created as a redirect from the beginning, and has never been a draft. The Bowling Alley-Cat was redirected by Koavf in 2019, but that's not a reason for this redirect to exist. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete, probably G2 as a test page. For some reason an IP editor copied and pasted The Bowling Alley-Cat into draft space, including the "R with history" tag and categories. I can only assume that someone was using draft space to play around with redirects. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 17:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Njago-gunda[edit]

  • Njago-gunda → List of cryptids  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

More WP:FRINGE content not described anywhere on enwiki, we're better off deleting this. Hog Farm Talk 07:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete No valid target. The List of cryptids target has been trimmed heavily over the past few years and these orphaned redirects should be removed accordingly. –dlthewave ☎ 16:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete, No mention anywhere. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Devil monkey[edit]

  • Devil monkey → List of cryptids  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

"Devil Monkey" is not mentioned at the target, although the string does appear in several other articles. There's no good target for this; delete to provide uninhibited search. Hog Farm Talk 06:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete No valid target. The List of cryptids target has been trimmed heavily over the past few years and these orphaned redirects should be removed accordingly. –dlthewave ☎ 16:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. This does appear in a few articles on TV shows and the like, but I'm not seeing a good primary target for this. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 17:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • This could possibly be pointed to Hellboy but it's a stretch.  — Scott talk 12:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • delete per nom. I'm also okay with retarget to List of Lost Tapes episodes where an episode is dedicated to the cryptid --Lenticel (talk) 08:29, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
It also appeared in Monsters and Mysteries in America and is mentioned in List of The Secret Saturdays characters, so I would oppose retargeting to this specific show. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:33, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Chipekwe[edit]

  • Chipekwe → List of cryptids  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Enwiki has no content about this varmint. Google search suggests that this was a "dinosaur" someone "saw" in 1907. Seems to be WP:FRINGE that doesn't warrant a mention anywhere. Hog Farm Talk 06:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete No valid target. The List of cryptids target has been trimmed heavily over the past few years and these orphaned redirects should be removed accordingly. –dlthewave ☎ 16:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete, No mention anywhere. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 17:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Governor 1%[edit]

  • Governor 1% → Andrew Cuomo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Governor 1 percent → Andrew Cuomo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not mentioned at target, appears to be from one Vox article from 2014 - in no way a common name or search term. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 03:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep: in addition to the Vox piece you cited, there is a 2016 Jacobin article, a 2012 WNYC article, mentions in a 2011 NYT article, a 2014 Salon article, a 2014 Times Union article, a blog post by Diane Ravitch, and surely more, suggesting sustained usage of the term. WP:R#DELETE says to delete "if the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name"; I don't think this qualifies. Is it a biased term and unlikely to be worth mentioning in the target? Surely, but that is not a reason to delete either per WP:RNEUTRAL#3. — The Earwig (talk) 06:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
    Rethinking this, I was too concerned with trying to find usage of the term. Nil Einne's arguments below are convincing that this is a confusing redirect without discussion at the target and unlikely to be the name anyone knows the subject by. We are the 99% may be a better target, but still leaves the "Governor" part completely unexplained, so I'm unsure it's better than deletion. — The Earwig (talk) 21:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment I don't think the redirect should point to Andrew Cuomo if something to this effect isn't mentioned in the article per Wikipedia:R#Astonish. Readers should never be left scratching their heads why they're on an article when they search for a term they've heard but don't why it's used. If we're not going to cover something then we don't cover it rather than pretending we do. It would be better to redirect this to something like We are the 99% so readers can at least gain some understanding of why the term might be used. Yes this will mean they won't know who the nickname is for (assuming they don't already) whereas a redirect to Andrew Cuomo would let them guess it's a nick name for Andrew Cuomo but this seems much more minor than the risk of confusion for those who don't understand the context. Attorneygate doesn't seem comparable since although true this does require people to be aware of the usage of -gate suffix to understand (as it isn't mentioned there), it seems far less likely someone will search for the term trying to understand where the -gate comes from than someone will search for the nick name trying to understand it. Importantly it's entirely plausible that someone looking for the article will search for that name since it's a simple short name they know the scandal by. By comparison, it seems fairly unlikely someone would think of Governor 1% as the term to find the article on Andrew Cuomo except for fun. (I.E. it may be fine redirect without explanation when there isn't really any need, but this doesn't seem to be such a case.) Nil Einne (talk) 19:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
    I took the liberty of merging the other discussion. — The Earwig (talk) 21:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While there seems to be consensus that the redirect shouldn't be kept, it's not clear whether redirecting to We are the 99% or deletion is the preferred outcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 04:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete, this really makes no sense at all, and the 99%/Occupy movement are completely different. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • I commented above, but to clarify my position is delete due to the lack of discussion in either article. WP:RCOM, which I just found, seems to be the correct precedent to apply here. — The Earwig (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Ace Deuce[edit]

  • Ace Deuce → Ann Arbor, Michigan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not mentioned at target, no clear relation. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 03:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep: a plausible if uncommon nickname, as documented here, here, and here. Doesn't seem common enough to discuss in the article (though it formerly did), but probably good enough to redirect. — The Earwig (talk) 06:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 04:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Jimmy Zoppi[edit]

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Ken Gates[edit]

  • Ken Gates → Rodger Parsons

Alleged pseudonym for Rodger Parsons. Cannot find a reliable source of information for this connection which is why this redirect page should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homechallenge55 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment: I just tagged both redirects nominated by User:Homechallenge55, since they were both missing an RfD tag. CycloneYoris talk! 01:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - Less issues with deleting than Jimmy Zoppi above as the article no-longer uses the old name (due to recent edits by the nom, and as use of the other name were unsourced). Article was moved back in 2007 with the justification "Since it appears to be his actual name, it should also be the article entry name". Note also that IMDB does list Ken Gates as an alternate name of Roger Parsons (near bottom of [5]). A7V2 (talk) 08:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 04:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Barnabas the Barmy[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 15#Barnabas the Barmy

Canadian Association of Physician Assistants[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 15#Canadian Association of Physician Assistants

March 6[edit]

[edit]

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Fourth Coast[edit]

  • Fourth Coast → Great Lakes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Not mentioned at the target, no clear indication from an internet search that this is an alternative name for the target. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 20:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete the top google hits are for a bakery in Kalamazoo, a renewable energy system supplier in New York state, a SoundCloud user, a Chicago-based quartet (which may or may not be the SoundCloud user), a cafe in Massena, New York, an Urban Dictionary definition matching this redirect, a journal article about Alaska's Arctic coast and a cider producer in Lake Orion, Michigan. Thryduulf (talk) 21:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Note: there was an unreferenced article at this title for over a decade before it was PRODed in 2019. The article stated that it's a "reference to the Great Lakes region, with a particular reference to Michigan". The term does appear to be used in that manner, but I'm not aware of any reliable sources that make the connection explicit. - Eureka Lott 00:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Anecdotal comment Grew up in Michigan (not in Kalamazoo), lived there 15 years, family and friends were there longer, and I never, ever heard this term before. OTOH, I see that there is apparently a book: The Fourth Coast : Exploring the Great Lakes Coastline from the St. Lawrence Seaway to the Boundary Waters of Minnesota by Mary Blocksma (1995, Trade Paperback). Don't know if that counts as RS to make connection explicit. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 01:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Third Coast and add a blurb summarizing Thryduulf's findings there. -- Tavix (talk) 21:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Sonnenaufgang[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Hubless hweel[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Space Marine Vindicator[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Fubbi Quantz[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Sentinel (Warhammer 40,000)[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Basilisk (Warhammer 40,000)[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Griffon (Warhammer 40,000)[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Creating List of winners of the Gold Medal, Senior Piobaireachd and Former Winners' MSR at the Argyllshire Gathering[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. Created when fixing a page created in the wrong location.

Creating Locomotive Services Ltd.[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 - clearly created in error.

Creating 1977-78 United States network television schedule (Saturday morning)[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 - clearly created in error.

Creating National Cabinet (Australia)[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6.

List of BattleTech characters[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Non-nutritive cereal varnish[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Quitter (social network)[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Kalininia[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

March 5[edit]

Template:Editing Template:Russian Civil War[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 - clearly created in error.

Editing Template:USCongRep/CO/107[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 - redirects created when fixing pages created in error.

Editing Wikipedia:WikiProject Ghana/Parliament of Ghana/Members of the 3rd Parliament of the 4th Republic of Ghana/Contest[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 - fixing pages created in error.

Editing Le Tour de Chant d'Édith Piaf a l'Olympia - No. 2[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 - created in error.

Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More: Revision history[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 - clearly created in error.

Redwood Lodge, California[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Locker room talk[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 12#Locker room talk

One-ring fraud[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Join-calculus (programming language)[edit]

  • Join-calculus (programming language) → Join-calculus#Languages based on the join-calculus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Join-calculus appears to be notable. The Join-calculus programming language is not. Guy Macon (talk) 23:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  • The target article has had a long-standing paragraph on the language [6]. I don't know if it is notable, but there's a fair number of results on a web search for "join calculus language", which suggest the topic is at least noteworthy. In the absence of any argument to the contrary, I'd imagine the default action would be to restore this paragraph, and – if need be – trim it down to a list entry to match the rest of the content of the section. – Uanfala (talk) 19:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep and (partially) restore the paragraph. The language need not be notable to be suitable for inclusion, simply noteworthy and verifiable, and I think Uanfala makes a good case that it is noteworthy-enough for a mention. Perhaps a good compromise would be to cut down on it a bit to make it fit better. -- Tavix (talk) 00:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Embarrassed naked female[edit]

  • Embarrassed naked female → Sexual fetishism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 
  • Embarrassed nude female → Sexual fetishism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ]

Implausible redirect, not mentioned at the target. gnu57 22:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Note I've added Embarrassed nude female to this discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 00:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Restore article (at nude) without prejudice and retarget the naked redirect there. These are absolutely plausible search terms, getting 508 (naked) and 360 (nude) views last year. There was an effectively unsourced (the only reference is to Urban Dictionary) stub at Embarrassed nude female that was redirected by Ironholds without discussion. There is also an unsourced draft at User:ENF - Embarrassed Nude Female/sandbox. I'd be frankly astonished if there wasn't sources available to improve these, but finding them is going to require filtering out the massive number of porn and erotic story hits (the latter are also common on a books search) (which gives another indication of the plausibility of the search terms). I'll leave a note about this discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography as I guess people there will have more knowledge of how to find useful sources. Thryduulf (talk) 00:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. If the subject is notable, this is the kind of topic that would need a fully fleshed-out and well-referenced article to support that. Until then, deletion is the right call. -- Tavix (talk) 03:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Trending topic[edit]

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Australasian relations[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 12#Australasian relations

Lil Bit (disambiguation)[edit]

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: withdrawn.

AIMBot[edit]

  • AIMBot → Chatbot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

Looking at the page history, "AIM" is an abbreviation of "AOL Instant Messenger". While there is a short mention of the messenger in the section Chatbot#Malicious use, to which this could be refined, "AIMBot" on its own is not mentioned at the target nor anywhere else and could cause unnecessary confusion with an aimbot. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep, while dated, it's definitely a way people referred to chatbots at one point. The capitalization is not likely to be used by someone looking for Aimbot. signed, Rosguill talk 01:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment: AIM_(software)#Chat_robots may be a better target than Chatbot. I also don't oppose deletion though - I agree that the capitalization is unlikely for aimbot, but I'm not sure that people used this spelling (capitalized Bot, no space between AIM and Bot) all that much for AIM chat bots either. Adumbrativus (talk) 06:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Inquisitor (Warhammer 40,000)[edit]

  • Inquisitor (Warhammer 40,000) → Warhammer 40,000  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

There currently is no mention of inquisitors in the main warhmmer 40,000 article, and the obvious target for this redirect was deleted last year after an AfD nomination. There does however seem to be a tabletop game, video game, fan magazine and series of books which could be potential targets. Does anyone view one of these as a primary target or should it be disambiguted? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 17:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Weak redirect to Warhammer 40,000: Inquisitor – Martyr. I'm not super familiar with Warhammer 40k, but page views suggest that this video game is the most prominent example of the suggested potential targets. signed, Rosguill talk 21:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 20:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget per Rosguill. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 18:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Dabify to Inquisitor (game), Warhammer 40,000: Inquisitor – Martyr, Inquisitor (magazine) and List_of_Warhammer_40,000_novels#Inquisitors. All of those media portray and expand the Inquisition's lore in WH40k but I don't think any of them deserve to be the primary topic. --Lenticel (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Inquisitor (disambiguation), where all WH40K articles with the name should be listed. Note that disambiguating at this title is a violation of WP:INCOMPDAB. -- Tavix (talk) 00:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Tolstoy writings[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Super mutant[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 12#Super mutant

Extremely minor Harry Potter characters with nonexistent sections[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ogg (Harry Potter character)[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Unboundedness[edit]

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Battle of Zabadani[edit]

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

AB 2[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 16#AB 2

MO3 (rapper)[edit]

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: restore

YouInsensitiveClod[edit]

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete